User Profile: Red West

Red West

Member Since: March 21, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • July 31, 2014 at 1:32pm

    He thinks the comments by Kyle damaged his reputation. Regardless of what did or did not happen and whether Kyle was telling the truth or not, just what does this moron think continuing to pursue a $1.8 million against the widow and child of the one of the most well-known fallen heroes in America is going to do for that reputation? What an unbelievably short-sighted turd. Unless he’s so broke he’s borderline homeless, his best bet would be to come out and say “I wanted only to clear my name, not to punish a woman who was innocent in the entire situation. I have my verdict, and I feel the record has been set straight. I’m therefore waiving the judgement and hope that we can all move on and put this behind us, as there were no winners here.”

    Short of that, I think he’s pretty much beyond help.

  • [3] July 30, 2014 at 2:39pm

    What’s the problem? They are in the business of providing a great dining experience. Is listening to a screaming baby 3′ away at the next table really something you want to do? I don’t. And when restaurants are that loud and out of control, I don’t go there. And yes… I have kids. And when they would start acting up when they were young, I had them out of there before they ever had a chance to annoy anyone. It’s called respecting the rights of others.

    Private business… good for them.

  • [1] July 30, 2014 at 2:35pm

    Still going to Holder hoping for action? Seriously? That’s like asking Al Capone to investigate Frank Nitti. These guys seriously need to get a clue. I mean if they’re going through the motions just to have it all documented so they can say they tried… fine. But if they’re actually thinking this corrupt scumbag is going to suddenly revert to ethics, law and justice, they’re delusional and beyond stupid.

  • [28] July 29, 2014 at 3:50pm

    “Murders people for money?” Just ONCE, I’d love to see people that make retarded comments like this have to live in a world where the American military did NOT kill when it needed to. Believe me… I’m sure it turns the stomach of every vet (I know it does with my Dad and his father who fought in Vietnam and WWII respectively). The notion that they watched their friends dying beside them so that trolls like you could make asinine comments like that is truly a disgusting thought.

    So by all means… you want to live in a world beyond the reach of those who “murder for money”… pick your sorry a## up and move the middle east… we’ll pull out of the region altogether and you can live their in your little paradise… where they don’t kill for money. Granted, they’ll kill for 1,000 other reasons that any sane civilized human being would be repulsed by, but not for money, right?

    And just a quick side note on your truly stupid username. Forget the story of Jesus turning over tables and going off on the tax collectors? I’m not even a religious person, but seeing frauds like you try to hide behind a shield of religion is so disgusting it offends even those of us who align with no religion at all. What Jesus purportedly taught was “GIVING”… “CHARITY”… caring for your fellow man. Can you show me the passage in ANY bible that references GOVERNMENT CONFISCATION AND REALLOCATION OF WEALTH AT THE THREAT OF IMPRISONMENT? I missed that passage.

  • [1] July 17, 2014 at 1:51pm

    I’d say they might have been whistling out the back end as that tunnel came crashing down around them, but then knowing what we know about them, I’m sure that whistle has been bored out to more of a “whoosh” noise at this point.

  • [2] July 17, 2014 at 1:50pm

    Just one more example of Israeli’s doing it right. Not only did they destroy the tunnel on their end, but they destroyed it on the other ensuring any scumbag who may have escaped the initial strike has now been buried alive. Well done! I’d love to have Netanyahu as a Commander in Chief instead of Rodney Mom Jeans King asking the scum of the world… “Can’t we all just get along?”

  • [7] July 17, 2014 at 1:47pm

    That’s how Israeli’s play Whack-A-Mole!

    I won’t apologize nor do I feel remotely bad about the fact that watching this brought a huge smile to my face. Now they just need to repeat the process about 100,000 more times and we may start to see a slightly better world.

  • [6] July 16, 2014 at 4:16pm

    What these morons like Zuckerberg’s sister fail to understand is that free speech without fear of reprisal need to go hand in hand. Yes… it would be a wonderful world if we could all engage in dialog openly and without anonymity. Unfortunately, when standing up for your principles can cost you your job, your business, your home or your life because radicals choose to attack rather than win the debate, it only serves to silence people and put an end to all debate. Having the ability to engage in debate without fear of being attacked in any forum outside the one in which you’ve chosen to engage… that’s critical to the free flow of thoughts.

    Yes, that means you have an unending line of morons who do nothing but “throw bombs” and work to trivialize the debate with irrational bull####, but having to listen to stupid people is part of the price of a free society. Hell… I would love to never have to hear Nancy Pelosi, Reid or Obama ever again. But that’s not an option unless I’m willing to sacrifice my own voice too.

