As I’ve said, everyone is “racist.” It’s not necessarily a bad thing. We’re hard wired to notice what doesn’t blend it. It’s a survival instinct.
Anyone not buying into the left’s agenda has been called racist for having differing views. These people are tired of it. So, is there “racism” behind Trump’s success? Damn straight! The majority of people who don’t buy into the left’s lies are tired of being bullied into a corner.
 May 4, 2016 at 10:27am
Not to get ugly, but America is already dead. I would argue that NOTHING we can realistically expect the average American to endure would fix the mess we are in (the masses would revolt if we stopped the bread and circuses). The RNC has proven they are pretty much one-and-the-same with the DNC. So, putting up another republican stooge who will do little or nothing to change course isn’t a “fix.”
Sometimes the only thing that will straighten someone out is an immense amount of pain. Perhaps it’s time for America to feel the pain so we’ll wake up from the fantasy and start dealing with reality.
 May 4, 2016 at 10:14am
Exactly. The action was dumb, but anyone using the photo should have examined it closely. It’s not illegal to expose yourself to a camera. Had that same student distributed the picture, then he’d be responsible. Instead, others did the job of distribution because they didn’t pay attention to details.
[-1] May 4, 2016 at 8:00am
Frankly, I’m glad he’s out.
I’m not saying Trump is what America needs, but this is a screaming message to the RNC that THE PEOPLE do not support their agenda anymore. Conservatives are tired of RINOs and other establishment-favored proxies being put in power just to keep us going down the wrong road.
Honestly, if the RNC put up another RINO for office, I would just as soon have Hillary as president. If we’re going to kill the country, let’s not make it a long, painful death.
Shhh, let the idiot who wrote this article think they are smart....
Pretty much. You only weigh about as much as four cubic feet of dirt. Hardly enough to cause anything unless you did get all 7 billion people in the same spot.
So, what is the purpose or agenda behind releasing this unimportant fact?
The idiots want to dramatize what an effect people can have on the planet in hopes of convincing us that our collective actions could be dangerous and must be regulated.
According to Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, which is true?
- Jumping up is… jumping “up” a foot or so.
- Jumping up is… pushing “down” the earth and universe away from you (briefly).
Surprise! Both are true. Because it’s all relative. There is no single way to view motion.
And it is a reminder how unimaginably weak gravity is. Though it appears strong to us who are stuck onto this large earth, it is actually the weakest force in standard physics.
 April 21, 2016 at 12:17pm
So, government surveillance on the American public (city camera) spots a person in need and nothing is done to intervene before something bad happens.
"A family member of an assault victim is questioning the state of humanity after her cousin was knocked unconscious, "
There can be no humanity in an area in the wild where only animals roam.
Get used to it or get out of the cities.
 April 8, 2016 at 12:47pm
I’m sure she has enough dirt on BHO and his cronies that she’ll bring the whole house down with her if they don’t make it go away.
 April 7, 2016 at 3:50pm
That’s the key. NOT ALL VACCINES are necessary. I’d never take a NEW vaccine until a few years have passed and I see what the real numbers are for adverse reactions.
When I got my vaccinations, they were spread out over a couple of years and started at an older age. Now they want to give kids lots of vaccinations in a short time. I don’t buy for a second that it’s “perfectly safe.” The numbers don’t lie, and you really aren’t harming a child by being more conservative on how much is injected into their bodies at one time.
 April 6, 2016 at 12:03pm
Wow. A college education and she didn’t know about using CONDOMS?
I don’t know many people who would be pregnant again within 6 months of just having a kid.
What college student doesn't either how to say "NO" or to cross their legs?
April 6, 2016 at 8:14am
We could start by reforming the tax code so businesses have an incentive to locate/relocate manufacturing jobs here in the USA. I think special incentives should exist for companies that use only “American Made” throughout the production process (for things that can be obtained in the USA). Every company that shuts down impacts at least 10 other businesses that get business from them.
I know people fixate on paying your “fair share” but if you create more jobs and stimulate economic growth with tax cuts for people who create the jobs, it’s a long-term win for everyone.
Government got it’s money by taxing imports and exports. The whole “global economy” BS is why we have to tax individuals and businesses at ever increasing rates. There is no way a company should be more profitable by sending work to or buying products from 3rd world economies to sell here in the USA. Trade tariffs counteracted this economic imbalance. Without them, it’s a race to the bottom.
 April 5, 2016 at 2:30pm
Actually, it’s one camera and a mirror. If you pay attention, you can catch a “blip” where two videos were “spliced” together. He must have filmed himself doing this multiple times and picked clips where the ball starts/ends in the right location to look seamless.
 April 5, 2016 at 10:31am
Both sides have a point in this debate.
Most companies CAN afford to pay more than they currently pay workers. Most set pay scales at the lowest the market will bear (before it costs them too much in worker quality).
However, not ALL companies are in that situation. A lot of businesses struggle with the cost of labor (including benefits) in the overall cost of marketing a product or service.
Right now, we’ve driven the good paying jobs away from America, and you really can’t make a living on low-pay jobs. So long as there’s a distorted supply/demand curve, it’s not in an employer’s interest to pay you more.
What we need is more job creation by bringing businesses back to the USA instead of subsidizing/rewarding them to go overseas.
Still, $15/hour for entry-level work IS NOT going to improve things for the nation. It will just further incentivise companies getting by with fewer people or just leaving the USA entirely (if they can).
"you really can't make a living on low-pay jobs."
Low paying jobs, such as Naquasia's chosen career path, have never been intended to be more than entry-level jobs where young people can start to build employable skill-sets. They aren't meant to be lived off of as a primary source of income.
