User Profile: RavenGlenn

Member Since: September 02, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • March 31, 2016 at 8:17pm

    By everyone’s arguments here, they should take guns away from everyone since that’ll stop all crime. Obviously nobody would kill anyone with a gun again if they aren’t allowed to have them!

    Oh wait…the conservative argument is that it’s already illegal to shoot and murder people so another bull**** law wouldn’t fix anything.

    Over 200 cities have these protections for transgender people and there has not been a SINGLE instance of any pervert men dressed as women doing anything. You are all idiots.

  • [2] June 25, 2014 at 10:42am

    It never ceases to amaze me at how ridiculously some of you switch positions based on how the story is written.

    This man is innocent until proven guilty(say like…George Zimmerman). Yet, with George, everyone hammered on the media for public shaming. We knew 100% without question that he did kill Trayvon Martin, but not that he was guilty of murder. He was publicly shamed to massive amounts and we all screamed about him being innocent until otherwise proven guilty.

    Yet in this case where we know nothing about the facts other than what some store owner claimed to a third party…and you all want this guy to be publicly shamed relentlessly?

    This is why the law exists. To prevent these sort of unfair lynch mobs based on knee-jerk reactions. Anyone that is placed in this store’s window SHOULD sue and SHOULD win. Whether they are innocent of the crime or not. That’s for the court to decide, not this random store owner.

    Responses (2) +
  • May 28, 2014 at 7:24pm

    Yeah, I don’t buy it. I’ve been close to a lightning strike before. It literally blinded me for a moment and made me see an array of colors in a quick strobe. It lit up everything in the area extremely brightly.

    You mean to tell me he got struck directly and we don’t even see anything at all?

    And he was holding the camera. Have you ever seen someone video tape someone ELSE getting hurt? They can’t keep the camera focused. It goes all over the place when they get surprised. Now picture this man getting STRUCK by lightning. How is it the camera barely moves? He didn’t drop it? He didn’t even lower it? I just don’t see it.

  • [-8] May 24, 2014 at 2:12pm

    usfreeman – I agree. It’s also so sad to see that racial and gender equality have gained such a foothold that the government overrulled states rights and shoved it down our throats! I guess we all just had to learn to accept the wisdom of the federal government in accepting other RACES and…ugh…WOMEN as completely normal and VERY acceptable naturally occurring people!

    Fight the good fight, brother!

    Responses (3) +
  • [2] May 24, 2014 at 9:35am

    TexasKnight – How is getting up and going to the bathroom when you need to disturbing anyone?

    When I was in college it was called…hey I have to go…I’ll just get up and go while the class continues.

    If I’m at work, same thing. I don’t ask for permission or pay to go to the restroom. I go when I need to and there is absolutely zero reason I should have to ask for permission.

  • [-10] May 24, 2014 at 9:28am

    That’s right bigots! Keep screaming about the bible from the rooftops. I mean, sure…it was wrong about interacial coupling, selling your daughter into slavery, stoning your wife, forcing women to marry their rapists, synthetic fibers, meat on fridays, etc etc….

    But this time, by God, it’s right! You all keep standing on the wrong side of history with the liberal fiscal agenda. It’s worked out so well for you guys up till now. Just keep doubling down on it.

    Forget the whole ‘love they neighbor’ stuff. Forget how God is the only one that can judge someone. Heck, forget all about taking care of yourself and your own family first. No, you need to bother people that effect you in NO way. That’s how you get into heaven!

    Bigotted idiots. This is why I stick with being a libertarian and not a conservative.

  • [-1] May 12, 2014 at 11:37pm

    So myr…if people aren’t born gay, they must choose to be that way, yes? If so, when did you choose to be straight?

    Okay, now that I shut down that stupid argument, let’s go for the other one religious bigots like to throw out, shall we? Society made them that way! And more specifically, if people are allowed to just BE gay, they’ll corrupt our children!

