User Profile: Papadoc


Member Since: September 02, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [49] January 28, 2015 at 11:38pm

    If she doesn’t understand the question, then she’s not qualified to be AG. Actually, that would make her unqualified to eat noodles, but I digress.

  • [4] January 14, 2015 at 12:53am

    It’s Brits talking here. And you should take the word of a gun “expert” who uses the word “reactivated” when talking about guns.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] January 14, 2015 at 12:50am

    There’s nothing waterproof forever. The guy probably did the best he could with what he had and intended on coming back sooner than never at all. Given that he never recovered them, one has to wonder if he died shortly afterwards. Makes you wonder how many more guns are in England that nobody knows about.

  • [14] January 14, 2015 at 12:43am

    Pretty sad, isn’t it? And in other news ISIS just learned which country is ripe for takeover because all their men start crying like Boehner in a news conference at the first sight of a gun. This is the future liberals have in mind for this country.

  • [7] January 14, 2015 at 12:38am

    Daggum straight! And if the truth be known, probably each of those guns could easily be salvaged if they could find a Brit that knew how to clean them up and the government didn’t go into complete meltdown. And no, we wouldn’t be reporting it to the government either.

  • [24] January 14, 2015 at 12:35am

    You should see what happens to his underwear when shown a Poptart chewed into the shape of Oklahoma. Stupid Brits!

  • [2] November 29, 2014 at 12:32pm

    Of course they don’t have jobs. Every single one of these fools is either on the government dime or their parents. There’s nothing here here that can’t be fixed with 6 little words, “You’re on your own now sweetie.”

  • [1] November 8, 2014 at 11:39am

    Arson is covered if “someone else” does it. You’re not being creative enough. Every parent out there knows from their children that “somebody else” and “not me” do an awful lot of really bad things.

    You’ve got a thief and a liar staying in your house who probably has a criminal record and likely a drug issue. If then the police think that YOU are a far more likely suspect than the squatter/criminal/addict doing it accidentally or on purpose, you’re doing a lot of things really wrong.

    Make up a story about how your confrontation with the guy ended with a threat that he’d burn the place to the ground before letting you kick him out and you left fearing for your life. Daggummit if the somuvabich didn’t do exactly what he promised.

  • [2] November 8, 2014 at 11:25am

    Agreed! While being honest in legal situations is generally preferred, this is not one of those times when being on the up and up will actually benefit you. But you have to have all your bases covered and think it through before executing any plan. You’re going up against thieves and liars, and you need to be able to out-lie and give enough credible evidence to turn this from a civil case into a criminal case, with the other guy being the criminal and having all the risk.

    I had a rental they were doing the same thing. Against my better judgement, I rented to a family despite the fact that the information he gave me at age 40 showed he had no credit history whatsoever. Yeah, I know… but it was my first rental and first tenant. Even his deposit and first month’s rent check bounced.

    I knew that both of them had jobs they simply couldn’t avoid going to, so I told him to be out by Saturday or when they were at work, I’d bring up a dump truck and remove all their belongings to the landfill, move my stuff back in, change the locks, and shoot them dead as burglars if they tried breaking in. But that if somehow he lived, his only option was to take ME to court and I wasn’t worth much.

    He said he’d call my bluff, but I guess he decided that there were other opportunities and it just wasn’t worth the risk. He moved out Friday. Everyone has something they aren’t willing to risk. You just have to figure out what it is and convince them that you are willing to go there.

  • [90] November 7, 2014 at 8:06pm

    It’s not much of a surprise that the kid didn’t know how to behave. There aren’t any standards in the household to look up to.

  • October 20, 2014 at 2:12pm

    I’m pretty sure Martina Navritilova was white, and she looks more like someone’s brother than either of the Williams sisters.

    Not sure how she’s pulling racist or sexist out of that one, unless she’s the one making racist and sexist assumptions.

    The guy was rude, but hardly racist or sexist. Particularly rude when you consider the number of Russian women at Olympics over the decades who have a higher testosterone level than most males.

  • [16] October 20, 2014 at 11:39am

    It does sound like fodder for a “November surprise”, doesn’t it? Grand jury delivers their exoneration 2 days before election. Just long enough to get Sharpton and Jackson back on the tube to fire up the base.

    Never let a crisis [or a dead black guy] go to waste. Wasn’t that the motto?

  • [30] October 20, 2014 at 11:37am

    They certainly weren’t there to protest against football fans. So why hang around there unless it’s to start a fight and assault some folks.

    Black “female” needs to be charged with a hate crime as I see it. But probably released an hour later after a ride back to her home.

  • October 8, 2014 at 1:39am

    It’s all “pick-a-nationality” anyway. Most of us can trace back a wide variety of ancestral nationalities and even races, so it’s not who we are, but who we choose to identify as. Most American black people aren’t in any way purely from a single race all the way through time. Most have substantial white blood in them as well.

    Look at Obama – - easily identifiable as half black, half white, but what does he choose? Not mulatto or half black. He chooses black African American. How can anyone choose their race and have it be considered legitimate?

  • [1] September 25, 2014 at 11:51am

    Not buying it either. Sounds like someone who wants a little press on herself and her 15 minutes in the light.

  • [59] August 12, 2014 at 2:43pm

    New property owners build in the old man’s back yard, vote themselves into the local city, then whine about the house that they built next to because it looks as it almost always has and it’s not up to code that was passed long after this house was built. I see this happen all the time to farmers and ranchers when some contractor builds a subdivision downwind from their barn and then complains that the smell is a public nuisance.

    Responses (1) +
  • [12] August 4, 2014 at 11:06am

    No matter the facts in the case, Ventura has won the smaller battle but lost the larger one. The bigger man would have first, laughed it off and said Kyle was lying for publicity purposes. If not for your own bellacose blabbering, 99% of the people never would have heard about it and the other 1% didn’t and still don’t care. But go ahead and sue YOU c.r.y.b.a.b.y. You were offended and like the emotional child you are, so you were due your day in court. Evidently, you won on the facts.

    The bigger picture here though is that right or wrong and no matter who actually writes the check, you lose. You are now known as a sniveling loser who sued the widow of a comrade. You have your money, but you’ve lost the respect of your peers and proved the case of your detractors. Your image to others has been the focus of your entire life, and now that may never be redeemed. Wallow in your money cretin, because it’s what you have.

  • [28] July 23, 2014 at 2:22am

    It’s not just the leadership though. It’s also who they lead, who put them there. These are the bigger audience of clapping seals.

  • [37] July 19, 2014 at 1:06am

    I’ve pretty much had it with Blaze. Power companies hate this, grocery stores hate this, “weird trick” blah blah, 90 year old looks 18 again, new rule in [yourstate-based in IP address], mom invents blah blah, eat this and lose weight, and on and on and on. When you can only get craaaaaaep advertisers, you’ve lost all credibility. When you 20-somethings to copy paste stories and you end up with this nonsense, I’ll stick a fork in ya, cuz you’re done!

    I don’t even really see many good trolls hanging around any more. Bye Blaze! Glenn, let me know when you’re serious again, okay?

    Responses (6) +
  • [6] July 18, 2014 at 3:07pm

    Yes! In progressivism, “what do you think” is translated to “tell us what the polls say your constituency wants to hear you say today, knowing full well you can come back to “clarify” it with an opposite statement if it somehow comes out wrong and you get too much criticism for it”.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love