User Profile: Recovering_Sheeple

Recovering_Sheeple

Member Since: November 23, 2012

CommentsDisplaying Recovering_Sheeple's 10 most recent comments.

  • Chuck Norris will never have a heart attack, his heart is not stupid enough to attack him.

  • Here is an hour of information – the looting of America — http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=gP6rny-E1Cw

  • End the fed — — — — http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wTNkSSrWpc

  • to number 4, even if that building didn’t have direct connection, the one just up the road and the drones in the sky did. IMO it is a CYA thing, as a liberal/progressive/socialist she was only thinking on level one, not thinking about what outcome would happen after they decided to co-op the ArabSpring/Occupy movement, before they knew who they were dealing with. And now we give the MB hundreds of millions of tax dollars, top of the line F-16s and tanks. American fail like the Bay of Pigs.

  • The truth. Regardless of who it hurts. Any trolls have questions??

  • Barack Hessuen Obama (Father is a British Citizen), John McCain (born on Sovereign Panama Soil), Marco Rubio [non US father at time of birth, Naturalized after birth] are all not eligible to be POTUS or VPOTUS.

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001401—-000-.html http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0088_0162_ZS.html

  • So, the only jus soli JS naturalized-at-birth US Citizenships NAB were meant for former slaves, or for babies with one Indian or US Citizen parent, since Indians are US Citizens. (I know what you are thinking, but you can’t take laws/regulations from 2011 and apply them to the 1960s now, she was not age of majority, but still NAB vs NBC clearly defined)

    STJ does not mean 2 foreign parents as “Democrats” falsely espouse, since that would mean having 2 foreign parents have more rights than having 1 US Citizen parent or slave.

    Democrats diluted the true rights of Indians and blacks with foreigners for their own political agendas, to create a new slave class (from anchor babies).

    It also makes no sense for the law to read “no US Citizen parents born on US soil” are required for NAB Citizenship but the next paragraph says “one US Citizen parent born on US soil” is required for NAB Citizenship, but still not a Natural Born Citizen.

    Also that shows that 1 US Citizen parent born on US soil is just a statutory naturalized-at-birth US Citizen. So no matter how you slice it, it takes 2 citizen parents to be natural born by natural law.

    So that means, Per the Constitution of the United States; Article II Section 1 including and not limited by The Fourteenth Amendment and also the Declaration of Independence, upheld by the Supreme Court with – SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 88 U.S. 162, Minor v. Happersett, Argued: February 9, 1875 — Decided: March 29, 1

  • Democrats realized in the 60s that they were not going to be able to stop MLK and the republicans with the civil rights movement. Wanting to still **** on blacks and Indians they made them their slave class (The great society) and for decades have been pushing, and now push harder for TAXing the wealthy and redistribute as entitlements/security that they “feel” the peasants have coming, nevermind, ill get back to the topic.

    US Code 1401 statutes for naturalized-at-birth (NAB) US Citizenship still reflect the original intent of the 14th amendment:

    Democratic Government classifications are as follows;

    NAB #1=JS/STJ Anyone born here subject to the jurisdiction (STJ) of the USA, as in having no other citizenship by natural law is a naturalized-at-birth US Citizen (NAB). (No other jurisdiction means no country alliegence/slave)

    Next is Anchor babies (with 2 foreign citizen parents) are not born subject to the jurisdiction of the USA since they are from born foreign citizens (from the parents).

    NAB#2=JS/1IND Or, you must have 1 American Indian (1IND) parent (meaning 1 US Citizen) and be born on US soil, jus soli (JS).

    NAB#3=NJS/1USC Or, you must have 1 US Citizen parent (1USC) and be born abroad (non jus soli NJS).

    NAB#4=NJS/2USC Or, you must have 2 US Citizen parents (2USC) and be born abroad (non jus soli NJS).

  • Blaze posting is weird – CPAC Orly Taitz was able to discuss the issue of Obama’s forged IDs with former Attorney General of the United States Edwin Meese Taitz provided Meese a copy of Obama’s 2009 Tax Return, which was posted by Obama on WhiteHouse.gov on April 15, 2010, PDF of which was not initially flattenned before posting, and which contains an unredacted Social Security Number. Taitz also provided Meese E-Verify and SSNVS reports showing that the Social Security number used by Obama was never assigned to Obama , an individual with a stolen Social Security number is residing in the White House.. Taitz advised Meese that she brought a legal challenge in the Federal Court in California and that the Holder Department of Justice appeared on behalf of the U.S. Congress seeking to dismiss the case, presenting to the judge that the U.S. Congress does not want the court to adjudicate on the merits. Taitz related to Meese that a number of U. S. Representatives and U.S. Senators advised Taitz that when the Department of Justice made such statement, the U.S. Attorneys did not consult with the Congress, that the members of Congress were kept in the dark and that we have now a scandal much bigger than Watergate that involves not only the President, but also the Attorney General and the Department of Justice.
    http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/breakng-news-orly-taitz-discusses-obama-fraud-to-members-of-us-congress-at-cpac/
    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=4029

  • CPAC Attorney Orly Taitz was able to discuss the issue of Obama’s forged IDs with former Attorney General of the United States Edwin Meese.

    Taitz provided Meese a copy of Obama’s 2009 Tax Return, which was posted by Obama on WhiteHouse.gov on April 15, 2010, PDF of which was not initially flattened before posting, and which contains an unredacted Social Security Number. Taitz also provided Meese E-Verify and SSNVS reports showing that the Social Security number used by Obama was never assigned to Obama , as such we have the most serious National security breach, an individual with a stolen Social Security number is residing in the White House.. Taitz advised Meese that she brought a legal challenge in the Federal Court in California and that the Holder Department of Justice appeared on behalf of the U.S. Congress seeking to dismiss the case, presenting to the judge that the U.S. Congress does not want the court to adjudicate on the merits. Taitz related to Meese that a number of U. S. Representatives and U.S. Senators advised Taitz that when the Department of Justice made such statement, the U.S. Attorneys did not consult with the Congress, that the members of Congress were kept in the dark and that we have now a scandal much bigger than Watergate that involves not only the President, but also the Attorney General and the Department of Justice. http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=402903