    Scientific studies have shown without exception that children raised in a ‘gay’ family with two fathers or two mothers end up gay/straight in the exact same percentages as those in ‘normal’ families.

    So there goes that argument as well. So then, let’s go back to your first argument. People aren’t born that way…right. So, why is it that we find homosexual conduct in a WIDE array of nature? See…there is no survival instinct that simply demands conception. It demands sexual stimulation. If it only demanded conception, nobody would be masturbating(animals included) as it serves NO reproduction purpose.

    So…yeah, let’s stop with the complete nonsense that religious conservatives have failed to actually think out. It doesn’t make you look any better than the idiotic enviro-wackjob liberals.

    Be a thinker. Be scientific. Above all else, use common sense. You’ll find neither the conservative platform or the liberal platform make a lick of sense…and soon you’ll realize that social issues are not at all what is important today.

  • [-5] May 12, 2014 at 11:29pm

    Really Adolph? I wasn’t aware that by being a lesbian, a woman’s internal reproductive organs just like…fell out or something.

    Last I checked, a lesbian can still sleep with a man if they so wish and can still get pregnant. They can also go the route of sperm donors or adoption.

    But sure, it’s degenerate, disgusting, and/or mentally ill to be a loving mother who is gay. They should instead be these teens getting pregnant and giving birth through wedlock. Because that’s the natural way.

  • April 4, 2014 at 4:34pm

    Whoa whoa whoa….Wait just a moment here Jeff. So…you’re argument is that the children will be messed up before a gay couple even begins raising them? So a gay couple shouldn’t be allowed to adopt that ‘screwed’ child because….?

    You’re argument made no sense at all. Where do those children come from? Well most of them probably come from the adoption of children who were neglected and tossed away by those straight men and women that everyone here is so fond of. Those children need a good home and if two daddies or two mommies can provide that, not a person in this world should argue against it.

    Unless YOU personally plan to take in and adopt every single child out there that needs a home, you have NO room to complain when someone else wants to(barring obvious felonies or other such criminal activity that bars them from that right – Or cases where someone is molesting a child or something. Just trying to cut off the strawman arguments before you make them :) )

    So either put up, and raise the children in your loving and caring ‘proper’ family…or shut up and let someone with love in their hearts take care of those kids. I promise you, they won’t make them gay any more than someone ‘made’ you straight.

  • March 11, 2014 at 9:07pm

    You all make me sick. You really do.

    First: It’s none of your business what anyone wants to do with their life.

    Second: You all are MASSIVELY reaching on these things like the examples from Frozen.

    Third: You used to trust Disney? When was this? When a woman stayed in a house with 7 men in the middle of the forest?

    When it was romantic for a man to take liberties with a woman in a coma?

    For a man to blackmail an imprisoned woman and try to get her child in a twisted deal?

    Disney cartoons have been based off of VERY dark folklore with far worse than ‘Pro-gay’ agendas in them.

  • February 14, 2014 at 11:45pm

    This is nothing new for most of us in the country. Honestly, I was looking at the pie chart and wondering what all these companies I have never heard of were.

    Speaking for myself: I’ve lived in Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, Boston, Punxsutawney, and other suburbs around those various areas. In each one of them, my choice was either: Comcast for high-speed internet or DSL/dial-up. Only at one point in Pittsburgh did they finally bring FIOS to my area.

    Comcast has always been this monopolyptic entity that controls the television access in areas I’ve lived. In the one case where I was able to get FIOS, I jumped at the chance and loved it as it was far cheaper and WAY better service. But for the most part, Comcast gives garbage service for massively inflated prices and you literally have no choice otherwise unless you are okay with ludicrously slow internet.

  • January 6, 2014 at 12:54pm

    It’s not. However, since the federal government has tax laws that affect marriage, it places the entirety of the system into a dangerous area. Specifically that everyone is supposed to have equal protections under the law.

    By saying that you can only have those protections if you get married and ONLY if you marry who they want you to, it is definitely in a very shady area when it comes to the equal protections clause.