    Those that are most upset by the anonymity rules are those that are simply looking for an attack list, which is expressly the purpose of those rules in the first place. Why do you think they don’t want anonymous donors in politics? Why do you think they want the IRS (who has been happy to comply) to turn over donor lists for Tea Party groups? So the left can work to destroy them. Not complicated folks.

  • [1] July 16, 2014 at 4:05pm

    Agents and publicists sure are quick, aren’t they? It’s not that either of these brainless retards actually disagrees with what they tweeted… just that they were subsequently informed that showing clear support of the Palestinians which can be perceived as tacit support for those terrorists fighting under that same banner might not be the greatest career move.

    Responses (1) +
  • [17] July 16, 2014 at 4:03pm

    If it was them that actually threw the rock, each should be consigned to indentured servitude to this family for the rest of their lives. 50% of every dollar they make should go to the family… forever. This sort of tragedy happens, in large part, because kids (and adults) today see no real repercussions as a result of criminally negligent behavior. Those who act to harm others should be forced to pay the price in real terms for as long as those they’ve wronged feel the pains of their actions.

  • July 16, 2014 at 3:54pm

    With all due respect, and I say that because I do absolutely understand the sentiment behind your points, you’re ignoring history. You’re only looking at the horrendous results of elections in which we sat out and leftists took over. But we’ve also risen up and voted party line many time, but what was the result, even in victory? Bush? 6 years of control of the Presidency, the House and the Senate, and the government shrank how much? Spending shrank how much? The welfare state shrank how much? Cronyism and overregulation shrank how much? Don’t get me wrong. I think Bush, and his Dad, and many others on the “right” mean well when they act… they simply don’t understand the long-term implications of the compromises they make.

    Who started No Child Left Behind and Head Start? Bush. Monumental failure, but a darling of the left. It’s virtually untouchable now. Best of intentions, but never should have happened.

    Who started the Americans with Disabilities Act? Bush Sr. Again, great intentions, but it was the government stepping in where it didn’t belong. Clinton got ahold of it, ran with it, and has destroyed countless businesses and lives as a result.

    Even the current border crisis. It’s Obama’s making, but he’s using a law passed by Bush that had the greatest of intentions for political cover.

    Just winning elections doesn’t change a thing if those you elect don’t understand the limits of government and respect them!

  • [3] July 16, 2014 at 3:44pm

    Vote the party… no matter what. Really? Do you actually hear yourself? Voting for a bad guy because you don’t think he’s quite as bad as the other bad guy is NOT the way to fix things. Again… we did not get here because we voted for people with principles. We got here because for decades we’ve been abandoning our principles when we vote. We’ve been asked to hold our noses for the better part of a generation and vote for the lesser of evils. Why? Government has grown under the Republicans just like it has under the Dems. Our Foreign Policy has been as jacked up under them as it has under the Dems. Increased regulations, crony capitalism, increased power by unelected thugs in federal agencies, shrinking of state’s rights and personal liberties, increased tax burden, all of it… almost as bad under Republicans as it has been under Democrats.

    Tell me something… We had the Presidency, the House AND the Senate from 2000 to 2007. How many Federal Agencies were disbanded during that period? How much did spending decrease during that period? How many pro-border control policies were put in place during that period? What happened to our debt during that period? What true tax reforms were put into place? What restrictions on lobbying were imposed? What foreign aide to enemy countries / groups was cut?

    Face reality. Just having an R after your name isn’t the solution. Principles… that’s the solution!

  • [1] July 16, 2014 at 3:34pm

    Damned Straight!!! The ONLY way we win the fight for smaller government, secure borders, personal liberties, states rights, etc. is to elect more and more and more people like Mitch McConnell, Lindsay Graham, Susan Collins, Thad Cochran, John Boehner, George Bush, Jeb Bush, etc. etc. etc. THEY ARE THE FUTURE OF… wait?

    What was your point again?

  • July 16, 2014 at 3:29pm

    Choosing not to vote for a Republican who lacks conservative principles is ignorance? Got it. So if you believe that the Department of Education should be done away with and the power returned to the states, you should vote for a Rep. like Bush… who grew the Dept. of Ed massively? If you don’t believe in cronyism like we’re seeing out of Obama, then you should vote for someone like Bush… who started the bailouts? If you believe in sovereignty and secure borders, you should vote for someone like Bush (Mr. Amnesty) or Graham?

