User Profile: Plainview

Member Since: December 15, 2010

CommentsDisplaying Plainview's 10 most recent comments.

  • What the hell is the matter with some of you people. Romney was not good enough for you so we got O! Aiken was not good enough for you, so we got Caskill or what ever is her leftist name. Hilliary was responsible for the killing of four American , and you still give her credibility. Monica’S Bill Clinton lied and was convicted of prerjury and no complaint from you. Pull your heads out of your butts, Sandford is the republican candidate in SC. You have the choice to back a socialist/communist radical or a republican. The socialist/ communist will continue the destruction of this nation! Who will it be???

  • Add your comments

  • This is totalitarian police state tactics by the police.

  • Add your comments

  • “There simply are not enough people that understand liberty and freedom to vote out the bad guys.
    There are not enough people who care about the Constitution.

    The ONLY people who will get voted out are the ones who stand against:
    – amnesty
    – gun control
    – gay “marriage”
    - free Obama phones

    If you are against those things then you will get voted out real quick.

    It is truly sad!”
    Stop right now! That is fatalism and should be put out of the minds of those in that frame of mind. The truth is the Republicans won big in 2010 and 2012. 232 seats in the house of representatives and they now have 30 governors as a result of those elections. The democrats won 203 seats a deficit of 29. Some say that the POTUS election result was perplexing and still is. The republicans have some sell outs like Toomey, Graham, and McCain to mention a few. But that’s no reason to become fatalist. good luck!

  • Talk about a whacko, this gun control moron say 90 % is for a communist type record check of all Americans. When was a vote taken by 300 million+ people in this country on a background check? If he cannot produce the date of such vote, then he is a GD liar.

  • Add your comments

  • Your head is screwed on 100% wrong and has striped the gears to your brain!

  • Add your comments

  • Reprinted by permission from Imprimis, a publication of Hillsdale College.
    The Whole People Are the Militia
    The Second Amendment reads as follows: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The immediate impetus for the amendment has never been in dispute. Many of the revolutionary generation believed standing armies were dangerous to liberty. Militias made up of citizen-soldiers, they reasoned, were more suitable to the character of republican government. Expressing a widely held view, Elbridge Gerry remarked in the debate over the first militia bill in 1789 that “whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia.”

    The Second Amendment is unique among the amendments in the Bill of Rights, in that it contains a preface explaining the reason for the right protected: Militias are necessary for the security of a free state. We cannot read the words “free State” here as a reference to the several states that make up the Union. The frequent use of the phrase “free State” in the founding era makes it abundantly clear that it means a non-tyrannical or non-despotic state. Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), rightly remarked that the term and its “close variations” were “terms of art in 18th-century political discourse,