There you go Patty…now Pineapple will have to go look up the word “dolt”. You insulted him because you forced him to crack open a book. ;o)
June 5, 2013 at 8:25pm
The is a guy, that as a child, got his butt kicked in by the entire grade school…this is how he pays it all back. I wonder how much chapstick he goes through in a week.
June 5, 2013 at 10:50am
Susan Rice…Promoted to her next level of incompetency.
May 29, 2013 at 4:22pm
Nice ad Mitch…btw, ha Holder stepped down yet? LMAO
April 4, 2013 at 12:48pm
It seems that Colrado is digging in the same hole as California…sad to see you all are a few shovels deeper than us, how strange is that?! Major changes need to be made in 2014, vote these worthless representatives out before there is no America. “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”
March 22, 2013 at 10:58am
And if they fix all that, get rid of all bilingual packaging, store advertising and alike. The language of the land is ENGLISH…LEARN IT OR GTFOOH.
March 18, 2013 at 12:00pm
The Navy has been using aerial targets like these for 40 years off the coast California, this is just a newer version and moves faster than a BQM-34
"You want a reward? Sorry, sequestration. Thanks for bringin' it back, brah."
Looks relatively intact. Hope whoever was using it for target practice will be better against the real thing.
Works for me !!!
I've never seen one of those up close in one piece before.
Former US Navy, FC2(SW)
Some of the ones we fired on were electronic measures of proximity missiles, so they were not actually supposed to be damaged just send data. Unfortunately our missiles would track so well we destroyed the target drones
In other words they didn't look like that!
Seeing that makes me think of the Bell X-1.
Hopefully not, the nex drone might be heading at 'We the People's' way....
Seeing that makes me think of 'Uncle Martin'.
Yes, these are common items for target practice for missiles (much cheaper than a plane). As for finding it & salvage rights, I guess it would depend on it if was within the 20-mi area off the US coast. If it was in International waters, I would say "Yippie, look what I get to keep". As for asking for a reward to give it back to the government, they might reward you with a pair of concrete galoshes or maybe a tax audit & getting your name added to the terrorist list. That does seem to be how "The most transparent administration in US history" rolls.
The anti-missile shield was tested on this - they thought it was a hit.
My God, who fricking cares if a military practice target is found floating. Geez...............How about some real news. Like what kind of raping criminal activity is the US govt doing to us today?
The Navy used to have a Det from VC-6 in Roosevelt Roads, PR that launched those. Not sure where they'd be now. I was on an Oiler in the early 80s and we fished one out while in the vicinity of Roosey Roads.
Just an updated version of the "Firebee" drone.
Plenty heading our way. Do not discount any of this. Keep prepping, guns, ammo, water, food & a plan. The commies are inside the wire!
I hope it ends up on Ebay.
Thanks for the info. I wasn't aware they used laser technology for training purposes. Yet I myself am looking to joining the Navy this year, so forgive me for my ignorance. Hopefully won't happen again. ;)
The Navy I come from thought that Flash Gordon was the only place Lasers existed.
A man once told me- "If you don't learn something new each day, even if it's how not to do something, it's a wasted day".
Good luck with the Navy.
March 11, 2013 at 4:51pm
Oh really UN “seemed to have been caused by a ”Palestinian rocket that fell short of Israel.” You investigated it and all you can say is it SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY A PALESTINIAN ROCKET? So where is the apologies to Israel from the main stream liberal media?
March 7, 2013 at 4:57pm
I was told 47…split the difference? It was probably from grant money (your tax $$)
March 7, 2013 at 4:20pm
“Tourists have been targeted in the past by Bedouin in Sinai wanting to pressure police to free detained relatives. Tourists are typically not held long and released unharmed.”
So this means that it’s still okay to visit Egypt and if you do get kidnapped, it is just a passing thing, you will be released. Nothing to see here folks, move right along, tickets for the pyramids form up in isle 3.
March 6, 2013 at 10:01am
Okay folks, I think we have had enough of this madness. It is way past the point where we should be pressuring our Senators and Congress to cleanse the WH. This cannot continue for the remaining 3 1/2 years.
