User Profile: Rebalee


Member Since: November 14, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [-1] April 27, 2016 at 4:20pm

    It would stand to reason that if her pac was low on funds if he’s picking her as a running mate his pac might share funds with hers. The pac now will need to promote her for VP which cost money.
    Not saying I like the pick but I don’t think you can call it a bribe as their individual pacs aren’t allow to collaborate with the canidates legally. Pacs aren’t run by the canidates. More often than not I think they do more damage than good. Like this for instance is going to be seen as some kind of bribe by the Trumprons because they are to stupid to know pac rules even if you tell them they will swear up and down the pacs against their canidate are cheating.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] April 26, 2016 at 12:40pm

    I think they removed it because they figured out what it might have meant or could mean.
    A subtle comment on what universities are doing to Christianity perhaps. Even if it was put together by a young misguided artist who doesn’t believe in God or Jesus the artist hit on something profound.
    Wait until Christmas and when everyone is squabbling about greetings and nativity scenes think DARTS right into the heart of Christianity.

  • [5] April 26, 2016 at 12:31pm

    I think it’s profound. Whether the artist meant it to be a desecration or a subtle comment on what is happening to Christianity we would have to ask. I see it as what’s happening to Christianity today. Did the university figure it out and that’s why no big fight about freedom of speech to back it up and keep it prominently displayed for all to see how diverse and inclusive the college is. Accident that it says it all or not it does say it all. I would give the student an A+ if I were the art teacher because I’m a Christian and it displays exactly how I feel about having darts thrown at my religious beliefs daily.

  • March 4, 2016 at 3:50pm

    I think that claiming to be an athiest means that you have no one to pray to and therefore could not give an opening prayer. I would say if an athiest has something of importance they want to convey to the group and ask to give an opening statement it could be done but it shouldnt cancel the opening prayer.

  • [6] March 3, 2016 at 6:10pm

    Is it hipocritical for people who jet and yatch around in their privately owned fuel burning luxury transportation to lecture me about my Jeep Liberty leaving a carbon footprint? Act and shut up.

  • [15] March 2, 2016 at 2:42pm

    I will be writing in Cruz. You can still write in a canidate right?

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] March 2, 2016 at 11:19am

    Looks like he just realized he sold his soul to be VP.

  • March 1, 2016 at 12:16pm

    Coulter just thinks Trump will win. I’ve questioned her choices in candidates since she was a huge mouth piece and backer of Chris Christy. She just backs who she thinks can win. Winning seems to be more important than who.

  • [1] February 29, 2016 at 3:21pm

    I don’t think they should make a blanket law that being involved in a domestic violence situation takes away your second amendment rights. This is just another way to take guns from people. It would be like taking away your right to own a car because you have liquor in the house. You might get drunk and run someone over.

  • [2] February 27, 2016 at 12:03am

    Haha. Throw yourself on the floor kicking and screaming because the election year pre-empted your show.

  • [2] February 26, 2016 at 11:13pm

    Trump is clueless. He’s rich and he owns stuff but he hasn’t a clue about any of it. Businesses get audited all the time. If they own **** they get audited. If they have inventory they get audited. If his companies didn’t get outside auditors to audit them on their own then the IRS will audit them. Maybe that’s cheaper. Whatever. He’s an idiot who makes cutsy baby faces when he doesn’t get his way or win. Yeah I want a toddler in the White House. Not!

  • February 25, 2016 at 11:54pm

    Her and her family should be awarded the land. Sounds to me like the owners never claimed it after their company went out of business because they didn’t want to pay taxes on it.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] February 24, 2016 at 2:34pm

    You are so beyond wrong. Israel does to let Palestinians who live in Israel and are citizens vote. Muslims in Israel are allowed to vote just like the rest of the citizens. In fact there are a lot of Palestinians that are citizens of Israel as well as other muslims from other places and that even originate from Israel. They are not band from voting. The muslims that live there are peaceful and wish to live and work there and they tend to be open about not liking the surrounding Muslims that cause them all trouble and Israel harm.

  • [1] February 24, 2016 at 9:56am

    I’m really disappointed in Rubio. He is repeatedly lying about the gang of eight immigration bill. Cruz was not for that bill. Yes he put stuff in it. But the amendments he added to it were to stop the worst aspects of the bill from becoming reality if it did pass. He voted against it because he didn’t want it at all but he put in some changes incase it didn’t get voted down to try and make it better. Rubio is the liar. He has started following democrat tactics of if is say this often enough enough people will believe to ruin Cruz. I’m almost at the point I would vote for Trump before I would vote for Rubio.

  • [4] February 23, 2016 at 12:15pm

    We don’t need to deport them. We need to quit giving them free stuff and most of them will just go home. As those that don’t go home turn up on the radar then deport them.
    My immigration policy would be to inforce the immigration laws. That would be going all the way back to having to have a job they are coming to and a sponsor.

  • [3] February 23, 2016 at 12:07pm

    Pardon but I personally do not, like me repeat that, DO NOT! want compromise! I WANT THE EXISTING LAW INFORCED. NO THE GOVERNMENT IST THERE TO ALWAYS BE MAKING AND ADDING LAWS. We have laws covering and recovering issues of immigration and they are not be INFORCED. The nonsense about Americans being to good to do certain jobs is just that. Nonsense! Most of the people getting government aid are getting because they refuse to work. And now because the government are so freaking generous with our money we people flocking in to go on the dole with our lazy worthless lot that are to good to work for a living. You are the one who doesn’t understand our great documents. We didn’t need another law at all in the subject of immigration. The laws we have need to be INFORCED.

    Responses (2) +
  • February 23, 2016 at 11:01am

    If you read the New Testament you will find that homosexuality is still a sin. The punishment however is not death by our hand. The apostles told the churches to cast these people out of their congregations. They are unclean. What became shunning for a sin. The same goes for any kind of fornication. This pastor in no way is suggesting homosexuality is “ok.” What he is saying is the New Testament relieved us from meeting out punishment. Basically you have the right idea as to how it is to be dealt with. We are not supposed to condon it or kill them for it just keep ourselves separate from it to the extent that we can. Now I can’t tell you scripture and verse on this without doing a whole bunch of research For You. It would be better for you and me if you just pick up a bible if you don’t have one and read the New Testament. By the way those bibles in hotel room, the Gideon, that’s there for you to steal. I myself have donated money to put those there so you can have one. God Bless.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] February 18, 2016 at 11:48pm

    He was a boy and his mother made her own choices.

  • [6] February 18, 2016 at 11:44pm

    I rarely even bother to comment here anymore for that very reason. Seems the comment stream here is taken over by trolls that hate Beck. They can’t possibly be people who pay for The Blaze just so they can trash Glen Beck and disagree with every little thing that happen on his shows.

  • [5] February 18, 2016 at 2:34pm

    Why do tax payers have to finance a performers security for their show anyway? She should get the black panthers to provide her security. A cop wants to sign up to do that and get paid by the performer great. The police department shouldn’t be jumping through hoops providing personal protection for any of these people out of local tax payer funds.

    Responses (1) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love