User Profile: PzV

Member Since: July 10, 2011


  • October 27, 2014 at 9:17pm

    Yes, you are right, it will end really bad for them when they show up to my house.

  • [2] October 27, 2014 at 9:02pm

    uhm, the cops were really nice. It will be a lot different when our currency collapses. It is not a question of if, only when. I say that and it is true and there are hard times coming that most people cannot imagine. But it is no excuse how this man was treated. It was a ******** fine to begin with and has no credit in court of true law. Like our founders said, the ownership of private property is supreme.

  • [-1] October 26, 2014 at 8:13pm

    It’s nice, but you know, Jeb Bush, all the rest, they are wolves acting like sheep. I will not vote for any of them. This is why a liberal republican can never win in this country. If you think you have the government behind you, you are like suck a nice sucker.

  • January 15, 2014 at 9:12pm


  • January 15, 2014 at 9:03pm

    Common nonsense, why are so many American ladies fat?

    Responses (1) +
  • December 4, 2011 at 3:22am

    People are finally waking up to the fact that holding their nose and voting for the nominated politician in their party has not worked. I have and I am disappointed that I have thrown my vote away over the last 20 years voting for the establishment candidate “because they can win”.

    Remember the definition of insanity? Look it up and never forget it!

  • December 4, 2011 at 3:13am

    Wow, for a nobul! you’re re(tum is full of it.

    Here is the bottom line. YOU think the Gingtch is great!? Here is the truth. Gingrich, Romney, Perry, Huntsman, and Obama are all the same. The end result is the same. The difference is semantics. It is the speed of the train taking us down the same track. The destination is no different.

    So if one of these is selected, then why should I vote for them in the general election? The result is the same. If we are going to insist on destroying our country, it is better to do it sooner rather than later. For this gives a better opportunity to return to our former values.

    I know there are millions out there like me. If a RINO is selected for a republican presidential candidate, I will be voting for Obama – as will millions of other Americans that really care about this country.

  • November 12, 2011 at 2:37am

    A$$ hole to A$$ hole, You may have studied. But what you have learned is completely inadequate. It is quite clear you do not work in a high stress job where results are more important than efforts.

    What you don’t understand, and probably never will, is that the 9-9-9 plan helps those making 70,000+ per year immediately. Are you not in that category?

    More importantly, it helps businesses! And this is key as it helps everyone. It cannot be repeated enough. To help business is to hire people. Cain’s plan therefore creates more jobs and more contributing to the tax base.

    It is American as apple pie to think that if I strive hard that someday I can become rich. The democrat plan is against this. But to encourage people to make more money by keeping what they make (i.e. a flat tax of some percentage) is both fair and motivates people to make more, thus creating job opportunities.. This is very good for the economy.

    This results in a demand for employees. Then businesses compete for employees and wages increase and the unemployment rate decreases. Why this is not understood by the educated elite is mind boggling.

    So it looks like you need to study some more. I would recommend to you that the best course of study is to start your own business. Then you will quickly learn the principles that drive our economy to success or failure. But I gather you are an academic and would never submit yourself to such a trivial pursuit.

  • November 9, 2011 at 11:22pm

    @ BS FeCe

    “The Tea Party are weekend warriors. Wanna be movement.”

    Well yes, people in the tea party actually have jobs and pay taxes. Did you miss this?

  • November 9, 2011 at 10:46pm


    I have been in management for some time now. I have also been involved in three court cases, we won them all. But I can also tell you that there have been numerous times where we have settled with a complainer. It has never been a case where we thought we were in the wrong; rather, it was far cheaper to pay them out and sign an agreement to our liking than to fight it in court.

    The evidence I see up to this point substantiates what I see happening at our company. It is a cost benefit analysis every time. So these claims prove nothing. It is completely he said, she said and I have to say there are plenty of people out there quite willing to sue a company over nothing in order to get a settlement.

    If these women really had a case, they would have sued many years ago for 6 figures or more, not the measly one year wages we are reading about!!!!

    Come on guys, try and use some logical thinking here. If Cain really did such bad things, there would be significant judgments against him and his company. The fact that these women took small payouts and did not sue clearly indicates that they are gold diggers with no case at all.

  • November 8, 2011 at 10:30pm

    Ha Ha, Nice try. KIDCHARLEMAGNE!

    It is obvious that you are the one who is confused. You have much to learn KID. When you have learned and can post sensibly ( in several years if that ) try again!

    Until then….

    And no!, I do not support Cain. So that is a non-starter for all you trolls out there.

  • November 8, 2011 at 10:15pm

    Well yes, Football Lady, thank you for pointing out the obvious. But can we elect a candidate with similar values?

  • November 8, 2011 at 9:57pm

    I meant to say in the second paragraph that “Perry and Romney are RINO’S” – not Perry and Cain.

    the greatest thing about Cain is he tells it like it is.

  • November 8, 2011 at 9:45pm

    For all those sorry a$$ Romney and Perry supporters out there that are salivating at the demise of Cain, I have news for you.

    If Cain fails, Perry and Romney will not pick up their support. See, the problem is that Perry and Cain are RINO’S !!!!!! So Cain support goes elsewhere.

    And if Perry or Romney get the nomination, I can guarantee that there will be millions of conservatives that will either not vote or vote for a third party candidate!

    It has come to that. The difference between Obama, Perry, and Romney is simply semantics. They are all on the same track to the same destination. The only difference is the speed of the locomotive taking us there.

    So if you have character and want to save the country, then vote for a candidate who will change the direction of the country back to the constitution ( and no that candidate is not Ron Paul ).

    Go Sarah Palin!

    Responses (5) +
  • November 4, 2011 at 1:24am

    @ ENCIDIOT (Nov 2 3:21)

    It is quite obvious you are not paying attention.

    Watching CNN, ABC, CBS, reading the Los Angeles times New York times, etc. is clearly insufficient to gather the necessary information in order to make informed comments.

  • October 29, 2011 at 12:19am

    @ Turkey13

    Your handle describes you well. You are so ignorant it boggles the mind!

    If the national guard were to do that, there would be a lot of dead people real fast. They would back off as their casualties and public opinion against them would rapidly mount.

    When they come to my house, people will die.

  • [1] October 24, 2011 at 11:33pm

    Amen Drippy Fawcett!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    And for you women out there, deciding that is is OK to be 50 – 200 lbs overweight and your husband should still be attracted to you is ridiculous. Much of the problem is the females themselves and not trying to be attractive for their husbands. This is usually the number 1 or 2 emotional need of men – for their wife to be attractive to them. Yet women consistently refuse to meet this need claiming as their excuse that they must be liberated, independent women. I argue that 90% of the pornography problem is the woman herself.

  • October 23, 2011 at 10:25pm

    Yep, Obama, Romney, and Perry are all on the same track. only difference is whether we will be traveling in a freight train or an express train if any of those are elected.

    I used to think that I was throwing away my vote if I cast it for the conservative candidate knowing his chances of winning were small. Now I realize, that all these guys are headed to the same destination and not voting for the conservative regardless of his chances is truly throwing away your vote, your country, and the future for our children.

  • October 23, 2011 at 1:16am

    …and to clarify, if either Perry or Romney is the Republican nominee vs Obama, I will vote for a third party candidate or not at all!

  • October 23, 2011 at 1:14am

    I will not be voting for either Perry or Romney !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

    Bottom line, is the direction they would take this country is fundamentally no different than the track we are on now. The only difference is semantics – the speed of the train going down the track. The destination is the same!

    Responses (1) +