If you've been doing some research, can you tell me which "schools of thought" don't apply the doctrine of abrogation and which openly denounce dhimmitude? Those would be the only ones not subscribing to an evil theology, and I can't find any . . . so please, do some research and let us know.
The Radical Athiests will be all over them. Now, if we were in the Middle East, they wouldn’t live to report on what happened.
Ya…the frenzie......dly city
@ Priscilla King.....Here's one for ya! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYBOYPAte_0
Priscilla -- I wouldn't trust their report. Fundamentalist Christians are all liars. They always lie to achieve their political goals. Fundamentalist Christianity is not a religion -- it is a political ideology.
 December 10, 2015 at 1:59pm
If she’s angry at terrorists, which she has every right to be, let her take the police and/or military training and go after them. Interrupting people’s prayers is tacky. And cowardly.
Sure, Secret Service ALWAYS WAIT IN A LONG LINE OF IDIOTS! Let me guess, you went to a LIBERAL COLLEGE!
October 8, 2015 at 2:04am
I call foul. People who accept hypnotic suggestions might idolize the hypnotist or participate in “jokes” (“When my given name is pronounced, you will immediately want to make passionate love to me”), but suicide? Hardly a suggestion an educator would be likely to make. Before they demonize the principal these parents should at least be asked whether their children had also taken any kind of “medication.”
We don’t know what he did during the hypnosis. I would bet my money that he pleaded guilty to what was found out because if they did further investigating they would find a pedophile behind the hypnostism. I know I shouldn’t judge, I just have been too close too these types of situations not to highly suspect that sexual abuse and suicide commands to encourage forgetting of the event were going on in this case. What else would be his motive? He very well could have drugs involved as well. Adults with jobs working with children are suspect in and of itself. Where else would a pedophile want to work? But people don’t see it so they won’t suspect.
October 8, 2015 at 1:35am
Why are so many–Republicans? ???–wasting a good opportunity, just to say something nasty? The word for the young Hillary Rodham who talked a good line about poor people, but never really thought of them in the same context with anybody she, like, knew, was RICHIE. And the word for Candidate Clinton, which I’d expect Republicans to say early and often, is BRAIN-DAMAGED.
October 7, 2015 at 7:53pm
Why not? He’s Jewish after all. The news is that a celebrity would be so anti-Israel.
What I want to know is what’s in the water out there (when there is any water) that’s making these people fight so madly over “rights” to a desert. Especially when they trace their descent to a common ancestor who’s revered as a prophet and patriarch for saying “Rehoboth,” room for all of them. Why not just work out a deal, share the historic attractions, and use the tourist revenue to buy more and nicer land somewhere else?
October 5, 2015 at 11:22pm
It’s called woman-hating: evicting law-abiding middle-aged women to make room for young men who, if they were seeking asylum, would be with their families.
October 5, 2015 at 10:31pm
Speaking strictly as an occasional viewer…I’d rather see/hear athletes after they’ve drunk some water, washed their faces, and thought about what to say, than see the cameras shoved in their faces the minute they get off the field. Kyle Petty wasn’t much of an athlete, but after dropping out of a race in 1994 he really “said” it all. (Right, for young readers, I mean the famous spew-on-the-camera moment.) Reporters can think of better questions while athletes are getting themselves together. It’s such a win/win.
October 1, 2015 at 7:13am
Makes two of us…probably more.
October 1, 2015 at 7:11am
That said…it’s not only possible that Muslim terrorists will try to exploit this particular child’s talent, it’s *likely*. Especially if he leaves the U.S. feeling hated and persecuted here. So there are valid reasons why we should all be very very nice to young Ahmed. Muslim children cannot all be as public-spirited as Malala Yousafzai.
[-3] October 1, 2015 at 7:06am
So, he’s a bright, mischievous, rebellious little kid whose parents happen to be Muslims. How bad is that? Personally I don’t see bias in people’s displays of support for young Ahmed because I’ve displayed support for bright, mischievous, rebellious little kids who are Christian, Jewish, White, Black, even female. I just generally like smarty-pants kids better than the couch-potato type.
That said...it's not only possible that Muslim terrorists will try to exploit this particular child's talent, it's *likely*. Especially if he leaves the U.S. feeling hated and persecuted here. So there are valid reasons why we should all be very very nice to young Ahmed. Muslim children cannot all be as public-spirited as Malala Yousafzai.
What indication do you have that he's bright?
You like the "smarty pants" kids who take apart a clock, put it in a case, and intentionally let it be "discovered" so it will be thought to be a bomb?
You're rather odd.
 September 27, 2015 at 3:37pm
Donald Trump is hardly in a position to criticize anyone else’s face, voice, manners, accent, hair, etc. He of all people should keep it parliamentary. Hillary’s politics would give everyone plenty to criticize even if she hadn’t uttered a few choice lines like (to Bill at a party) “Those people aren’t rich; they’re useless.” Then she’s *twice* cited brain damage as an excuse for not testifying. Beating her in a straight two-party election would be a cakewalk if Bill hadn’t sent out Trump to be a spoiler, which job includes picking on things poor li’l Hillsie can’t help (shrill? How bad *was* her famous bout with flu?) and making people feel sympathetic toward her.
September 27, 2015 at 3:30pm
Are we talking about the same Hillary? Has her voice changed lately?
September 27, 2015 at 3:26pm
It’s not a sexist remark if her voice *is* shrill. (I’d be inclined to take anyone’s word for that since I seldom watch television.) Trouble is, from what I’ve heard, Hillary has a well modulated voice and usually a bland, calm manner. Eleanor Roosevelt was shrill. I’ve not listened to his voice, but a lot of things Rump says *read* like things that would normally be uttered in the shrillest voice with which a person is endowed.
September 27, 2015 at 3:23pm
One of the world’s best middle school nicknames, granted. Too bad her voice is usually pretty mellow.
[-1] September 27, 2015 at 1:48pm
Honorable? What about “forsaking all others, keep only to [Ivana] until death doth [them] part”? This guy is such a liar, I wouldn’t take his word that it was raining outside.
Luckily not too many people g.a.s what you think. I'm sure you have been absolutely perfect since birth, though. Write a book, please /s.
September 22, 2015 at 11:02pm
Some people get into bickering about evolutionary theory because they don’t want (or can’t afford) to be doing real studies of current life forms. In the same manner, some people get into bickering about global warming because they don’t want to deal with the facts of man-made local warming…which are hard to miss. El Nino was what gave much of the world a record heat wave last summer. Local warming was what made people in certain cities feel that their temperatures were almost as hot as where ISIS are going.
I’m a global warming skeptic, or doubter, in the sense that I’ll wait for the facts to come in (if I live long enough) before becoming a believer or denier. Local warming, however, cannot be denied. Only ignored–by keeping up the quarrel about global warming.
September 21, 2015 at 6:29pm
One Facebook button and one Twitter button are plenty. Lose the pop-ups, @TheBlaze, if you want so much as a Google +.