Whether the company can pay more or not is not the issue. These yahoos agreed to work for the amount offered. They work for the company, the company does not work for them. If they don't like what they get paid, they should quit and go somewhere else. If they can't do better somewhere else then they have reached their fair market value and do not deserve more. If they want more than their market value then they need to increase their market value by bettering themselves with trade training or college education. Forcing the businesses to pay more just makes the business owners leave for a better market or go out of business where the opportunity cost of the product is already maximized.
 April 1, 2016 at 12:39pm
[-2] March 30, 2016 at 2:06pm
I think it’s an idea long-past doing. There’s many people who can’t drive but NEED the mobility a car affords. Autonomous vehicles would be a huge blessing and a Hell of a lot safer than these same people choosing to drive either without a license or with impairments severe enough to make them a danger to others.
There have long been such things as mass transit, handicap-assistance transportation, taxis, Super-Ride, and now Uber to assist those who cannot drive but need mobility...so your point about this being to serve people is pretty pointless. Further, there are laws that already regulate insurance for autos, make it illegal to drive without a license, and make it illegal to engage in distracted driving...the big reason people still engage in such activity is that these laws are not uniformly enforced--not at all. We have police engaged in such absolutely ridiculous activities as responding to idiots selling "loose cigarettes" and myriad other non-law enforcement activities. You can google and find police being used for the most absurd things--rather than simple law enforcement. When more than 9000 American citizens are killed in traffic accidents each year due to illegal immigrants driving on the roads, we have some very simple things we can do to make things safer--just enforce the laws of this country.
Rather than further reducing individual responsibility and creating an even less responsible and more PC society, we should address the underlying causes--not serve to cater to it and foster ever greater problems. Autonomous vehicles will not lead to reduced problems...
 March 29, 2016 at 1:53pm
Ironically, that very show proved how throwing money at the jobs issue doesn’t work. So long as the money flowed, people were put to work. Once it was cut off, they lost their jobs because the employers couldn’t absorb them.
You don’t need government funding jobs. You need an atmosphere that stimulates job creation by the ones who create the jobs.
Which argues for tax cuts ... not increased government spending. Government spending (which is 100% debt) does stimulate the economy for awhile for some. Mostly military and highway contractors.
 March 24, 2016 at 1:05pm
Or maybe Christians are so tired of being bullied and preyed upon in a society that claims to value religious freedom and freedom of expression that someone not afraid to fight back against the real bullies (the establishment and PC crowd) draws their support.
Bullied and preyed upon? Give me a break. A couple of bakers getting fined for not making a cake does not add up to mass persecution. You need to go to the middle east to see real persecution, maybe then, you would stop whining because one gay person can marry another gay person is not persecution.
Foot, shin, knee, thigh, other foot, shin, knee, thigh. Point of hip, point of other hip. Fingers 1-5, other hand 1 -5.Elbow, other elbow. All bone hits, all with .22 short. Repeat....
Of course this would take time, so it could be used in questioning.
[-9] March 18, 2016 at 12:12pm
Surely you jest.
Only parents who bring their kids up on Christian values must be sent to Parenting 101.
 March 18, 2016 at 8:02am
Voting for the least evil is still voting for evil. This is why the “establishment” has gotten away with murder for so long.
The Democrat party is gone; the GOP has sold its sole to the Chamber of commerce, what the people are asking is when do I get representation, this is not about your guy or my guy it's about the country, jobs and open borders. The American people need a common goal but with current divide I do not see that happening.
"let God tell you who to vote for"..? really?
God gave us our agency so that we could make those decisions. He doesn't tell us who to vote for He let's us make that decision and live with the consequences. He gives us the ability to think for ourselves and to make up our mind and then we can take that decision to Him for confirmation, or rejection, but ultimately it is our job, our decision.
Staying at home this Nov. means you MUST be a Hillary supporter.
Hillary wants illegals to have amnesty to vote for her. Trump will deport them and keep them out.
Hillary wants to keep ObamaCare. Trump wants to repeal it and replace it with the free market.
Hillary wants to hike taxes even higher. Trump wants to cut taxes.
Hillary wants to double spending and the national dept to buy votes. Trump wants to cut spending, pay off the national debt, and grow the tax base as Reagan did.
Hillary wants to kill babies, with taxpayer money. Trump will defund Planned Butcherhood.
Hillary wants the EPA to kill the coal and oil industry forever. Trump wants to discard the EPA and make the coal and oil industry great again.
Hillary wants to take away all our guns. Trump wants to enforce the 2nd amendment.
Hillary wants the feds to mal-educate in schools. Trump wants to get rid 100% of all federal control over education, and return that 10th amendment power to the states and localities.
Hillary will keep the ruling political class machine funded with our tax dollars. Trump will completely destroy the donor class, the lobbyist class, the government welfare class, the ruling class, the bureaucracy class, the big government class, and the RINOs!!
even if that means holding their noses and opting for “the least heathen of the two heathen.” Just so I understand is this heathen in the case of Jim Baker, Tammy Faye Baker or Jimmy Swagger?
Yes, but a no vote for the lesser of two evils is a half a vote for the greater of two evils. One makes it that much easier for the greater of two evils to win when they choose not to vote because they help to reduce the total number of votes needed for one to win.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
If you vote for the lesser of the two evils, you are still voting for evil and you will be judged for it. You should always vote for the best possible candidate, whether they have a chance of winning or not, and then, even if the worst possible candidate wins, the Lord will bless out country more because more people were willing to stand up for what is right.
One or the other will be elected. The proper choice is to minimize the evil if we can't avoid it.