User Profile: Oldmantex


Member Since: December 15, 2011

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

123 To page: Go
  • April 16, 2014 at 2:29pm

    @ mom Now keep reading past verse 11 in your Bible and tell me when light was shone upon the earth.

    I use KJ btw.

    Like I said just because God created light does not mean that it was upon the face of the earth. He tells us very clearly when that took place.

    Verse 17 is when he set them in the firmament to give light upon the earth. That is when the sun and moon were put in place.

    Im not sure why you think I am lying when its clearly written further down in your Bible as well. Just keep reading.

  • April 16, 2014 at 11:48am

    Gen 1:12
    And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

    Gen. 1:15-18
    And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
    And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.
    And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,
    And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.

    Apparently I dont have it wrong. God created light that doesnt mean it was on the earth. That didnt happen until verse 15 and the statement “and it was so.” confirms that.

  • April 16, 2014 at 11:01am

    For those Christians that want to have it both ways, please think of this. You are using the Bible to say a day is not a day because of the thousand year comment. If you want to use the Bible to define what it means, that is great.

    But consider this; the Bible says there was no death before sin.

    How do you have evolution without death?

    Also Genesis is clear that the light that was made to shine on the earth was created after the plants. So how did the plants survive for thousands or millions of years without sun light?

    Responses (7) +
  • April 16, 2014 at 10:52am

    Wow so much hate for Christian’s beliefs. People should just calm down and stop arguing the age of the earth. If you want to make an argument it should be if God is real or not. To argue with a person that believes in an all powerful being and then expecting them to limit that beings power is really the silliest argument of all.

    Yes Christians believe in an all powerful God, all powerful means being able to create the earth in an instant, yes it means he could have created it already old.

    To try and say a Christian or anyone of faith should capitulate the age of the earth because of science, immediately puts a limit on God and therefore removes his ability to be God.

  • April 13, 2014 at 7:22pm

    @ rapture – Now let’s talk about this blanket authority you say we must submit to. Does that mean in the end times those here when the antichrist reigns should submit to him?

    What about Revelations 13:4 – And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?

    Here we see the beast gets his power from the dragon. The antichrist will get his power from satan.

    Hosea 8 :4 – They have set up kings, but not by me: they have made princes, and I knew it not: of their silver and their gold have they made them idols, that they may be cut off.

    How did God not know they set up kings, if HE establishes all kings on earth??

    You are misunderstanding Romans 13 and it’s not uncommon because Christian teachers have been telling people for years that it means to do whatever the government tells you.

    Roman’s 13 is telling us governments are setup to punish evil doers. It is not telling us to submit or even partake in the evil because God put the leaders in power.

    If it did, then wouldn’t all the apostles be in violation of Romans 13 and should receive damnation as it states since they went against all the known governments of their time?

    I hope this helps you some in understanding Romans 13. God Bless!!

  • April 13, 2014 at 7:00pm

    Finally, you seem to contradict yourself when it comes to the question of the revolution.
    You originally said “Taking up arms against the government is what will spark the downfall of this country.”

    Then you say:

    “It is obvious we were raised up for a time to support the fledgling country of IsraelIt is also obvious those days are long over. This country had its hand in giving away Gods land to the enemies of Israel. Land that the enemies of Israel now launch attacks against Israel from”

    Wouldn’t people standing up to this government be a movement BACK to God and supporting the higher power he put in place “The Constitution?”

    You say don’t take up arms because we violate Gods authority and then claim because the people in power are violating Israel we will all pay for it. How are we to STOP those in power from harming Israel without standing up to the authority you claim we should not resist?

    Remember the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land. NOT the BLM or any other government entity that chooses to ignore its authority.

    If anyone is ignoring the authority put in place by God it is the current men in power, and standing up to them is exactly what God would expect us to do.

  • April 13, 2014 at 6:58pm

    @therapture – First off it appears you are using an NIV or ESV in some of your post and that might help with the misunderstanding. You seem to have quoted Romans wrong. Romans 13 is what you meant to quote and this is how KJ says it.
    - Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.

