User Profile: Pushfoot

Pushfoot

Member Since: October 19, 2011

Comments

  • [1] November 30, 2014 at 10:59am

    My name, my nickname, my middle name, my daughter’s first name and her nickname all came up as liberal. But my husband (the proud Dem) and my sons have purely conservative names, and my daughter’s middle name (which is more typically a male name) came up conservative as well.

  • [2] November 7, 2014 at 12:05am

    Mexico released him last week, though, not after the election.

  • [2] October 30, 2014 at 11:10pm

    Suppose folks just call him “yellow”?

  • [13] October 30, 2014 at 10:21pm

    It’s okay, though, because you can just rebuild on top of it until one doesn’t sink.

    I just want to… sing!

  • [12] October 16, 2014 at 12:32am

    Rodriguez, the moderator says that the rules he has been shown say that there should be no fan. He doesn’t say that the rules don’t mention a fan, but that they specify that there should be none. He says that Crist has asked to be allowed a fan (doesn’t say that permission was granted, but I suspect that Rodriguez himself gave it,) and then says, “Somehow there is a fan there…”

    Doesn’t the job of moderator include rule enforcement? If he gave permission without reviewing the rules, then say, “I have made a mistake; fans are not allowed by the rules, and your opponent does not agree to relax the rules,” and rescind the permission. Scott may have backed down when he shouldn’t have, but his objections weren’t even fairly presented. The moderator is the one who really screwed up.

  • February 11, 2014 at 1:15pm

    I agree with you. I was neither popular nor unpopular, but I do remember being laughed at for giving a valentine to a boy the rest of my class snubbed. My shame is that I didn’t keep standing up for him when they called me his girlfriend.
    I’m sorry you have that sort of pain in your memories. And I wish you a peaceful, happy Valentine’s Day, not because I’m supposed to, but because I want to.

  • February 11, 2014 at 1:05pm

    When I was in elementary school, they used to send home a list of the children in the class and we were told to bring one for EVERY child on the list. Valentine’s Day at this age isn’t about romance; it’s about friendship and kindness. Especially in Kindergarten, we want our children to treat each other the way they want to be treated themselves (we used to call that the Golden Rule.)

    When I was in the 6th grade — with the same “everyone gets one” rule — one boy in my class got only ONE valentine. From me. He took the time that day to hand-draw me a card with a pair of horses on it, because I was willing to include him. Is one person leaving a child out “bullying?” What about an entire class?

    In Kindergarten, no names on the cards means your child doesn’t have to ask the teacher to read the names on the envelopes so they are distributed right. It’s about saving time and frustration.

    Coincidentally, at my daughter’s elementary school, no edible items are allowed to be sent, and if they are, they will be confiscated. Our local news covered some school in Colorado with that rule, but totally ignored the same thing in our own area.

  • October 25, 2013 at 1:14pm

    I have read this story with horror, wondering how our country has come to this point. How could officers justify the seizure of a reporter’s private papers on an unrelated search warrant? And then I thought of all of the episodes of crime-fighting television programs that I have seen where I have cheered for the brilliant characters who have done precisely this; they find some little thing and take it to a sympathetic judge who signs the warrant, and they search the bad guy’s home and find __ on his computer, in his basement, in his video collection, whatever. And the world is saved from another bad guy.

    I suddenly realize that I have been conditioned to look on this sort of “creativity” as heroic, and I am sick at heart.

  • June 27, 2013 at 1:09am

    “…it is because [of] people like you who are gaming the system are adding to that backlog…”
    Sorry, Becket Adams and The Blaze. Your addition of “of” to the sentence makes it grammatically incorrect.

  • May 28, 2013 at 1:01am

    We moved to a different state when my oldest son was in 3rd grade. In one state, he had been in a special class for gifted students; in the other, I was told he didn’t qualify for their one-day-a-week gifted education program. In the gifted class, the teacher was like this one, willing to accept “outside of the box” answers. I often volunteered in the classroom and sometimes was asked to check math homework. It was often exciting to see the ways the children explored possibilities — and their answers were usually right.
    After the move, I was ill and unable to volunteer. When my son brought home one of his first math tests, and his score was considerably lower than was his history, I checked out the “incorrect” answers. I was STUNNED. They were all questions with arrays of items, and it would ask him to “circle two-thirds” of them. Circling four columns out of six was boring, so he had circled three items here, skipped a couple, took this one… He had circled 2/3 of the items, just in a somewhat random style. He had done it on every fraction-of-an-array question on the test. When I asked the teacher about it, she said, “He knew I would not accept that style of answer.”
    On every test after that, there was at least one of these types of questions, and right up to the final, his were marked as incorrect. (And this is my “follow the rules” kid, not my “rules are made to be broken” one.)
    I still wish I’d stood up to her, or had them change his class.

  • April 29, 2013 at 11:30am

    It is too bad the young woman didn’t say, “No, it isn’t an African-American person, it is a black figure, a shadow of human potential. Maybe you didn’t notice that I didn’t paint it in a natural skin tone, but in a generic black. I don’t think your objection is to the character on the quilt, it is to our incidental referral to it as ‘the black person.’ Your race does not own the color, nor the word, black. Get over yourself, and stop looking for offense where none is intended.”

  • April 25, 2013 at 11:53am

    Booger71, the court case establishing the requirement of reading a suspect his rights (the right to remain silent is Constitutional — the right against self-incrimination) prior to interrogation was in 1963. The “public safety exception” was created in 1980. That was essentially this: the subject was seen with a gun in a store, and was captured in the store without the gun. The arresting officer saw his empty holster and asked, “Where is the gun?” The subject pointed, and the gun was found hidden behind product on the shelves. Then when they went to court, the attorney claimed that asking the whereabouts of the gun was an unlawful interrogation and tried to get the “confession” inherent in pointing to the weapon thrown out, because he hadn’t been read his rights before the officer asked. The courts determined that the question was asked as a matter of public safety; the subject could have passed the weapon to a second shooter who could either shoot the arresting officer or others.

  • April 23, 2013 at 8:30pm

    Okay, I posted my reply about the sleeves without watching the video; I guess the screen shot I saw was the boy wearing a sweat-jacket over the shirt. Sorry about that!

  • April 23, 2013 at 8:26pm

    The still picture in the video frame shows someone in the tee with long sleeves.

  • November 15, 2012 at 8:10pm

    Actually, 5 votes out of 255 voters is 1.96%.