March 4, 2013 at 2:48pm
I can appreciate this tragedy being laid on Egypt.
Yes, because they're little foreign brown people, who speak Arabic, aren't they?
February 27, 2013 at 10:12am
She doesn’t understand that my personal pleasure is to see her, Boxer and Pelosi voted out of office.
Stop dictating to us what guns we are allowed to have to protect our families against thugs and a tyrannical government
February 14, 2013 at 6:14pm
No kidding huh? Heh, California loons…we have millions of them. Better keep this guy out of the evidence room, someone had been sneaking around in there…ya think?
January 28, 2013 at 3:20pm
The other day I passed by this Mexican market and there was a sign that said; “Tongue Spoken Here”. I didn’t go inside. If I knew Megan might have been there I may have made the effort…just to take notes of course.
January 16, 2013 at 4:42pm
@alinskythis….I couldn’t have said it better. Right On
January 16, 2013 at 1:07pm
We are losing people…America has been taken over by tyrants and the fools who voted for them all.
January 16, 2013 at 12:29pm
Even if they started impeachment proceedings this week, he would have served his entire term before it actually went through the process.
January 14, 2013 at 4:16pm
Mark should go have a “Father to Son” chat with the Congress…put them back in line because they are ignoring their constituents’.
A big percentage of constituents want radical gun control. That's the problem; not congress. It;s people that need the talking to and, until we get a great leader in the gop, then we'll get screwed on so many different things.
California, Iowa, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York have no provision in their State Constitution for: The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state.
If you live in one of these States you are screwed. Cut and dry for the rest of us.
Remind your elected Officials of their Oath and the State Constitution that defines how your State regards the 2nd Amendment: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
No MYR...they've been told they want radical gun control over and over and they begin to believe it.
That kind of propaganda can be reversed.
You are right!! It is not only Democrats but Republican in congress who are support gun control legislationl. They just don't get it or ... maybe they are they are Democrat/Marxist plants and they comprehend perfectly.
Ronald Reagan – 40th President of the USA (1981-1989)
“There are those in America today who have come to depend absolutely on government for their security. And when government fails they seek to rectify that failure in the form of granting government more power. So, as government has failed to control crime and violence with the means given it by the Constitution, they seek to give it more power at the expense of the Constitution. But in doing so, in their willingness to give up their arms in the name of safety, they are really giving up their protection from what has always been the chief source of despotism — government.”
Care to cite that stat? I haven't seen even one study or poll that says a majority of anyone in America wants gun control.
A majority of the radicals, maybe... if this was your point, I would agree but ask that you better state your comment next time.
He Who Shall Not Be Named is an off-the-rails rule-by-fiat plutocrat and yes, HUGE spending Socialist.
That's because they are all following the Messiah - Dictator - King Obama and love sucking the life out of this once great nation. Now, he wants U.S. to be slaves to his satanic bunch. I think not!
Oh, and get this, no guns for U.S. but guns and guards for Barry for life because he's scared to death that someone is going to come after him. I suspect that based on his comments recently that there's millions of gunowners that would like to take him to the woodshed and straighten his sorry @$$ out.
@trigus: you are wrong. u.s. constitution trumps all state laws and state constitutions. anything not enumerated under the u.s. constitution is then left to the states, or the PEOPLE.
every gun law, regulation, ban, etc. is unconstitutional as the 2nd Amend. reads "shall not be infringed." there are two ways to amend the constitution and neither was ever done was passing any law, state, code, regulation as regards the right to bear arms for EVERYONE.
was passing = when passing
The unfortunate thing is the congress doesn't give a rats ass about the american people. They will vote their jobs and nothing else. Our biggest supporter of fiscal conservatism left us--Jim DeMint.
"...the love of my country will be the ruling influence of my conduct."
(Answers to thr New Hampshire executive, November 3, 1789, Writings 12:175)
"Let the reins of government then be braced and held with a steady hand, and every violation of the constitution be reprehended."
(To Henry Lee, October 31, 1786, Writings 29:34)
I only see one person with a gun to American's heads.
