My Wife and I read this together and it is amazing. We have been married for 35 years and when we read this it was exactly what we do in our marriage and I am happier today than when we first married. We are all in.
October 18, 2013 at 5:08pm
What kind of a moron is she and what rock has she been hiding under? “if we don’t have an effective federal government, people get hurt. In fact people can die.” We haven’t had an effective government for years.
July 13, 2013 at 11:01am
These punks should be tried as domestic terrorists for their threats and if found guilty given the death penalty. This administration, with their lack of action has emboldened these thugs.
February 25, 2013 at 11:37am
I hear land in Detroit is pretty cheap, in fact they could probably buy the whole city for little to no money.
Yup. My suggestion as well. Take Detroit. None of the rest of us want it. I would suggest Dearborn but Black Muslims and Arab Muslims don't like each other. Malcolm suggested that Arabs and Blacks and White Muslims should all live in peace... Louis and his sycophants murdered him for it.
February 21, 2013 at 5:35pm
Any word on S&W or Glock’s stance?
I am in the market but only want to support those who support us.
Voting with my dollars.
Jefferson did state "they [each individual] are endowed by THEIR CREATOR, with certain unalienable rights"
That's what The Constitution and The Republic it Creates exist SOLELY to DO, JF. Secure GOD ENDOWED Unalienable Individual Rights.
By his OWN WORDS, Jeff says the ONLY reason FOR legitimate Government is to SECURE GOD ENDOWED Individual Unalienable Rights.
You cannot, in any Jeffersonian sense, EXCLUDE God from the Public Square since the RIGHT to Free Speech and to the "FREE EXERCISE of RELIGION" is GOD ENDOWED, right along with the RIGHT to hold The State ACCOUNTABLE for NOT "establishing" a religion.
As long as nobody says "You ALL got to be Baptists", you ain't got a leg to stand on and any attempt to FENCE OFF PUBLIC Debate from "Religious" thought is ANTI-Constitutional and ANTI-Jeffersonian. No ESTABLISHMENT and NO infringement of FREE EXERCISE.
I'm down with the first, some people keep crossing over into infringement of the second CLAIMING authority from the first. Such authority does NOT exist. BOTH and, not either or.
February 11, 2013 at 12:05pm
I feel the Love of Christ in your words and am glad to say I am not in your congregation “REV”.
February 11, 2013 at 12:02pm
Larry, Just keep paying your subscription, we may not like your liberal progressive views but your money will help the cause of the conservative movement.
January 16, 2013 at 4:23pm
Looks like he was doing exactly what the major corporations are doing ever call the Sprint help desk in New Deli? or how about American Express Customer Service?
It is okay for California to hire China to build a bridge replacing the Oakland Bay Bridge but not for an individual to be creative. Apparently he work was done to the companies satisfaction. If he didn’t break the law what did he do wrong? He just subcontracted his work, pretty ingenious.
January 15, 2013 at 4:09pm
What a despicable pig, no different than standing on the caskets of the 20 dead children from Newtown.
If this were someone from the right all we would hear is how they are politicizing the deaths and using children to further their agenda.
Funny how this distraction has taken the headlines from Benghazi and the Economy with no mention of the jobs that will be lost when one of the few manufacturing jobs left in America (Guns) are squashed by this tyrannical Government.
January 10, 2013 at 5:42pm
As a Patriot there are things worth dying for.
Our Founding Fathers were willing to dedicate their very lives, so must we be prepared to stand for Liberty, for our God, our Children our Wives and our Country.
Right you are, and if we roll up now, how many of those who sacrificed and died will come back to haunt us?
Americans have been pampered and lulled, and have to learn to reconnect with those original values, and to fight and be strong again.
January 10, 2013 at 1:21pm
How can this be?
California has very strict gun laws, that is why I left there in the first place.
They max you at 10 rounds...that is why only 2 were shot.
Watch for this to be the soundbite for the antigunners.
Oh, it be.
November 19, 2012 at 10:31am
First they create the problem, sell it to the “Useful Idiots” and then propose their solution as the only way out and voila they have the power.
November 19, 2012 at 10:28am
No, the dumbest people on Earth are those who continue to keep them in power, the American Voters.
November 19, 2012 at 10:26am
Follow the Money, they are trying to create a whole new cottage industry whereby the can rob us of any remaining chances of wealth creation for anyone other than the elitist jerks that are the World’s Puppet Masters.
November 19, 2012 at 10:15am
Hey I have an idea, lets turn over our healthcare to them too.
