User Profile: PubliusPencilman


Member Since: August 31, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • May 2, 2015 at 1:11pm

    You need to spend less time reading Nazi fetish fan fiction.

  • [4] April 29, 2015 at 3:43pm

    I suggest that you read more.

  • [5] April 29, 2015 at 3:36pm

    “It’s people like yourself who have zero respect for people’s identities, Publius, as it’s y’all who keep trying to change them!”

    Ha! What counter-intuitive up-is-down nonsense. I am not changing anyone’s identity, and neither is Jenner. Yet, somehow the idea that someone might be living their life in a way that you don’t agree with means that they are oppressing you! Logic doesn’t get much more tortured than that. It would be laughable if it wasn’t so damaging to young transgendered people who just want the chance to live their identities.

  • [4] April 29, 2015 at 3:32pm

    Feel free to live your life however you like Report. I very much doubt that anyone is trying to stop you.

  • [6] April 29, 2015 at 1:33pm

    Well, it seems like by that logic all the justices should recuse themselves, since all of them PARTICIPATED in heterosexual weddings.

    Responses (10) +
  • [5] April 29, 2015 at 1:30pm

    I think that many married Jews, Hindus and Muslims might be confused by that definition…

  • [2] April 28, 2015 at 8:16pm

    Yes, how can we possibly have a free country when people are allowed to live life in what way they feel is right!

  • [1] April 28, 2015 at 8:15pm

    Wiltsie, unfortunately your reasoned posts are thoroughly ignored by this crowd.

    And we can debate whether Bruce Jenner is a hero or not for choosing to speak out. Jenner may not be a hero, but this conversation certainly has plenty of cowards–cowards who would rather spew ignorance and hatred than confront anything marginally different from what they believe.

  • [10] April 28, 2015 at 8:11pm

    Why are you so invested in the idea that Bruce Jenner is a man? What does it take away from you to let another person live in a way that they feel fit? When did your personal notions of how you want people to live become more important than simply respecting people and their identities?

  • [-3] April 28, 2015 at 9:39am

    “Babylonian nature worship theme.”

    Haha. I see. So being an active steward of God’s creation is like Babylonian paganism?

  • [-6] April 28, 2015 at 9:38am

    Yes, funny how you folks believe in religion and moral authority, as long as that authority is telling you that you can drive your SUV around all you want without caring about anyone or anything else.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] April 27, 2015 at 4:18pm

    Clearly you know nothing about the Constitution, since the Religious Test Clause is a well-known part of the document:

    Article IV:
    “no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.”

  • [-9] April 21, 2015 at 6:01am

    “You can’t save what you didn’t create”
    Haha. Well, I wouldn’t go printing up any bumper stickers, because that phrase is just stupid.

    And no, the biggest threat to the planet is not people trying to save it. You cherry-pick a few examples, while deliberately ignoring the enormous amounts of damage done on a daily basis by polluters.

    And, once again, no. The earth was not created to “self-preserve.” I’d like to see the science you have to back this up.

  • [3] April 20, 2015 at 8:45pm

    “What we are talking about is forcing an entire society to change their social mores and traditions to suit a handful of citizens who practice a certain fetish.”

    It’s not a matter of changing your social mores or traditions. No one is asking you to be a homosexual. You just have to mind your own business and let other people pursue relationships they like.

  • [4] April 20, 2015 at 4:00pm

    “While it’s ridiculous to deny this has gone on since time immemorial, it seems equally ridiculous to me to PROMOTE it in the way our society is doing today.”

    To be fair, no one is asking you to seek out news articles about same sex marriage and comment on them. I suspect this would have little impact on your life if you didn’t actively pursue the topic.

  • [9] April 20, 2015 at 3:57pm

    “The NAMBLA folks disagree with you that it’s abuse. They defend their desires in the same way that homosexuals defend theirs.”

    So? It doesn’t matter if they don’t think it’s abuse–the law is clear on that. It doesn’t matter if they use the same kind of argument–it doesn’t apply, because abuse is different from a consenting adult relationship. It’s cut and dry.

  • [9] April 20, 2015 at 1:41pm

    “So you support marriage between brothers and sisters, fathers and daughters, and males or females with with 200 spouses?”

    No, but all these are heterosexual relationships, so that should be fine with you, right?

  • [9] April 20, 2015 at 1:36pm

    Well, since pedophilia is a crime and clearly constitutes abuse, it’s obviously a very different thing.

    Maybe it wasn’t your attitude he was reacting to–maybe it was the fact that you’re a moron.

  • [4] April 20, 2015 at 1:33pm

    “I could be sexually attracted to a wall or my car.
    Acting on my attractions it’s still a choice. I prefer it not be sanctioned or normailized by our society”

    A relationship between two consenting adults is not the same as a sexual fetish for an inanimate object. Done and done.

  • [5] April 20, 2015 at 1:24pm

    “But it demonstrates the fascist nature of the deviant sexual campaign”

    And that would make the outlawing of same-sex marriage what?

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love