User Profile: poetopoet

poetopoet

Member Since: November 04, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • August 31, 2015 at 2:59pm

    Do not they call that a Bonfire, as defined as a:

    “A bonfire is a large but controlled outdoor fire, used either for informal disposal of burnable waste material or as part of a celebration. The name “bonfire” is derived from the fact that bonfires were originally fires in which bones were burned.”

    Hillary and the demon-crats are a waste as their bones are.

  • [3] August 31, 2015 at 2:45pm

    Work, Ha, ha, ha, the fence will work harder and longer than those freeloaders who want to cross it and the fools that deny a fence works 99% of the time keeping the good dogs in and the bad dogs out.

    Responses (1) +
  • August 26, 2015 at 11:51pm

    Does Mr. Allies really think and state:

    “ Megyn Kelly represents the very best of American journalism and all of us at FOX News Channel reject the crude and irresponsible attempts to suggest otherwise.” No she does not, he is her boss and he manhandled her to attack Trump.

    No one nor Mr. Trump have read or heard of Mr. Allies or M. Kelly apology, for Alies and her “Hit Job” on Mr. Trump” during that rigged debate. Allies directed and put on the air as Fair and Balanced. Allies then dares call it “the very best of American journalism” which is laughable, pathetic and rhetoric on Alies part!

    Mr. Allies, also foolishly claimed or try too redact and redirecting: “allowed ourselves to be bullied by anyone and we’re certainly not going to start now.” When in fact that is what Allies and her have done and did to Mr. Trump; by Allies own admission and direction he is guilty!

    Responses (1) +
  • August 26, 2015 at 11:31pm

    Does Mr. Alies, really think as he stated:

    “ Megyn Kelly represents the very best of American journalism and all of us at FOX News Channel reject the crude and irresponsible attempts to suggest otherwise.” No she does not, you’re her boss and you manhandled her to attack Trump.

    No one nor Mr. Trump have read or heard Mr. Alies or M. Kelly apology for their “Hit Job” on Mr. Trump” during that rigged debate Alies directed and put on the air as Fair and Balanced. Who then dares call it “the very best of American journalism” which is laughable, pathetic and pure rhetoric on Alies part!

    Mr. Alies, also foolishly claims or tries too redact and redirect: “allowed ourselves to be bullied by anyone and we’re certainly not going to start now.” When in fact is what Alies and Kelly have done it and did it to Mr. Trump; Mr. Alies by his own admission and direction, is guilty!

  • August 26, 2015 at 12:10am

    Neither I nor Mr. Trump, have not read, heard or posted, your Mr. Alies or M. Kelly apology, “Hit Job” on Mr. Trump”; during that rigged debate you put on as Fair and Balanced, as directed by you!

    You now dare too call her or you are “the very best of American journalism”, is laughable!

    Mr. Alies, you also foolishly claim or try too redact and redirect: “allowed ourselves to be bullied by anyone and we’re certainly not going to start now.”, when in fact that is what you and her have directed and did to Mr. Trump; Mr. Alies by your own direction!

    Is that not right or is that all that is left of you, you over waited and overrated (fat) slob and as a slugger Mr. Alies, which you can fowl as a out!

  • August 26, 2015 at 12:06am

    Neither I nor Mr. Trump, have not read, heard or posted, you Mr. Alies or M. Kelly apology, for your and her “Hit Job” on Mr. Trump”; during that rigged debate you put on as alleged as Fair and Balanced, as directed by you!
    You now dare too call her or you are “the very best of American journalism”, is laughable!
    Mr. Alies, you also foolishly claim or try too redact and redirect: “allowed ourselves to be bullied by anyone and we’re certainly not going to start now.”, when in fact that is what you and her have directed and did to Mr. Trump; Mr. Alies by your own direction!
    Is that not right or is that all that is left of you, you over waited and overrated (fat) slob and as a slugger Mr. Alies, which you can fowl as a out!

  • [3] August 25, 2015 at 2:31pm

    Really Mr. Alies:

    “ Megyn Kelly represents the very best of American journalism and all of us at FOX News Channel reject the crude and irresponsible attempts to suggest otherwise.”

