I doubted this writer’s integrity & veracity from the the get-go.
Once he typed that Rush called Sandra Fluke a “slut,” (False, Rush did NOT say that), I couldn’t read any farther. The writer has comprehension problems, among others.
[-1] April 18, 2015 at 12:38am
The lady was not going to harm anyone, but the cop is commended for stopping her from ending her life, which is what she wanted???
April 17, 2015 at 6:21pm
Seems minor, depends if sex with a prostitute was during their “on duty time” or otherwise interfered with their job.
On one hand, it could be less time-consuming than trying to pick up a gal (w/out payment), & maybe expose the agent to potentially less problems.
Unknown by me. I don’t care to learn & evaluate the details. That’s not because it wouldn’t matter to me if the Secret Service botches their job in protecting BO.
April 17, 2015 at 6:12pm
Are you trying to make a joke?
Deposits of uranium do not just generate heat, right?
Although there have have been a few documented case of a natural nuclear reaction. I forget details; maybe 3 at most, & probably long ago, but figured out from geology (historical) research. I think one was in South Africa, whcih one could almost guess, because of the numerous minerals (ie gold, diamonds) there.
 April 9, 2015 at 4:05pm
Yep, Dr. Krauthammer is false on saying that there are many similarities on foreign policy — for which BO has done a lot of meddling — making situations worse than doing nothing, which Dr. Paul is not advocating.
Would Dr. Paul have: sold guns to Libyan rebels; withheld protection for the Bengazi outpost (wasn’t an embassy); not protected the Pakistani doctor whom revealed info about OBL; revealed info on Navy Seals; allowed a mission in an old helicopter & without air-cover, leading to the deaths of about 20 Seals; massively eroded the military, including morale, effectiveness & regulations? And so on…
 April 9, 2015 at 3:47pm
Log, not concrete – minor error. (I viewed on a 50” screen) True, the thrower continued foolishly against a car. The driver’s actions were a reaction, although overboard. Maybe caused by log distraction, haha.
The fighting reason is ridiculous. One was upset about an “ugly baby” comment on Facesmack (sic). Maybe true, wouldn’t doubt it. Sure, that’s rude, but obviously violence about any insult is unwarranted.
And now, for something completely different, although tangential & related…
Why do many persons not know how to be civilized? True for many Whites too. Perhaps, a large cause are the lack of a family & minimal education – students’ having low motivation & low desire to excel. About 50% of Blacks drop out of HS. About 75% of Blacks are born out of wedlock. Nah, it’s because of racism.
Those figures were much lower 50+ years ago – near the level of White’s – as well as B’s unemployment. Recall, more racism then. Those rates started increasing in the late 60s, due to LBJ’s Worser Society (sic). The continuance of those lefty welfare programs, has taken away the desire to learn, work & have a responsible marriage/family, for many.
Why are there many successful Blacks (especially as entertainers & athletes)? Wouldn’t they face the same phantom racism? Why do Black immigrants excel, as well as Asians (includes Indians)? All those cohorts eventually earn a higher than average income
(Darn, longer than my intended one ¶. Who read this far? You get a star & racecard.)
 March 28, 2015 at 6:46pm
Hadn’t thought of that, but your point is true — self-defense. It is a travesty that Bernie Goetz was charged & & prosecuted. It seems like police don’t want an individual to do their job, which is ludicrous. Be meek until authorities arrived, ~10 minutes later?
A person cannot protect themselves? — By arms or other means? This can be a split second decision & depends upon a victim’s resources (firearm, combating skill, other) based upon…
In the video, this white guy was beaten because of his ancestry — clear-cut racism by a Black group upon a Caucasian guy.
Why is this — black on white crime — ignored?
March 28, 2015 at 4:33pm
To Blaze staff:
What is ADL? Actually, I figured it by re-rereading the first paragraph. It is somewhat standard to introduce fairly unknown abbreviations as such: “Anti-Defamation League (ADL)” or “ADL (Anti-Defamation League)” in the first sentence, rather than forcing the reader to backtrack or just continue reading without knowledge of whatever the abbreviation stands for.
Additionally, in that 1st paragraph, a sentence was grossly grammatically incorrect. “TheBlaze emailed that ADL about the exact quiz on Monday.” The 3rd word, “that,” should be removed.
BTW, another recent error (in article on plane crash in Alps & co-pilot’s former girlfriend) is the misuse of “who,” which should have been “whom,” because it was referring to the object of the sentence, rather than the object.
The sentence was also poorly constructed, because the independent clause seemed like it was referring to the subject rather than the object. The only real way to determine that was its use of a gender pronoun.
There are grammatical in errors in almost every Blaze article – more than any other media website that I read. Those errors are not heinous, but are negative for several reasons: slows reading speed, reduces comprehension, questions credibility.
I didn’t fully get the meaning (lack of interest). Although it enlightened me as to how some people take stereotypes [of a Jewish male] & apply to all in said group & to a pet. Could be labeled as racist thoughts, but Judaism is not a race, despite used often. It was disheartening to show how many women are judgmental.
