Kierstead looks like he's checking out Rubio's rear end. He also looks like he's approaching Rubio from behind to get close to his behind. Where is Rubio's security.
it has nothing to do with love or sex - it has to do with forced acceptance.
Redefine marriage? You mean that thing that heterosexuals have been redefining for years? You mean that covenant that God encourages us to enter into and not break—but yet millions of divorces are filed every year in this country? Redefine marriage, you say? Redefined as in the high levels of adultery (you know…cheating on your husband and wife) that occur daily. Kinda like what Herman Cain was doing? Ha! Let’s not pretend that gays are redefining marriage. Straight people have screwed up the definition of marriage for many years. Some of them are on their 2nd and 3rd marriages. Now that my friend, is how you redefine marriage. Care to rebut?
So gay people don't "really" love each other huh?
 January 11, 2016 at 1:38pm
Hey, Ms. Sauerbrey! Are you saying that girls shouldn’t wear mini-skirts if they don’t want to be raped? Or, does “no mean no” only apply to white anglo-saxons.
If a woman is raped or molested or even engages in consensual sex by a white man or college student it's condemned.
If a woman is raped or molested by a minority, especially a muslim, its the woman's and Western scoiety's fault. Minority 3rd world culture is the one thing that trumps feminism.
MUSLIMS DO NOT ASSIMILATE.
Just ask Hillary Clinton whose fault it is. she is an expert on going after victims of her husband. Why is it liberals blame the victim.
It's the bigotry of reduced expectations and the ability to hold mutually exclusive beliefs simultaneously without conflict, that marks the modern 'liberal'.
All cultures are equal, yet at the same time these men come from a culture where they're not expected to behave in a civilized way, and can't behave any better than criminals until they're taught Western norms.
 December 16, 2015 at 5:18pm
Why hasn’t the Freedom From Religion crowd shown up to threaten a law suite? I thought their goal was to stop all religious indoctrination from happening at public schools? Or, is it only Christian indoctrination they are concerned about? Just wondering?
Coulter is obsessed with her own appearance and voice. She became obnoxious a few years back when she was backing Christie because he (like Trump) is a bully who shewts off his mouth.
 October 20, 2015 at 5:09pm
The entire bad should resign and walk out over this. I wonder how the school officials would react to not having a marching band?
 September 1, 2015 at 1:30pm
Another science denier.
 September 1, 2015 at 1:29pm
“Death threats” and “should be raped”??? I thought this was all about “love”. Where are the signs saying “Love won out” ??? Also, why aren’t the Femi-Nazi’s out demanding an investigation into the rape threats? I thought the seriousness of the charge was what is important. Or, does that only apply to women to are in college and have no conscience? Just asking.
That is Mr. Stavers words. He is the last person you should be quoting.
 August 21, 2015 at 2:22pm
Yep! Spot on!
 August 21, 2015 at 2:19pm
So, are you saying that people who practice abstinence are more likely to get pregnant or transmit an STD than people who use condoms? Or, where you just trying to take a swipe at someone named Palin? Just trying to clarify things.
 August 21, 2015 at 2:16pm
I imagine she wants the school district to give her son free condoms so she doesn’t have to worry about anything. After all, who wants to have to deal with an “unwanted” pregnancy.
What’s sad is she is a writer of young adult novels. I’ve never heard of her and have no intentions of reading anything she has written. Odds are, it’s not worth the time if she gets upset that a school district is telling her son to speak with his parents about sex.
 August 6, 2015 at 1:08pm
Two things wrong with this video. First, the guy filming says, “You guys have done enough to my family.” What does that mean?
Blaze, please investigate this statement. Is this guy a trouble maker, or is the police singling him and his family out?
Secondly, the office asks, “Are you some kind of Constitutionalist…crazy guy or something?” Really!!!? Do all police see Constitutionalists as crazy/nut jobs?
Finally, is it really a big deal to take your hand out of your pocket when the police office asks? As Solomon said, “A soft answer turns away wrath.”
Liberals think they are constitutionalists.... We have a president that that thinks he is a constitutional . But this guy was a crazy nut job....
The agent of the state asked the citizen if he was a constitutionalist because agents of the state view constitutionalists as a threat to the state. Agents of the state also view veterans and Christians as a threat to the state and the feds created a list of groups it has determined to be enemies of the state and should be surveilled.
 June 10, 2015 at 2:29pm
Martha MacCallum said there is no reason for the officer to slam the girl down. So I suppose if someone refused to comply with a police officer’s order, and when the officer attempts to arrest them they resist, the officer should just let them walk away? Is that right?
I think Martha MacCallum should then ride along with the police. Let her respond alongside the police. Walk the Talk.
 May 29, 2015 at 1:56pm
I’d like to ask Chris if putting a crucifix in a jar of urine is as bad as saying the “N” word? Would he equate having a picture of the Madonna covered in feces the same as saying the “N” word? Why would he defend the right of some atheist artist to defame Christianity, but argue against another atheist ridiculing Islam?
That’s because they are right when they say it’s not about free speech. For them it’s about a hatred of Christianity.
I'd like to ask Christians if it would be okay if a Muslim group paid to have drawings of Jesus having anal sex with another man or having sex with a goat on the side of a city full of buses or would they consider that disrespectful.
[-1] January 21, 2015 at 4:11pm
I don’t understand how deflating the foot ball gives the Patriots an advantage. Don’t both teams use the same ball? If it makes it easier for the Patriots to hold the ball, isn’t that true for the Colts as well.
So, while this may be a violation of the NFL rules, I don’t see how it constitutes cheating. It’s not like they were videoing the Colts play calling from previous games and studying it in advance…
Both teams do not use the same balls. The offensive team brings their own ball on to the field with them. So deflating the balls allowed the Pats to have more ability to hold onto the ball. If they are so great, they shouldn't have to cheat to win.
They should NOT be allowed to play in the SuperBowl. I feel that only encourages teams to cheat since they make a LOT of money once they are in the SuperBowl - more then losing a pick will do.
 November 26, 2014 at 1:18pm
Unless you can prove that they edited the video with the intention of doing Kirk Cameron harm, a law suite would be useless. Because they cover their defamation under the cloak of humor, they are protected by the First Amendment. However, that sword can be used both ways. Anybody have a video of these dirt bags they’d like to edit?
Libel is any Defamation that can be seen, such as a writing, printing, effigy, movie, or statue. Slander is any defamation that is spoken and heard. we were only kidding won't fly ESPECIALLY since they claimed :
“But, it gives me great pleasure to show the world what an arrogant douchebag Kirk Cameron is.” his words show they meant to damage his reputation
 August 18, 2014 at 12:48pm
I think we might be seeing the Bubba Effect Glenn has been talking about. However, instead of it involving small town USA, it is in Urban town, Furgeson.