    I or Mr. Trump have not read or heard you Mr. Alies or M. Kelly apologize for your and her “Hit Job” on Mr. Trump” during that rigged debate you put on as Fair and Balanced and dare call it “the very best of American journalism”!

    Mr. Alies you also foolishly claim: “allowed ourselves to be bullied by anyone and we’re certainly not going to start now.”, when in fact that you and her did that to Mr. Trump!

    Mr Alies You are digging and stating a bigger grave for yourself and her!

  • August 24, 2015 at 11:03am

    Mirror, mirror at what? Attracting fools and flies like you?

  • August 24, 2015 at 10:42am

    How can a news network like MSNBC pretend and portray themselves as journalist and not fronts for the Political Mafia of the once Democrat Party or whom ever?

    When, they really are the Tommy-Guns as in Hatchet-Men/Women in print and in live broadcasts Goose-Stepping as was German’s fowl progeny Paul Joseph Goebbels and Russia’s Joe Stalin’s Pravda, come a calling too peddle their lies.

    Chris Matthews and company are nothing but the paid collectivization at work of the errant back stabbers of what’s left of their serfdom to bolshevism, Russia’s failed police state that does want to die out.
    MSNBC does not by any means have the ratings or the NYT circulation have the through advertising funds the money to support these maligned puppets, for this long, We the People today call political Hacks!

    Then these Un-America democrat operatives are funded by whom?
    Some who want bring or burn down America to their level of control of collectivized and instituted by profit margins for retirement?

    When the exact opposite is true, for their sins can never be forgiven.

  • August 24, 2015 at 10:33am

    Ted Cruz is not even an Anchor Baby fool.

  • [1] August 23, 2015 at 6:52am

    Gov. Jindal, I hope you live long.

  • [1] August 22, 2015 at 8:04am

    Sandy Hill for one Graveyard.

  • August 22, 2015 at 7:56am

    That proves he is not Jewish?

  • [1] August 22, 2015 at 7:52am

    Actually any U.S. Sheriff can constitutionally.

  • August 22, 2015 at 7:50am

    That would certainly enshrine Obama in Ripley’s Believe or Not.

  • August 21, 2015 at 4:52am

    Please, 99.9% of woman murderers do not pay for their murders, but they are guilty still the same, born or parted out for sale or not.

  • August 21, 2015 at 4:45am

    I would call the LSM, the Unbelievable Puppeteers Servers, but that is already a trade mark called the UPS.

    Then how about the Very Unbelievable Puppeteers Servers, their call card would be, we are the VUPS, it’s sickening just to say VUPS, dirt-bag please.

  • [31] August 19, 2015 at 3:08pm

    In 1884, the Supreme Court in Elk v. Wilkins noted that the language of the Civil Rights Act was condensed and rephrased in the Fourteenth Amendment and that courts can therefore look to the Civil Rights Act to understand better the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court reasoned that if a person is a foreign citizen, then their children are likewise not constitutionally under the jurisdiction of the United States, and therefore not entitled to citizenship. In fact, the Court specifically then added that this rule is why the children of foreign ambassadors are not American citizens

    Responses (1) +
  • August 19, 2015 at 3:06pm

    In 1884, the Supreme Court in Elk v. Wilkins noted that the language of the Civil Rights Act was condensed and rephrased in the Fourteenth Amendment and that courts can therefore look to the Civil Rights Act to understand better the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court reasoned that if a person is a foreign citizen, then their children are likewise not constitutionally under the jurisdiction of the United States, and therefore not entitled to citizenship. In fact, the Court specifically then added that this rule is why the children of foreign ambassadors are not American citizens

  • August 19, 2015 at 3:06pm

    In 1884, the Supreme Court in Elk v. Wilkins noted that the language of the Civil Rights Act was condensed and rephrased in the Fourteenth Amendment and that courts can therefore look to the Civil Rights Act to understand better the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court reasoned that if a person is a foreign citizen, then their children are likewise not constitutionally under the jurisdiction of the United States, and therefore not entitled to citizenship. In fact, the Court specifically then added that this rule is why the children of foreign ambassadors are not American citizens

    Responses (2) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love