TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying PRRedlin's 10 most recent comments.

• New Undercover Abortion Clinic Video Sparks Pro-Life Furor: ‘They Will Not Resuscitate’

  May 3, 2013 at 3:55pm

  In reply to PRRedlin.

  oh and by the way bigwhite, having steak tonight. meat is murder and murder is delicious.

• New Undercover Abortion Clinic Video Sparks Pro-Life Furor: ‘They Will Not Resuscitate’

  May 3, 2013 at 3:54pm

  In reply to PRRedlin.

  So none of you prolifers would seriously put one of these fetuses into your own wombs to save the child? interesting.

• New Undercover Abortion Clinic Video Sparks Pro-Life Furor: ‘They Will Not Resuscitate’

  May 3, 2013 at 12:35pm

  In reply to angelstarz.

  Again, as to my statement below. If you are so concerned, then start a charity to do the medical research necessary to develope a procedure which removes a fetus from one womb and implants it into another. Then you can volunteer your body to carry to term, and then raise said child.

  If you wouldn’t do this, then you are guilty just as much.

• New Undercover Abortion Clinic Video Sparks Pro-Life Furor: ‘They Will Not Resuscitate’

  May 3, 2013 at 12:33pm

  In reply to PRRedlin.

  Why should that matter angel? The bible says we are to procreate. shouldn’t it be a wonderful thing for women to “create life” even if they do not raise them? Would you personally carry a stranger’s child, perhaps of a different race, to save the child from abortion? And then raise the child?

• New Undercover Abortion Clinic Video Sparks Pro-Life Furor: ‘They Will Not Resuscitate’

  May 3, 2013 at 10:44am

  In reply to PRRedlin.

  We can effectively end abortion, and just relabel it Preadoption!

• New Undercover Abortion Clinic Video Sparks Pro-Life Furor: ‘They Will Not Resuscitate’

  May 3, 2013 at 10:43am

  Women have the first amendment right to privacy over their own body (as the court ruled in Roe V Wade).

  But it’s murder you say? Ok then, prolifers, I submit to you this.

  The solution to ending abortions is simple in theory really.

  Medical science must find a way to remove an unwanted fetus, and implant it into the womb of a volunteer prolifer. The prolifer can then decide whether or not to raise the child or give it up for adoption.

  No child is murdered, and prolifers can practice what they preach.

• Chicago Sports Reporter Has Awkward Slip-Up on Live TV

  May 2, 2013 at 3:26pm

  Who seriously sits around with a video camera aimed at their television.

• New Undercover Abortion Clinic Video Sparks Pro-Life Furor: ‘They Will Not Resuscitate’

  May 2, 2013 at 3:18pm

  Here’s my take as a prochoice libertarian:

  A woman has a right to choose. This is an extended expression of the first amendment.

  No being has a right to survive if that requires the unwarranted use of another persons body, whether or not the individual’s condition is a direct result of the woman’s actions. (i.e. if i hit you in the kidney and your kidney fails, you do not have the right to my kidney. Same is true if a woman gets pregnant, the child has no RIGHT to use the woman’s body to survive).

  Ok, here’s where I differ from planned parenthood. IF the child has reached the age of viability, roughly 21 weeks-24 weeks+ and is able to survive post partem with the help of machines, then it is the hypocratic oath of the medical examiner to resuccitate the child. At this point, the woman will either have to retain care for the child, or sign the child over to the state to be adopted at a later date.

  In other words, if you are a woman and you do not want to be a mother and you do not want to carry to full term to give the child up for adoption, then have the abortion at an early gestational age, not beyond the point of viability.

  Yes, abortion at any gestational age is a killing of a child, however, this child does not trump the first amendment, and is not given rights until they are born.

• Will the Only State in New England Not to Allow Gay Marriage Soon Legalize It?

  April 23, 2013 at 10:09am

  In reply to JimTheBrew.

  I’m straight. if gay people can get married, and it does not affect me, how exactly are they ramming something down my throat? it does not affect me or my marriage one bit. on the other hand if i fight to prevent them from getting married, am i not ramming my lifestyle down their throat?

• Will the Only State in New England Not to Allow Gay Marriage Soon Legalize It?

  April 23, 2013 at 10:08am

  In reply to Mikatopia.

  Let’s see how many people you’ve confused by saying your gay and you have a girlfriend. (hint blazers, women can be gay too, they don’t need to use the term lesbian).