User Profile: RedHarley


Member Since: October 03, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [8] May 27, 2015 at 4:31pm

    “I know this might be unpopular but…..”

    Yes, it will be unpopular, because this is not “everyone’s dog”. This is a veterans service dog. I would be more likely to deny you service than this young man and his companion.

  • [2] May 26, 2015 at 10:12pm

    Slut is not profanity. You think the censors would have let it on the air back on the 70s if it was ?
    George Carlin had the seven words you cannot say on television back around the same time. Slut is not one of them.

  • [4] May 26, 2015 at 4:24pm

    I would get the old Chevy truck soon. The price will skyrocket after the first EMP.

  • [4] May 26, 2015 at 4:21pm

    Benedict did not leave on his own. He was forced out to make room for the Marxist.

  • [5] May 26, 2015 at 4:12pm

    Why does The Blaze act like they worry about the 4th amendment when they are shredding the first amendment here ? On the Rose McGowan story I said “Rose, you ignorant S L U *, something that was said many times on SNL on regular broadcast TV in the seventies !! The Blaze removed that post. Seriously ?

    Responses (7) +
  • [3] May 26, 2015 at 4:06pm

    Say goodbye to the 1st amendment here at The Blaze.
    They removed my post which made a statement that was played on regular TV on SNL back in the SEVENTIES !! Wow. I am actually stunned.
    I said Rose, you ignorant S L U * , and got my post removed
    Blaze, you have turned a corner here as far as I am concerned. No different than Chris Ruddy’s Newsmax , They remove my posts many times when I talk about Ruddy giving $1 million to the Clinton Foundation and Massage Parlor.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] May 26, 2015 at 6:05am

    You and I often think alike. I was going to say that summoning demons is easier using

  • [6] May 25, 2015 at 5:16pm

    “Not in my office,” he wrote. “I told her there’s a line for mothers with small children and she should stand on the shorter line with the rest of the mothers.”

    Every time he used MOTHERS in this sentence he was uttering half of the words he should have used.

  • [42] May 25, 2015 at 5:13pm

    This is what the left and the Obama administration want for THIS country.
    If you are accused of racism, at any time by anybody, you should just kill yourself.
    Or let a mob of the “victims” kill you, while on their way to steal some shoes.

    Responses (1) +
  • [78] May 25, 2015 at 9:57am

    So strange the assailants were not described…..

    Responses (7) +
  • [159] May 23, 2015 at 12:30am

    Conflicted yet again. Wish we knew what was in this. Generally speaking, when Harry Reid, Lizzy Warren and the unions are against something, I am for it.
    But then again, McConnell is a traitorous POS, as is Boehner.
    What to do…what to do.
    I think my stand right now is to oppose it if for no other reason than it is too secretive. If we can’t see it, then don’t freaking vote for it.

    Responses (4) +
  • [-1] May 21, 2015 at 10:46pm

    I just have a couple of questions. People argue that weed is no different than booze.
    Everyone I know that smokes weed does it to get high. That is not true with people that drink alcohol. What do you call someone who drinks only with the goal of getting drunk ?
    Second, would the country benefit from more drug users, or less drug users ? And would legalization create more or less drug users ?

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] May 21, 2015 at 10:08pm

    I knew this would draw a lot of flak, and understandably.
    As far as whether more drugs would follow, that is obvious. The same arguments that others are making for marijuana will be used for other drugs.
    Here’s one: You can’t be pro freedom and against legalizing weed
    Ok, Then you can’t be pro freedom and against legalizing meth.
    You can’t be pro freedom and against legalizing crack.
    You can’t be pro freedom and against legalizing black tar heroin.
    You can’t be pro freedom and against legalizing date rape drugs.
    You can use that argument for almost anything.

    Also, while I am not advocating return to prohibition, I defy anyone to refute the fact that without alcohol there would be a lot more people alive today whose lives were taken by drunks, a lot more marriages would not have ended in divorce, and a lot more people’s whose childhoods were taken from them by alcohol use by their parents. If anyone believes that adding more legal things to numb people’s minds will not result in even more destruction of human beings, then you are not being realistic.

    Then I hear the argument that more kids lives are destroyed by the enforcement of drug laws than are destroyed by the use of those drugs by their family members………..really ?
    You need to spend some time in the inner city. I have and it ain’t pretty.

    Lastly, anyone that believes that making marijuana legal and taxing it will end the illegal drug trade only needs to look at the cigarette market in New York City.

  • [2] May 21, 2015 at 4:30pm

    I have to disagree with this one. It is the slippery slope. It is boiling the frog. All of this stuff seems so harmless, but in the end it will destroy us. Other drugs are sure to follow if you use the same arguments. We are a better society without even more people running around with their heads in a fog, let alone legally using crystal meth and crack.
    That should work out great for the kids of the users.
    I agree it should be handled by the states, but I would hope my state does not make this mistake.

    Responses (8) +
  • [2] May 18, 2015 at 8:20am

    May have been big clackers, but just as easily could have been a brain that would fit in Obama’s clacker box.

  • [13] May 18, 2015 at 8:14am

    Rescue crews don’t offer themselves up as sacrifices to the moron gods. They gladly do their jobs, but a line must be drawn when these good folks lives are needlessly risked because some idiot decides to endanger his life. This idea that police/ firefighters / EMS personnel are there to put themselves at risk for any reason whatsoever is ridiculous.

  • [119] May 17, 2015 at 5:19pm

    Just a chip off the old worthless pile of steaming dog crap.

    Responses (1) +
  • [29] May 17, 2015 at 10:29am

    Louis CK just needs a few initials changed.
    From Louis CK to Louis POS.

  • [3] May 16, 2015 at 7:18pm

    Of course they kill other Muslims……..that is in the headline.

  • [67] May 16, 2015 at 7:16pm

    You had the same thought I had. I am glad they separated O from the believers of the cross, because they are not one and the same.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love