I don't think that is it. She does the same old hyperbolic schtick as everyone else but with weird timing and delivery. Just my opinion.
 October 18, 2016 at 8:44am
No because their is actual evidence that Clinton did what he was accused of doing. Their is no evidence for Trump’s accusers.
 October 18, 2016 at 8:43am
So the fact she is correct has nothing to do with it? You just pop off with a misogynist comment that really contributes nothing to the discussion. What you can’t deal with a hot, smart woman who won’t sit at home and make babies and cook your dinner?
Too, one of the third party candidates can win. If it satisfies your conscious to vote for one of them then of course do what you feel is best. None of them are really a good answer in my opinion but every vote not for Trump can mean a vote for her. If it is close then the corrupt party machine will ensure her victory.
October 18, 2016 at 8:37am
And they will tax you into paying for it.
October 18, 2016 at 8:36am
Of course Nova will be amongst the first to be repressed by Hillary for whining and will then realize what we have been sayin all along.
Do you personally hate Hillary? If so, do you know her personally? If not, do you ask the same question to those here that clearly do hate Hillary?
(You can ask me that question if you'd like.)
It just seems that a lot of people like to start talking about not casting the first stone, not judging, etc., but only when concerned with the candidate they have already decided to support, but not concerning the opposition.
We are told that we are to know people by the fruit that they bare. Both Trump and Hillary have a long history of rotten fruit.
Seems from your past posts you dont seem to care that people hate hillary. How selective of you....
I dont personally need to know Islam terrorist to hate them.. I am sorry but personally knowing someone is not a prerequisite of hate.
 October 18, 2016 at 8:32am
Any body with a reference to Jimmy Carter can’t be taken seriously.
 October 18, 2016 at 8:31am
That’s fine. He might actually accomplish one or two conservative things. Like appointing conservative justices to the SCOTUS.
He doesn't care about appointing conservative justices. If he did, he wouldn't be talking about how he's going to get the Congressional Republicans defeated as payback.
 October 18, 2016 at 8:30am
Why the hating? She is telling the truth and you know it!
 October 18, 2016 at 8:29am
It wouldn’t matter who ran against her. The establishment on both sides would make sure she won. Maybe a. Establishment Republican like Bush might have won but it wouldn’t be any different in the long run.
With Republicans losing sight of beat Hillary at all costs they have helped drag Trump down. This digging into frivolous things in his past was to be expected. Look what they did to Palin who was pretty squeaky clean. They should be shoring him up and fighting back against the Clinton media machine.
Get the priority straight. Getting a non establishment president who can really do no worse than what we have had can lead other non establishment candidates to be successful. Beat Hillary first the. Sorry about working with Trump.
October 5, 2016 at 12:52am
True but when Putin did it the first time it caught a lot of people off guard. Then. USB worked to get him out. When he came back, Obama should have seen it coming.