MYRO6 and All
Even if 100% of the nation wanted to nullify the 2nd Amendment it would NOT be sufficient to do so.
Our Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, are NOT subject to the whim of a majority. It takes a Constitutional Amendment to do that, but the process contained in the Constitution itself.
"The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the "high powers" delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.' A law cannot be passed to
infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power." [Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859)]
their constituents favor gun control.. "According to a Pew Research Center poll, 85% of the public backs making private gun sales and purchases at gun shows subject to background checks, with comparable support across party lines. And the poll indicates that 80% favor laws to prevent mentally ill people from purchasing guns, with broad support from Democrats, Republicans and independent voters...Two-thirds of people questioned in the survey say they support creating a federal database to track gun sales...Fifty-five percent favor a ban on assault style weapons, 54% back a ban on high capacity ammunition clips, and 53% support a ban on on-line ammunition sales"
I've written my representatives and since I live in NY they are uber liberal. Every time I get a response it is basically spewing out their liberal agenda. One said something to the effect of I am grateful you are concerned with this and I agree that something needs to be done. That is why I have done yadda yadda yadda pooed on the constitution etc. It was like getting a pat on the head and being told in a condescending tone aren't you a smart puppy. They don't feel they have to respond because we are their slaves.
and trigus. that definition isn't just for those states. its for every state. in 2010 the supreme court ruled that everyone has the right to bear a fire arm for hunting and protection, and militia is no longer mandatory. that being said.. the arms that are allowed are open to restrictions and regulations from the government.. again 2010 ruling by the republican controlled supreme court. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/us/29scotus.html?_r=0
Also this is a big chance for the GOP to save some face in the nations eyes. with the majority of Americans supporting gun control action, here is a chance for the GOP to actually look like they listen. and quit letting the tea party drag them down. recent polls showed that just 8% of Americans identify with the tea party. If the GOP wants to win another national election they need to ditch the tea party. the majority of them will vote republican in 2016 anyway. plus you collect a lot of votes from the moderates and independents that have been disenfranchised with the recent actions of the GOP.. we'll see.. but the best thing for Democrats politically in 2016 is for reasonable gun control laws to be vetoed by republicans in congress.
No guns for you then.
Trigus claims, "...The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state..."
Since when does someone need permission of the state- any state- to defend themself? To make such a claim is amatuer thinking. As to 'defending the state', there's that pesky little thing called a the United States Constitution and it's even more pesky Bill of Rights, that transcend all state laws. And before that, there is God given Natural Law.
I don't need your permission, or the state's, to defend myself- especially from the state's tyranny.
@sapient: you are correct. and even more food for thought is that the right to self-defense is a natural right that cannot be legislated away even without the 2nd Amend. the founders referenced natural rights, including life and liberty, which would automatically include the right to defend same, regardless of the BOR. even an evolutionist would have to agree, considering they believe in survival of the fittest, that, if someone encroached on your life or liberty you should be able to meet them with equal force to have a level playing field to determine who is the fittest.
just as an aside, and some will disagree, even a person on death row would be within reason, if truly innocent, to defend his/her right to life by opposing one trying take that natural right to life.
some will say, well, they were convicted. well, we have seen many times, as a result of modern science, people released from death row as evidence proved their innocence. now, should every inmate kill their guards? obviously, no. but anyone truly innocent should not be publicly or otherwise persecuted for defending their right to life. man is flawed. the courts are flawed. prosecutors can be self-serving and ruthless. i spent an entire profession career in the court system and speak from experience.
Wolf.. just one example of tyranny please? just one!
The majority of the public do NOT want any more gun control, especially that which has no affect on anybody but law abiding gun owners.
77% of gun crime and murders occur in urban centers, with a preponderance of it committed by gang bangers.
We don't have a gun problem. We have a black crime problem. Until a severe crackdown on crime occurs in the black neighborhoods there will be no curtailment in gun crimes no matter how many laws this black geek gets around to encouraging.
Highlighting a few doped up white nut jobs does no more than shine a light on the tiniest tip of the iceberg.
