The point I was making was that at the time my friend felt it was necessary. I dont know that history well enough to know if the states were involved in land management or not.
But in my state, the county I live in is is 70% owned by out of state wealthy hunters who do not allow any type of farming, ranching or other use. It is strictly there for them too come in a few months of the year and hunt. No one is allowed on too it. When people around here see that it is hard to argue with them that the feds should not control some of it otherwise we would all be stuck in our homes with no place go.
Where I live people believe in freedom. The funny thing is, with all the “no trespassing” signs around I feel absolutely no freedom.
This is my problem with Trump. I agree with most of what he is saying, but regardless. I care how we get those things accomplished. And skirting the Constitution to get things done is not an option for me. We dont need the “rights” (if he is indeed on the right) version of Obama.
THE CONSTITUTION MATTERS!
@Andrew, yes you can hunt on federal land. Not all federal land, but most you can. Unless of course a wealthy rancher leases that federal land from the feds, and then they put up no trespassing signs. While you still pay taxes for that land.
 February 11, 2016 at 8:29am
Funny thing rvick, I had this conversation with a friend of mine and he said he loved Teddy Roosevelt and if it was not for him taking the land then we would not have any where to hunt, and rich people would be building mansions on the cliffs of Yosemite and putting up signs that say “keep out” .
With all of the places I am not allowed to explore because wealthy people buy up the land and keep people out, it is hard to argue with him.
Except as you say, we have rule of law and the Constitution does not allow it.
 February 11, 2016 at 7:55am
Whats that saying?… Oh yea!
“Birds of a feather, flock together”
 February 9, 2016 at 7:27pm
Everything he is complaining about not being done is exactly what Cruz is doing yet he dont like Cruz.
 February 8, 2016 at 9:25am
Well I wondered how good the super bowl halftime show was going to be this year. After watching and skipping through most of this I wonder no more.
Still didn’t miss anything except my two minutes of time skipping through this video to see the racist dancers.
Doesn't matter who he bashed, he will make some statement about "between the remaining candidates, I support ... because..."
My guess is Rubio because very few of the Senators liked Cruz telling it like it is against McConnell which is the very reason I like Cruz. Rand and McConnell are both from Kentucky but are not near the same people. McConnell is a real POS and he would go if Cruz got elected.
I like Rand Paul or at least what he’s suppose to stand for, however in recent history it appears from my perspective that he makes deals that undermine the principles he supports, I wouldnt be surprised to see Rand pick someone totally off the wall or even progressive
Hopefully I’m wrong. It would restore some of my faith in him if he stuck with a liberty candidate and threw his hat in with Cruz
This a big reason why I struggle with Paul. He says a lot of good things and then goes after Cruz while endorsing McConnell. It is a head scratcher.
Yeah, when Cruz endorsed Cornyn (the TX McConnell), he really showed his true colors.
Not to mention Cruz voting with McConnell to give Obama and the NSA more power. At least Rand stood up for what’s right.
Cruz outed himself by missing the audit the fed vote. Even Bernie Sanders was there to vote for it but Cruz himself didn’t have time? Perhaps his Goldman Sachs wife has something to do with that. The big problem that libertarians or non-statists have with the current brand of so called conservatism is the very fact that conservatives are statists just like their liberal counterparts. So called conservatives believe in regulating physical items that they believe could cause harm to an individual vs letting the free market be free. They believe in using the power of the federal government to force change throughout the world even though its been unsuccessful every times its tried, yes that includes WW2 as well. In all they really believe in big government especially at the federal level. Most conservatives actually love the Federal Reserve because it allows them to promote the false narrative of “Pax Romona” that the US government can instill peace throughout the world with imperial power. Non-statists believe the power of the free market and true belief in Natures Laws are the only way to topple tyrannical regimes around the world. It will be difficult to pull the vote for Cruz, too many inconsistencies and Bush people on his political team.
Yes, Cruz loyalists are low information voters. They refuse to ever mention the deals Cruz made to vote McConnell in as Senate Leader; as every GOP Senator did, and his deals with progressive John Cornyn of Texas. But of course Beck will never speak of this or the abominations of legislation Ted supported.
February 3, 2016 at 9:14am
Agreed, but also dont forget that he did side with the GOP establishment. Which made me question his motives.