    What is the highest power in America? The constitution my friend. So for you to support an authority that does not support the highest power put in place by God, by your own admission, you violate Gods command.

    Second it is talking about those powers being in place to punish those breaking the law.

    Third if an state senator tells you to go peak in your neighbors window, would you do it, since he is an authority placed above you? What about a police officer telling you to do that?

  • April 11, 2014 at 6:08pm

    Isnt it his civil right just to come here anyway?

  • April 11, 2014 at 6:06pm

    They are not Catholic. To be a Christian of any denomination, one must live the faith. Saying I am a basketball player while dressed in football pads doesn’t make me a basketball player.

    Sick of people giving themselves a title related to Christianity to gain favor with the public, only to run from said title as soon as they are expected to live it.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 7, 2014 at 11:38am

    No biggie its a gay wedding, that does not mean everyone there will be gay. Go and only take pictures of the straight people and make sure all photos of the groom and groom are out of focus. If you force someone to do something they dont want, that will be the results.
    The next time a gay couple hires you do the exact same thing. Then go and promote yourselves to gays and when they dont hire you, sue them for discrimination. Its a two way street folks use your brain.
    Lets see them prove that your camera was not malfunctioning during the groom groom photos. Almost all weddings have a certain time for the groom & groom photos and both parties, during that time my camera messed up and everything was blurry. By the time we got to the reception I realized it and I corrected it. Sorry…..
    Then when they sue over bad photos they have to go to court and admit they sued you to take them and now they are suing because they dont like the results. No jury will side with them and you ruined their “special” day.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 6, 2014 at 9:52pm

    LOL Easter is a Bible based holiday, it’s just not Christian. It’s Jewish and Easter means passover. So he offended by Christians celebrating a Jewish holiday in a mostly muslim town. Sweet!!

    Kind of like stores telling people not to say “Merry Christmas” but instead “Happy Holidays” The root of Holidays is “Holy Days” HAHAHA

  • April 4, 2014 at 11:11am

    These officers need to remember Plummer vs State

    He was lucky he went home that night.

  • April 3, 2014 at 12:23pm

    Jp4 – No it does not apply as whites will never be a minority. Read any form that you fill out where RACE is required and notice that they all say “White” and “White Non-hispanic” So there you go, they made all hispanics white and therefore Whites will never be a minority.

  • April 3, 2014 at 12:05pm

    With a name like yours, do you really want to point that finger?

  • April 3, 2014 at 10:40am

    The difference is now they pump them full of mind altering drugs to “FIX” them and then they go nuts. There is reason they call doctors offices are sometimes called a “practice.”

  • April 1, 2014 at 12:20pm

    Okcupid has no convictions, if they were really serious they wouldn’t let people use the link at the bottom to STILL access their page with Mozilla. They just want free press and they are now getting it.
    We can see, bottom line they still want the potential revenue from Mozilla users.

  • April 1, 2014 at 12:12pm

    Deip – Nice try but none of those animals are gay. Gay humans have sex for pleasure as there is no possible way it can be for procreation. It is impossible to say those animals that do have “gay” sex do it for pleasure.
    At best they are showing dominance and we can see that from other actions as well, at worst they are physically and mentally flawed. So where does that leave gay humans? Are you just messed up in the head, looking to show dominance?

    If you want to be relegated to animal status by all means go for it, but remember how most humans treat animals!!

    Nature in no way proves being gay is common and in fact really only demonstrates the act is either out of a desire to dominate or a genetic flaw.

  • March 31, 2014 at 11:47am

    That would have to be some kind of video footage to show how she posed a threat to him. Police are supposed to respond with necessary force to stop a perceived threat and NO MORE than that.

    This guy hit her like she had swung a knife a threw a punch at him. Doubt any video from another angle can justify the level of force used in relation to the supposed threat.

  • March 31, 2014 at 11:44am

    Exactly Grignak, and that is what many are saying on here is coming. One day it will be the wrong girl and all heck is going to break loose.

  • March 27, 2014 at 12:58pm

    But forgiveness does not mean there are no consequences. They should remove everyone from the board that pushed this change. We can forgive you, but that does not mean you walk away with no consequences.

123 To page: Go