User Profile: Purple Pinto

Member Since: November 30, 2010


  • [5] May 8, 2016 at 2:19pm

    Troll much?

  • [8] May 8, 2016 at 2:15pm

    Jesus was biggest on following his Father’s commands.

  • [7] May 8, 2016 at 2:14pm

    Does the phrase ‘Salt in the wound’ mean anything to you? The media killed the possibilities for the best candidate in our lifetime precisely when we needed him, and you ask this in your tone of snark?

  • January 17, 2016 at 2:32pm


    I’m afraid you are twisting terms again. Here’s the legal definition of involuntary servitude. Forcing a business owner to perform services against his or her will could indeed fall under this definition.

  • January 17, 2016 at 2:12pm

    The ‘choice’ they were faced with results in yet another example of a few selfish individuals ruining it for many.

    “This gay activist couple hold their own marriage secondary to the activism they hold more dear.
    How can you start your married life by destroying someone else’s livelihood? It sounds like a dark and depressing way to live.”

    Well said, excellent point. It’s not about their own celebration of love and commitment. It’s about an agenda. I find that evil.

  • [-1] January 17, 2016 at 2:02pm

    No, again. Sexist bigotry does not cover your sexual behavior. It’s a phrase you’ve created to demean the party who follows their faith on the teachings about the homosexual lifestyle. If fact, your behavior is bigotry. Look at these definitions:

    intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.

    By demeaning and shaming the Christian for their beliefs, you are the bigot. No one said we all have to agree. No one said they hate the sinner, just that they don’t condone the sin.

    sexism definition. The belief that one sex (usually the male) is naturally superior to the other and should dominate most important areas of political, economic, and social life. Sexist discrimination in the United States in the past has denied opportunities to women in many spheres of activity.

    See? No references to sexual behavior. Only gender. Result? A made up term on your part with the intent to shame.

    Lastly, your final comment that Muslims don’t tend to be so into the ‘filthy lucre’ whatever that is?? I beg you, try and hold a homosexual wedding ceremony at a mosque. See how far you get. Your argument is void.

  • January 17, 2016 at 1:33pm

    Just makes me shake my head. You know what I find the most perplexing about the typical leftist? Not the campaign strategist or the head community instigators, but the garden variety liberal, the ones who follow said ‘heads and strategists’ See, they’re all supposed to be these intellectuals. Educated in the public school system by their socially engineered programs and curricula from K on up to a bachelors or masters. One would think these should be the most intelligent folks on the planet. Why is it these people are so naive about the human condition? Why do they not ‘get’ what typically motivates and drives humanity?

    My theory? Through all their education, they are taught to think and believe that they are the fortunate (true), and the elite (not so much). That they need to reach out and help their fellow human. (good intention) however in doing so, they fail to see their own humanity and flaws. They place themselves about the great unwashed, yet truly believe they aren’t. Why do I say this? Because instead of allowing the ‘great unwashed’ the liberty and freedom to make their own choices, they are going to form programs and regulations to save them. Failing to see their own human limitations, and the inherent program limitations that come from being created and run by flawed humans.

    Who is committing these gun crimes? Is it the guns and access to them that needs ‘fixing’ or the people? Doh! It’s the people. Hello!!?

  • [-1] January 16, 2016 at 5:46pm

    But this wasn’t refusing to do business with a couple because of their sexual orientation. It was refusing to hold a wedding ceremony for the homosexual couple. They were free to hold their reception there, rehearsal dinner, etc. Simply not the portion that directly violates the owner’s religious beliefs.

  • [2] January 16, 2016 at 5:26pm

    Sexist bigotry? I think you have your terms a bit confused here. A sexist would be someone who discriminates based upon the gender of the individual. Gender is a fact of nature. It is not a sexual behavior.

    Your lack of respect for a couple’s Christian religious beliefs shows a huge element of bigotry on your own part. So the world is to accept you and your beliefs, but not in the reverse? No. That’s not how it works.

    You do not require a Muslim butcher to process your hog. You don’t require an Orthodox Jew to cook you a cheeseburger. A devout Catholic doctor to perform your abortion. Why would you storm into a Christian’s home and demand they hold your wedding ceremony? They haven’t told you they wouldn’t serve you because you were homosexuals. They have told you they cannot host a celebration ceremony for something their religion does not condone. You’re welcome to have your party here afterward, but we can’t participate in something we cannot condone. Got it? Would you have the gall to ask this of a Mosque? Of course not. How overbearing and presumptuous can you be?