Many of us don't want civil war, but we'e ready if it comes. Now would be better than later.
As Hannity says, then we can force an acceptance of secession. From Texas over to Florida can be a sovereign nation. Let the wimps who don't like it move to other areas.
The time has come.
I don't often listen to talk show hosts, but when I do, I prefer scatological Zionist talk show hosts.
Stay profitable and entertaining, my friends.
Independent.. the majority DOES want gun control.. did you see my post above? it comes with links!
haha! the most interesting troll in the world! classic!
Posted on January 14, 2013 at 6:11pm
Wolf.. just one example of tyranny please? just one!..."
I'm sure it's probably well beyond your level of comprehension, Keaton, but if you read the Declaration of Independance and change the king's name to BHO, you'll see many examples of the tyranny we're living under now.
Then again, it may be expecting a bit much of a wuss to understand such explicit writings.
Now, go back to your mother's basement with her Ladies Home Journal and look at the girlie pictures while you play with yourself.
Wolf... so to be clear you are unable to name just ONE example...
Teets33, one question for you: Do you trust the government?
myr. you do make up a good lie
to a certain extent yes
What say you Glenn? The Marxist is still furthering his far left ideological agenda. Eleven million illegals are about to receive anmensty. The appeasement of Islam is ongoing and the infiltration of the MB in the American Adminstration continues.. These are the issues that are destroying America and must be be exposed. Please refocus.
Mark Levin blasts Obama as imperial president while on with Megyn Kelly
Jan 14, 2013
Mark Levin: If Obama unilaterally acts on raising debt limit he should be IMPEACHED!
January 14th, 2013
Polls can be made to say whatever the pollster or the pollster's client wishes. Questionnaires and sampling can be designed too give a desired result very easily, yet the poll can appear flawless and totally random. Sometimes results are not what was expected or desired...not because the data was collected wrongly, but because the design was flawed. Pollsters rarely give their study design details for these very reasons...statisticians could put more holes in the poll results than a colander.
I for one would love to see the design of this. Off hand, I would wager a statistically significant number of the subjects were from major urban centers and "purple" regions. Also of interest would be the sample scatter map showing locations of each subject polled (no I don't mean street addresses, but town/precinct level). Just as a poll done only in major urban areas among many states would likely give a slant to the liberal side, a poll done only in rural areas would likely give an equally strong slant to the conservative side. The ratios of each type of area polled would be revealed in the result and be controlled for bias, and you could even split it into more than just two groups, such as add a group for "suburbs of major urban areas" or even subgroup by urban areas in "blue" states and urban areas in "red" states. Gender, education, age, etc may also inject bias in this poll's design. Now if I can see THAT data, things would be much clearer. And yes,I kno
@ KEATON....When you make a broad sweeping statement such as, "the majority of Americans want gun control", it is a very misleading statement. It defines literally nothing to the point that people could agree with that if they don't want felons to have the right to get guns or the mentally unstable. The question I have for you is this. If you lQQk at the UN's stats on violent crime per 100,000 of the population you will see that literally dozens of countries with gun bans are ahead of the USA.. For example, England has well over 2,000 violent crimes per 100,000 people and the USA has slightly over 400 per 100,000. If we lQQk at our own country we will see that "gun free" zones consistently are some of the most violent areas in our nation. The numerous gun laws already in place haven't stopped any of these tragedies so far. BTW Connecticut already had an assault weapons ban in place and it obviously stopped nothing. Finally, do you want all guns restricted? Do you believe the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to own personally a firearm? If so do you believe places like Chicago, NY etc have passed unconstitutional laws forbidding the ownership of guns by law abiding individuals? Thank you....
@ KEATON.....Follow up question for you my friend. Were you in favor of Obamacare passing even though a majority of Americans did not want it in the form it was written? Do you believe the constitution protects the rights of even a minority group regardless of the majority's desires or wishes? Thank you.
No MYR…they’ve been told they want radical gun control over and over and they begin to believe it.
Hammer meets head of nail...
Xiccarph, you seem to know about polls and how they are conducted. And you've asked some relevant questions, ones that I would ask when I see see poll results. You're probably one of those people who questioned the polls that that said President Obama would win reelection, you and all the people at FOX.
