Don’t know much about lawsuits do you? In order to bring forward a lawsuit you must have standing. You can’t file a lawsuit just because….
See, things aren’t all that black and white outside right wing bubble.
February 17, 2014 at 9:59am
Only the government has to respect your right to free speech. The rest of us don’t have to respect you, your church, your god (who I’m pretty sure would be Gay if it was real), or your right to free speech.
February 17, 2014 at 9:36am
Hey granny were you the voice of Charlie Browns teacher. You sure sound like her.
February 17, 2014 at 9:23am
God is gay.
February 17, 2014 at 9:21am
It isn’t going to take ten years. God is fast tracking gay rights.
February 17, 2014 at 8:47am
We have been in your churches, and your tp groups for years.
February 14, 2014 at 1:09pm
No snow, it was the pack they were after not the soldier. Just like you to try and make it into something it’s not.
February 14, 2014 at 12:45pm
Or, maybe his life wasn’t in any danger, and contrary to what many of you seem to think, you can’t shoot or kill someone just because you’re pissed. Castle law or not.
I propose you just take all your stuff and put it out on the curb and let the thieves have it....That' seems to be what you are saying here...So do it yourself...
Your entitled to your opinion, and if you believe the cops will be there when you need them you are sadly mistaken. Stop making excuses for criminals who break the law. This guy can defend himself and his property how he sees fit. Who are you to criticize? What would you do oh great wise one?
Actually you're wrong. you can use lethal force to defend your property even if you are not in physical danger. Most states limit that to only on your property, though. And here in Minnesota they limit it to your "abode" which we assume means only inside your house. the spefic verbiage in men is when in immenent danger of great bodily harm OR to prevent the commission of a felony in ones abode. burglary is a felony in every case, so as they explained in my carry class, yes you can legally shoot someone in the back if you find them running out of your house with a microwave. no, we don't advise that. the law was put in place to protect anybody that has valuable possessions but there is no requirement of value because it could have sentimental value or hard to determine value. the one case of a permit holder screwing up here in men was 2 brothers, one on the other's property stealing his car. owner came out and fired several shots to stop the theft but the guy got out of the driveway. he only got in trouble because the last shot he fired was after the guy left the driveway.
February 5, 2014 at 8:32am
But, if you were to look for it you would find that that was not the meaning of infringement when the 2nd amendment was written. Like many words the meaning of infringement has changed over the years. That really doesn’t make any difference because there are always going to be restrictions on your 2nd amendment rights. Like it or not the American people will never allow unrestricted weapons possession, and the founders never meant for it to happen.
July 15, 2013 at 8:25am
I think that in the long run GZ will be just fine. I don’t believe anyone is going to hunt him down and kill him. I think he should be in prison because I don’t believe it went down the way he said, but that’s just my opinion.
July 10, 2013 at 8:44am
We don’t have to pass laws that allow same sex marriage in res states. All we need to do is get the court to say your anti- same sex marriage laws are unconstitutional. You know, like we did in California. You WILL lose this fight
July 4, 2013 at 6:53am
I always have to laugh when I read what you guys have to say about the Muslim brotherhood. Come on, look in the mirror. The tea party is so close to being the western equivalent of the Muslim brotherhood that it’s laughable.
June 19, 2013 at 8:18pm
“They think people are stupid”
No, we think people like you are stupid.
June 14, 2013 at 3:37pm
The word matters. If a gay couple can’t use the same word to legally define their union that a straight couple uses then those two couples are not equal under the law.
So you are saying that if we removed the clothing of a heterosexual married couple and a homosexual "married" couple, that we would see no differences between the two couples? Only if we closed our eyes and pretended. Isn't it truly a fundamental inequality that God made it like this? What the heck was he thinking?
June 14, 2013 at 7:46am
I almost feel sorry for you Cons. The browning of America continues, and you’re starting to see that you are powerless to stop it. Get over yourselves. Your country has kicked you to the curb.
April 24, 2013 at 3:50pm
I’m just so very happy that none of you are now, or will never be running anything except your mouths.
As long as Google Earth isn’t on your property you can’t set any restrictions as to what they can take pictures of. In fact, even if they are on your property there isn’t much you can do about it other than making them leave. You have no right to stop them from photographing anything.
February 7, 2013 at 9:30am
Oh come on Miami, no one wants you to keep quiet. In fact, we want you and your ilk to keep running your mouths because the more you talk the more Real America rejects you.
January 25, 2013 at 9:57pm
Yes some probably would start shooting, but in the end they would probably be dead or locked up for a very long time.