Member Since: December 07, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [2] August 21, 2014 at 4:34pm

    There should be no public funds going to any private business, for starters.
    Next, we have property rights that trump your right to violate my property, if such exists.

    Time for everyone to re-familiarize themselves with the writings of John Locke.

  • [4] August 21, 2014 at 4:32pm

    “Judge Migdalia Pares, who argued that the fact that the owners live on the premises does not mean that the business is private in nature, ruled that Liberty Ridge Farm is a public accommodation as it rents its space and regularly collects fees from the public.”

    False. It is private property and the owners have property rights. there is no lawfully enforced right to have a wedding on someone else’s property against the wishes of the property owner.

    See John Locke, 2nd Treatise on Government, chapter on Property.

    Without property rights we are all animals on the government Pig Farm.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] August 21, 2014 at 4:06pm

    Just look at the convoluted rulings they have made in the last several communist and godless decades.

  • August 21, 2014 at 4:05pm

    Since when do federal judges know anything about the Constitution?

    Responses (1) +
  • August 20, 2014 at 4:01pm

    good rationalizations you got there. that’s the how cops rationalize it also.

  • [-3] August 20, 2014 at 4:00pm

    Tasers are an unconscionable use of force. I would never use one on anybody, let alone authorize my representatives to. They are considered innocuous and THAT’S the DANGER right there. Too easy to abuse.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] August 20, 2014 at 3:57pm

    If only it had anything to resemble what ACTUALLY happened, then it would be a good analogy. But it didn’t happen that way, or in an analogous way. It’s just plain ridiculous. The colonists were faithful and decent British subjects and felt the government was rejecting THEM, not the other way around.

    Responses (1) +
  • [28] August 20, 2014 at 3:56pm

    It’s a DISGRACE that there is so little real history taught in our schools.

    Absolutely disgusting.

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] August 20, 2014 at 3:54pm

    Maybe we should appeal to the sources instead of making up fairy tale fictions.

    Here’s what Dr. Franklin said about the colonists and their attitudes.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] August 20, 2014 at 3:52pm

    So if they had grown apart, something which is a bald faced lie, they considered themselves British subjects with British rights, but set that aside for a moment. The British Parliament decided to treat them as commoners and directly tax them, and ALSO sent soldiers to enforce the shutdown of colonial legislatures.

    It’s much more than “growing apart” which isn’t true at all. Look up the Examination of Benjamin Franklin.

  • [1] August 20, 2014 at 3:49pm

    Yeah, only a dozen or less people were killed by an imperialist government who dissolved the New York and Massachussetts legislatures, which had been legally constituted bodies, and they send soldiers to enforce that along with the Townsend Acts. So what if a handful of peasants died? BIG FRICKIN’ DEAL.

    this is what they call education these days?

    Responses (1) +
  • August 20, 2014 at 12:56pm

    It’s not discrimination. It’s a basic property right – we have the right to associate and buy and sell from whomever we want however we want. Government cannot usurp this right without being at a state of war with individual rights.
    Sec. 123. IF man in the state of nature be so free, as has been said; if he be absolute lord of his own person and possessions, equal to the greatest, and subject to no body, why will he part with his freedom? why will he give up this empire, and subject himself to the dominion and controul of any other power? To which it is obvious to answer, that though in the state of nature he hath such a right, yet the enjoyment of it is very uncertain, and constantly exposed to the invasion of others: for all being kings as much as he, every man his equal, and the greater part no strict observers of equity and justice, the enjoyment of the property he has in this state is very unsafe, very unsecure. This makes him willing to quit a condition, which, however free, is full of fears and continual dangers: and it is not without reason, that he seeks out, and is willing to join in society with others, who are already united, or have a mind to unite, for the mutual preservation of their lives, liberties and estates, which I call by the general name, property.

    Sec. 124. The great and chief end, therefore, of men’s uniting into commonwealths, and putting themselves under government, is the preservation of their property.

  • [-1] August 19, 2014 at 8:43pm

    “I’ve been listening to you ever since you were on the radio 3 or 4 years ago”

    Where has he been? Glenn’s been on the radio for a LOOOOONNNNGGGGG TIME.

    I was listening to him over a dozen years ago and he was old then.

    And Glenn doesn’t yet realize that Osama bin Laden was a creation of the CIA? He doesn’t realize that the war in Syria is for an in behalf of the bankers? He doesn’t realize the caliphate are mere pawns in the game, much like the Americans are? He doesn’t understand that Iran is not the enemy of us but is our common ally against the bankers? The reason they hate Iran is because Iran has the temerity to create their own money system.

    The reason our government hates marijuana is that it is a cheap and effective pain and cancer killer. They serve BiG PHARMA, not the people.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] August 19, 2014 at 8:38pm

    You had me up until this point:

    “Was is Gods will to drop a bomb on Hiroshima? Probably not – but that action probably saved millions of lives in the long run.”

    Dropping the bomb was a nightmarish evil which progressives promoted, as a trial run for future wartime deception. Nothing good came of it. It was 100 percent Satanic to drop the bomb on a civilian population or two.

  • [16] August 19, 2014 at 8:36pm

    Perhaps we should have titled this piece

    “what a narcissistic TV guy thinks everybody in the whole country wants to know about him”

    Yeah, I kinda think that would have been better.

    Responses (2) +
  • [23] August 19, 2014 at 7:45pm

    It’s called triangulation. They’ve infiltrated both parties. Time to understand principles not parties.

  • [2] August 19, 2014 at 7:43pm

    The communists are roving over the US, trying to do some cow tipping. It’s the uninformed and ignorant masses who respond. It’s the easily prejudiced and swayed, that can be “nudged”.

    Be careful who your friends are, if they are communist, make them aware of their history. Read the later books of Eldredge Cleaver, the repentant communist. Soul on Ice.

    Once he saw what communism actually did, he ran like heck.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] August 19, 2014 at 7:39pm

    “We have inspired people all over the world”

    And what have those people gotten in exchange for their revolutions? Despair, famine, murder, and oppression, which is all the communist deceivers ever intended to give them

    Smiling faces,,,,, sometimes, ,,,pretend, to be your friend.

    Breaking News

  • [3] August 19, 2014 at 7:32pm

    Breaking News

    Responses (1) +
  • August 19, 2014 at 7:08pm

    breaking news

123 To page: Go