Are these polls representative of Americans? Do they "over sample" Democrats? Don't these polls actually show that Romney is going to win, and win by a large margin, when the biases are corrected? And so on. You're asking the right questions, as I would.
What's curious to me is that you didn't go to the PEW website, where the answers to you questions are posted. PEW, as far as I can tell, conducts statistically sound polls, and they list their methodology. They give, on their website, the exact information you say makes you question the poll, such as the design of the poll, who was questioned, the population sampled, and so on. The link is posted on the website but here ya go: http://www.people-press.org/2013/01/14/in-gun-control-debate-several-options-draw-majority-support/2/
My question to you is this. If you had questions about the validity of the poll and how it was conducted, why didn't you go to the source and read the PEW statement of their methodology and results?
debate this: Barry will piss on the Constitution of the Untied States. It is then up to the States to stand up to Barry. 10th Amendment.
As soon as Barry passes an executive order that goes against the Constitution of the United States, He has committed perjury, and Joe and his group have committed conspiracy to commit perjury. Oath of Office: 5 U.S.C. §3331. The United States of America stops as we know it on this day.
It is up to the States who have provisions in their Constitution: The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state to push for Barry's removal and defend their sovereignty.
You can argue about our rights under the US Constitution, but this ilk has no respect for our rights. Send out letters to all your congressional legislators and remind them of the Oath: 5 U.S.C. §3331. Remind them of your State Constitution: Bill of Rights. Remind them that any executive order that supersedes Congress and the US Constitution is also removing your right to vote.
Learn about your State Constitution - learn about the 10th Amendment -
@WOLF - put the glue down and relax. Do you honestly believe that Barry and his band of 40 thieves gives a flying #### about the US Constitution, The Bill of Rights, or your rights?
Do you not think it is strange that the States added their own Bill of Rights to their Constitution? Would you like to guess why?
@Anti - take a look at the 10th amendment - supreme court 521 U.S. 898 (1997)
Do not come here being a internet warrior and try to talk the talk - most will hand over their firearms and cower inside their houses. Very few will hold the line. There are no Rights guaranteed to the people unless you are willing to hold the line.
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) 809.ART.90 (20), makes it clear that military personnel need to obey the "lawful command of his superior officer," 891.ART.91 (2), the "lawful order of a warrant officer", 892.ART.92 (1) the "lawful general order", 892.ART.92 (2) "lawful order". In each case, military personnel have an obligation and a duty to only obey Lawful orders and indeed have an obligation to disobey Unlawful orders, including orders by the president that do not comply with the UCMJ. The moral and legal obligation is to the U.S. Constitution and not to those who would issue unlawful orders, especially if those orders are in direct violation of the Constitution and the UCMJ.
@trigus: did i say anything to you other than you're wrong about state constitutions superseding u.s. constitution for you to presume i am an internet warrior and don't walk the walk? you know less than zero about me.
Look up the word "demagogue" and add to your vocabulary-fits 0blama perfectly!
If a large enough number of their constituents want gun control then they need to amend the constitution using the proper channels through congress and then out to the states to vote on it. I don't care if 100% of the people want 100% of the guns confiscated, incinerated and melted down into a statue of the king of America. It cannot legally be done by executive order..
If you're building a house you can't pour the foundation, build the house up around it and when you're putting the last shingle on the roof write a provision for the foundation to be null and void.. Fact is.. the foundation is still there and the rest of the house, including that frail shingle depend on it in order for them to do their job..
Passing an executive order to nullify (all or a portion) the Bill of Rights wont work.. The whole administration would be strung up by their toes and made to explain themselves in a very public way. Only this time "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" won't work.. because his actions violate EVERYONE.. Not just a trollop of an intern and his spineless wife.
@ SENDTHEMETEORS....I would like to ask you the same questions I asked KEATON a couple of posts above your last comment. I believe you both come at this topic from a relatively similar starting place based on the things I have read from the both of you in previous comments. Thank you ahead.
This president does not think he is president but a God.