TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying READRIGHTHERE's 10 most recent comments.

• Police Use Facebook to Tell Mom Her Son Died — and She Doesn’t See Message for Weeks

  February 22, 2013 at 9:16pm

  In reply to Lordcsmith.

  No joke, but there was a joke in it, funny…but true.

• Police Use Facebook to Tell Mom Her Son Died — and She Doesn’t See Message for Weeks

  February 22, 2013 at 9:14pm

  In reply to Elena2010.

  Why does it matter, 20 days go by and she didn’t call the police? Apparently she was unaware of his lack of contact anyway. Very caring mother, who now is undoubtedly racked with guilt and trying to shift blame to a government agency for not making it possible for her to be awakened to the fact that her son is gone and she was completely unaware. No doubt indicative of the way he was raised and the actual reason for the general lack of knowledge that he was even missing. Meh!

• Caption that photo!: Michelle Obama and Big Bird

  February 22, 2013 at 8:50pm

  I am so thankful right now, I mean, if it wasn’t for you Big Bird, I was going to have to start flying with my husband on the same plane to our vacations. Whew! Dodged that bullet!

• Pro-Lifers Target Famed Abortionist After Teacher’s Horrific Death Following Late-Term Abortion

  February 13, 2013 at 8:11pm

  In reply to flatbroke.

  @Enc

  As if it matters! Good hell, your thinking gives rise to even more evil logic such as…We should continually evaluate the value of any life based on their limitations, whether they were born with them or acquired them at a future date. Wheelchair bound after an accident? No one needs to live like that, take this pill…Morbidly obese with a flatulence issue, no one can survive that with their self esteem intact…You can’t even do your times tables? Why, let’s take a shower. What are those mommy? Why those are just really large pizza ovens sweetheart, by the way you failed math again this year, do you feel like a pizza? At what point is a fetus a life, when its viable (33 weeks is well past that cut-off point)? Your logic makes me ill. When are folks such as yourself ever going to absorb the reality that sometimes life and the choices we make while living have sometimes unavoidable consequences? Did you not watch the video of the guy born without legs and arms. What gives you the irrational notion that you are intellectually superior enough to predetermine the value of a developing life? Don’t bother answering that. I am regretting this post even before I click reply. Useless endeavor on my part. Ideologue!

• Family Research Council President Debates CNN’s Soledad O’Brien on Gays in the Boy Scouts: ‘Doesn’t Pass the Parent Test’

  February 6, 2013 at 9:40pm

  In reply to elosogrande.

  @sosorryforyou,

  Discrimination due to a gene governing skin pigmentation is not the same as discrimination against a behavioral choice. Please don’t degrade the suffering of African Americans at the hands of bigoted morons in the social majority by equating their triumphs over evil with Homosexuals obtaining normal status in society by allowing their unfettered access to teenage boys on camp outs! Shame on you.

  Sexual preference is a choice (Prefer is a verb). If you would like to posit that a homosexual man has no choice but to be attracted to other males, I will take that statement and ask how as a parent can I trust a man, who has no control over his behavioral choices, to “camp” with my sons?

  Do you honestly believe that a Male human possessing a gene predisposing him to be sexually attracted to males has a switch that only allows his impulse when a potential target has reached the magical biological age of 18, making his behavior acceptable?

  Do you think or just regurgitate?

  Just as the Girl Scouts should not allow a Heterosexual man to go on camp outs with teenage girls, the Boy Scouts should maintain their ban on Homosexual men being intimately connected to and associating with teenage boys. Duh. It really is that simple, and you really are that daft, or at least genetically predisposed to dereliction of the frontal lobe.

• Karl Rove Super PAC Goes After Lib Actress With Brutal Attack Ad

  February 6, 2013 at 6:45pm

  In reply to katzmeow44.

  She is on the wrong side of youth, acting will be sporadic, national politics will ensure her lifestyle even when her face and body can’t.

• Saudi Cleric Confesses to Murdering 5-Year-Old Daughter Over Virginity Concerns — Gets a Fine & Brief Jail Time

  February 4, 2013 at 2:03am

  In reply to gyro.

  @advection

  Thank you. Starve these morons of our cash, charge them a fortune for water, and let their power over anyone shrivel on the vine. That it would even be a moral question on how to punish this monster who no doubt took his own daughters virginity and then killed her for giving it up, should be the reason we walk permanently away from these ties. Not one more penny.

• ‘It’s Dead, Dead, Dead’: Justice Scalia Blasts Schoolchildren Who Don’t Understand the Constitution

  January 29, 2013 at 7:14pm

  In reply to fbanta.

  Enc,

  The woman’s body does belong to her and her alone, especially when she is choosing whether or not to protect herself from pregnancy during intercourse, which again is another choice afforded every woman. (Unless of course she is raped, but conservatives already “allow” for that contingency and there are rape victims who choose not to “punish” the new life growing inside of them regardless of the painful memory of the nature of its genesis. Once a new body has been created, whether by intention or accident, due to the plethora of decisions already executed by the mother, things change. The woman’s body is still hers but what of the new body being created?

  Does the body being developed belong to the fetus? If not at the moment of conception, at which point does the body belong to the fetus? When do human rights kick in; only when a person is “allowed” to be born by its birth mother? Premature births are happening at earlier and earlier times, and these tiny babies are kept alive through medicinal intervention. Do we use a benchmark for viability through medicine as a cutoff point by law? Does the mother’s right to choose continue even after the fetus has been removed from her body and laid in the corner of the operating room to die? Is this your cutoff to ensure the mother’s “rights” are not infringed?

  I choose to disagree.

• White House Responds to All of Those Secession Petitions: There’s No Right to Secede

  January 12, 2013 at 7:03pm

  In reply to DadRocked.

  @ dadrocked

  I think Piers would have a higher number of “official” protesters if it didn’t require registering with the White House to do it.

• Is Adoption a ‘Pro-Life’ Policy That Evangelicals Should Embrace More Fervently?

  January 6, 2013 at 12:00am

  If we are to push a Pro-Life ideology as a governing policy, we must address the issues of single parents, broken homes, fatherless children, wasted and irresponsible mothers and fathers, drug addicted parents and infants born addicted to the same drugs, and so on. In other words, if we are to have our way, and require the law of the land to reflect our values regarding the sanctity of life, and the rights of the individual, we have to address the environment to which these children are born.

  Abortion is and has been a tidy answer to all of these issues, and is in fact the go to argument when pleas to support woman’s rights fall in the face of our collective horror at the wanton destruction of life espoused by liberal talking heads.

  We know abortion is wrong, at least most of the time, if not all the time. So what do we do, stare down the morons who inadvertently and through irresponsible thinking created life and demand, regardless of their obvious deficiencies, demand they step up to the plate and responsibly care for their spawn? Duh, of course not. We turn our focus to a solution that actually works. Adoption. We make it smoother and simpler, and permanent. We make sure adoption is highlighted in our society and in our schools as not only normal, but wonderful, empowering, and sensible.

  And when the birth parents escape the fog of their fear, and change their minds toward the fantasy of only being happy once reunited with “their” child, we tell them no.