TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying OhioRifleman's 10 most recent comments.

• United Nations Report Says Israel’s Settlements Violate Palestinians’ Human Rights

  January 31, 2013 at 4:21pm

  In reply to OhioRifleman.

  Ahh, a semantic game, Jerk. I’ll answer your call with a double-down, given it is only appropriate.

  When I said ‘Palestine is an old Roman insult, not a country’, I forgot to clarify that Palestine as a territory is recognized in the same fashion that the Miami Valley in Ohio describes a geographic plot, but is not a recognized state or county. Palestine is a funny bit of insult with longevity that became the name of a land nobody wanted anything to do with until a convenient target arrived and expropriated it. Then and only then is it a fxcking hot potato, worthy of fighting over, etcetera.

  I also note that you completely dodged the first three points and only got me on a technicality on the fourth.

  Your move, amigo.

• United Nations Report Says Israel’s Settlements Violate Palestinians’ Human Rights

  January 31, 2013 at 3:51pm

  Oh, so I guess the following things do not count?

  1. The state of Israel was a wasteland with little to no inhabitation before it was settled, and the countries that it was parceled out of really didn’t want it to begin with.

  2. I dunno, maybe 6 million recent casualties to a population that has been off and on decimated by arsehole governments for going on 3000 years, maybe that doesn’t count for anything anymore?

  3. When the ‘Palestinians’ were displaced, NOBODY ELSE WANTED THEM TO BEGIN WITH. Tells you right there the color of their character, when the Quaran has a requirement for hospitality and nobody wants to show it to them.

  4. PALESTINE NEVER EXISTED. In sync with point #1, There never was a Palestine state. These people, whose lands were legally expropriated, belonged to four countries that really wanted nothing to do with them to begin with. The name Palestine is an old Roman insult, not a country.

  Every time I hear a story like this, I have to LOL. History is always such a b1tch to political agendas.

• I Was a Victim of Violent Crime: Immigrant Behind Viral Testimony Explains Why He’s Pro-Gun

  January 31, 2013 at 3:12pm

  In reply to BODYBAG.

  There is no such thing as a coincidence until it can be readily proven that it is a coincidence.

• 7 Common Weight-Related Myths Debunked (e.g. the Importance of Eating Breakfast)

  January 31, 2013 at 3:07pm

  In reply to woodyee.

  Repost it, Woodyee, may have been a glitch.

  I am convinced that the Blaze servers have a lot of glitches with the posting section, as I have had completely innocuous posts disappear into some manner of black hole. Keep trying, you may have better luck with the second or third repeat.

• 7 Common Weight-Related Myths Debunked (e.g. the Importance of Eating Breakfast)

  January 31, 2013 at 2:54pm

  In reply to MCON29.

  Everything you do, up to and including nothing, can and eventually will kill you.

• Legal Immigrant’s Must-Watch Testimony Against Gun Control: ‘Few Saw the Third Reich Coming Until It Was Too Late’

  January 31, 2013 at 2:28pm

  In reply to TSUNAMI_22.

  Ineligible. He’s a right-wing immigrant. The Media would diassemble him before he even threw his hat in.

  Funny how they apparently gave the Marxist-in-chief a pass on that…

• Union Leaders’ Epiphany Leaves Them Scrambling: Wait, Obamacare Is Going to Drive up Our Costs?

  January 31, 2013 at 11:36am

  In reply to icarenough.

  Such an inconvenient truth, I daresay.

• What Obama ‘Joke’ Was Greeted With Overwhelming Boos at a Local Chamber of Commerce Dinner?

  January 30, 2013 at 3:20pm

  In reply to your_imaginary_friend.

  I see your facepalm, and raise you a head-desk.

• Wayne LaPierre Hits Back During Hearing: ‘Background Checks Will Never Be Universal Because Criminals Will Never Submit to Them’

  January 30, 2013 at 2:45pm

  In reply to AmericanStrega.

  PA Patriot

  Perfectly legit question. Remember that this will be a numbers game — the likelihood that everyone will give up their guns is 0, the likelihood that 50 percent will give up their guns voluntarily is very high (at least 80 percent that half will play the proper sheeple). If they can get half to give up their guns, they can marginalize and intimidate the other half until someone snaps, then they clamp down with the support of the media.

  As to whom will do the disarming, the initial push will be voluntarily turn in your guns. After that, the operation will be handled by the ATF, FBI, DoJ, DHS, Federal Marshalls, with a sprinkling of sycophants of other departments. Force of numbers will be used, and you will see a few repeats of Ruby Ridge and Waco for them to drive home the point. It becomes a game of psychology, who is more willing to die to get their job done, all the while the Press will be cheerleading for the gun-grabbers.

  They win by way of incremental stripping. You cannot eat an elephant in one bite, you must take it out in little nibbles. I will leave methods of defense to other, more qualified persons.

• Wayne LaPierre Hits Back During Hearing: ‘Background Checks Will Never Be Universal Because Criminals Will Never Submit to Them’

  January 30, 2013 at 2:05pm

  In reply to Nevermind.

  @ Never (had a) Mind

  Simple consideration here: anyone that sells firearms to a felon is himself guilty of a felony (Straw purchasing). Rather than being a smart4ss about it, report those parties to the ATF. Stop whining about the problem and fix it. You have the power.

  That said, the bulk of criminal attainder in firearms is through illegal means: theft, straw purchasing, or black-market purchasing. Adding extra background checks will not impact these illegal means of firearm transfer, and anyone who believes they will is smoking an otherwise illegal material.