They are both New World Order stooges. If they weren’t, they wouldn’t be allowed the Republican nomination. The Tin Man made his money off the New World Order.
August 12, 2012 at 1:27pm
Everyone knows they are stinking social liberals like you. If they didn’t they’d give ‘em the Santorum/Palon treatment. Romney is the governor of the most liberal state in the nation and he was the most liberal governor.
Baaa! say the sheep…baaaaaa…
August 12, 2012 at 9:01am
Fox is controlled by the Saudis. Murdoch would lose control without their vote.
August 12, 2012 at 9:00am
“We”? You are a social liberal, New World Order, open borders, globalist?
August 12, 2012 at 8:58am
A stinking social liberal globalist picks another stinking social liberal globalist, to run against the stinking social liberal globalist.
And you patsies get all excited about it, pathetic.
August 12, 2012 at 8:55am
The Koran was written over a century after Muhammad. In fact, there is no historical evidence that either Muhammad or Islam was mentioned for at least a century after when Muhammad was supposed to have lived. Lots written about the Arab expansion during and shortly after when Muhammad was supposed to live, but none of the writers ever mention Muhammad or Islam.
There is a massive amount of historical evidence for Jesus. Heck, the burning of Rome in the 60′s was blamed on the Christians by Nero. A very big deal a couple decades after the cross. But no one mentions any Muhammad.
August 12, 2012 at 8:49am
Nonsense, Muhammad was of course very familiar with Christianity. Granted he inherited the Pagan High Priest of the Pagan Ka’aba Shrine job from his grandfather and they were all Pagans, but Islam is like a cartoon version of Christianity. All the main characters are there, including a risen from the grave Muhammad, in the Mahdi, who looks precisely like him and acts precisely like him. Got an anti-Christ too, and the satan-god and the Judgment Day, the whole ball of wax.
August 11, 2012 at 9:45am
Turkey, U.S. weigh no-fly zones for Syria
(Reuters) – The United States and Turkey are considering imposing no-fly zones and other steps to help Syrian rebel forces as the conflict there deepens, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Saturday…
Well, the Good Ole’ Boys chose Hussein for President to keep up the job of killing Islamists. They figured the Muslims would think he’s Muslim and they were, of course, right.
1. Followed GW’s instructions precisely in leaving Iraq. Even wanted to stay longer, but the Iraqis woudn’t let him.
2. Doubled the number of troops GW had in Afghanistan.
3. Took out Khadaffi with the US Navy. Nice work.
4. Has Predators flying overhead Muslim countries blowing Islamists to Hell with Hellfire missiles willy nilly, no permission from the preemptively attacked country required.
5. And now, the frenzied arch-neo-con, our boy Hussein, is going to take out Syria!
6. About the only Muslim country he hasn’t attacked is Iran, and he’s making daily threats.
Sure hope he has a plan for the Syrian and Iranian Bioweapons. I wouldn’t want to be president with the decisions he may have to make. The Gates of Hell.
Go get 'em, Hussein! Sure hope you have a plan for the Bioweapons...
Syrian opposition leader calls for no-fly zone
August 11, 2012 at 8:52am
They aren’t there for Syria, they are there to grab any loose Bioweapons. Make the Twin Towers look like a back yard picnic.
August 11, 2012 at 12:45am
Jews invented nukes over a half century ago, (Szilard, Teller, etc.), they have much better now.
You figure they’ll need it?
August 11, 2012 at 12:44am
That’s why the Good Ole’ Boys put Hussein in office, to deal with the Muslims in general and Iran in particular. Since it’s obvious we don’t plan on doing anything about Iran in the next few months, betting the fix, Hussein gets 4 more years.
You know, if we do have to take out Iran, better that the President is considered Muslim by about 95% of Muslims. He’s even more of a neo-con than GW and it’s fine by the Muslims.
See what I mean? If they wanted a piece of Iran, they have the perfect excuse in Syria and they won’t even give the rebels weapons.
August 9, 2012 at 9:41pm
But if we do want to try to take out the Iranian nuclear program, or turn out the lights, or whatever, we have our excuse, sitting there in Syria, and we aren’t taking it. Automatically get all the Sunnis on our side, Muslim Brotherhood would love it, heck Al-Qaeda wouldn’t object too much. Iran attacking Israel might not even work.
So no, we have no intention of bombing Iran any time soon, if we did, we’d be confronting them in Syria, half their Revolutionary Guard is there killing Syrians. It’s all a bluff, and after making the same threat for at least 5 years running, not like the Iranians are impressed.
It won't matter in the long run, Al-Qaeda says that once it gains control of Syria then it will go to war against both Israel and Iran:
"One Qaeda operative, a 56-year-old known as Abu Thuha who lives in the Hawija district near Kirkuk in Iraq, spoke to an Iraqi reporter for The New York Times on Tuesday. “We have experience now fighting the Americans, and more experience now with the Syrian revolution,” he said. “Our big hope is to form a Syrian-Iraqi Islamic state for all Muslims, and then announce our war against Iran and Israel, and free Palestine.”
They aren't there for Syria, they are there to grab any loose Bioweapons. Make the Twin Towers look like a back yard picnic.
August 9, 2012 at 9:28pm
You can’t bomb a nuclear reactor. Might as well set off an Atom Bomb. You can’t bomb anything radioactive. The Iraqi reactor was a building under construction, no radioactive stuff.
You have to be a fool to think some surgical strike is going to knock out their nuclear bomb program. If nothing else, they can just store the nuclear stuff near any non-nuclear critical stuff.
Doesn’t matter if every computer in Iran is working for us, and we know everything, still can’t bomb it.
We can shut the country down, turn off the lights, but massive human suffering, that would be a very tough sell.
And of course, at some point, Iran will start shooting at our aircraft carriers in the Gulf and the tankers, and they’ll sink some of them. And they had and used massive amount of Chemical Weapons at the end of the Iran/Iraq war. Lots of practical experience and they’ve had decades to make it far far worse. Easy to see how this baby could very quickly spiral out of control where Iran, literally, is vaporized, and the world descends into a hyper-Great Depression and civilization as we know it comes to an end.
My solution? Wait until the next big meeting of the to gangsters in Iran, the annual “Death to America” day or whatever they are all in one place, and then take out 10 city blocks on all directions. It’s our best chance.
August 9, 2012 at 9:14pm
And the Pals are mixed in.
But Alawites aren’t Muslims, they could care less about the Temple Mount or Pals.
And dictators, in some situations, such as dying, only care about revenge, they could care less about their people.
August 9, 2012 at 1:10am
Jesus also said rich people can’t get into heaven. Can’t cherry pick which rules you want to ignore unless you think some of the Bible is wrong.
August 9, 2012 at 1:05am
Words have meaning and it most certainly was NOT about some rock entrance, it’s meaning is clear, and repeated dozens of times…
“Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”
22 At this the man’s face fell. He went away sad, because he had great wealth.
23 Jesus looked around and said to his disciples, “How hard it is for the rich to enter the kingdom of God!”
24 The disciples were amazed at his words. But Jesus said again, “Children, how hard it is[e] to enter the kingdom of God! 25 It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”
August 8, 2012 at 11:49pm
Well, you claimed the Talmud had something to do with them not being Jews any more, and they definitely believed in the Oral Law/Talmud at the time of Jesus, it just wasn’t written down and commented on. And it was written down and commented on long after Jesus.
Personally, I don’t think the Oral Law completely goes back to Moses, but then I don’t think all of the Torah does either. Some of the Talmud/Oral Law is obviously very old.