User Profile: Ojebuss

Ojebuss

Member Since: June 23, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [2] June 25, 2015 at 4:14pm

    Well lets put this into context then. Lets say that you are married and you and wife/ husband own a housing construction company. Being a Christian you believe that to have relations with anyone other then your spouse is a mortal sin. Now the government comes in and makes this crazy rule that before the finial handover you must christen the house by having relations with one or more of the future occupants. By doing this you damn your soul to hell for all eternity. This is how they feel about gay marriage. Having gay relations is a sin. If they indorse something that their faith tells them is a damnable offense, they are just as guilty of that sin.

    Responses (6) +
  • [3] June 25, 2015 at 9:10am

    The Bible is a guide on how to best live life. So it is creditable in any subject that pertains to actions taken through out life. It then has value in every subject as a base guide on how to perceive said subject. References to the bible put into the presentation was then helpful context on her view of the subject. Failing someone for their view is not permissible, teacher failed. Simple.

    Responses (5) +
  • June 24, 2015 at 6:18pm

    #1 the stats you reference do not include where in the US those homicides come from. They are primarily in gun restricted large cities.
    #2 The reason that we haven’t had another country use a nuke is because we have them also…. same as with a gun they are going to be more hesitant to use one if they know they could be shot themselves. Then you have the crazy ppl who just don’t care AKA, Iran. You are not going to give a gun to someone who is proven to be mentally unstable.
    #3 The element of surprise will have the advantage only for the first shot.The solution there is: multiple ppl with guns. He will get the first shot off and maybe a second. Having a trained CCL holder with a gun is going to shoot better then most. Now if they were open carrying, then he would probably just walked away. Spent an hour in there checking it out.
    #4 READ THE WHOLE THING!!!!!! It makes sense if you don’t split it up. The people, to protect against a tyrannical government or out side invading force, must have the access to buy the same arms as the military, with no restrictions. There is no crazy clause.

  • [4] June 17, 2015 at 8:50am

    If they want to make a religion that their “higher power” condones gay marriage, more power to them. Get married all ya want. The issue at hand is: will the government force me to believe something that is against my faith? We need to get the government out of the marriage business. ONLY issue civil unions, this way all are equal under the law, no one is forced to violate their faith, and marriage is defined by you and what you believe.

    Atheists don’t believe in a higher power, why would they care about a religious concept like marriage? They above all groups should be pushing to separate this church concept form state.

    Responses (6) +
  • [-1] June 11, 2015 at 1:32pm

    @Pat68
    The solution is to get Government out of the marriage then. What ever happened to the “separation of church and state”? As far as the Government should be concerned there should just be a contract issued between 2 or more people that forms a union between them giving them all the same privileges. If adoption was a Right then they would not be able to prevent someone form adopting a random child from any house hold. That would be grate on my taxes, adopt all the kids on my block, put them down as dependents. lol

  • June 11, 2015 at 1:16pm

    @LibertarianSocialist
    Perhaps you forget my position, I don’t want the Government telling me what marriage is. I don’t care if you or your church say that you are married. More power to ya. I don’t have to recognize it same as I don’t have to recognize reincarnation. I have a problem when the Government says that I have to believe in reincarnation.

  • [-3] June 11, 2015 at 1:09pm

    folks “Did” to it…. everything happening now is trying to undo what the religious made this country into.

  • [-1] June 11, 2015 at 1:05pm

    Ya the mental anguish over why your mom chose to have you but kill your brother/sister doesn’t impact at all…..

  • [-4] June 11, 2015 at 12:56pm

    @Pat68
    What rights are you talking about? The simple fact that you have to get a Marriage “License” means it can be revoked. I would love the Right to get married. Using the government to force (insert hot celebrity here) to marry me. It goes well with the right to murder our child before its born.

  • [-2] June 11, 2015 at 12:49pm

    @LibertarianSocialist
    Its called a Civil Union License. You can have a ceremony anywhere. Have the person presiding over it make up a Marriage Certificate. Good to Go.

  • June 10, 2015 at 5:46pm

    Perhaps we are talking about 2 different things then. Marriage certificates have been issued for as long as there has been paper to wright on. Government Licenses and the enforcement of them is a relatively new concept started in the UK in 1836. Now the UK had long been messing in church business of coarse (Marriage Act of 1753), which was one of the large complaints our founders had and the reason for the first amendment. Sooooo in the case of Licenses in the United States I am correct.

  • June 10, 2015 at 4:58pm

    Marriage Licenses in the US were set into place to keep blacks from marrying whites. Before that it was only a religious concept. White racists made it a civil institution. And now bigots want to use the same laws to force people to redefine the concept of sexual sin to not include homosexual acts. The simple solution is to have the government only issue civil unions. If you want to be Married get a certificate from your place of worship.

  • [153] June 4, 2015 at 3:23pm

    The problem is they are trying to change the definition of marriage. So they can be married, have sex, with out people looking down on them. They don’t understand sin. You are still going to be accused of homophobia if you believe in traditional marriage. The only way to fight this is to remove government form issuing marriage licenses. Only have the government issue civil union licenses. If you want a marriage certificate, you can get it form your place of worship.

    Responses (10) +
  • [3] June 3, 2015 at 11:36am

    So you would be in favor of a Muslim coming in and asking for a “kill all the Jews” cake or a white supremacy group’s ‘”N’word”s all came from apes’ cake? I would hope that both of those would offend you enough to refuse to make them.
    If a Muslim or a WS wanted a regular cake I would sell them all they want. We just don’t want to be seen as associated with ether one of those messages.
    Likewise with gay marriage, be gay all you want, just don’t force me to condone something that we believe will send us to eternal damnation.

    Responses (3) +
  • [10] June 1, 2015 at 2:41pm

    Its freedom “of” Religion, not freedom “from” Religion.
    There is no right of “not being offended”
    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he did not exist.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] June 1, 2015 at 2:10pm

    Ok not really news…. Darwin award yes …. but not news.

  • [2] May 29, 2015 at 12:23pm

    Well the isolation has not worked, best way to change Cuba is to rot it form the inside out. We have the most experienced progressives that know just how to do it. ( That is if they didn’t already agree with the politics as they are now.)
    This is not a surprising move. The US is feeling more like Cuba every day.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] May 29, 2015 at 11:41am

    Just as Obama is a Constitutional scholar, so he can know how to subvert the Constitution. So Hillery knows the bible. To conquer your enemy, with out force, one must study the enemy to the point that you can walk and talk as one of them.

  • May 28, 2015 at 3:42pm

    It seems to me that the phrase in question refers to those brothers and sisters of the body of Christ. Being part of the church it is the duty of those in the body to bare witness to Jesus. This being done largely in our time by sharing and teaching the Gospel, as well as by actions and deeds. So the phrase is not necessarily about the poor, although within the body there is poor among us. It is more about all who believe in Christ.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] May 21, 2015 at 10:49am

    Copyright violation.. Looks like Mika doesn’t want it to go viral.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love