He entered the theater through the front door unarmed. He bought a ticket, walked in unarmed, went to theater #9, and sat down in the front row. After about 15-20 minutes, probably feigning a cell phone call, he gets up and heads to the emergency door by the screen. He opens the emergency door, props it open. He goes to his car. Since it is the first showing, he probably did not know which of the 16 theaters was showing the movie, so his car is probably not parked nearby. He finds his car, drives it to the back entrance of the theater, near the emergency door he propped open. He exits his vehicle, puts on his gear, grabs his weapons and some ammo (but no where near all of it because it is too heavy to carry all of it), and reenters the theater through the propped open emergency door. Then he starts his violent crimes. See? He doesn't need help, it's a one man job. Also, he didn't bring in the weapons in the way you and I would have were we maniacs. He thought outside the box. Walk in through the lobby looking normal with no weapons, then exit the through the emergency exit, dress in his gear and then bring in the weapons while everyone is distracted by watching the movie. It was well planned.
I forgot: There is an arial photo, taken from a news helicopter, of the back of the building emergency entrance, You can see his white car with the sunroof parked in the slot closest to the door. Also, lying on the sidewalk by the purple emergency exit door is the semi-automatic rifle with a gray magazine in it.
July 23, 2012 at 9:28am
And why was a 6 year old at a PG-13 Movie at Midnight?
Pappywags: What parent cares more about being at a movie at midnight than having their child safe and secure in bed at their own home. No children should have been at this movie at midnight. The 13yr. old will be tramatized for life because of immature childish parents.
maybe the parents and the child wanted to see the movie...yes it is late for the child but maybe she really wanted to watch the movie...
a better question is WHY was she there? a 6 yr old is not the right age for a Batman movie..at least not the current three...they are based on Frank Miller graphic novels....and VERY dark....my children have watched them but at home not at the theatre...where they could leave the room if they got scared or the movie could be turned off...
we went to the Lord of the Rings movies at midnight once...my kids were only 6 and 4 and they LOVED the movies, even stayed awake the entire 3 hours....
it can be a nice family outting...you just have to know your children..and as their parent i can make that judgement....
Have you watched the movie? Any child that loves batman would be able to watch this movie. The rating could ONLY have been from fighting scenes. There is nothing gruesome at all in this movie, and as always, there is no profanity like normal hollywood trash standards, there is no nudity or wild sex scenes. I mean, they show a scene where a dude is dead that just got shot up, and he has NO blood or bullet wounds at all. In today's standards of what PG-13 is, this movie should have been PG.
To recap, any 6 year old that loves batman can watch this movie. I would have taken my 7 year old nephew (that loves comics) to this movie with no problem.
"No children should have been at this movie at midnight. The 13yr. old will be tramatized for life because of immature childish parents."
Really? And here I thought it was a madman bursting into the theater and opening fire that would have been the cause of the trauma. But now we really know who to blame - the parents. Clearly the gunman had good reason to believe only adults would be in the theater at that time for this movie, so we can absolve him of the deaths of the children.
Hey Pappy why don't you raise YOUR kids and let other parents raise theirs? What you think about their decisions isn't relevant in the least.
Termyt....great handle....but it is called RESPONSIBILITY, which is an before the act/after the act issue. When one is responsible, then one has to make the decisions BEFOREHAND, but when that decision turns out to be wrong, then one takes on the consequence and is RESPONSIBLE.
Why are many of you good conservatives shying away from asking that the adults to be responsible for taking a 6 and 13 year old to this movie at midnight? I would feel the same if the theater burned down and the 6 year old died....or hit by a car in the parking lot.
Raise your children as you care to, but when any of us make a wrong decision in that regard, it is up to society to call us on it, hold us accountable and not turn a blind eye and say "sh*t happens, I feel so sorry for them".
I'd like to know why a newborn baby and a 6 year old were brought to the movie. To cry and ask a ton of questions through the entire thing? If I were a ticket holder there, I probably wouldn't have been among the victims. Why? Because I'd have been out complaining to the manager about all the noise that was being made by the children of the inconsiderate and selfish parents.
Getourcountrybackwards: When a selfish parent brings their squawking baby to a movie, especially a premier, the bad judgement of the parent becomes everyone's problem and should be dealt with by an escort out of the building. I am 100% for a law to make it illegal to bring a child to something like this.
June 20, 2012 at 2:56pm
The cops are asking for help I am no computer wiz but you can read the license plate from the offending car and I an sure with a little computer manipulation you could make out the plate on the victims as well. I am no cop but all of the required clues are in the video. The feds also seem to be able to track down people who post videos on YouTube why not the LA police?
stolen or reported stolen is what usually happens ?
Preach it, PAPPY!
December 6, 2011 at 2:23pm
Newt follows the money wherever that takes him, he is a Washington good’ol boy. If you want more of the same old thing in Washington he is your man. I will vote for anybody before I vote for him or Nobama.