So, are you saying that people who practice abstinence are more likely to get pregnant or transmit an STD than people who use condoms? Or, where you just trying to take a swipe at someone named Palin? Just trying to clarify things.
 August 21, 2015 at 2:16pm
I imagine she wants the school district to give her son free condoms so she doesn’t have to worry about anything. After all, who wants to have to deal with an “unwanted” pregnancy.
What’s sad is she is a writer of young adult novels. I’ve never heard of her and have no intentions of reading anything she has written. Odds are, it’s not worth the time if she gets upset that a school district is telling her son to speak with his parents about sex.
 August 6, 2015 at 1:08pm
Two things wrong with this video. First, the guy filming says, “You guys have done enough to my family.” What does that mean?
Blaze, please investigate this statement. Is this guy a trouble maker, or is the police singling him and his family out?
Secondly, the office asks, “Are you some kind of Constitutionalist…crazy guy or something?” Really!!!? Do all police see Constitutionalists as crazy/nut jobs?
Finally, is it really a big deal to take your hand out of your pocket when the police office asks? As Solomon said, “A soft answer turns away wrath.”
Liberals think they are constitutionalists.... We have a president that that thinks he is a constitutional . But this guy was a crazy nut job....
The agent of the state asked the citizen if he was a constitutionalist because agents of the state view constitutionalists as a threat to the state. Agents of the state also view veterans and Christians as a threat to the state and the feds created a list of groups it has determined to be enemies of the state and should be surveilled.
 June 10, 2015 at 2:29pm
Martha MacCallum said there is no reason for the officer to slam the girl down. So I suppose if someone refused to comply with a police officer’s order, and when the officer attempts to arrest them they resist, the officer should just let them walk away? Is that right?
I think Martha MacCallum should then ride along with the police. Let her respond alongside the police. Walk the Talk.
 May 29, 2015 at 1:56pm
I’d like to ask Chris if putting a crucifix in a jar of urine is as bad as saying the “N” word? Would he equate having a picture of the Madonna covered in feces the same as saying the “N” word? Why would he defend the right of some atheist artist to defame Christianity, but argue against another atheist ridiculing Islam?
That’s because they are right when they say it’s not about free speech. For them it’s about a hatred of Christianity.
I'd like to ask Christians if it would be okay if a Muslim group paid to have drawings of Jesus having anal sex with another man or having sex with a goat on the side of a city full of buses or would they consider that disrespectful.
[-1] January 21, 2015 at 4:11pm
I don’t understand how deflating the foot ball gives the Patriots an advantage. Don’t both teams use the same ball? If it makes it easier for the Patriots to hold the ball, isn’t that true for the Colts as well.
So, while this may be a violation of the NFL rules, I don’t see how it constitutes cheating. It’s not like they were videoing the Colts play calling from previous games and studying it in advance…
Both teams do not use the same balls. The offensive team brings their own ball on to the field with them. So deflating the balls allowed the Pats to have more ability to hold onto the ball. If they are so great, they shouldn't have to cheat to win.
They should NOT be allowed to play in the SuperBowl. I feel that only encourages teams to cheat since they make a LOT of money once they are in the SuperBowl - more then losing a pick will do.
 November 26, 2014 at 1:18pm
Unless you can prove that they edited the video with the intention of doing Kirk Cameron harm, a law suite would be useless. Because they cover their defamation under the cloak of humor, they are protected by the First Amendment. However, that sword can be used both ways. Anybody have a video of these dirt bags they’d like to edit?
Libel is any Defamation that can be seen, such as a writing, printing, effigy, movie, or statue. Slander is any defamation that is spoken and heard. we were only kidding won't fly ESPECIALLY since they claimed :
“But, it gives me great pleasure to show the world what an arrogant douchebag Kirk Cameron is.” his words show they meant to damage his reputation
 August 18, 2014 at 12:48pm
I think we might be seeing the Bubba Effect Glenn has been talking about. However, instead of it involving small town USA, it is in Urban town, Furgeson.
 August 15, 2014 at 4:35pm
“Dawkins went on to say that moderate religious people who are kind create the notion that “there’s something good about religion” … I wonder if Dawkins would agree that moderate socialist/communists who are kind create the notion that there’s something good about socialism/communism? After all, socialist/communist are responsible for more mass murders than any one else in the history of mankind.
 August 6, 2014 at 7:02pm
Perhaps it is based on the promise of Christ in John 14, when he said, “I will come again and receive you until myself.”
Also the book of the Revelation of Jesus Christ is not about Christians winning. It is about God’s masterpiece being unveiled.
 July 17, 2014 at 2:25pm
I don’t understand how my refusal to pay for you accessing a specific service constitutes denying you access to that service. Can’t you pay for it yourself? Just because you can’t “afford” it, doesn’t mean I have to pay for it. It’s like demanding Bill Gates pay for your driving a Lexus just because you like them and want to own one.
That sounds good. Now then, tell that to all the new and existing invaders that have crossed our borders.
 July 17, 2014 at 11:55am
That is why Holder is the first one Congress needs to impeach! Oh, wait a minute. Make that Speaker Boehner as the first one to be impeached. Then go after Holder.
June 26, 2014 at 5:28pm
Sounds more like he was his own grandpa.
 June 26, 2014 at 5:19pm
I am amazed that Animal Control was able to reach the home owner, but the police could not? They used the phrase, “urgency to find the child” as justification to trespass on this man’s private property. However, the ease with which the man was contacted AFTER they shot his dog illustrates they did not need to enter his backyard without his permission. This is a clear case of unlawful search and seizure. Bring on the attorney!
 June 24, 2014 at 2:01pm
I head there was a cruise ship carrying a lawyer convention that sank in the Caribbean. They said that sharks ate everyone except the attorneys. The reason…professional courtesy.
June 24, 2014 at 1:56pm
If I read Mike Rowe’s encounter correctly, the attorneys would take the case, primarily because they believe the defendants would settle out of court. If the defendant choose to fight the case, they might regret this decision. That’s because there is a difference between winning an argument, and winning a large damage decision. Just because you win the case, doesn’t mean you will win very much in damages. Just read Leon Uri’s QBVII.