User Profile: purecolorartist

purecolorartist

Member Since: September 22, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [1] November 19, 2014 at 1:59pm

    I like this shorter version better:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1-6mcg9_J8

  • [1] November 18, 2014 at 7:05pm

    Things are about to change soon, you global warming kooks. There has been no global warming for over 18 years. Soon science truth will triumph. (CO2 is not a pollutant – get that through your thick heads).

    Responses (1) +
  • November 18, 2014 at 4:56pm

    That’s what you get when you mix socialism with capitalism – crony capitalism. That’s pretty much the definition of crony capitalism.

  • November 16, 2014 at 5:42pm

    This was back from 2007 – no wonder I couldn’t remember specifics:
    http://www.wnd.com/2007/12/45294/

  • [5] November 16, 2014 at 2:22pm

    I have done my homework on CAIR. They are always on the side of the Muslim terrorists. I just remember something about Savage vs CAIR early on that I was referring to. Can’t remember the specifics, but it illustrated that they were on the side of the terrorists.

  • [26] November 16, 2014 at 1:38pm

    CAIR has always been a terrorist group in my book. Just ask one Michael Savage for one. Take a look at their history.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] November 16, 2014 at 1:17pm

    I don’t know if this short video has been posted on the Blaze, but it helps explain Grubering:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1-6mcg9_J8

  • [4] November 16, 2014 at 1:14pm

    Grubering explains a lot in this administration. Grubering is this administration. I first heard the word Grubering this morning, and I am going to use it from here on out. It was in regards to Climate Change that I heard about it (it fits):
    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/11/16/new-term-grubering-and-how-it-applies-to-climate-alarmism/
    You can define most of the actions of this Admin as Grubering.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] June 9, 2014 at 9:09pm

    I wonder how he got it there…don’t see it answered in his FAQs. It must have been a tough landing. For Google Earth fans, here’s the location: 45°24’28.99″ N 123°00’28.12″ W

  • June 9, 2014 at 1:22am

    Before you agree with the president, you might want to take a look at this, along with a host of other stuff on WUWT:

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/06/07/noaa-shows-the-pause-in-the-u-s-surface-temperature-record-over-nearly-a-decade/

  • [1] June 1, 2014 at 10:45pm

    So when will Obama realize that CO2 is not pollution?
    So when will Obama realize that CO2 is not carbon?
    Same with the main stream media…

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] May 24, 2014 at 10:56pm

    I hope he wasn’t an NRA member. I doubt if any of these mass shooters were…

    Responses (1) +
  • May 12, 2014 at 10:54am

    That’s why I quit real golf.

  • May 11, 2014 at 2:32am

    I never watch these “reunion videos from deployments” They make me a little ill. When I returned from Vietnam on an ammunition ship with 250 men and 15 officers, there were about 7 people on the pier to greet us. And they were not all happy greeters. Just sayin…

    Responses (1) +
  • May 4, 2014 at 9:44am

    It was funnier than her sit-com. = Funniest presentation at the dinner.

  • April 24, 2014 at 11:35pm

    I wish someone could summarize why common core is bad. I keep seeing that common core is bad, but there are never 1,2,3 reasons why…
    Do they teach agenda 21 is good? show where, etc…

    Responses (1) +
  • April 21, 2014 at 2:06am

    To me the first glaring error was the statement, not the graphics. Astronauts travel over 17,000 mph and the fastest jet pilots fly faster than a speeding bullet:
    “A pistol bullet travels pretty fast at about 80-900 MPH, depending on the gun. A 9MM bullet travels at about 681.8 MPH. A rifle bullet travels faster, at 400 to 3,300 miles per hour depending on the rife. A Winchester .270 Rifle Bullet travels about 1,924 miles per hour. But that’s still not fast enough to shoot down the fastest jet, the SR-71 Blackbird, which travels at 2,193 mph!”

    Responses (1) +
  • April 6, 2014 at 8:24pm

    With the contact information in the bag also, why go to the police? I would have contacted the owner and arranged a deal. After all a reward is negotiable.

  • April 3, 2014 at 2:21am

    If Sarah was in office, this wouldn’t be an issue:
    (sorry for the long post fronWUWT, but it’s important):
    Alaska Squeeze: Washington continues to squeeze the oil industry in Alaska, which once provided 10% of the oil consumed by the US. Washington’s policy threatens the Alaskan pipeline. At its peak of 1988, the throughput of the pipeline averaged 2,032,928 bbl. per day. In 2013, the average was 534,480 bbl. per day, a drop of almost 74%. If volume drops to about 300,000 bbl. per day the pipeline will freeze and cannot be restarted. By law, once it stops, this valuable national asset would have to be disassembled.
    By continuing to squeeze oil production, Washington is squeezing the budget of Alaska, which depends heavily on royalties from oil. Washington is preventing development the Coastal Plain (ANWR), the National Petroleum Reserve, Indian Lands, and hobbling development of the Chukchi Sea OCS work by Shell. In contrast, Russian is proceeding aggressively with its development of the oil reserves in its portion the Chukchi Sea. One joint ventures includes Shell. Among the Russian fields being explored is one about 40 to 50 miles from Shell’s US leaseholds and about 150 miles from the Russian coast.
    US recoverable resources are estimated to be 40 Billion barrels of oil. Congress must decide if a tiny portion of ANWR can be developed, the balance is under the control of the Administration. The Administration refused to permit a 3-D survey of ANWR.

  • February 2, 2014 at 1:55pm

    Climate change prediction:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWmbuKSWLDE

123 To page: Go