User Profile: RealLiibertarian

RealLiibertarian

Member Since: June 11, 2012

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [-1] January 28, 2015 at 11:19am

    He violated company policy so he’s done
    When will Christians learn that their religion is not an excuse.to break the rules?

  • [1] January 28, 2015 at 8:51am

    She should have worn a tank top and shorts, just to tell them what we think of their ridiculous religious rules.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] January 27, 2015 at 5:11pm

    Deb, I think way too many people on all sides abuse their right to be offended. Whatever happened to saying, ‘Eff it, not my business, not my problem’? Those same people who spend their time getting offended are the same ones who spend their time trying to engineer, direct, and “protect” society, something which I consider to be a waste of time. If it doesn’t personally affect a person, there is no reason to care. Instead, we have people trying to force people to accept their lifestyle and I don’t care if they are gay or Christian, I think they are both idiot losers.

  • [3] January 27, 2015 at 4:53pm

    jlroejim try reading what I said. I said you don’t have the right to NOT be offended. You can be offended all you want.,, That doesn’t mean you have the right to eliminate, restrict, or discriminate against what offends you.

  • [11] January 27, 2015 at 2:46pm

    Personally, I don’t think the government (fed, state, or local) should have any jurisdiction over marriage. We should not have to ask permission from the government to do that, among many other things. I also don’t think that any religion should have any control over it, either. I have no problem with EVERYONE having the status of civil union, and that is the only legal status that counts for anything. If you want a religious ceremony, that’s between you and your church, but it should not have any legal status. I think civil unions should involve nothing more than registering the union with the town clerk, at which point it becomes legally binding on all government and private entities. I’m also in favor of the people involved being able to put a time limit on that union. Give people a chance to admit they made a mistake without having to go through the hassle of divorce.

  • [5] January 27, 2015 at 2:30pm

    Why does there have to be some standard definition of normal? Everybody has a different definition or opinion of it. Why can’t we all just live as we wish and stop trying to make society conform to any one set of views? We do not need a government or societal standard on this issue, and there is certainly nothing in the Constitution to give any government the right to set one.

    Responses (1) +
  • [9] January 27, 2015 at 2:21pm

    There is a huge difference between disagreeing with their lifestyle and putting legal restrictions on it. You have the right to think whatever you want. You don’t have the right to use the force of law to discriminate against them. And you don’t have the right to not be offended by them.

    Responses (8) +
  • [6] January 27, 2015 at 2:10pm

    And that’s valid if you are a Christian, or at least an evangelical Christian. There are Christian denominations who do not agree with you, like the Episcopalians and the Presbyterians. Not to mention all of us who are not Christians? Where is the legal status for Conservative Christianity owning the term ‘marriage’? Can you show me a patent or a copyright legally filed? That is what counts in this country. Look, I know YOU think its a sin, but the rest of us don’t. What gives your narrow denominational view the right to rule the rest of us? The Bible is not law in this country.

    Responses (3) +
  • January 27, 2015 at 11:59am

    Considering the hatred some of the so called ‘Christians’ have for the internet and their irrational fear of porn, and the way they try to censor public libraries, such vandalism would not surprise me. All they would need to find is a couple of their ‘banned books’ and I can easily see them going off on the library.

  • [-4] January 27, 2015 at 11:51am

    I am a libertarian. That means I don’t like groups that restrict freedom, and evangelical Christians are right up there with Muslims with their hatred of freedom and their wish to impose theocratic rule on the rest of us. I’ll support religious rights to full equality when they quit their crusade against gay marriage, women’s rights and choice, and anything else they deludedly class as ‘sinful’.

  • [-2] January 27, 2015 at 11:48am

    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/01/michigan-christians-want-to-drive-carpetbagger-atheist-activist-out-of-town/

  • [-2] January 27, 2015 at 11:44am

    Yeah, maybe be better off in Michigan, they have a no-go zone where non Christians will be driven out. More BS about Christian persecution. Here’s a clue, being forced to follow the same law as everyone else is not persecution or discrimination. Keep your offensive religious beliefs out of the rest of our lives.

  • [-2] January 26, 2015 at 9:53am

    Ellietoo You should also read up on the Pequot Wars.

  • [-6] January 26, 2015 at 9:34am

    Ellietoo Have you ever cracked a history book? The Plimoth colonists were split, some coming to enforce their own religion, some coming to start a new life but they were all under contract as part of a commercial enterprise. And take a look at the actions of the conquistadors in central America, and the forced conversions of the Norse in the 10th century.

  • [5] January 24, 2015 at 9:20am

    Considering how many times I see the so called Christians on this site insult other denominations and curse the ecumenical movement, I’m surprised this is getting any support around here.

    Responses (2) +
  • [5] January 24, 2015 at 9:16am

    When religion and politics mix, people get burned at the stake.

  • [-1] January 24, 2015 at 9:09am

    McMad- your so called immorality is everyone else’s freedom. Keep your theocracy to yourself.

  • [1] January 24, 2015 at 9:06am

    Absolutely what we DO NOT need. Keep your damned theocracy, your bronze age mythology, and hatred of freedom to yourself. Logic and reason should rule this country, not somebody’s, or anybody’s, religious belief.

    Responses (2) +
  • January 22, 2015 at 10:04am

    You make no sense. I am advocating removing ALL religious law and doctrine frome the legal system. Christian, Muslim and everyone else.

  • January 22, 2015 at 9:50am

    It never ceases to amaze me how people can’t live their own lives and stay out of other people’s business. This is a matter between a woman and her doctor. Government, religion and society have no right to force themselves into the equation.

123 To page: Go