User Profile: READRIGHTHERE

READRIGHTHERE

Member Since: November 04, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [1] May 2, 2015 at 7:20pm

    I think making such a declaration and defacing what is basically the symbol for all of us, should automatically cancel any and all access to tax payer funded entitlements, and remove any tax credits or deductions. The extra money could be used to relocate them to any home country of their choice without the opportunity for repatriation. If you don’t like it here, we will help you find a different home.

  • [1] May 2, 2015 at 6:47pm

    Catholic Adoptioin Services had to shut down operations in Massachusetts because they refused to be forced to provide services to a legally married gay couple. As far as the LGBT community is concerned they don’t want to be left alone to do as they please, they want to legally force their acceptance and what they see as their rightful place in the public concept of mainstream normalcy, and they will destroy anyone who begs to differ. Businesses are first, then schools and their text books which will have to provide a disproportionately exaggerated presence of LGBT examples, and Churches (The only true enemy to their complete societal acceptance) are certainly next. At the very least, they will require churches to discontinue providing marriage services for anyone if they will not provide them for gay couples, their “outdated” belief system be damned. The Mormon church has a way out regarding their Temples. (Folks will have to get legally wed by a Government authority and then enter the Temple for a sealing ceremony. This is already done in other countries.) But Glen, even if his prediction is a little overzealous, is not far from the mark. The LGBT community will stop at nothing, it is only a matter of time, and churches, with their lands, holdings, and revenues are certainly a potentially juicy future target.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] April 21, 2015 at 4:50pm

    All behavior is a matter of choice. It may not feel like it, especially when one is entrenched in their addiction, but all behavior is choice. We make choices for all kinds of reasons, far too many to simply categorize and apply generalities. Although people might be like snowflakes, there are moral absolutes. Each individual has to seek out their own motivation for getting with the program. We extend to all their right to opinions, and consenting behaviors, and we are therefore obligated tolerate what happens behind closed doors as long as nobody is having their personal rights trampled, but that doesn’t make every choice acceptable, or normal, or even understandable.

  • [1] April 19, 2015 at 9:07pm

    Depression is the fourth stage of grief when confronted with truth you are desperately trying to ignore. Of course he is depressed, the lies he peddles are more fun for him to believe than the truth coming from Fox News. The last step of the grief cycle is acceptance, doubt he gets there.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] February 28, 2015 at 9:12pm

    This really gets to the crux of the matter. Are we or are we not born gay, straight, or anything in between? (Sounds more like a spectrum disorder more heavily skewed by environmental factors than genetics, because after all, a preference for wearing dresses could hardly be attributed to genetics, and besides it hasn’t been proven and is simply a matter of science by consent (Much like global warming. But that is another discussion). Now being black is certainly genetics making it a crime of reason to treat someone with prejudice (Positively or Negatively) due to their skin shade (If you still do then you are an idiot with self esteem deficiencies in need of psychological review or at least a decent trip to the woodshed.) But more to the point, equating the LGBT struggle for acceptance for their behaviors and that of African Americans for acceptance of their humanity, is inane and worthy of derision and ridicule, and another trip to the woodshed.

  • February 20, 2015 at 3:38pm

    What is vile is the belief that so many now possess that they are allowed to use their first amendment rights to say anything including threats (F the police counts as a threat because F is a verb) to police officers. Resisting arrest means a physical altercation is not only likely but necessary, and I do not believe any cop has the responsibility to figure out just what you are physically willing to do to them before they are allowed to respond in kind. When a cop says stop you had better dang well do it. If the cop is in the wrong file the complaint and pursue means to correct it after the fact. Handcuffs don’t hurt as bad as being an idiot.

  • December 13, 2014 at 7:18pm

    A green light means “Go when safe.” The flashing lights on the squad car say, “it’s not safe.” For all the cop haters, can you possibly imagine this society without them.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] November 18, 2014 at 2:47pm

    The same principle that drives addiction drives the repetition of any behavior. If we find something we have done to be rewarding we will likely do it again (thank you Dr. Skinner.) We have no problem with healthy addictions like exercise, hard work, or aggressive study habits, etc. We are appalled, however, when people engage in self destructive habits that are obviously counter productive such as drug use and abuse, sexual deviation, or hoarding.

    Sex has a built in physiological reward mechanism, making it highly addictive, once the behavior is learned, no one wants to quit cold turkey. Once certain patterns of arousal are ingrained they do not easily go away. No one likes to feel responsible for their poor behaviors, it is infinitely easier to establish victimhood so as to relieve guilt, “I can’t help it.” “The devil made me do it.” or “I was born this way.” Besides, if we can establish that behavior choices are strictly genetic then we can group all deviant behavior into a subset of all that is considered “normal”, and claim that any prejudice against it is similar to that experienced by any other cultural minority for the color of their skin. And look! That is exactly what the Gay agenda is doing. Whether it is marriage equality or demographic representation in media, literature, or school texts, the argument is that the LGBT community needs to gain recognition as perfectly normal. Acceptance, if society will not freely grant it, must be legislated!