However I still think the american person wants a king. Thats why they like trump so much. They dont care how it’s done, just get it done. Sounds like a bunch of Obama supporters.
Hmmm, maybe thats why Obama won two terms. The same people voting for trump.
Except for the fact he didn't side with the establishment he voted against them every time
You got it wrong. Obama was not successful at anything before he was elected twice. The race hustlers guilt tripped the white power structure into electing the "First Black President". I'm so glad that experiment is over.
DLV, I think that he is referring to McConnel. I was just telling a friend a moment ago about how Reagan just barely did squeak out a win in the 1980 Republican Primary over GHW Bush. As a tactic Reagan then embraced the Republican establishment for the shear number of votes by taking Bush in as his VP. Sometimes it is just that, nothing more than a tactic when seeking unknown numbers during an election. The trouble is these days some have no real vision beyond the tips of their own noses.
RJ- it was tactic that's it. It seemed smart in the moment but only ended up biting him
Rand could have walked on water for the last couple years and folks would still have found fault.
The truth is, folks do not want libertarian....They want 'conservative'.
 February 2, 2016 at 8:19am
I hope they do not indict Hillary until after Obama is out of office. That way he cannot pardon her.
[-1] February 2, 2016 at 8:16am
“So a billionaire businessman is going to raise the debt ceiling? Really???”
Why not? He has filed bankruptcy several times for raising his own personal debt ceiling.
Ohhhhh, wait. My bad. He never personally filed bankruptcy. Only his business’s have. After using “the system” to funnel money from the business to his personal bank account and then filed bankruptcy thus leaving the tax payers responsible for the cleanup.
 January 31, 2016 at 12:35pm
“We don’t believe that he believes all the things that he is saying”
Ya, you really showed me.
 January 31, 2016 at 10:58am
“If this is the true face of “conservatism” I want no part of it.”
This is why I am voting for Trump. I want a guy who sleeps with married women, makes fun of peoples shortcomings, doesn’t believe in private property rights, and bribes politicians to represent the conservative values.
Is it this one? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcUCLwWCihE
Erica. Yes that's the one and I offer it to Trumpster divers as a public service.
He needs to fire his campaign manager.
You mean this one?
I believe this is the one you're looking for?
@cowbell, leave it to a Trump fan to resort to ad hominem. Glenn Beck is not running for president, though he did at least wise up, while Trump is STILL changing his positions, though not all of them. Some of his leftist and establishment positions he still has, as I've told you in other comments.
January 28, 2016 at 4:03pm
The fact that you believe Donald Trump qualifies you as a low information voter…or ignorant.
 January 28, 2016 at 9:03am
Obama went in highly in debt. He will leave a multi-millionaire. Trump will go in making ten mill a year and leave making 300 mill a year.
Trump has made his money by using the system. His words not mine. Common sense says why in the world would someone want to change the system that made them rich?
 January 28, 2016 at 8:40am
Funny how a guy that says he can beat china, russia, north korea and isis is running from megan kelly like a scared spoiled child.
LOL, Trump isn't running from kelly. He is well ahead of the group of liars and doesn't have to put up with kelly. He shows confidence in his abilities to win with out Fox news. The only way I would not vote for trump is if he make John Kasich his running mate. I won't watch the debate even if trump was to attend. I can't stand the phony, liberal, mean spirited, stuck up _________. I don't watch her show, why would I watch a debate with her as a moderator?
The fact you and other low information voters think Trump is running scared from Megyn only shows how clueless you really are about FOX.
@ yes you do
Pretty shallow thinking. You can't possibly believe that Trump's decision was based on a fear of the head cheerleader (m.k.) at FNC.
The fact that you believe Donald Trump qualifies you as a low information voter...or ignorant.
Politician=low information voter
January 26, 2016 at 9:44pm
All he has to say is that he don’t need to debate someone who is not eligible to run for president. That way Cruz can’t beat him and he can still look like he came out on top. This way the lemming followers can still tell everyone he was right.
 January 26, 2016 at 6:17pm
My supporters are so loyal, they will even stick with me if I shoot someone. Says Donald Trump.
So no Rush, you are wrong. I actually agree with Trump. It dont matter what Trump does, his followers will jump off a cliff he says thats what it takes to make “good” deals.