User Profile: RealLiibertarian

RealLiibertarian

Member Since: June 11, 2012

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [1] February 5, 2016 at 10:56am

    How about something regarding real freedom? “In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own.”- Thomas Jefferson

  • [-10] February 5, 2016 at 10:51am

    Sin is a man made construct, designed to control the masses. It has no value as a legitimate idea. The only real “sin” is hurting someone else. Do try and grasp the concept that we do not all have to accept your values, morals, or concept of “sin”. Between your own Bible’s statements on free will, and the First Amendment, she and everyone else are free to believe and act as suits them best.

  • February 5, 2016 at 10:42am

    No. These are trumped up charges that the US forced Sweden to issue, so they could have him arrested and sent back to the US. Funny how some on the right want transparency about Benghazi, but not about everything else.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] February 5, 2016 at 8:27am

    The bankers, hedge fund administrators, and Wall Street manipulators caused the great recession. By pushing large amounts of money at congress, they have stopped investigations and kept themselves out of jail, where they belong. Iceland jailed their bsnkers, bailed out the people and they are recovering well. We should be doing the same. Screw the bankers, screw Wall Street. No more financial bailouts, jail the bankers.

  • February 4, 2016 at 3:56pm

    No, there is no giving up, but in order to buck the status quo, it may be necessary to put up with some unpalatable things. Paul is out. He was the only one on the right who said anything about curbing the banks or reversing citizens. We saw how much the GOP at large liked that. The system is still run by the parties, and by the money. So, as I say, Sanders/Warren. Sometimes, medicine tastes foul and has side effects. But unless you can show me anyone else running that wants to break the hold money has……

  • [1] February 4, 2016 at 3:32pm

    Point remains, who is going to do it? Right wing judges are not going to overturn people united.. I don’t think you are going to get any support from anyone in government to abolish the IRS. We need someone who will completely buck the system to break the hold that the corporations, banks, and Wall Street have on government. Nobody on the right will do that. Hillary has been paid off, so she won’t. You are left with two choices, the libertarian candidate, who is not likely to win, or a Sanders/Warren ticket, who could. No, it’s not my ideal and there’s a hell of a lot wrong with it, but I see nobody on the right with the stones to break the system.

  • [3] February 4, 2016 at 3:10pm

    OK, Mike. Who are the politicians who make the rules going to listen to, the average Joe in the street or the corporate lobbyist with deep pockets for bribes? Until we overturn citizens united, institute term limits, and curb lobbying, there will be no restricitons on corporations. Even the new trade deals are set for them, where they can sue governments for regulating them.

  • [5] February 4, 2016 at 3:05pm

    You don’t have to choose between the two. Get rid of this ridiculous notion of two parties that rule for the elites, the lifetime politicians and the CEOs, and think beyond the number two. More parties, more choices, more freedom.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] February 4, 2016 at 2:59pm

    Which would tie in nicely with Washington’s warning against political parties.

  • [-1] February 4, 2016 at 2:57pm

    The world has changed, unfortunately. There is much that has happened since 1781 that the Framers never imagined, much less provided for in the constitution. I’d love us to go back to an 18th century way of thinking, but I don’t see 99.9% of the people accepting that.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] February 4, 2016 at 2:48pm

    Slaves to whom? Slaves to the government or slaves to the corporatocracy? Voting Dem will get you one, voting Rep will get you the other.

    Responses (12) +
  • [20] February 3, 2016 at 12:30pm

    Anyone who believes anything that Bachmann says needs serious mental help and heavy meds. Billy, why are we still giving a stage to Bachmann and her moronic pronouncements?

    Responses (1) +
  • [-2] February 3, 2016 at 12:23pm

    One of two things. If he believes and intends to push his ideas- returning Christianity to the forefront, reversing Roe, and reversing the the gay marriage decision, then he’s running for Pastor in Chief and that’s not what the country wants or needs. If he’s just pandering to get the Evangelical vote, then he’s not to be trusted.Why can’t you people keep your religious beliefs out of everyone else’s lives and let us all have the real freedom to live as we wish, no matter how much it offends you?

  • [2] February 3, 2016 at 10:56am

    Mike. Didn’t say we needed to scrap the parties, I said we need to scrap the system that only gives us two bad choices. More parties means more possibilities for people to actually choose what they want, instead of being forced to choose between the lesser of two evils.

  • [-1] February 3, 2016 at 9:39am

    Then why do the conservatives spend so much time and money pandering to the evangelicals? Why does the t party make such a big deal about idiots like Bachmann and Santor?

  • [7] February 3, 2016 at 9:34am

    Which is why we need to scrap the 2 party system and give serious attention to the Libertarian party and let the voters know they have a real third choice. The media will never cover the LP because they are beholden to the two idiot psrties.

    Responses (6) +
  • [2] February 3, 2016 at 9:24am

    Ted Cruz does not support libertarians as long as he keeps pushing the idea of making religion a central part of his campaign.

  • [21] February 3, 2016 at 9:20am

    The GOP is, sadly, not fond of freedom and liberty, unless it is freedom that they approve of. Any freedoms that they disagree with or find offensive, are freedoms that they wI’ll try to ban.

    Responses (5) +
  • [-3] February 2, 2016 at 3:17pm

    Pardon me, I should have said in the law, not the bill of rights.

  • [-3] February 2, 2016 at 3:11pm

    Is that why only 2 1/2 of the Commandments are in the Bill of Rights?

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love