User Profile: planecrashlaw

planecrashlaw

Member Since: March 28, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • March 1, 2015 at 10:07pm

    Not quite 225, but my prediction from the story about the white goober who gunned down 9 was spot on:

    [2] February 27, 2015 at 7:23pm
    Why so few comments, Blazers? They guy was a dark shaded non-Christian after all, right? Easy 225 comments here.

    No, you say? Let’s see….

    White
    Male
    Rural
    Southern
    From Texas county
    Baseball cap
    Possible mullet
    Pick up truck
    Possible double wide dweller
    Likely a quaint Tray Goodie twang
    2 first names…….

    In other words-a Blaze poster child.

    Nothing to see here. Just another redneck killing 9 relatives with an automatic weapon.

    Just like our wise Founding Fathers intended.

    Try washing that blood off, gun nuts.

    In reply to the story Seven People Shot to Death in Missouri Rampage

    Responses (1) +

  • [2] February 27, 2015 at 7:23pm

    Why so few comments, Blazers? They guy was a dark shaded non-Christian after all, right? Easy 225 comments here.

    No, you say? Let’s see….

    White
    Male
    Rural
    Southern
    From Texas county
    Baseball cap
    Possible mullet
    Pick up truck
    Possible double wide dweller
    Likely a quaint Tray Goodie twang
    2 first names…….

    In other words-a Blaze poster child.

    Nothing to see here. Just another redneck killing 9 relatives with an automatic weapon.

    Just like our wise Founding Fathers intended.

    Try washing that blood off, gun nuts.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-3] February 22, 2015 at 4:20pm

    We have been waiting 30 years. It hasn’t hit and never will.

    My wire would more regret our not flying First Class to Phoenix or not having a 1500 square suite at the Phoenician this weekend-none of which would be happening if we did not decide to terminate her pregnancy. She would not have been able to have put a husband through law school, be at the top of her profession or experience the finest that life has to offer if we were forced to have a child we did not and never will want.

    If all you ever want to be is a flyover housewife, have at it. But we made the right choice and do not regret the high achiever lifestyle we enjoy-100% guilt free until the day we die and fade to nothingness.

    Responses (1) +
  • February 22, 2015 at 4:12pm

    And 30 years ago my wide had a safe and legal medical procedure which she has not regretted a single day since. Nor have I. Your dysfunction is yours, so stop pushing it on other people.

    Responses (2) +
  • [-6] February 22, 2015 at 4:00pm

    Slut shaming. Sex is bad and must be punished.

    The dark ages called to say they miss you.

    Responses (3) +
  • February 21, 2015 at 7:10pm

    And you think you flyovers are anything but a laughable group of paranoid shut-ins to the rest of us?

  • [-1] February 21, 2015 at 6:10pm

    Hi.
    How can you be a Muslim and an Athiest? Is it kind of like “keep your government hands off my Medicare?” Silly teabillies.

    Responses (1) +
  • February 9, 2015 at 9:09pm

    If you retract the anti-American part, I’ll have at least a small amount of respect for your intelligence.

  • [-2] February 9, 2015 at 12:03pm

    Sure, because anyone who does not embrace the KKK or Nazi party hates America. Or how about all 12 of the NBPP that you all fear so greatly. Hating them seems to be a full time job of the pro-American bigots here.Try this; “I agree with what some of the SPLC does, but not in this instance. And I will not call them anti-American, since that is a petty and immature way of labeling someone with whom I disagree.”

    Much better.

    Responses (2) +
  • [-7] February 7, 2015 at 9:28pm

    If this “patriot” had just held on a few more weeks or days, he could have used his weapon in the inevitable and Constitutionally approved defense of we the people from our tyrannically government.

    Or if the Muslim atheist communist imposter could have just a little more time, he could have used his natural right to defend himself and his loved ones from the hordes of “them people” once their EBT cards were cut off.

    Sadly, his timing was just a bit off. Instead, he used his weapon to slaughter 5 people.

    I bet the dead are so happy the Second Amendment exists. Because without it where would they be?

    Oh. Alive.

  • [2] February 6, 2015 at 10:35pm

    That hair. That southern accent. A redneck joke. Go Tray.

