User Profile: R.Waher


Member Since: November 02, 2012


  • [4] June 22, 2014 at 8:33pm

    Not even remotely the same situation. The problem here is political correctness running our lives and constraining our free speech, yet at the same time allowing for “exemptions.” Like for instance, you can say, “All white people are X” but you can’t say “All black people are Y”. Likewise, racial slurs. Some are okay, some aren’t. Why? Why can we say one but not the other? I’d like to see the rationale for this on one of your lefty forums where 90% (hahahaha) of the positions have an intellectual basis… on a subject that’s driven purely by emotion and irrational thinking.

    But hey, you got the obsessed liberal troll to agree with you, so you’ve accomplished that much.

  • April 25, 2014 at 8:48am

    I won’t deny there’s been an effort by the ruling class to get black people under their thumb, but it’s not the same as slapping chains on somebody and making him live in a stable. Get a damn clue and spend your time defending someone who deserves it.

  • April 24, 2014 at 7:00pm

    Okay, guys, I know you’re all eager to defend this guy’s remarks, likely out of a misguided sense of obligation or because you’re actually a liberal hoping to make everyone look bad, but the fact is, we can’t defend these remarks AT ALL.

    The black man would be better off on a plantation? Bundy, you try it, you fat idiot! You try working for some jerkwad who pays you nothing, treats you like an animal, and can beat and abuse you anytime he wants. It’s a deplorable existence and for you to defend this stain on our nation’s history is reprehensible, and every single commenter who tries to defend your remarks is an even bigger idiot than you are for saying them.

    Yes, something has gone horribly wrong with black culture but even implying that blacks would be better off as slaves is utterly reprehensible.

    Responses (2) +
  • May 4, 2013 at 8:37pm

    Stop trying to drive the effort to expose a real coverup into the ground with your insane tinfoil BS please.

  • December 17, 2012 at 7:09pm

    Folks, I’m going to warn everyone right now that while Anonymous may seem to be fighting for a good cause today, tomorrow it’s just as likely to fight for a bad one. Westboro vs. Anonymous is nothing more than a case of bad vs. bad.

  • December 11, 2012 at 2:46pm

    Don’t give him ideas. :(

  • December 11, 2012 at 2:43pm

    So even just having my lights on makes me a racist? Up yours, NAACP.

    This is the kind of world we live in, now. You can’t even exist without committing some unforgivable sin.

    In reply to the post NAACP: Coal is racist

  • December 10, 2012 at 11:19pm

    Great, so erotic fanfics are big sellers now. Maybe I should try to sell my Captain Kirk/Optimus Prime slashfic to Random House.* I could make a killing.

    *I didn’t actually write that. But someone probably did. :(

  • December 8, 2012 at 9:28pm

    Kay, lemme explain something to the libs snickering about Texas taking stimulus money. Let’s say–and for any confused libs, this is a hypothetical example–the Feds tax $100 billion from your state. In a recent stimulus package, they promise you $20 billion for whatever. The Government’s already sucked out $100 billion from your state, and now you have a chance to get a fifth of it back–why the hell wouldn’t you? Oh, but taking that money makes a “hypocrite.”

    Let me propose a different idea. How about the Government only tax your state for $80 billion in the first place, then not bother with the $20 billion in stimulus money, hm? Why don’t we do that?

    Oh, but can’t we do that. Because then the Government couldn’t pick and choose winners. Then the Government couldn’t ride in like a knight in shining armor and save the day. And then the snarky libs couldn’t snark at the state for taking its money back… and that’s the most important thing, isn’t it?

    You stupid libs, you think we aren’t aware of the scam you’re pulling and the no-win scenarios you try to force us into?

  • November 27, 2012 at 1:39am

    While this article is a nice bit of red meat, I’m apprehensive about Putin himself. He’s hardly a champion of freedom. I mean, imagine if this author had laid into Putin in the same manner. I doubt he’d live longer than an hour. And there’s the fact that Putin is trying to re-enact the Cold War by stupidly enabling the very same sort of fanatics who have conducted terrorist attacks on his country to arm themselves with nuclear weapons. Way to play the long game, dumbass. Hope you enjoy seeing a mushroom cloud over Moscow when your “allies” return their gifts to you.

    But, on the other hand, it does make me think. If it takes a government mouthpiece working for a virtual dictator to tell you how it is in America, what the hell does that say about our mainstream media?

  • November 27, 2012 at 1:26am

    Man, I hate it when my power is striped. I much prefer it checkered.

  • November 16, 2012 at 2:12am

    Please, the state of Texas could kick the ass of the entire nation of Mexico. Go on, tell me it ain’t true.

  • November 14, 2012 at 3:43pm

    Beck, I like some of your work, but you’re wrong on this one. We have to send our government a message that we will not simply sit idly by while they steal elections and engage in corruption on a massive scale. What alternative do you propose, sir? The Democrats have almost everything they want. The Presidency, the Senate, shoot, they might even get another judge in the Supreme Court. Next election we might lose the House of Representatives if Boehner keeps screwing things up. How, exactly, will we be able to stop the descent of our nation into despotism, then?

    If we keep trying to work within a system that has been corrupted we will get NOTHING out of it. We need drastic action and we need it now. Man the hell up, Beck.

    Responses (1) +
  • November 14, 2012 at 3:23pm

    Nope, the word RINO is very useful for bashing over the heads of Republicans that don’t have the guts to stand up for the values of their constituents, and McCain is such a man. Yes, every now and then he’ll say something that’ll be really awesome, but we need more than strong words from our political leaders. And I don’t think we should forget that it was thanks to his lackluster campaign that we got Obama in the White House in the first place.

  • November 14, 2012 at 3:44am

    Yeah, what a dirty trick! It’s not like these ads are so over the top that I couldn’t get the impression that there’s something fishy going on with them.

    That was sarcasm.

    Anyway, this is actually kind of hilarious. People like to paint Glenn Beck as a kook, but with this stunt he’s allowed Alex Jones to hoist himself on his own petard and distance himself from him. It’s always important, while discussing a REAL conspiracy, to distance yourself from those who froth at the mouth over imaginary ones.

  • November 12, 2012 at 6:37pm

    What the hell makes you think Obama cares if his guys violate his own executive orders if that’s what he wants them to do? The man’s never respected any law before now, why bother even being consistent with his own orders?

  • November 11, 2012 at 4:28am

    Disclaimer to all newcomers to the Blaze: All white supremacist commenters here are not actual conservatives, but liberals trying to make us all look bad. Please ignore them.

  • November 10, 2012 at 10:34pm

    Right, and what exactly was Barack Obama’s plan, Publius? Oh, right, he didn’t have one, never bothered, never got called on not having one. And even if he did, it’s not like he’d stick to it anyway. Remember his first plan? Cut the deficit in half? Shut down Gitmo? How’d that work out? And how about those foreign policy failures? Yeah, Libya worked out pretty great, too, didn’t it? Maybe the next time you swing by this website, Publius, you might want to be less of a low information commenter.

  • November 7, 2012 at 3:25pm

    Pretty impressive, but unfortunately, as others have noted, it can’t last. Even if Sam can still keep up with the boys at an older age, there’s going to be all the awkwardness involved between the different genders.

  • November 7, 2012 at 3:02pm

    Ron Paul had zero chance of winning. Get over it.