User Profile: P8riot
Member Since: September 13, 2010
CommentsDisplaying P8riot's 10 most recent comments.
Channel Finder
Find TheBlaze on your TV
Channel Finder
TheBlaze is available on channel .
Spread the word!
If you can't find TheBlaze, please call to upgrade your package
Channel Finder
Unfortunately, TheBlaze is not available on .
But you can help! Call at or press CONTINUE to email your provider and urge them to add TheBlaze to your channel lineup.
But you can help! Press CONTINUE to email your provider and urge them to add TheBlaze to your channel lineup.
ContinueRequest TheBlaze
Please complete the form
Thank you for supporting TheBlaze
Interested in doing more? Spread the word about TheBlaze to your friends and family.
Spread the word!




















































































































Footage Surfaces of Rapper Lil Wayne Stomping All Over American Flag While Filming Music Video
June 17, 2013 at 3:48pm
“Lil Wayne”? More like “Lil Punk”!
The Bible Is Making a Big Comeback in One Secular European Country
June 7, 2013 at 8:14pm
@THEOTHERBEREAN
Oh my. After reading your posts directed towards anyone who disagrees with you… its clear you need to purge the hate from you. PLEASE just take a step back and re-evaluate your approach to expressing yourself.
The spirit of love will get you much further than the spirit of contention in any aspect of life.
Vaya con dios.
Bible Scholars’ Controversial Claim: One Man, One Woman Isn’t the Only Form of Marriage the Bible Supports
June 7, 2013 at 8:01pm
@AMTSOUNDSMITH & SCHMIDT_RUBIN
Yes, I’ll admit it, you’re right. I did spend WAY too much time on this one :)
Bible Scholars’ Controversial Claim: One Man, One Woman Isn’t the Only Form of Marriage the Bible Supports
June 5, 2013 at 9:03pm
@SNOOOP1E
You hit the nail on the head with theotherberean. He obviously hasn’t read James 2 either.
Bible Scholars’ Controversial Claim: One Man, One Woman Isn’t the Only Form of Marriage the Bible Supports
June 5, 2013 at 8:26pm
@THEOTHERBEREAN
Now you’re calling it MY quote? lol – PLEASE start from the beginning and you’ll see that YOU are the one who cited that quote. Here is is for simplicity:
YOU SAID on June 3rd @ 6:20pm:
–according to President Joseph Fielding Smith, since he said, “As long as one elder remains on earth today he would have the priesthood and could organize the church even though all of the apostles and first presidency, etc., were killed off” (Latter Day Prophets Speak by David H. Ludlow, p. 213).–
Then I said on June 3 @ 8:54pm:
–Please get any version of the book you cited to (Latter Day Prophets Speak by David H. Ludlow) and you’ll see that no such quote exists in it (get a digital version and you can simply do a quick word search)–
then you suddenly claim today that:
–I quoted from Marvin Cowan’s book, Mormon Claims Answered, p. 77.–
Your NEW citation was NEVER mentioned in your original post citing to “Latter Day Prophets Speak by David H. Ludlow”.
Then you called me a liar for telling you that YOUR quote was NOT in the book “Latter Day Prophets Speak” … when in reality… its NOT in the book just as I claimed.
So in a nutshell, I accept your apology for calling me a liar. :) But please check your sources before posting them for credibility.
As for answering your question that this all stemmed from – I did answer it today on the same thread you posted it on.
‘It’s Not a Hate Thing’: Boy Scouts Face Monumental Loss After Choice to Allow Openly-Gay Members
June 5, 2013 at 7:33pm
@THEOTHERBEREAN
Nothing you quoted contradicts that an apostasy happened. Just because there were as little as 3 or 4 priesthood holders on the earth (assuming they were not transfigured) does not mean that Christ’s organized Church was on the earth. Your own cited quote shows this as clear as day — its sad you can’t understand it. It clearly states “Could he do this without revelation?” Answer… “No.” So even though it only takes as little as one Melchizedek Priesthood holder to organize the Church, it can ONLY be done if he is given the revelation to do so!
P.S. We believe that Joseph Smith WAS given a revelation directly from God Himself and Jesus Christ to organize Christ’s Church on earth once again (not to mention having the necessary “keys” to lead the church, as was given to Peter by Christ, Matthew 16:19). — thus, a restoration.
huh – that was easy.
