Can anyone explain why liberal Israelis should be in favor of ceding territory to allow for the creation of a Palestinian state to a people who voted for and are governed by a terrorist organization whose goal it is to destroy Israel, and who have never shown any sign of wanting to peacefully coexist? Seems like the liberal Israelis suffer from the same mental disorder as their American counterparts who voted twice for an anti-semite who is enabling Israel’s enemies to pursue their goals. When Judaism conflicts with Progressivism, suicidal, liberal Jews invariably choose to worship at the wrong altar.
Lib Israelis were for the most part very big supporters of JFK. He seemed to us to be a genuinely compassionate man supporting the blacks and downtrodden poor. We've been there ourselves so we are sympathetic. We got a big surprise now and that surprise came in the form of the most anti-Semitic black man that ever existed. Not to worry. We get it now. Fooled again.
For the same reason OBOLA wants to give away America. Because he is a Fascist radical Muslems who despises this country.
 February 27, 2015 at 10:24pm
Moron King knows full well that DHS will not be shut down if not funded since the overwhelming majority of employees are considered “essential”. So he is flat out lying. Another big government RINO. Life and death, my butt.
Hey, when you’re right, you’re right MR. Guns cause crime, and if we take guns away from people who haven’t broken the law yet, then criminals will also not have guns…somehow. Gun-free zones also protect people from criminals, who we’re sure won’t enter “gun-free zones” for some reason. Unless they do…. Which proves the problem is actually law abiding gun owners somehow or another. And that’s why we need more and more gun laws until all the people who obey gun laws can’t have guns any more, which will save us from criminals and crazy people who don’t care about the law.
Brilliant, MR, freakin’ brilliant!
 January 2, 2015 at 9:45pm
This is what happens when you don’t have term limits. Power is addictive, and old fools like McLame, react like mad drug addicts when you try to move them out. He is no longer a public SERVANT. He has become a megalomaniac. Time to term limit this old bastard.
 December 24, 2014 at 11:03am
I call BS on this racist woman. The classic dodge of a debater who has a completely untenable position is “Oh, come on, you know exactly what I’m talking about.” You need to make these liars articulate very specifically what exactly they are talking about. If Fox News is racist, then spell it out by citing clear examples. It’s like throwing around “right-wing extremist” when that is never defined, but usually means a person with moral values, common sense and responsibility who opposes radical causes.
 December 15, 2014 at 9:18pm
Another one-trick jackass…every mother lovin’ little thing is about race. Blah, blah, blah. Whose the racist Jackson? Middle initial is for Loser!
Surely you jest! That would make this... gasp!.. racist!?! Not hearing! Not listening!...
Remember the 300 years when affirmative action meant "whites only"?
I've read about it. 300 years? Before there was an America? Did you go to government school?
But, if you mean the 200 years when America went from nothing to the greatest country on Earth; yes, those white guys did a bang-up job!
No it's not racist. Its only racist if a white ends up on top, isn't that what we're taught in schools now. Anything else is saving the minority from the evil whites.
D'Souza showed the perfect example:
"If a white man and a black man apply for the same position and the black man is more qualified, but the white man gets it, then it's racism. If the white man is more qualified but the black man gets it, it's affirmative action."
It is also about stupidity.
 August 8, 2014 at 9:02pm
Yes, in Bloombertistan only cops, elites and criminals are allowed to have guns. All others are designated targets. Liberalism run amok.
 July 22, 2014 at 10:32pm
James Crow, I call BS on you, lib. Anyone who believes in AGW (man-made global warming for the low information voter) in the face of all of the scientific information available, is deliberately ignorant. The statist masterminds want to use AGW as a pretext for massive international wealth transfer, all while lining their own pockets. You are just a useful idiot if you buy into it. Ever wonder why these Red greenies never, ever debate the “science?” They cannot defend their “beliefs” (not facts) by any scientific proof. Science is not a matter of consensus. It is a matter of objective fact. And the warmists have none, just made up nonsense and scare mongering. Wake up.
...That's not how this works...That's not how any of this works....
While I'm not a tremendous fan of ol' Al Gore and his "inconvenient truth", American scientists as well as foreign are all in agreement on climate change being human-driven. James Crow does have it wrong, it's not 97%, it's actually 99.3% of climatologists (Scientific American, April 2014).
If you want to find something to rail against, it shouldn't be the source/results of climate change, which, done correctly would be a huge boon to the US Economy (nobody builds anything on the planet BETTER than we do) and would put us on the forefront of self-sustainability. If you'd like to get real upset, find out about all the companies that have offshored to the Caymans who are now switching to Ireland because of the distinct possibility that the Caymans won't be there in as soon as 25 years. Heck, Apple has already moved all of their holdings in the Caymans to ones in Ireland and Raytheon is relatively close to doing the same.
Also, it would behoove us if we care about survival to care about understanding systems upon which we are dependent for survival--like the ecology of Earth. Like our own bodies, it maintains "metastability" (a degree of stability over time) because of balanced cyclical processes. How "delicate" the balance is among these factors is a matter of description, and may or may not be fully understood by us. But in any case, if we fail to understand that which we depend upon, then we will fail to anticipate possible causes of our own destruction--we invite extinction if we are lax in dedication to investigating the truth of our reality.
So this debate over whether or not climate change is happening RIGHT now (it is because it ALWAYS is and has been changing--it's only a matter of degree that is at issue), what share of responsibility can be directly or indirectly attributed to human actions, and what the immediate and long-term consequences of the shifts are/will be is ultimately irrelevant--it's enough to know with near certainty that the climate HAS drastically changed over time in the past, sometimes in ways that would likely be adverse to our own well-being and/or survival if the same or a similar thing were to occur again.
 July 15, 2014 at 11:20pm
This guy Jason Howerton is right up there with the likes of Hank Johnson (of Guam capsizing fame) and Miss Teen America 2007 contestant on geography. Looks like his editor knows a boatload about guns too. Another reason the avoid Rolling Stoned.
 July 14, 2014 at 3:48pm
Y’all need to realize that Mama Jamma here is not illeterate…she speaks the Dark Tongue of Mordor. She is working toward a doctorate in Ebonics.
July 6, 2014 at 8:58pm
He was reported to have been in Times Square. Not what anyone would consider a “black area.” He was carrying concealed, as we all should be allowed to do, so it seems he would not have risked death. In Bloombergistan, it is exceedingly difficult to actually acquire Second Amendment rights to “keep and bear arms.” Only bad guys and cops are generally allowed to have guns. Everyone else is a designated victim. IL Duce Cuomo is following in Bloomberg’s fascist footsteps to confiscate guns statewide. The “culture of violence” in our inner cities would disappear if the good guys were allowed, and even encouraged, to carry a concealed weapon. The bad guys would start becoming the victims.
 June 27, 2014 at 11:42pm
The media is succeeding in blurring gender differences and you are a victim. Can you say political correctness?
 June 27, 2014 at 11:39pm
Yes, absolutely. Goodness!! A burka even. Please. Stone her.