No, there won’t be a court case. They’ll sign a gag order in order to get their daughter back. In two years? We’ll see…
[-1] May 22, 2014 at 6:55pm
Darn, you got us all figured out! Thought we had you fooled there for a minute, Igor, but NO, you were one step ahead of us! I guess the jig is up!
In the meantime, we’ll continue to overeducate ourselves, put in 60-100 hour workweeks & rise to the top of every field of endeavor we enter. You’ll be sure it must be the Devil, or some primitive tricks, that got Jews where they are, since you aren’t watching us “front-loading” our hard work so that we can relax more later.
You wear that L on your forehead well!
[-1] May 22, 2014 at 6:45pm
The first instance I know of for Common Core is when Adam & Eve shared an apple. It did increase their knowledge, but not the kind of knowledge that would’ve made them truly successful.
As much as they were born into privilege, their mistake was not in discriminating, but in not being discriminating enough…
Seriously, though, the reason minorities don’t do so well academically has nothing to do with academic standards, and CC will do nothing to address the sociological issues (or Teacher’s Unions) affecting them…
Pookie, dear, your parents may have given you a leg up, but YOU had to find the right fire hydrant…
A brief introduction to Bolshevik ideologue David Coleman, a key architect of Communized Core:
 May 22, 2014 at 4:25am
Name 3 Jews who have done so.
I guess you know more about what Jews think than I…
May 22, 2014 at 3:31am
(continued) so they HAVE to go on welfare!”
WRONG: “Trayvon Martin was a teen thug, who would be alive today if he had politely answered a few questions by a Neighborhood Watch person, or walked away.”
RIGHT: “Trayvon Martin was a polite little boy, who would be alive today if a racist white Hispanic Neighborhood Watch person wouldn’t have wanted to kill a black person so badly.”
With a few minor adjustments of thought like these, we could all leave our cowardliness behind, and have an honest discussion about race…
May 22, 2014 at 3:30am
“But no matter what you do, the point is to never be afraid to talk about these issues, particularly the issue of race,” Michelle says. Our AG, Eric Holder warned us in 2009 that “…in things racial we have always been… essentially a nation of cowards…” He continued by declaring, “It’s not easy to talk about it. We have to have the guts to be honest with each other, accept criticism, accept new proposals.”
So, let’s leave our cowardliness behind, and have a frank discussion about race. But first, let’s get some mistakes out of the way, some wrong-headed RACIST mistakes.
WRONG: “If half of convicted murderers come from the 13% of the country that are African-American, the A-A community must introspect & confront this problem!”
RIGHT: “If half of convicted murderers come from the 13% of the country that are African-American, it proves the court system is racist, and that racism is still so endemic that it causes A-A’s to devalue other blacks’ lives!” Also note that white people kill people too, and would kill more blacks if Al Sharpton wasn’t so vigilant.
WRONG: “A higher percentage of A-A’s are on public assistance than other ethnic groups. Black leaders must therefore stress greater self-reliance.”
RIGHT: “More whites are on public assistance than blacks, so only racists would consider this an issue. IF there is a slightly higher percentage, it’s because whites still control big businesses and are afraid to give blacks good jobs,
May 20, 2014 at 12:42am
This is just a wild guess, but maybe what he’s trying to convey is that in this manic Digital Age… it is vital… to clear the mind… constantly?
D’ya think I’m on to something, or what?
May 20, 2014 at 12:30am
Actually, we’ll be glad to use any sociologists definition of perversion, if you wish. Using a part of the Digestive System, pairing it with a part of the Reproductive System, might cause someone to rightly say that you’ve perverted the use of that part of the anatomy.
From an Evolutionary point of view, the first order of business of any organism is to reproduce itself. If one moves away from that most basic Survival Instinct, you might say you’re perverting your most primitive & natural instincts.
So, I’m not sure how this became a religious or conservative issue, when this is basic to any worldview.
Unless, of course, you meld the religious values of love, faithfulness, sublimation of personal desires, etc. to secular concepts like self-fulfillment, right to privacy, following your heart, etc. Then voila, you can create a “gay agenda”!
 May 20, 2014 at 12:08am
Actually, YES. Warm hug when chosen? Great! Lip lock? Inappropriate. Eating a piece of cake? Lovely. Licking cake off your partner’s face? Gross!
What do children have to do with this? Considering every good liberal program is done “for the children”, what’s so bad about self-control in public “for the children”? You don’t want them to see smoking, but yes to face-licking? Seeing open racism will affect them negatively, but seeing open sexuality won’t? Interesting!
 May 19, 2014 at 11:53pm
fortherecord, he’s trying to say “Jews” without using the word. He assumes that only his cleverness will get him past them Jews that control the banks & the media, perhaps the world.
Thanks, ashes, for making me feel powerful for the moment while I try to figure out how to pay next month’s bills!
However, the Talmudists like me, & surely the Kabbalists, would never condone any action G-d calls an abomination. Nor, as thinkers, do we ever get shrill.
The hysteria is coming from homosexuals (1.4% of the population), their close relatives (probably another 5%), and the ardent leftists fighting to undermine any Biblical mindset (probably another 5-10%). An ascendant & ruthless minority can make a lot of noise & do a lot of damage, but G-d always prevails.
February 5, 2014 at 7:58pm
I think it’s appropriate that a British worker should be in a minimum wage commercial, since in England the enhanced minimum wage was able to almost completely wipe out supermarket baggers there, per Mark Steyn.
February 3, 2014 at 11:38pm
Janets, I am one of those who has upon him the responsibility of having been chosen by G-d to bring His Presence & Word to the world. I am very much for a sane US Immigration Policy, starting with the word “legal”.
