At the very least, it is now again verified that Israel is the primal lease holder to the holy land. Every one else is a visitor.
 May 31, 2015 at 2:01am
The point is Einstein saw grand and intricate order in the construction of the universe instead of the byproducts of chaos, and instinctively knew that intelligence and not chance was required to generate our reality. What generates frustration for me is how often, those who would design to maintain the right to ridicule any God believers, assume we are limited in our capacity to process probabilities and therefore believe in a “Bearded Guy in the Sky” who wields lightening bolts of retribution. While some may keep for themselves a vision of God derived from Renaissance art, certainly not all Christians imagine such a deity. And not all of us believe that God would never allow a symbolic day and night representation of the creation regardless of the actual time it consumed to be inserted into His “Flawless” book of Scripture, but would only allow His Bible to literally detail his creation labor as spanning only six actual days, and a subsequent 6,000 years of modern human history from Adam to this day. That may be someone’s understanding of the scriptures but by no means is this a definitive interpretation. And for the souls determined to limit God to their literal take on the written word, it would be very disconcerting to encounter evidence to the contrary and therefore likely that denial would be a knee jerk reaction. The Earth can be old and the Bible can be true all at the same time.
 May 2, 2015 at 7:20pm
I think making such a declaration and defacing what is basically the symbol for all of us, should automatically cancel any and all access to tax payer funded entitlements, and remove any tax credits or deductions. The extra money could be used to relocate them to any home country of their choice without the opportunity for repatriation. If you don’t like it here, we will help you find a different home.
READRIGHTHERE - If I'm not mistaken, the United States of America does indeed have a law on the books that will pay for the airfare of any US Citizen to relocate to any destination (of their choice) within the world. The caveat - they lose their US citizenship and are never, ever allowed to step on US territory again; akin to a true one way ticket. Perhaps those that stomp on this country that God has so blessed should take up the offer and remove themselves from American society. No love lost should they take the offer.
 May 2, 2015 at 6:47pm
Catholic Adoptioin Services had to shut down operations in Massachusetts because they refused to be forced to provide services to a legally married gay couple. As far as the LGBT community is concerned they don’t want to be left alone to do as they please, they want to legally force their acceptance and what they see as their rightful place in the public concept of mainstream normalcy, and they will destroy anyone who begs to differ. Businesses are first, then schools and their text books which will have to provide a disproportionately exaggerated presence of LGBT examples, and Churches (The only true enemy to their complete societal acceptance) are certainly next. At the very least, they will require churches to discontinue providing marriage services for anyone if they will not provide them for gay couples, their “outdated” belief system be damned. The Mormon church has a way out regarding their Temples. (Folks will have to get legally wed by a Government authority and then enter the Temple for a sealing ceremony. This is already done in other countries.) But Glen, even if his prediction is a little overzealous, is not far from the mark. The LGBT community will stop at nothing, it is only a matter of time, and churches, with their lands, holdings, and revenues are certainly a potentially juicy future target.
Are we ready for this? I say, get into the WORD and be ready
Let's see what happens when Catholics shut down their hospitals because they refuse to comply with some effed up court decision bound to come on the heels of this. There are quite a few Catholic hospitals in this country. It would be a healthcare nightmare.
 April 21, 2015 at 4:50pm
All behavior is a matter of choice. It may not feel like it, especially when one is entrenched in their addiction, but all behavior is choice. We make choices for all kinds of reasons, far too many to simply categorize and apply generalities. Although people might be like snowflakes, there are moral absolutes. Each individual has to seek out their own motivation for getting with the program. We extend to all their right to opinions, and consenting behaviors, and we are therefore obligated tolerate what happens behind closed doors as long as nobody is having their personal rights trampled, but that doesn’t make every choice acceptable, or normal, or even understandable.
 April 19, 2015 at 9:07pm
Depression is the fourth stage of grief when confronted with truth you are desperately trying to ignore. Of course he is depressed, the lies he peddles are more fun for him to believe than the truth coming from Fox News. The last step of the grief cycle is acceptance, doubt he gets there.
This really gets to the crux of the matter. Are we or are we not born gay, straight, or anything in between? (Sounds more like a spectrum disorder more heavily skewed by environmental factors than genetics, because after all, a preference for wearing dresses could hardly be attributed to genetics, and besides it hasn’t been proven and is simply a matter of science by consent (Much like global warming. But that is another discussion). Now being black is certainly genetics making it a crime of reason to treat someone with prejudice (Positively or Negatively) due to their skin shade (If you still do then you are an idiot with self esteem deficiencies in need of psychological review or at least a decent trip to the woodshed.) But more to the point, equating the LGBT struggle for acceptance for their behaviors and that of African Americans for acceptance of their humanity, is inane and worthy of derision and ridicule, and another trip to the woodshed.
February 20, 2015 at 3:38pm
What is vile is the belief that so many now possess that they are allowed to use their first amendment rights to say anything including threats (F the police counts as a threat because F is a verb) to police officers. Resisting arrest means a physical altercation is not only likely but necessary, and I do not believe any cop has the responsibility to figure out just what you are physically willing to do to them before they are allowed to respond in kind. When a cop says stop you had better dang well do it. If the cop is in the wrong file the complaint and pursue means to correct it after the fact. Handcuffs don’t hurt as bad as being an idiot.
December 13, 2014 at 7:18pm
A green light means “Go when safe.” The flashing lights on the squad car say, “it’s not safe.” For all the cop haters, can you possibly imagine this society without them.
LOL no it doesn't. That would be a YIELD sign if you have to yield to see if it's safe. In Minnesota there is actually question on the drivers exam worded "If you approach an intersection to take a left and the left turn arrow is green, do you have to check for pedestrians or other cars before proceeding?"
