User Profile: Okieman64

Okieman64

Member Since: April 18, 2013

Comments

  • March 3, 2014 at 9:56am

    I’m not sure how to even classify this video. Not an Obama fan but hey, this has to fall in the realm of attempting to encourage good for people. I’d rather chuckle at this than cry over Obama’s abysmal handling of our nations highest elected seat and the continued surrender of my sovereignty.

  • October 27, 2013 at 5:07pm

    Have all our police become senseless automatons? Where’s the officers with courage enough to stop, or at least control this obvious wrongdoing? Sad.

  • April 18, 2013 at 3:10pm

    Legislators getting nervous about “Anonymous” much? Corporations do not need legislation to protect their information, if they truly have a problem with leaks, they need to start hiring better people and stop being so dam dependent on internet connectivity. By most accounts, they have plenty of capital to provide their own appropriate safeguards. I think this is more about shrinking visibility of government official (once public) information that may prove to be a bit uncomfortable to explain. You can’t mismanage something for as long as our legislators have without getting a little paranoid. As far as Obama’s veto threat…easy show-boating as he never expects this to get past Reid.

  • April 18, 2013 at 2:53pm

    The Bible teaches Christians to follow the law of the land. Illegal immigrants choose to ignore our law from the outset. That certainly doesn’t bode well for their respect for God’s teachings. Religiosity aside, it certainly makes them criminals and therefore criminally minded. Question should be, “Will the United State of America make it their common practice to provide safe haven and opportunity to the criminally minded?”

    Responses (16) +
  • April 18, 2013 at 2:41pm

    “Wouldn’t you agree with me that it’s negligent for us as an American administration to deport someone who was reportedly at the scene of the bombing and we’re going to deport him, not to be able to question him anymore?”

    Where’s the misstatement and misapprehension in that question? Seems straight forward enough to me. Should the administration support law enforcement by preventing witnesses and suspects from being deported during a criminal investigation? Napolitano’s response is contemptuous. Does everyone in Obama’s administration have to pass a special weasel course to be appointed?