However, I can’t keep the memory of FDR sending back the ship St. Louis to Europe to almost certain death out of my mind. Or how close we were to not giving Chen Guangcheng political asylum, essentially condemning him to death and casting a chill over all Chinese anti-Communist dissidents. Or not being haunted by us doing nothing as Hutus hacked millions of Tutsis to death with machetes.
Situations like those make it very hard for me to just say, “Bar the door, and to heck with them all!” I try to be pro-life even for those already born, while balancing those desperate humanitarian situations with the preservation of national sovereignty, the need to increase our tax base & lower our social costs, and the need to have and keep an American culture.
Rabbi, I know a country much closer to the HuTu's and Somoli's who need rescuing-Israel. But, that's right, they are arresting and deporting all their illegal African refugees, TO SWEDEN. And you can drop all that expanding the tax base BS to as 71% of illegals here are still on welfare after 10 years. What have you got against Whites? Come clean.
"I am very much for a sane US Immigration Policy, starting with the word “legal”."
Why do people think this is some achievement? So you import millions of immigrants "legally." What difference does it make?
"Situations like those make it very hard for me to just say, “Bar the door, and to heck with them "
Agreed - THEY SHOULD ALL BE ALLOWED IN ISRAEL. Still agree?
Rabbi...you said a mouthful there. I'm sure there are a few endangered souls coming across our border, But most are attracted by the images they see on our television broadcasts. Easy living. Real paved roads. No cartel violence ,(yet).
There's no work for them, now. But there is "assistance", and food stamps...and all the hedonism they can handle.......
February 3, 2014 at 11:06pm
I applaud Jerry’s diversity, since he’s had African-Americans (Mario Joyner & Chris Rock), females (Sarah Silverman & Tina Fey), vertically challenged (Jason Alexander, Patton Oswalt), follically challenged (Larry David & Carl Reiner), foreigners (Ricky Gervais & Gad Elmaleh), victims of ageism(octogenarians Mel Brooks & Don Rickles) and victims of sizeism (Barry Marder & Patton Oswalt) on his “Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee” – and we’re only in the 3rd Season!
This wonderful diversity makes me weepy, so don’t mind if I run to go blow my nose…
Wow, Bill Maher is like a regular theologian! Glad The Blaze was able to catch a few more pearls of wisdom that dropped from his twisted lips!
Bill, I commiserate entirely! I work for a boss that’s a “mass firer”! He has fired hundreds over the years! Just because he gave us a job means he can just take it away at a whim? For minor infractions like misusing the computer he gave us, or missing a couple of deadlines with our work? For breaking “rules” that only he understands fully? Where’s the love?
If a whole department is becoming dysfunctional, this brute will fire a few people to supposedly ‘get our attention’. Why can’t he just send an e-mail? I know we ignored the first 10, but we surely would’ve heeded the 11th! And if it’s endemically dysfunctional, he’ll fire the whole department & start over! Doesn’t he know he surely has fired some good people in the deal?
I resent having to define my purpose here by what he needs from me. And I don’t always get his system of bonuses, promotions & demotions, etc. He seems like a “psychopathic mass firer” from where I’m sitting! Yet somehow, the company stays profitable & keeps growing…
December 31, 2013 at 9:47pm
Can’t imagine why Giggly would accommodate two other non-crew members seating needs, and not this Prince of a Man. Frankly, I think I would’ve served his seat partner copious amounts of cabbage myself…
So you would be more than happy to sit for hours next to an obese person whose fat pushed over into your seat space and whose body odor caused you to gag?
December 31, 2013 at 6:24pm
Vaman, thanks for creating a Thought-Free Zone around yourself!
As one of those who would never convert from Judaism even under pain of death (since G-d made an Everlasting Covenant with us that I must honor), I still deeply appreciate the love of Israel of these caring, loving Christians.
Is it so far-fetched to believe that these Biblically-based people appreciate seeing the fulfillment of Biblical prophecies, and support the beneficiaries of these miraculous events? Or that morally-based people would look at Right & Wrong in the Arab-Israeli conflict, rather than who is wearing the Victim Mantle at the moment – like your pro-Palestinian elite liberal friends?
It makes me wonder if Vaman is short for Vapid Man.
December 31, 2013 at 5:57pm
Glad they’re not wasting their money on luxuries like food! Sometimes, you just need to practice a little cannibalism to get up enough strength to ski down the side of a mountain…
December 31, 2013 at 5:53pm
I am working on getting Apple to put retractable bayonets on the top of iPhones.
In this way, if his father gets him the wrong gift next year, he won’t have to suffer the inconvenience of having to rustle through the knife drawer!
December 31, 2013 at 3:57pm
Usually I read a bunch of comments before responding, but my combination of indignation & sadness is compelling me to just respond.
The Romneys could adopt any baby in the entire world. They could get a blond Romanian baby that would fit perfectly into that picture. They could get a Jolie-style baby from some country from which it is socially hip to adopt, like the Vietnamese boat babies were in one generation, Colombians in the next.
Instead, they adopted the baby that needed THEM the most. There are tens of thousands of black babies waiting futilely for adoption in America, and who become institutionalized or warehoused, while white babies have waiting lists of people with six-figure cash amounts in their hands jostling for the opportunity to adopt them. I’m sure everyone understands the Romneys would not have had to stand at the end of any of those lines.
Furthermore, Romney is not running for anything, nor will he ever be. Nor does he represent the Republican Party, though he was their standard-bearer for a few months before fading.
Exploitative to put their black grandchild in their family pic, Marc? Imagine the hue & cry had they left her out because only biological children go into their family pic, or only those who have already embraced Mormonism?
The silly left “mean-spirited” narrative has to trump the reality of nuclear, loving, giving families on the Right, truth be damned.
“Marc Lamont HILL, you say? Is that with an “I” or an “E”?”