CommentsDisplaying Randolph Phillips's 10 most recent comments.

Play To Win The Game: A Winning GOP Strategy Includes Winning Back Businesses and Voters in Cities

December 8, 2012 at 8:55pm

In reply to FotoChief.

FOTOCHIEF,The republicans do not think it is good form to talk about fraudulent elections and stolen votes. They still have hopes that Karl Rove and Ralph Reed’s hopes to take about a fourth of the black vote will work out for them–some day. Don’t want to criticize a black candidate, or make the poll watching black panthers angry, now do we? Republicans might be called racists, and that would be awful after all that image building with Colin and Condi–who voted democratic in 2008-12. But that was Republican fault, for not reaching out enough, and on and on.

Republicans ran the House in 1996 and Gingrich was Speaker. Bob Dornan, a longtime Conservative California Congressman lost his seat to a hispanic woman by 1000 votes. An investigation revealed that more than 800 illegal aliens had voted, and further investigation showed that 2000 registered voters appeared to be illegals as well according to immigration recorrds, but Gingrich’s House of Representatives seated the hispanic democrat over the conservative male republican. I guess that was early reaching out to the latino democrats. She’s still in the House.
The leadership of the Republican Party did not get bad in just the last few years. It’s been that way since 1989, when the Bush Family took over.
Play To Win The Game: A Winning GOP Strategy Includes Winning Back Businesses and Voters in Cities

December 8, 2012 at 8:35pm

Mr. Giles is another Harvardite, and as I read this article I can see he was saying the kinds of things I believe Mitt Romney believes, understands, and would practice as President. It appeals to the corporate mind, but he is taling about a Rockefeller Republican Party–operate everything on a business model, but politically and every other way about 76% on the liberal side.

Save Big Government, ignore the Constitution, and keep tax rates low. These guys aren’t about to listen to anyone who says we have to bring back our domestic economy to the US from China and elsewhere. He’s not about to say bust the big banks and end corporate takeovers and buyouts.

But he does say we goota go gay and lesbian marriage, abortion, and urban street life. This guy is taling Big Business democrats and big big government–probably even a form of Obamacare. Leave the disster in place, get used to it, and make money and win elections off it. And I hate to say it, most Republicans I know feel the same way. Boehner does, I’m sure, and that is why he’s in Obama’s hands. If Republicans join Buffett, Google, Soros, and court liberal urban constituencies, they will just be democrats.
Does GOP Have ‘No Other Choice But to Push Immigration Reform’? The Party’s Future Could Depend on it

December 8, 2012 at 7:03pm

In reply to GCT.

Boehner and the other congressional leaders are listening to Karl Rove abd the Bush family, who are only interested in electing JeeBBB Bush President in 2016.

If Jeb Bush is the Republican Presidential nominee in 2016, the Republican Party deserves to be beat so bad the party is finished. And I will do my best to make that happen.
Does GOP Have ‘No Other Choice But to Push Immigration Reform’? The Party’s Future Could Depend on it

December 8, 2012 at 6:59pm

This article promotes the idea that Romney lost because he did not do well in the hispanic community because of his anti-amnesty stand. Yet the article itself points out that if he had got all the hispanic votes in , Wisconsin, Iowa, and New Hampshire, Romney would still have lost all three states. To Carry Ohio, Romney would have had to get 78% of the hispanic vote, but he would only have had to carry a few more percentage points of the white blue collar Reagan democrats to carry the state. But Romney made virtually no attempt to get the the Reagan democrats to support him anywhere. He would have carried Michigan if he had mobilized the Reagan Democrats, and maybe Pennsylvania, too.

It is a false argument to claim that Romney’s tough stance on illegal immigration cost him the election, and a deliberate attempt to assist the Bush family’s and Obama’s push for amnesty next year.

