User Profile: RealLiibertarian

RealLiibertarian

Member Since: June 11, 2012

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [-2] September 19, 2014 at 7:52am

    Wrong, Jenn. The Scots who wanted independence wanted it because they weren’t getting enough socialist benefits from Westminster. Out of all the Members of Parliament for Scotland, there is exactly ONE conservative Member.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] September 18, 2014 at 8:46am

    So all you supporters of the Constitution want to ignore that part that says ‘No religious test shall be required’. You Christians are hypocrites and your own worst enemy.

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] September 15, 2014 at 11:19am

    Southe. You do not have a patent on morality. You can be completely moral without being Christian. Dont lie cheat or steal and don’t injure or kill anyone. All the rest is bs designed to control us.

  • [3] September 15, 2014 at 7:57am

    No Feral, read your history. We were never a democracy, we are a republic with a Constitution designed to protect the rights of the minority and to protect our right to not be Christian. The ten commandments, much though they are touted as the basis for are laws, are no such thing, in fact, the First Amendment is in direct opposition to the first commandment. What we are seeing is the backlash against the backlash. With the rise of the imMoral Majority (which was never a majority) in the 80′s, a backlash started against these religious fanatics who wanted to control our lives. WE’ve had enough of being told how to live, what we can read or see, and how we should live our lives. Now the Christian backlash has started as they see that we are becoming a post Christian society and the Christians are desperately trying to hang on to their power and feeling it slipping away rapidly.

  • [2] September 15, 2014 at 7:30am

    Thanks, cdn. Yeah, what started out to be an intelligent news site has devolved into another Christian Reich propaganda site. I find it interesting that most of these people have turned against the sites owner and founder since he has publicly promoted tolerance and libertarianism. They all claim to support freedom and the rights of the people, but as soon as one of those rights contradicts Christian evangelical dogma, they are willing to take that right away. Hypocrites, most of ‘em.

  • [4] September 15, 2014 at 12:22am

    49- you prove my point. We do not have to share your morality. Just because you think it is not morally right, does not mean that everyone does. and the First Amendment gives us the right to believe in a different morality.

  • [2] September 15, 2014 at 12:12am

    All- and the Christian right is so tolerant of Pagan shops, pentacles and solstice bushes, and individual freedom. As I’ve said before, all this so called ‘war on religion’ is, is a pushback against the Christian right who, since the 80′s has been trying to reverse the freedoms we won in the 60′s and 70′s.

    Mick- your ‘deviancy’ is another’s freedom. And I will always support individual freedom over societal ‘gruppenthink’. Sure, they can protest each other for the next hundred years, and both of them have the right, but don’t think that the strip club is going to give up before the church does. Remember that it is the town that wants this to stop, so both sides, the church that was the instigator, and the strip club that is responding, need to agree to cease.

  • September 15, 2014 at 12:02am

    If you are going that route, then the strip club owners and dancers have exactly the same right to protest the church. The only thing we have to accept is what is legal and what is not, and, no matter how the sanctimonious folks don’t like it, the strip club is legal.

  • [1] September 14, 2014 at 11:48pm

    Non Christians and more liberal Christians.

  • [9] September 14, 2014 at 11:40pm

    Sure, go ahead with the thumbs down and the insults, but the fact remains that none of you ever respond to the question. Why should those of us who are not hard line Christians have to follow your religious dogma about sin and morality? The First Amendment, which you all claim to support, gives us the right to live our own lives, with regard to your religious rules, but that is a side of the amendment that you all refuse to recognise.

    Responses (10) +
  • [2] September 14, 2014 at 11:26pm

    The protesters at the church started in retaliation for the church protesters at the club. If the church would get a clue and leave other people alone to pursue their legal activities, instead of trying to ram their outdated and pathetic morality down everyone else’s throat, this wouldn’t be happening.. When will these churches accept the fact that the rest of us have no obligation to follow their rules concerning sin and morality?

    Responses (6) +
  • [6] September 14, 2014 at 11:24pm

    It is legal to be topless in Ohio and some other states.

    Responses (2) +
  • September 13, 2014 at 7:51am

    Intelligent people don’t need to resort to that kind of violence. If you can’t discipline with your hand, you should not be a parent. And if you were such delinquents that a “switch” was necessary, you should have been dealing with the law. But it does explain why so many on this site have 19th century, mouthbreathing, knuckledragging ideas, so useless in the 21st century.

    Responses (1) +
  • September 10, 2014 at 9:03pm

    CE used the same dating system as the Western or Gregorian calendar. It simply changes the name from a dead language and keeps it secular, since it is now the international calendar of business and used by countries that have no Christian Bias.

    @808- you ignored the second part of my post.
    there is a huge difference between telling someone about your religion and attempting to enforce it by rule of law. Do you acknowledge that under freedom of religion, we have the right to reject your rules and morality and live by secular law?

  • [1] September 10, 2014 at 6:13pm

    AD is being replaced in many areas by CE Common Era.

    @ Duck We’d all be a lot happier if you guys would leave the rest of us alone and stop trying to make us live by your rules and morals. We have the right to reject Christian ideas and live our own way, whether that be atheist, secularist, or non Christian religion. When will you get that and stop trying to convert us or legislate your beliefs?

  • [-3] September 9, 2014 at 6:16pm

    Gee AvenJERK, the amount that you keep talking about Nambla, I figure you must be their PR officer.

  • [1] September 9, 2014 at 6:04pm

    Do you object to the ruby slippers from the Wizard of Oz that are on display?

  • September 8, 2014 at 6:19pm

    Ster- but you guys have no problem using the Government to curtail freedom for those who don’t believe in your morality. Plenty of Christian legal movements to stop gay marriage, curtail gay rights, censor media that you find offensive, close adult entertainment venues, push dress codes- I could go on. This is the problem. You want the government to enforce your morality, but get your knickers in a twist when others push back and use your methods. You could end all of this by leaving people alone and not trying to legislate and demand your morality.

  • [-2] September 5, 2014 at 9:08am

    When a leftwing actor says something, you people are all about calling him an idiot and saying that such people should have no platform or right to speak about things outside their job description. Ah, but when a conservative actor says something, these are great pearls of wisdom that we should all listen to and take note of. You people are hypocrites and idiots. These people, left and right are actors, and worse, reality stars. No clue about anything.

  • [1] September 5, 2014 at 8:09am

    Problem, cpfaff, is that character needs to be individual, not some social standard. I’d rather see a nation of individuals, a nation of creative, thinking, even eccentric individuals, rather than a nation of people who have been taught that we must dress to placate the corporate masters, the religious prudes, and the PC brigade.

123 To page: Go