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] June 29, 2015 at 8:21am

    Wow. So the goal I see behind this campaign is to keep everyone in an ultra heightened sense of awareness of their differences and an ultra heightened state of sensitivity. ALL of the responsibility for acceptance and assimilation lies with the non-minority person. This scenario paints a picture of the minority immigrant person as this fragile, hypersensitive party that is owed some special treatment. Interesting. Oh, and don’t mistake the message here folks; it is wrong to expect these immigrants to assimilate to OUR culture.

    So let me get this straight. When I as an anglo saxon female travel the globe and perhaps decide to take up residence elsewhere, I now have license to behave like a hypersensitive prima donna and not expect ANY different treatment from the native population?

    Wow. When I was growing up and moving around, I moved into a couple places where I was the minority. It was hard at times, especially in the last town that was rather cliquey. Carrying around this chart, I would have had the attitude that I was entitled to have a permanent chip on my shoulder and underlying hatred for those who said ANYTHING to me at all that acknowledged my origin. These folks that made up this list HAVE to be smarter than this. They HAVE to be. This is encouraging division and racism, while enabling childish behavior and expectations on the part of the immigrant. Humans are humans. They recognize difference. Get over it!!

  • [8] November 17, 2014 at 2:31pm

    People, please. The color of the man is not important. Trash comes in all colors, my own color included. He’s simply a greedy, dishonest creep.

    Responses (2) +
  • [29] September 11, 2014 at 2:53pm

    @sosorryforyou: DO NOT begin to think you are speaking for me or the majority of conservative Americans when you utter such drivel. Americans want their politicians to work together? Not if it means ‘compromising’ with the likes of Reid, Pelosi, McCain, Schumer, Feinstein and the rest of the liars. Working with such statists is exactly what we don’t want or need.

    What Americans truly want is more honorable men and women who stand for what is right, despite popular opinion. Cruz fits that bill. Now if we could just get our political strategists to stop acting like Boehners and listen to intelligent minds like David Horowitz, we might actually win an election or two.

  • [1] March 30, 2013 at 4:25pm

    Exactly!! ABC is to modern day as the Pharisees were to Christ’s time. They were trying to trap the truth teller. Christ showed us how to thwart this. Do not get into the gutter with the trash. Stop them in their tracks. You won’t win them over and you’ll only get yourself covered in their mire.

  • March 17, 2013 at 11:41am

    What a shame you don’t understand this important demographic – real men and what conservative women want. You’re left ******* and moaning with your other testosterone overdosed, under educated buddies degrading and disrespecting the opposite sex. The one that would keep you satiated and intrigued had you the least bit of understanding and respect.

    Conservative women appreciate real men. As for the liberal women? Anyone who is worried about appealing to ‘all’ is nothing more than a sell out.

  • February 29, 2012 at 9:00am

    We shall each be judged for our sins. God doesn’t grade sins as Really Bad, Sorta Bad, Not so Bad, etc. A sin is a sin. My gossiping may be seen as harshly as a killer. Hard to wrap our human brains around that concept, Knowing this, that even the priest denying the communion is an imperfect human, we are faced with a difficult task. Is it denying sacrament to a mocking sinner? Do you believe she should have asked the priest for forgiveness through confession first? The priest is but another human. Isn’t this woman’s soul and relationship in the hands of Jesus himself? Are we sanctifying our act of communion to deny it to a person blatantly and unrepentantly sinning or are we being judges when it’s not our place to do so?

    Responses (1) +
  • October 4, 2011 at 10:07pm

    On the nose, Ghost. Former waitress/bartender myself.

    It’s a stereotype, but for the most part, very true.

  • November 30, 2010 at 11:44am

    @Ummah Gumma, (love the Pink Floyd in your name!:)

    The ‘you lie!’ guy is Joe Wilson. Representative from South Carolina and re-elected in November. I honestly think without the threat of losing his standing in the house and committees, he still has the hudzpah.

    Nigel Farage is my newest hero!!