User Profile: PRESIDENT_OBAMNEY

Member Since: May 27, 2012

CommentsDisplaying PRESIDENT_OBAMNEY's 10 most recent comments.

  • So, Glenn can move to Texas as a safe haven and vote for the progressive, but he tells us to all stand down and stop flirting with secession?

  • Major Networks Call Ohio, Election for Obama

    November 7, 2012 at 12:17am

    In reply to 2MINUTESTOMIDNIGHT.

    @Rational Man: Don’t try pinning this on Libertarians! Romney, Reince Priebus and the RNC gave you this one. You like how they’re all complaining about vote switching at the polls all of a sudden? Me too. I love how Karl Rove and Anne Coulter were projecting last week that Romney the liberal was going to win all these Blue states! I would argue that the only bit of difference between on Obama and Romney on the issues was negligible. Romney was the etch-a-sketch candidate and he fit the mold of a good establishment kind of guy. Maybe if Romney runs Democrat again for 2016, he might have a chance. Would you like that? Then maybe you can vote for him again. Not me, I’m a Libertarian and I’ll stick with the Republicans.

  • @Jarhead 88
    I don’t care if he does him endorse him. Are you going to support Romney’s policies? He better do a 180 on his previous stances or we’re in for a heap of trouble! If Ron Paul endorsing him, meant that he got a meaningful cabinet position then I’m all for it. I’ve canvassed half my town fundraising for my local State Rep and State Senate Republican candidates, US Senate Republican candidate to fill Olympia Snowe’s vacant seat, written checks for them, and helped organize fundraisers for them too. I’ve voted Republican (with the exception of Pat Buchanan and Ross Perot) all my life. BTW: Active duty troops gave more money to Ron Paul than every other candidate, including Obummer, combined!

  • @ Pattycake Henry,
    I like Ron Paul and I don’t use drugs! I don’t know any supporter of Ron Paul’s that does either! Giving up on the useless drug war doesn’t mean that we have to go and use drugs. Ron Paul supporters are hard working Libertarians AND Republicans. Anyway–what is this REDO you speak of? It’s a false illusion. The Repubs have given us Obama II in Romney. There isn’t a chance of a Re-do until 2016–at which time you and the rest of you RINOs will just be attacking Rand next! The fix is in for Obama/Bush/Romney/Clinton policies to WIN: Socialized Medicine, Romney Care, unlimited government spying, huge server farms out in the desert protected by motes and bunkers, the un-Patriot Act, the NDAA’s indefinite detentions, more undeclared Middle East wars–including Iran next, more TARP Bailouts, unlimited military spending in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) which I think Paul Ryan is even worse on, more “war on terror”, more DHS expansions, more TSA molesting (which have been showing up to “protect” Romney and Ryan at speeches and conventions), continued increases to the debt ceiling, even more tax increases (known as fees to Romney), and despite that conveniently leaked fundraiser tape where Romney pretends to be strong on the Fed (which is supporting his campaign: look up Goldman Sachs Romney and Federal Reserve) he’ll support QE4, QE5, QE6, QE7.

  • @TIME_TO_END:
    You are a complete tool. I bet you didn’t even watch to the end of Paul’s 2008 speech. Here it is for all to see you as an evil deceiver. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqOpeRnvvNo

  • @ Freedombeliever
    Yeah you’re right. Romney is no problem for the LEFT. They would love him, except the only problem they might have with him is he’s the wrong color and he’s richer than them. But despite that they love his policies. Ever here of Romney-Care? Here’s a list of the great Romney/Ryan policies you Romney Republicans support now: Romney-Care, unlimited government spying with huge server farms out in the desert protected by motes and bunkers, internet control, the un-Patriot Act, the NDAA’s indefinite detentions, more undeclared Middle East wars–including Iran next, more TARP Bailouts, unlimited military spending in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) which I think Paul Ryan is even worse on, more “war on terror”, more DHS expansions, more TSA molesting (which have been showing up to “protect” Romney and Ryan at speeches and conventions), continued increases to the debt ceiling, even more tax increases (known as fees to Romney), and despite that conveniently leaked fundraiser tape where Romney pretends to be strong on the Fed (which is supporting his campaign: look up Goldman Sachs Romney and Federal Reserve) he’ll support QE4, QE5, QE6, QE7.

  • TIME_TO_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12 seems to know a lot about about gerbils.

  • I don’t think Romney is going to lose this election either. However–regardless of who wins now–the fix is in. The disgusting policies they BOTH SUPPORT will win: unlimited government spying with huge server farms out in the desert protected by motes and bunkers, the un-Patriot Act, the NDAA’s indefinite detentions, more undeclared Middle East wars–including Iran next, more TARP Bailouts, unlimited military spending in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) which I think Paul Ryan is even worse on, more “war on terror”, more DHS expansions, more TSA molesting (which have been showing up to “protect” Romney and Ryan at speeches and conventions), continued increases to the debt ceiling, even more tax increases (known as fees to Romney).

  • Yeah–but 2 party systems of having the powerful elite changing the rules (to give their offspring “coronation” conventions to rule over us) wasn’t in the plans of our founders. What other machinations can we come up with–if we still even have elections after this one? Perhaps Chelsea Clinton? Hillary? Jeb Bush anyone? Hey, maybe one of the little Obama kids after that? :-(

  • Yeah–but 2 party systems of having the powerful elite changing the rules (to give their offspring “coronation” conventions to rule over us) wasn’t in the plans of our founders. What other machinations can we come up with–if we still even have elections after this one? Perhaps Chelsea Clinton? Hillary? Jeb Bush anyone? Hey, maybe one of the little Obama kids after that? :-(