The correct answer is NO.
And turning right on a green you only have to watch for pedestrians that may have a walk signal.
 November 18, 2014 at 2:47pm
The same principle that drives addiction drives the repetition of any behavior. If we find something we have done to be rewarding we will likely do it again (thank you Dr. Skinner.) We have no problem with healthy addictions like exercise, hard work, or aggressive study habits, etc. We are appalled, however, when people engage in self destructive habits that are obviously counter productive such as drug use and abuse, sexual deviation, or hoarding.
Sex has a built in physiological reward mechanism, making it highly addictive, once the behavior is learned, no one wants to quit cold turkey. Once certain patterns of arousal are ingrained they do not easily go away. No one likes to feel responsible for their poor behaviors, it is infinitely easier to establish victimhood so as to relieve guilt, “I can’t help it.” “The devil made me do it.” or “I was born this way.” Besides, if we can establish that behavior choices are strictly genetic then we can group all deviant behavior into a subset of all that is considered “normal”, and claim that any prejudice against it is similar to that experienced by any other cultural minority for the color of their skin. And look! That is exactly what the Gay agenda is doing. Whether it is marriage equality or demographic representation in media, literature, or school texts, the argument is that the LGBT community needs to gain recognition as perfectly normal. Acceptance, if society will not freely grant it, must be legislated!
Please, explain "deviant sexual behavior" to me....
 November 9, 2014 at 6:16pm
You have been lied to by men centuries dead, who established the nature of the Christian God via political and philosophical means while creating a church that had to forbid the reading of scriptures by the people in order to maintain their “authority.” Please tell me you don’t vote with such a misguided base of information.
[-1] November 2, 2014 at 2:33am
Modern Christians who maintain a belief in a formless God with no body parts or passions discredits the entirety of scripture. (If Jesus is God, meaning all of God, and had a body of flesh and bone after his resurrection which he used to consume fish and honey, and he condescended to endure the process of death and resurrection, basically going through “all that trouble,” what kind of body does he have now, and what scripture gives this “enlightened” view of God today?) Do you even read the book you claim to be infallible? Its OK, there there now, don’t distress, we love you anyway, and one day, when the lies and deceit of the politics of religion through the centuries of a rudderless church have been eradicated by truth, we will be happy to welcome you home.
 October 30, 2014 at 5:00pm
If I were a member of an actual minority I would be offended by his linking a behavior pattern that he has practiced and grown accustomed to in his life to the color of my skin or the origin of my birth. Pure arrogance and conceit. I didn’t need to know him that well.
September 22, 2014 at 11:05pm
You can’t use a subjective opinion to bolster another. Heterosexuality is indeed a “choice” even if those who embrace that lifestyle have no idea when that choice was made. Stop asking if someone chose to be straight, the science is in, and much to their dismay, the answer is yes. Which is why it is ludicrous to impose the morality of the civil rights movement on to the plight of the LGBT community who in fact were not born to be gay. As a business owner I have every right to determine what services I will provide and to whom. If everyone is disgusted by my choices they will make a similar choice and refuse me the service of their personal funds. You might have to bake your own rainbow cake, and I may have to accept work at McDonald’s having lost my business to public opinion.
September 22, 2014 at 10:51pm
How do you know that your environment didn’t create a situation in which you were simply more likely to choose heterosexuality versus homosexuality. Your opinion on the matter is subjective and inadmissible.
 September 22, 2014 at 10:32pm
Please don’t elevate the cause of the LGBT community and their litany of behavioral choices to the status of discrimination due to skin color. Not the same, no matter the length, volume, or color of the temper tantrum they thrust on society.
My point is that we did have laws discriminating against blacks. If you believe that being gay is a choice, then I see your point.
If you believe it is a choice, at which point in your life did you choose your sexual orientation?
If you believe it is a choice, then could you in theory decide to be gay (I am assuming you are straight for some reason)?
I don't believe it is a choice for a most gay people, but it possibly is for some. So in a sense it could be considered a civil rights issue and thus the comparison to how black folks were treated.
I am not a lioberal by any means. I just like to see people treat each other with a little respect and dignity.
I would also say that there are people in the gay community that go way overboard throwing it in your face. There are people like that in every group...there are even christians who do such things.
No group of people on earth is devoid of its idiots and jerks, (from what I've seen)
I must say, there are a lot of christians I've read comments by that really need to work on that whole hate thing.
 September 22, 2014 at 10:29pm
This is exactly the consequence when potentially free people are duped into believing the Government should make everything fair. This isn’t a question of faith in God or an interpretation of the bible for business purposes, this is a question of faith in the free market. If my catering company refuses to help a gay couple celebrate their union, then they can blast their disapproval all over the place via social media. I then run the risk because of my convictions of offending potential customers that I would have otherwise been happy and grateful to serve but who have decided because of their convictions that they no longer desire the brand of service I have to offer. Problem solved, and the government never even received so much as a phone call. After all, wedding services hardly constitute a vital community resource.
I do support a woman’s right to make her own decisions about her body, such as not having sex at all or using any number of birth control options with varying degrees of certitude, but once a new person is made, the body in question is no longer the woman’s, it is the unborn child’s. Sucks to be her. Sometimes poor decisions lead to consequences we do not cherish. But terminating life should never be an option, period. (Now if the fetus is threatening the mother’s life, that could be considered on a case by case basis)
September 22, 2014 at 9:55pm
Brilliantly put. Truth trumps stupidity yet again. Of course politicians refuse to believe they cannot have their cake and eat it to.
September 3, 2014 at 4:58pm
He is still operating in his career, and is reaching out to former clients from a period while he worked for someone else. Call me cynical, but there are issues with those financially compensated for their “Ministry.”