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] November 9, 2014 at 6:16pm

    You have been lied to by men centuries dead, who established the nature of the Christian God via political and philosophical means while creating a church that had to forbid the reading of scriptures by the people in order to maintain their “authority.” Please tell me you don’t vote with such a misguided base of information.

  • [-1] November 2, 2014 at 2:33am

    Modern Christians who maintain a belief in a formless God with no body parts or passions discredits the entirety of scripture. (If Jesus is God, meaning all of God, and had a body of flesh and bone after his resurrection which he used to consume fish and honey, and he condescended to endure the process of death and resurrection, basically going through “all that trouble,” what kind of body does he have now, and what scripture gives this “enlightened” view of God today?) Do you even read the book you claim to be infallible? Its OK, there there now, don’t distress, we love you anyway, and one day, when the lies and deceit of the politics of religion through the centuries of a rudderless church have been eradicated by truth, we will be happy to welcome you home.

  • [6] October 30, 2014 at 5:00pm

    If I were a member of an actual minority I would be offended by his linking a behavior pattern that he has practiced and grown accustomed to in his life to the color of my skin or the origin of my birth. Pure arrogance and conceit. I didn’t need to know him that well.

  • September 22, 2014 at 11:05pm

    You can’t use a subjective opinion to bolster another. Heterosexuality is indeed a “choice” even if those who embrace that lifestyle have no idea when that choice was made. Stop asking if someone chose to be straight, the science is in, and much to their dismay, the answer is yes. Which is why it is ludicrous to impose the morality of the civil rights movement on to the plight of the LGBT community who in fact were not born to be gay. As a business owner I have every right to determine what services I will provide and to whom. If everyone is disgusted by my choices they will make a similar choice and refuse me the service of their personal funds. You might have to bake your own rainbow cake, and I may have to accept work at McDonald’s having lost my business to public opinion.

  • September 22, 2014 at 10:51pm

    How do you know that your environment didn’t create a situation in which you were simply more likely to choose heterosexuality versus homosexuality. Your opinion on the matter is subjective and inadmissible.

  • [3] September 22, 2014 at 10:32pm

    Please don’t elevate the cause of the LGBT community and their litany of behavioral choices to the status of discrimination due to skin color. Not the same, no matter the length, volume, or color of the temper tantrum they thrust on society.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] September 22, 2014 at 10:29pm

    This is exactly the consequence when potentially free people are duped into believing the Government should make everything fair. This isn’t a question of faith in God or an interpretation of the bible for business purposes, this is a question of faith in the free market. If my catering company refuses to help a gay couple celebrate their union, then they can blast their disapproval all over the place via social media. I then run the risk because of my convictions of offending potential customers that I would have otherwise been happy and grateful to serve but who have decided because of their convictions that they no longer desire the brand of service I have to offer. Problem solved, and the government never even received so much as a phone call. After all, wedding services hardly constitute a vital community resource.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-2] September 22, 2014 at 10:03pm

    I do support a woman’s right to make her own decisions about her body, such as not having sex at all or using any number of birth control options with varying degrees of certitude, but once a new person is made, the body in question is no longer the woman’s, it is the unborn child’s. Sucks to be her. Sometimes poor decisions lead to consequences we do not cherish. But terminating life should never be an option, period. (Now if the fetus is threatening the mother’s life, that could be considered on a case by case basis)

  • September 22, 2014 at 9:55pm

    Brilliantly put. Truth trumps stupidity yet again. Of course politicians refuse to believe they cannot have their cake and eat it to.

  • September 3, 2014 at 4:58pm

    He is still operating in his career, and is reaching out to former clients from a period while he worked for someone else. Call me cynical, but there are issues with those financially compensated for their “Ministry.”

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] August 20, 2014 at 7:22pm

    Why would the paper be in troubled tweetland for printing the news and not ISIS for making it. This image kind of flies in the face of those who think Jihadist are just freedom fighters against an oppressive US Government. When Christians did not read the scriptures at all we got things like the Spanish Inquisition, Conquistadors, and Ethnic cleansing. As they were able to read their scriptures (Thank you printing press and the KJV from centuries ago, and even just recently for most Catholics, don’t forget) Christians by and large (loonies excepted) pursue peace. As Muslims in the Middle East (and even here) become more deeply entrenched in the practice of their religion we get stuff like this. For those that have read the Koran, is this to be expected?

  • [2] July 19, 2014 at 6:53pm

    According to scripture, they were commanded to do that once, and they never have been again since, “steeped” is hardly an accurate term, and to be honest, if Karma is involved, they have paid enough already. The Jews want peace and to be left alone in their own state, a land that was deeded theirs before Mohammed was ever born, the Muslim nations that surround her have sworn an oath to “Allah” to destroy her and we bend over backwards to shake their left hands. Israel is the only model we can consciously support in the region, period. For us to step aside and allow the destruction of the only official state to ever have occupied its borders (No Muslim state ever existed there throughout history, Palestine was a term given the area, not an official state name.) would be the destruction of advanced civilization in the world, for if a nation is not permitted to live in peace when established by international law, then what country is allowed to live in peace. Oh yeah, Russia apparently doesn’t care much for the rule of anyone else’s law either, and now you can’t even feel safe in an unarmed plane 30,000 feet in the sky.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love