Get a load of this idiot getoffmylawn will ya? What a prog moron.
 June 29, 2015 at 9:45am
Being forgiven and not changing the offending behavior is meaningless. There is a connection between forgiving the crime and accepting the punishment.
 June 29, 2015 at 9:41am
They are dangerous to themselves and society at large.
 June 29, 2015 at 9:40am
Father Morris needs to treat this as a serious matter. The gay community carries HIV/AIDS in numbers disproportionate to the average citizenry. Since half of the homosexuals over 50 are infected by this one disease, and there are others specific to gays, this is not just spitting but an assault with the intent to infect. Individuals who have HIV/AIDS have been tried, convicted and sentenced for knowingly infecting others. Just another contribution of the homosexual lifestyle to America.
You will be called a homophobe if you make statements like this in the future. Just like with other “protected” groups, like blacks, you cannot use actual facts and statistical data. That is bigoted and prejudicial.
I work around a lot of gay men. Here is an aside. Has anyone here heard of a bug hunter or a stealth pozzer? Look it up you’ll be amazed. I know I was when I first heard the terms and that was years ago. My point is that many of these people are so far gone and depraved, not to mention self hating, that they do this to their own kind.
So yes you are correct. There is a certain segment of the LGBTQ community that wants to hurt anyone and everyone by whatever means possible. I have no idea how large this subset of people is but it doesn’t matter.
 June 28, 2015 at 8:03pm
Get the government out of the marriage business altogether as is happening in Alabama. You don’t need a license to get married, you just need a civil contract. The Supremes can push the States but they can’t push the People.
Good idea. Here’s how to do it: Proposed: Amendment XXVIII
SECTION ONE: “Neither Congress, the Courts of the United States or of the several States, nor the Legislatures of the several States, shall make any law respecting the definition of marriage and neither shall the President of the United States nor the governors, agencies and civil departments and offices of the several states make any rule, regulation or policy regarding same.
SECTION TWO: After the adoption of this amendment, and excepting matters involving the estates of certain decedents and incompetent persons hereinafter defined, the resolution of all matters theretofore requiring a government to apply, make or recognize a definition of marriage shall instead be resolved pursuant to the law of contracts and other legal principles not requiring the government to apply, make or recognize a definition of marriage. Law then existing shall remain in force and effect, including laws respecting the definition of marriage, only insofar as applied to the estates of decedents who die and incompetent persons who are legally declared incompetent prior to the adoption of this amendment.”
Go to continuation of this post above.
Go to first part of this post above:
SECTION THREE: “Only the legislatures of the several states may make laws respecting the personal, cohabiting, family and child rearing relationship between persons, which laws, if made, must provide that such relationships may only be created, enforced and terminated pursuant to each particular state’s laws of contract or other applicable legal principles not requiring the definition of marriage, the reciprocal comity of such laws shall be determined by each state and the recognition of such laws shall not be denied by the United States. Individual states may limit the parties to such contracts to one man and one woman. Such relationships defined by or based upon consanguinity are not hereby affected.”
SECTION FOUR: “All laws made hereafter, and the application of such laws, which distinguish between a male person and a female person must do so by defining male and female on the basis of the presence and combination of a person’s male and female chromosomes. All prior laws and existing laws which are contrary to this amendment shall be interpreted and enforced in compliance herewith.”
 June 28, 2015 at 8:00pm
If it’s she, she is for it. She knows her congregation and has decided to walk very carefully. If your church is Episcopal, they are for it. If baptist, probably not.
June 28, 2015 at 7:57pm
I am going bananas trying to answer that question myself.
 June 28, 2015 at 7:56pm
That will be tested immediately.
 June 28, 2015 at 7:52pm
Or that the State get out of the marriage business and leave marriage to the discretion of the people as it was a 100 years ago.
 June 28, 2015 at 7:44pm
We need a good starting point. It really should start in the conservative churches.
 June 28, 2015 at 7:43pm
I can petition my State representative to get the State out of the marriage license business entirely. You can have your legal victory but no way to implement it in law. I will be calling my representative tomorrow to solicit help.
 June 28, 2015 at 5:10pm
I believe you mean microintolerance. By the way, I am waiting for Nanointolerance to be fully defined and placed in common usage. Please note that Nano intolerance is characterized by a deep sigh or slight frown. This is unlike micro intolerance which is characterized by a verbal outburst like “you dumb expletive” although the use of an expletive potentially raise the stakes to minus aggression because such an outburst is often followed by real aggression. Further, and to this point, nano intolerance has yet to be defined but my belief is that it cannot rise to the level of any other intolerance.. Whew! That was tough. Time for a stiff one. Well, really not a stiff one because that could be construed as some type of micro aggression or micro deflection. And yes, I have too much time on my hands today.
 June 28, 2015 at 4:46pm
I be buying.
June 28, 2015 at 4:42pm
Flash: for your entertainment, circ de ISIS will perform every night. Watch the ISIS team try death defying leaps from tall buildings, escape the whirling blades of Allah, augmented with fire and water, and avoid the jaws of hungry sharks imported from North Carolina – always a treat. A new set of ISIS performers all guaranteed to be sharia compliant each and every night. Tunisian Ministry of Tourism.
June 28, 2015 at 3:58pm
However, as Jurassic Park noted, nature will find a way.
 June 28, 2015 at 3:57pm
It’s now global bellicosity. Please keep up.
June 28, 2015 at 3:56pm
And the ants. Oh the humanity.
 June 28, 2015 at 3:55pm
I like North Carolina. Good people everywhere. Why can’t the darn sharks go to New Jersey or New York. Lots of diversity and a much greater international menu.
June 28, 2015 at 3:50pm
Sharks are grey, beavers are brown, and bears are black. The racism is obvious.