  • [4] February 5, 2015 at 1:43pm

    And you have proof that the HOA enforces the deed covenants and restrictions, including the rules and regulations, based on religon? Or is this just a verbal tick designed to bash the Muslim faith at every opportunity?

  • [-1] January 28, 2015 at 10:22am

    “What are the odds the planecrashlaw is the first to complain about #1A when a moderator deletes one of asinine comments.”

    The odds are below zero. He knows the 1st only prohibits State action (“Congress shall make…”). The Blaze is a private entity to which the 1st does not apply.

    And just to be clear, I am not completely anti-gun. I would permit single shot long guns, suitable for hunting, if properly registered and regulated, for most people. What works for the EU and the rest of the world can work here.

    I would even allow some exceptions for hand guns for persons who can demonstrate a verifiable safety need. Beyond that, if I can ban them outright, I would, and my point in all of this is to explain my position of the 2d not supporting a modern right to any and all weapons. And I refuse to buy into the anti-government conspiracies and SHTF paranoia as a modern excuse for unlimited gun ownership.

  • [-17] January 27, 2015 at 7:33pm

    Defend my position? No need to. When it comes to socially progressive change, I am not so concerned about the means as I am the results. So I truly admire Griswold, Roe, the ACA ruling and the upcoming Same Sex Marriage decision because they are modern, evolved decisions that support my very progressive views.

    And I also happen to support the way the rulings used a modern look at a very old document, written by some very dead men, who I and the current majority of society have nothing in common with. My side has been winning since the 60s, and I cannot imagine living in a country where what I assume to be your discarded views on social issues were the majority.

    We will not agree on this. But thanks for trying.

  • [-20] January 27, 2015 at 6:18pm

    “As far as the 2nd Amendment is concerned, one could apply similar arguments to freedom of speech, press and religion.”

    The courts do, and I fully support that approach. Society in the 1700s was quite primitive in many ways. We have evolved as a society (some people more than others, obviously), and thus the Constitution must evolve or become irrelevant.

    So I am not a “strict constructionist.” But neither are 1/2 of the current Supreme Court. So we are dealing with a legitimate difference in interpreting the Constitution.

    BTW, I studied Constitutional Law under Professor Harold Norris, one of the most well respected Constitutional Law scholars in the country. I obtained the American Jurisprudence Book Award for the highest grade in his Constitutional Law class.

    None of you are equally qualified to lecture me on this subject.

  • [-29] January 27, 2015 at 4:57pm

    Nope. Judicial review of a living, breathing document in a modern context works just as well.

  • [-51] January 27, 2015 at 4:28pm

    “However, the 2nd Amendment was not primarily about self-defense, it was about armed rebellion against oppressive, self-serving government.”

    Good use of the word “was.” This is not the 1700s and we have not been invaded by the British in a while. The Constitution is an evolving document, and what “was” needed a few hundred years ago is not what is required today.

    Today we fight the government at the voting booth, and while your side has lost the last 2 times, there is no justification for armed rebellion, and thus no need for high capacity weapons in the hands of private citizens on that basis.

  • January 25, 2015 at 8:15pm

    EOD:

    Michael is just a director. And the people in Traverse City who you want to hurt just want to see a few movies.

    Plus, be real. Your side couldn’t get more than 10 people to OAS, and that was to take back “your” country from a Muslim atheist socialist commie imposter dictator. You and 999 voices in your head do not equal 1000.

    You really expect thousands to show up in TC because a has been director said something bad about a movie and a dead sniper? Look, I served 6 years, but not during war. As a fellow service member, I urge you to please take advantage of the mental health services available to you. You have my support, and I hope you get the help you need.

  • [-15] January 24, 2015 at 9:33pm

    Wrong, WE have a film festival here. Michael is the founder, but this is an event that is one of the highlights of the summer season in Traverse City, with hundreds of volunteers and 119,000 admissions in 2014.

    Michael is very popular here, and encouraging outside agitators to commit verbal assault in this progressive, upscale city is not recommended.

  • [1] January 24, 2015 at 10:43am

    Stop kidding yourself.

    We don’t fear her. We laugh at her.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love