For a split second, I thought of taking the quiz, then I realized what it was about. I have no idea about the issue (male Jews in “courting” mode) of the quiz, nor date persons of the same gender.
March 24, 2015 at 12:59pm
Why should there be a Palestinian state? There never has been, and Palestinians are neither a race nor an ethnicity. The word Palestine came from the Romans, when they ruled most of the Mediterranean area & was just a geographic term.
Most of the Palestinians are racist scum murderers, & they should find their permanent home in one of the 57 Muslim majority nations. They neither have the wherewithal, nor economic sense to develop much in the desert, as the Israelis have. In fact, imagine how poor all of the Arab nations would be without selling oil…
March 24, 2015 at 12:46pm
In the US, why would any display of the flag or mention of the country or patriotism (ie “American”) be not inclusive, offensive or divisive? It’s obviously in this country, where immigrants (& illegal aliens) CHOOSE to move to.
Generally, would a person really dislike any reference to a nation’s history or pride when visiting or moving to another country?
That would be like outlawing butcher shops because vegetarians don’t like meat.
March 24, 2015 at 12:35pm
There is no “Democratic” Party. There is a “Democrat” Party.
The word “democratic” is an adjective & often improperly used.
Additionally, there are no true democracies, which would entail voters deciding on each bill to become a law.
 March 19, 2015 at 7:38pm
Things liked better than politicians cont.:
10. Unsliced bread
11. Pet food
16. Walking 10 miles to a job, uphill each way
I dunno -- unsliced fresh bread in a nuke machine slathered w/lots of hot garlic butter is mighty fine, if you ask me!
 March 19, 2015 at 7:32pm
How was his meaning twisted?
What poll or source did he cite for his statement? None! BO is often wrong in stating supposed facts.
Why would BO insult US citizens by claiming their fondness for the Royals. I think most do not care.
Although, it is very easy to like many people in another country versus US politicians, whom are mostly despised.
March 19, 2015 at 7:26pm
Even suppose that is true, which Obama had no poll nor database to cite — just as he’s often wrong with facts — it is a lot easier to “like” people in other countries, compared to US officials, whom have massive authority, often unjustly, over citizens.
I think most US citizens (“American” anything is inaccurate) do NOT care about the Royals.
March 19, 2015 at 3:18pm
I would say that it was inaccurate for the anti-gun clerk to say, “this is the gun.”
I don’t really see how it could be the same actual gun, as Mr.308 typed.
Those guns must be the “same type/model of gun,” which is obviously rather ridiculous, because any gun can kill a person, as well as knives, bats, arrows, rocks & many other objects.
How many murders, robberies, beatings & other crimes have been prevented/stopped, just by showing a firearm, or sometimes firing, but not resulting in death or even hitting of a criminal?
January 13, 2015 at 6:45pm
Additionally, he has taken many vacations. I recall recently that it was 30 vacations, although I’m not quite sure & could be mistaken. Even at 20 vacations — that’s 3 per year. Then there are his many golf outings & just the fact that his opulent lifestyle is like a continuous vacation.
It well-known that he is lazy, misses many security briefings, does not work well with others, is really tyrannical & exhibits many other egregious acts. Of course the LMSM (Lame-stream media) does not report those items.
January 13, 2015 at 6:18pm
I do not think that animosity can be rooted to 1,000 years ago. There are different people & governments. Heck, the U.S. has only existed for a 1/4 of that time.
Russia was kind of reset in 1917, but for the worst. The USSR & the US were even temporary allies in WWII. Although, that was after the Soviet Union sided with Germany, but then was invaded by Hitler. After WWII, the US even extended a hand of friendship, including offering for them to be part of the Marshall Plan & sharing nuke tech. Even their foray into Vietnam & Korea was unnecessary, but they got a communist NK & eventually all of Vietnam.
After WWII, the USSR closed up, retained control of most of Eastern Europe, spied on the US with many insiders (spies) in our gov, stole technology & other heinous things. Their claim throughout most of the Cold War was that it was defensive in nature, is bogus!
January 13, 2015 at 6:04pm
If I moved to another country, I would take it upon myself to learn their language, customs & such.
January 13, 2015 at 6:00pm
Yep, if we cannot identify those whom want harm & death upon us, we cannot properly defend against & defeat the enemy — hardcore, radical Muslims.
 January 13, 2015 at 5:53pm
No real comment on the cowardice & self-censorhsip.
For those wondering what those French words mean, I found the translation in another Blaze article:
“Je suis Charlie, a phrase that became popular across the globe following the attacks, means “I am Charlie.” The other French phrase on the cover apparently means, “All is forgiven.””
Although, I don’t quite understand what “I am ______” means, in any context.
Question: What does “Charlie Hebdo” mean? To me, that just sounds like a first & last name such as “Johnny Appleton.”