User Profile: Ojebuss

Ojebuss

Member Since: June 23, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • August 3, 2015 at 5:25pm

    “the incident began when Israelis he described as “settlers” tried to stop Palestinians doing farming work in the area.”
    Need more context
    Why were they trying to stop them?

  • [3] August 3, 2015 at 2:01pm

    “meaning his numbers have risen despite his controversial comments denigrating Arizona Sen. John McCain’s status as a war hero, something many thought would halt his increasing popularity.”

    #1 John doesn’t act like a war hero, but he does try to play one.
    #2 Trump is doing what we all wish we could do to the media, GOP and DNC. Tell them to STFU and GTFO!
    #3 Trump is playing the part of concerned citizen wile hiding his past views by laying it down as thick as possible and keeping the media focused on the “gaffs” such as the McCain comment.

    Trump is smart, he has had years of media experience provoking emotion. Also years of study in what Americans want to hear. He actually might be the most in touch with people just because he has had to watch ratings for the past few years.

    I’ll vote for him if he is the nominee, but based on his record, he is not my guy in the primary.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] July 30, 2015 at 12:46pm

    Ah good for you. When would you say that a “fetus” has that same right to choose what is done with their body? 18 years old? “It” can’t enter into a contract until “it” is an adult right? The parents have the right until then. So why not just give the mother the right to abort until the “fetus” is 18 years old? After all, it is just a “fetus”.

  • [7] July 30, 2015 at 12:24pm

    you still haven’t answered my first question. Will you donate your body to science when you die?

  • [5] July 30, 2015 at 12:13pm

    What is this fetus you speak of? I see them taking about body parts not some clump of cells. Will you be denying science on this issue as well?

  • [5] July 30, 2015 at 11:58am

    LOL keep trying LS. I wouldn’t mind if the child was able to sign something permitting their body to be used in medical experiments, but alas, it seems to not be the case. Tell me LS when you die will you donate your body to science?

    Responses (6) +
  • [4] July 20, 2015 at 1:58pm

    average cost of a wedding cake – $451
    The fancy ones are over 1k

    Responses (1) +
  • July 8, 2015 at 10:43am

    http://now.mercuryone.org/ 100% goes to helping.

  • [3] July 6, 2015 at 12:02pm

    Right? It was the southern Democrats that were for segregation. Check the record.
    https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/88-1964/h182

  • [-1] July 6, 2015 at 11:14am

    More and more studies are coming out that homosexuality is a defect of the brain like autism. Really, Homosexuals should be protected under the Americans with Disabilities Act. They could also get funding to cure the problem.
    http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14146-gay-brains-structured-like-those-of-the-opposite-sex.html#.VZqbOvk5PD8

    Responses (5) +
  • July 1, 2015 at 8:13pm

    @LibertarianSocialist
    One does not need to wonder. Christians follow natural law, how God made things to work. One of the tenants of the faith is to be fruitful and multiply, the only natural way to do that is with a man and a woman. Anything else is just sex. Marriage comes into play to stabilize that natural relationship between a man and a woman so better raise children and give them a stable footing wile on the road to become adults.
    Now there is also a spiritual aspect of marriage. You ever notice that really old married couples look a lot alike? There is a spiritual joining of their souls through God, and through the marriage act their souls intertwine and become one. This is why there is so much emphasis put on marriage in religion. Leave God out of it and you are just 2 people F’ing, married or not.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] July 1, 2015 at 12:14pm

    It also can go the other way that a good tradition can be changed if people have become morally corrupted. The “people as property” issue could have just as easily went the other way. Brush up on the Weimar republic if you want to see examples.

  • [1] July 1, 2015 at 11:59am

    All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

    Hmm, so by changing the definition of marriage to “between 2 people” The 14 amendment simultaneously protects their privilege of marriage, unless it changes for everyone, and the free exercise of religion, which defines marriage between a man,woman, and God. Still though, marriage is a privilege under the eyes of the law, and can still be changed as long as it effects all people. Its time to start the push to get rid of the marriage laws in all 50 states.

  • [-1] July 1, 2015 at 11:16am

    And what part of the Constitution would that be again?

  • [2] July 1, 2015 at 11:13am

    We dismissed the idea that people can be property with a constitutional amendment. The simple fact that the country was divided from the get go, and they compromised with the 3/5th clause, as to try and keep the slave holder states influence minimized. You can plainly see that a right to own a person was not part of the “traditional moral laws”.

  • [2] July 1, 2015 at 11:04am

    @ LS then what does that have to do with issuing licenses? The Court ruled that if a couple is issued a marriage license in one state all the other ones must recognize it. There still is no “right” to get married, never has been. A “right” does not need a license. In fact one of the ways that progressives are trying to take away our “Right to bare arms” is by forcing people to have a license.

  • [1] July 1, 2015 at 10:53am

    What right are you taking about?

    Responses (11) +
  • June 30, 2015 at 11:20am

    Its a mixed bag. http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/primarysources/declarationofcauses.html

  • [2] June 25, 2015 at 4:14pm

    Well lets put this into context then. Lets say that you are married and you and wife/ husband own a housing construction company. Being a Christian you believe that to have relations with anyone other then your spouse is a mortal sin. Now the government comes in and makes this crazy rule that before the finial handover you must christen the house by having relations with one or more of the future occupants. By doing this you damn your soul to hell for all eternity. This is how they feel about gay marriage. Having gay relations is a sin. If they indorse something that their faith tells them is a damnable offense, they are just as guilty of that sin.

    Responses (6) +
  • [3] June 25, 2015 at 9:10am

    The Bible is a guide on how to best live life. So it is creditable in any subject that pertains to actions taken through out life. It then has value in every subject as a base guide on how to perceive said subject. References to the bible put into the presentation was then helpful context on her view of the subject. Failing someone for their view is not permissible, teacher failed. Simple.

    Responses (5) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love