Enforce existing laws, enact mandidatory e-verify to discourage employers from hiring illegals, close the borders, prevent illegal services to illegal aliens, and these people will go back to their homelands.. No amnesty, no path to citizenship, no way.
Does GOP Have ‘No Other Choice But to Push Immigration Reform’? The Party’s Future Could Depend on it

December 8, 2012 at 5:59pm

In reply to Marsh626.

This post is essentially right.The Bush Family has run the Republican Party since Reagan left office, and they are neo Rockefeller (liberal ) “Republicans”. Their chief political consultants are Ralph Reed and Karl Rove, and the “Christian Right” among the family’s stanuchest supporters.

The idea that latinos are “religious” and therefore “conservative” and Republicans should chase them is the same argument Reed used for Republicans in a effort to get 25% of the black vote–3% of the national vote–to vote Republican. Reed’s reasoning was that–once you got past Civil Rights and other big government programs–blacks, being “conservative christians” would vote Republlican. Didn’t get then anywhere, even with Colin Powell and Defense and Condi Rice at State–both of whom went Obama in 2008 and 2012. Their argument is just a scam.

The Bush family has been for Amnesty since 1986, just as they are determined to make JeeeBBB the third Bush President. Even now, they’re teaming up with Obama to get amnesty, and sites like The Blaze are helping them out. Is “The Blaze” supporting Bush 3 for President already? Looks like it from these articles.

I will never vote for another Republican until they are smart enough to send the Bush family out the door.
Does GOP Have ‘No Other Choice But to Push Immigration Reform’? The Party’s Future Could Depend on it

December 8, 2012 at 5:37pm

In reply to Eirana.

Eirana, the quote in your post is “The Grand Bargain” proposed by the 2nd Bush administration in 2007. In exchange for a fence, Bush, McCain, Kennedy, and Graham offerred this. Give Amnesty to 10-20 million illegal aliens and a path to citizenship, which would allow them to bring all their family members over ((40-50 million relatives), and allow higher numbers of immigrants to come in here each year legally since the border would be closed to illegal entry.

Some Compromise. We’ll close the border if more can come legally, 10-20 million here now can stay, become citizens, and bring all their family members over–50-70 million people in all, and let more people in legally than we do now. Another several million each year?

Ronald Reagan signed the first amnesty, in 1986., It was thought around 300,000 illegals were in the US. George Bush I extended the deadline for signing up several times, fraud abounded, and the 300,000 became 3,000,000 instead. Bush I, Clinton, and Bush II ignored tillegal immigration. In Fact, NAFTA envisioned open borders throughout the world, so corporations could get employees from anywhere to anywhere. Reagan said the Amnesty was his greatest regret as President.

This Amnesty campaign would be going on even if Romney had won. Those who claim he lost because he only got 27% of 8% of the vote would now claim the GOP would have to get a bigger share of the 8% of the vote which is latino to win future elections. Theyre selli
Defunct or Lying Low? Once Powerful Soros-Backed Project Goes Mysteriously Silent

May 2, 2012 at 9:41pm

Haven’t you heard, Soros has bought the computer company which will count the votes in November’s elecion, and it’s headquartered in Spain. So if need be the Presidential election and Congress, too, will be stolen in the computer. There will be no way to trace the source of the totals, by the way. So there will be no evidence of theft.

Soros and the Obama machine have taken Stalin’s plan for their own. It doesn’t matter how we vote, Soros will count them, and no way to prove the counts are wrong.

What fools this nation was to put the Presidential election on computer. Led back in 2001-02 by George Soros.
Justice Ginsburg on Egypt TV: ‘I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution’ to Craft Modern Law Document

February 6, 2012 at 5:41pm

Well, I commented. The mesage said it would be a few minutes before it was put up a few hours ago.

I was polite, used acceptable language, and mentioned salient points to prove Justice Ginsburg is only relflecting liberal strategies since the 1930s for “changing” the Constitution by ignoring its language in favor of a “general interpretation as a whole”. Meaning, make rulings based on what you think the Constituion should mean, not its actual language.

Hasn’t been posted yet.