Overstock

User Profile: pearlriverwave

pearlriverwave

Member Since: June 04, 2012

Comments

  • February 6, 2014 at 8:25pm

    how do you know the universe is 13.9 billion years old and don’t say science says. give me an solution to the problem. universal assumption have to be made – so if you change the assumptions you change the answer (not exact science), that is why they always say it could have – might have – could be or the best maybe. science is repeatable and testable. historical science is not. so your guess of billions of years is an assumption but historical documents written down says different. You will laugh and assume man could not read or write or speak long ago or were not as intelligent but there again you assume. everything about evolution is an assumption, tell me where I can go and see 1 bit of evidence that did not use someone imagination to determine how something may have looked

    Responses (3) +
  • February 6, 2014 at 11:24am

    wonder what bill nye thinks of obama’s statements

  • January 24, 2014 at 9:55am

    I would have the aclu prove evolution is true in order to prove their case

    Responses (1) +
  • December 18, 2013 at 9:26pm

    you can change man’s laws but you can not change GOD’S law. since when is it wrong to have a different view. whose being homophobic now. He didn’t say anything about changing the law or hating the person, he just stated what God says

    Responses (1) +
  • December 4, 2013 at 5:49pm

    was her husband amer, where is he now, is she or her children on gov assistance

  • November 25, 2013 at 3:21pm

    evolution says death came before man – bible says death came after man sinned.
    believing evolution takes away the penalty for sin which is death, eliminates the need of a savior, and denies the need for Jesus’s sacrifice on the cross.
    evolution and creation are on opposite ends of the spectum

  • November 20, 2013 at 7:33pm

    well, Mike if you really support ACA, then you would sign up and pay the price increase. don’t be hypocritical

    Responses (1) +
  • November 17, 2013 at 8:00am

    I am 68 and I have never watched a macy parade. I don’t see where having a float in ny us helping sell beef. why south dakota do you waste your money?

  • September 26, 2013 at 10:16am

    another question

    why do liberals/democrats/atheists resort to name calling or low rating when they do not agree with something?

  • June 28, 2013 at 9:47am

    most americans are AGAINST obamacare, so defunding it would be popular with the majority

  • June 26, 2013 at 2:51pm

    sad that she is with the party that votes against everything she stands for. democrats vote against the military, protecst the irs and it’s contractors, cut medical for military and make them paid more for their health insurance, pay more to govt workers then they would every think about paying our soldiers. sad she is in the wrong patry

  • June 18, 2013 at 4:49pm

    michelle my bell how wrong can you be
    snowden told the truth about what they ARE doing
    no secret info as fAR AS I know
    nsa did NOT track muslims, whats right about that

  • June 18, 2013 at 4:45pm

    I agree, she is retiring and now she is jumping ship, maybe they have something on her in the NSA. I dont thing snowden gave info , he just said what they are doing

  • June 17, 2013 at 1:21pm

    I didnt read every post so if this was said sorry ( this decision is for federal elections – we need to do this for state elections so they cant vote and we would have a record of who is a citizen)

  • May 28, 2013 at 8:15am

    this is the type of teachers we need, come on Jindal cancel common core and get back to basics

  • June 4, 2012 at 11:18am

    Science does by its very nature involve gathering and interpreting evidence, testing hypotheses, and searching for answers in an ever-refining process. Affirming this process is neither an underhanded attack on evolutionists nor an effort to undermine science. However, pointing out that science is an ongoing search for answers through observation and controlled, repeatable tests highlights a vital distinction. There is a real difference between experimental (operational) science, which deals with how things operate in the present, and origins science, which deals with what happened in the unobserved past to produce what we are observing in the present. Well-controlled, objective tests that can be replicated for confirmation are used to find answers in experimental science but are not truly possible in origins science. For example, determining the strength of a metallic alloy under various conditions is a matter for experimental science. So is the design of new technological uses for the alloy. But theorizing about the chemical origins of life from non-living matter or the evolution of life from microbes to man or how the Grand Canyon formed are built on assumptions about unobservable, untestable, hypothetical, scientifically unverifiable processes.
    The late atheist Ernst Mayr of Harvard, considered by many to be the greatest evolutionist of the twentieth century, acknowledged this distinction. In his book, What Evolution Is, he wrote the following:
    part 1