Bible Scholars’ Controversial Claim: One Man, One Woman Isn’t the Only Form of Marriage the Bible Supports
June 5, 2013 at 7:16pm
@THEOTHERBEREAN
““Unfortunately he has a couple of typos– the author’s first name is Daniel Ludlow, not David.””
You’re attempting to call me out because of a typo in the author’s name… that truly funny… because the name of the book and the author’s name was cut and pasted from your OWN post — look it up. ha! Now you have to admit… that’s funny! :) Will you thus apologize for your typo? I easily apologize that I cut and pasted it from your post in an attempt to save time and didn’t notice your mistake. :))
Equally as funny is your averment that I’m a liar. YOU are the one who cited to a quote that DOES NOT EXIST! I never said the book doesn’t exist, in fact I told you to get a copy of it. I clearly stated that your made up quote (excuse me, Sandra Tanners made up quote) is NOT found in the book as you two claimed – a lie. For evidence of such, please note how you quietly left that quote out in your rebuttal.
PLEASE apologize for intentionally lying about a quote that does not exist in an attempt to bolster your faulty argument. Even Sandra Tanner doesn’t claim it exists when you emailed her – she only points out YOUR typo that I cut and pasted from. Or are you now claiming that your quote is found in Daniel Ludlow’s book?
Did you intentionally make up the quote and cite it as authentic, or did your source get it wrong?
Bible Scholars’ Controversial Claim: One Man, One Woman Isn’t the Only Form of Marriage the Bible Supports
June 5, 2013 at 12:45pm
The biggest surprise here is that its a surprise to others that polygamy was at times blessed by God and at other times forbidden. This is a very elementary biblical principle.
HOWEVER, as previously shown on this thread, homosexuality has ALWAYS been clearly forbidden… no exception. Thus ends that discussion.
It’s also bothersome how they tried to slip in the “marry the rapist” theory in there. Its typical of those trying to deceive to speak some truth mixed with falsehoods. Deuteronomy 22: 28-29 does NOT talk of rape, but rather of when a man “lay hold on… and lie…” with a virgin. To “lay hold on” does not mean to rape – that would be to “force” the virgin to lie with him as referred to just a couple verses above in verse 25. This verse clearly uses the word “force” and mandates that the rapist be killed for his crime. (25 ¶But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die:).
‘It’s Not a Hate Thing’: Boy Scouts Face Monumental Loss After Choice to Allow Openly-Gay Members
June 3, 2013 at 9:22pm
@THEOTHERBEREAN
I’m not trying to be rude, but when you come out and claim to be an expert on my religion, I have to draw the line there. I’m sorry, but from our discussions, your knowledge of our religion is that of a babe. We’ve tried to give you more knowledge, but you’ve rejected it. Milk before meat brother.
“9 ¶Whom shall he teach knowledge? and whom shall he make to understand doctrine? them that are weaned from the milk, and drawn from the breasts.
10 For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little:” Isaiah 28:9-10.
Paul also struggled with people in similar situations:
“1 And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ.
2 I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.” 1 Corinthians 3:1-2.
Finally, as for your constant averment that Joseph Smith was not a true prophet, you are basing your argument off of a false premise. Joseph Smith WAS a true prophet, pure and simple.
Trust me, regarding your understanding of Christ’s true Church in these latter-days, you are yet a babe. I don’t mean this as an insult, but rather as a call to learn more. Once you choose to open your heart to the truth, more mysteries may be opened unto you, but until then, they will be shut off from you just as Christ describes in Luke 8:10.
‘It’s Not a Hate Thing’: Boy Scouts Face Monumental Loss After Choice to Allow Openly-Gay Members
June 3, 2013 at 9:13pm
@THEOTHERBEREAN
You really don’t know why EVERY doctrine of the gospel isn’t taught the first time a missionary comes to your door? Now that’s just silly. Instead of giving you my answer, why don’t you listen to Isaiah? He clearly teaches that revelation comes line upon line and precept upon precept.
“9 ¶Whom shall he teach knowledge? and whom shall he make to understand doctrine? them that are weaned from the milk, and drawn from the breasts.
10 For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little:” Isaiah 28:9-10.
Paul also understood this simple principle. He stated:
“1 And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ.
2 I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.” 1 Corinthians 3:1-2.
Finally, as for your constant averment that Joseph Smith was not a true prophet, you are basing your argument off of a false premise. Joseph Smith WAS a true prophet, pure and simple.
Trust me, regarding your understanding of Christ’s true Church in these latter-days, you are yet a babe. I don’t mean this insultingly, but rather as a call to learn more. Once you choose to open your heart to the truth, more mysteries may be opened unto you, but until then, they will be shut off from you just as Christ describes in Luke 8:10.