Member Since: December 07, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • April 27, 2015 at 6:56pm

    An eloquent argument for private road ownership – state owned roads are subject to the tragedy of the commons

  • [1] April 27, 2015 at 9:54am

    And the planes had nothing to do with smashing the building into powder – one of the buildings that came down didn’t have a plane in it. And how did nanothermite residue show up in the debris

    Somebody lied

    Responses (7) +
  • [-4] April 27, 2015 at 9:52am

    I know I am. The 9-11 “investigation” was a sham.

  • [-3] April 27, 2015 at 9:50am

    I agree with him. 9-11 didn’t happen the way the NIST and 9-11 commission said it did. Building 7 was not hit by a plane. Look at how we have built the military industrial complex since 911 and look at all the money and power going to empire building abroad.

    We need the truth and the 9-11 commission covered it up.

    Responses (2) +
  • [-3] April 26, 2015 at 7:27pm

    And who owns the propaganda mills known as the US media who fed you this crap?

    The Zionists. You are eating right out of their hand.

    Responses (3) +
  • [-7] April 26, 2015 at 7:26pm


    Israel is part of the globalist new world order and so all of her enemies are “terrorists” because Israel says so. We should get out of league with this pillaging, plundering and raping nation.

    Responses (3) +
  • April 24, 2015 at 1:53pm

    Time to go there, en masse and protest. They need to understand the source of their “authority” and they need to stop abusing it.

  • [2] April 24, 2015 at 1:51pm

    “this is a university. It’s private. ”
    Fire this clueless mercenary now. he’s on a power trip that we did not delegate to him.

  • [4] April 24, 2015 at 1:39pm

    Liberals, totalitarians, and other statists, need to be kicked out of our public institutions. They don’t own them – we the people do.

  • [6] April 24, 2015 at 1:31pm

    The separation of powers is an integral part of the Constitution. The President has no authority to pass judgment or sentencing – and neither can he “revoke citizenship” as if that matters.

    Responses (1) +
  • [15] April 24, 2015 at 1:30pm

    And the JUDGE is right as usual. He seems to run circles around people with his knowledge and love of the Constitution and no where is that more evident than when he takes on the fake “Constitutional Scholar” in the White House who has usurped the power of the people to achieve his own agenda.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] April 23, 2015 at 8:31pm

    I wish I could trust Glenn on this but I think he has been threatened within an inch of his life which is why he pushes the Jewish propaganda – they are the ones who benefit from the buildup to war and the heavy investment in the US military industrial complex.

    This is all pre war propaganda no different from Hitler’s staging of events to cast blames on the Jews during WW2. Every country needs a villain to gin up the taxpayer to continue to spend themselves into oblivion and killing each other off while the Rothschilds rake in the money from both sides

  • [6] April 13, 2015 at 7:30pm

    God bless them, every one!

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] April 12, 2015 at 9:22pm

    Both GW and Obama are peas in a pod so arguing which pea was less Presidential is totally and completely beside the point. Obama continues the same warfare that Bush began. Obama still hasn’t closed Guantanomo. We still spend heavily on military.
    Both presidents were and are puppets in the hands of the globalists.

  • [6] April 12, 2015 at 7:59pm

    who is responsible for the safety of the child? The parents, or the state? If the parents, they seem to have taken care of the problem. if the state, our nation is in a world of hurt.

  • [-8] April 12, 2015 at 5:52pm

    That type of argument is known as the ad hominem fallacy.

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] April 12, 2015 at 5:50pm

    I agree with them. There are a lot of unexplained loose ends about 9/11 and the continued intransigence of the NIST to properly address them is getting more than a little suspicious.

    We should open up a real investigation – a transparent one. And we should connect all the dots not just the convenient ones.

  • [2] April 12, 2015 at 5:44pm

    I do not side with the so-called “christian” band nor do I advocate a violent response to policemen, and I think it was ridiculously crazy to assault the police and risk your life. And I think the police were ultimately justified in using deadly force in the situation.
    My only point was that they (the police) should be better able to manage a crowd and they could have avoided this by the proper use of their power. There are no winners in this – we are in the end all Americans trying to make sense of the situation. No one is served by going through these incidents and not learning from them.

  • [3] April 12, 2015 at 5:37pm

    “A cop’s job is to jail you.”

    A cop’s job is to enforce the law, and the Constitution is the oath they have taken. People who don’t live up to their oaths are not to be trusted.

  • [2] April 12, 2015 at 5:31pm

    “Yeah, I have 10 brothers that are cops and three that are lawyers. I believe you. You make about as much sense and sound as sensible as the civilian fools in the video.
    Have you ever even met a cop?”
    This is no way to begin a conversation. Isn’t this the same bad startup the cop used in approaching the crowd? Escalate first and to hell with the consequences? You and the cop in the video could be brothers, I’ll grant you that. And for you information, everything I have posted can be verified as to my relatives so unless you have some other card to play………

    “Anyone who fights a person with a gun is a fool.”
    And you think a person who makes the statement you just made can be taken seriously? Go surrender to the British.
    “It’s becoming common for people to fight back against cops because they are known to have restrictions. Would you pull the same crap on an armed thug? I think not.”
    And you suppose that’s the reason this incident originated? to use your words, “I think not”
    “Someone with a gun tells you down, GET DOWN!”
    Such a creative response. Submit to all armed people. Good safety tip, EGON. But then, it totally ignores the point of the this discussion – which is how effective are cops at managing potentially violent confrontations, and should they be amateurs at it or professional? You get the government you “submit” yourself for.
    “The cops were restrained and reacted properly.”
    Thank you for your opinion but I am trying to judge them by standards – the Constitution being one of those standards. The ability to manage a crowd is another.
    Nice chatting with you.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love