User Profile: PRRedlin

PRRedlin

Member Since: January 01, 2012

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • August 4, 2015 at 11:10am

    Well, every single candidate has a super pac, so of course they all get donated too by billionaires, and in return whoever wins will give the billionaire donors whatever they want.

    except Bernie sanders that is.

  • August 4, 2015 at 11:10am

    The big deal is no candidate should be getting more than $5400 from any one person. We need to do away with these super pacs and the hell Citizens United has bestowed upon us. No candidate gets my vote unless they pledge to get citizens united overturned.

    The rich do not need to have more say than any other man or woman.

  • August 3, 2015 at 2:20pm

    In order to go to a flat tax (same tax rate for everyone) we would need an EFFECTIVE tax rate of 34% if we want to fund government with zero deficit.

    Prepare to bend over!

    Responses (2) +
  • August 3, 2015 at 2:18pm

    Flat tax at current levels puts it at 34%. If you are currently paying less than 34% effective tax rate, prepare to bend over to uncle sam under a flat tax.

    Responses (2) +
  • [-1] July 28, 2015 at 2:59pm

    Did the mother provide sunscreen for the child with explicit directions to apply it to her children?

    If not, her bad.

  • July 23, 2015 at 2:49pm

    @UAV

    but how many times do we need to hear about the “bad apples” before the good apples start making changes?

    If I have a bucket full of apples, and one apple is moldy and covered in bugs and worms, the entire bucket is tainted.

  • July 23, 2015 at 2:48pm

    @UAV

    you can say that all you want “if she had just obeyed the man”

    but the point is, she didn’t have to obey. she complied as law required. she should never have been asked to step out of the car, should not have been pulled out of the car, should not have been arrested or charged.

    she exercised her rights, and the system took advantage.

    imagine if someone walking down the street exercising their second amendment rights by open carry was arrested, and turned up dead 3 days later with no official charge. where would the outrage be then?

    why because it is first amendment instead of 2nd amendment do the blaze readers suddenly side with the police?

  • July 23, 2015 at 2:45pm

    @psycho

    yes, as a prisoner you are officially a ward of the state, and as law, anyone who appears suicidal, such as when they admit it, must be monitored for their own safety.

    90 minutes went by from the time the motion camera detected motion until her body was discovered (though by some amazing means the motion camera didn’t film while she “hung herself”).

    come on, use your brain, something isn’t right here.

  • July 23, 2015 at 2:43pm

    exactly. bow down, forget about your rights, and spread that anus!

  • July 23, 2015 at 2:09pm

    downvoted by people who are in favor of police brutality.

    nice blaze, nice.

  • July 23, 2015 at 1:38pm

    probably because she did nothing illegal except for a moving violation.
    she laid no hand on the officer, did not threaten the officer, and posed no threat to the officer.
    she exercised her first amendment rights and as a result was arrested for no cause. why can’t you “conservatives” ever realize that maybe, just maybe, there are bad cops out there?

    Responses (1) +
  • July 23, 2015 at 1:33pm

    @UAV

    and all I’m saying is, a persons rights trump an angry cop. she did nothing illegal, and complied as necessary by law.

  • [1] July 23, 2015 at 1:33pm

    you are missing the entire point.

    you can not resist arrest if you are not under arrest, and you can not be arrested if you did not commit a crime.

    she committed a moving violation in a vehicle. there is no arrest for this.

    Responses (2) +
  • July 23, 2015 at 1:31pm

    not true. if you not under arrest, you are free to stay where you are.

  • July 23, 2015 at 1:30pm

    but her only charge was resisting arrest, which means at the time of resisting she was under arrest. but she wasn’t under arrest, because she didn’t commit a crime punishable by arrest.

    so basically, she was resisting the violation of her rights.

  • July 23, 2015 at 1:17pm

    since when are prisoners who are deemed “suicidal” left alone without guard?

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] July 23, 2015 at 1:16pm

    so what exact crime did she commit by exercising her first amendment rights?

    the only crime was a moving violation that the officer was giving her a warning for. it is not illegal to mouth off to a cop, and you can not resist arrest if you are not arrested, and you must have committed a crime to be arrested.

    her mouth means nothing. she did nothing to cause arrest.

  • [3] July 23, 2015 at 1:14pm

    If she did in fact kill herself, and if this report is infact real, then the police are even more culpable, as they were aware of her mental state and did nothing to guard her while she was in their custody.

    Criminal negligence at the very minimum for the guards, and a firing for the officer who violated her rights.

    You can not arrest someone for resisting arrest if they are not UNDER ARREST. Her only violation was a moving violation punishable by fine. Absolutely no grounds for arrest. If the cop had been a professional, he would have taken the signed warning, and left, instead of amplifying the situation.

    Bad cop with small dick.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] July 10, 2015 at 11:12am

    Whether it be the Bush’s, the Clintons, or the Obama’s, they are all Neo-liberal third way shill candidates who exist solely to line their own pockets.

    There are only two candidates in the 2016 race who are not beholden to billionaires. Paul and Sanders.

    Want to restore integrity to the white house and American populace? Vote for one of these two.

  • [1] July 10, 2015 at 11:10am

    Bush, Clintons, Obama. All the same THIRD WAY Neo-liberals.

    The only two viable candidates in 2016 are Paul or Sanders.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love