    In the end, you can call it whatever you want, but gay, straight, bi, transgender, etc should all have the ability to get the same protections and advantages in the law as everyone else. The entire point of the founding of this country was for everyone to be treated equal.

    Responses (1) +
  • November 26, 2013 at 7:27pm

    You realize that Peanut Butter Jelly Time is like…SUPER old and was a popular meme about 3 years or so before Family Guy put it in an episode right?

  • November 25, 2013 at 7:53am

    Good. As much as I cannot stand Bill Nye these days, he’s dead right here. It would be irresponsible and downright silly to include ‘religious’ details as scientific theories.

    Why? Because they AREN’T scientific theories. When you have something that contains no proof or evidence, you cannot simply throw it in a text book and wash your hands of it(that they do it with global warming is another issue altogether).

    And for those religious zealots on this site: Theories are not imaginary guesses. Theories are reasoned and educated explanations for how/why something happens that is to be tested until proven incorrect. The ‘Theory of Evolution’ has not been proven incorrect. Much like how the ‘Theory of Gravity’ has not been proven incorrect(yes, gravity is a theory).

    If you want to believe in something with no scientific backing or reasoning, go for it. But you cannot push that upon children in a class that is supposed to be all about learning the true facts of the world around them. There is no place for things that someone wrote down in a book and has never proven.

    Responses (8) +
  • October 23, 2013 at 6:51pm

    What the parents did in calling the cops was the right thing to do without question. Anyone saying that it wasn’t has no idea just how much trouble the parents could have ended up in. They easily could have been serving MAJOR time for having underage drinking(and who knows what else) in their home.

    However, with that said…what the parents did in leaving their teenage, underage girls at home alone for an entire weekend without even having a neighbor keep an eye on them was STUPID. It never should have gotten to the point where they had to legally cover their own behinds.

  • October 21, 2013 at 9:55pm

    So..Detroit falls into ‘Friendly’, but not Pittsburgh? Or heck, anywhere in the south like the Carolinas?

    What the heck were they smoking when they did this ‘study’?

  • October 20, 2013 at 8:34am

    Nice satire! It truly does sound just like that with all the ludicrous religious nutjobs that frequent this site. They actually expect us all to believe that they never think about sex, masturbate, use toys, look at porn, etc.

    Listen folks: We all know you do. Everyone does. It’s okay. You aren’t going to hell for it.

  • October 14, 2013 at 8:31pm

    Every major retailer has this policy. And there are VERY good reasons for it.

    1. They don’t want their employee to risk bodily harm over something that is insured anyway.
    2. They don’t want to be sued for you getting hurt over something stupid.
    3. They don’t want a customer getting hurt because you have now caused the thief to panic.

    We are told at my company that if someone comes in and steals, robs, etc to do as they say, comply fully, and do NOT go out to try and get a license plate or anything else because you may spook them and make them do something stupid(like run someone over in a hurry to flee, shoot someone in a panic, etc).

    Just do as your told and let them go. That’s what the police are for.

    Responses (1) +
  • September 5, 2013 at 7:58am

    I know most everyone on this site are homophobic bigots, but the fact is that homosexuality is a protected status in the country. You cannot discriminate based on the color of someone’s skin, their gender, age, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, etc.

    They can claim all they want that serving them would violate their religious freedoms, but then what stops someone from saying the same about someone who is black? “Oh, my religion says I can be a racist!”

    Sorry, it just doesn’t stand up.

    Responses (16) +
  • August 15, 2013 at 8:12am

    They really don’t. Women’s MMA is pretty darn good. Heck, back in the last Ultimate Fighter Finale, they had a women’s MMA fight that was honestly the best fight on the entire card. It was brutal as can be and both women gave their hearts out.

    I know most of the folks on this site are misogynists…but really man, if you don’t know what you are talking about, don’t open your mouth.

123 To page: Go