    Government has grown exponentially, as has our debt, under both Democrat AND Republican leadership… it’s just been more “light speed” and obvious under the Democrats. Voting “for the only candidate who can win because he’s more moderate” served us amazingly well with Dole… McCain… Romney… right???

    Face it… you point to people of principle and claim they’re ignorant, while behind you stands DECADES of failure as a result of being more “pragmatic” and “enlightened”. We are where we are not because of people with principles, but because of people who abandoned them. And you have the BALLS to ridicule those calling for principles and integrity and call them ignorant.

    For the record… ignorance denotes a lack of awareness or knowledge. You, in turn, have ALL of the information necessary to make the right decision and are in turn refusing to accept the facts. That, my friend, is far worse than ignorance… It’

  • [2] July 16, 2014 at 3:19pm

    Simple question… would you rather be led by an idiot, or a hypocrite/liar. The left is overflowing with idiots who make comments like “you have to borrow more money and spend more money to get out of debt”, and “unemployment is the most effective means of economic growth”, and “you have to pass it to see what’s in it”. And they actually believe this crap. But they’re not hard to fight… just let them talk.

    But the hypocrite / liar… FAR more dangerous. They’ll tell you what you want to hear, and they’ll preach common sense (RINOs) or vague platitudes (Progressives like Obama) that they know can be interpreted one way, but can be redefined at will to suit a purpose. Can someone please tell me how electing someone like McConnell, a proven hypocrite and liar, and giving him control of the Senate is any different than having someone like Harry Reid or Obama driving the bus? Seriously? If you can’t trust anything they say, what principle do you point to that separates one from the other? They’re all the same… just a different letter after their name.

    Then you have guys like Cruz. Runs on a platform… sticks to the platform. Gets demonized by the left… sticks with his principles. Gets demonized by the RINOs… sticks with his principles. I have no idea if he’ll stay the course, but if he does, HE IS THE PROTOTYPE for what we need to fix this country… not more like McConnell, McCain and Graham. I won’t vote for a lying Republica any mo

  • [2] July 16, 2014 at 1:39pm

    Best of luck with that. The most effective means of building an alliance typically doesn’t involve “we will crush you”, ridiculing you and then using far-left fear mongering and inciting voter fraud to defeat you after the majority of Republicans had already voted for the Tea Party guy.

    Sad reality is, if I were in MS, there’s no way I’d vote for Cochran. If I was in KY, there’s no way I’d vote for McConnell. And I suspect there are a lot who feel the same way. The establishment’s vile methods employed to ensure what they felt would be a victory in taking the senate this time around has done nothing but alienate actual conservatives, thus placing their chances of winning far more in jeopardy. Again… Best of luck to them.

  • [1] July 15, 2014 at 3:09pm

    Don’t think it’s direct… just the simple fact that he’s an apologist for terrorists and excuses the attack on the US. One would assume that he’s more than happy to extend that same philosophy to excuse the attacks on Israel as well. He’s a scumbag, plain and simple. But he is right about one things. Terrorism is the weapon of the poor. They can’t build armies, because they’d be wiped out. They can’t reach key targets, because they don’t have the resources. So their recourse… slaughter the easiest targets to reach and try and create a groundswell of backlash against their enemies. They’ll never get decent people to side with them on policies and merit, but they can terrify decent people and con the stupid ones into pressuring their governments to effectively surrender.

    It’s the weapon of the poor… the cowards… and the scum fighting for a way of life that no civilized human being could ever rationalize. “Leave our country alone… so that we can continue to abuse and kill our women, execute those who don’t believe what we believe, murder gays in the streets, etc.” Somehow, that message doesn’t seem to work really well amongst decent people. But “leave our country you imperialists… what gives you the right to impose your beliefs on us…” Now THAT they can sell, just so long as those hearing the message are either too stupid or too lazy to comprehend / look up what that independence means for millions of innocent people.

    So what’s

  • July 15, 2014 at 2:56pm

    Zimmerman vs. Trayvon… I see this much the same way I see the Sunnis vs. the Shias. One scumbag taking out another scumbag. I fail to see how this is a tragedy by any definition that takes into account the definition of a decent society.

    They can try and put lipstick on the pig (apropos given the star of this particular article I suppose) all you want, but at the end of the day, one loser is ruined, and another violent scumbag is gone. Isn’t that the real-life enactment of the philosophies of one of the left’s greatest heroes… Darwin?

  • [1] July 15, 2014 at 2:53pm

    Something that large simply doesn’t fade. If it does, it leaves behind a black hole from which not even light can escape.

  • [2] July 15, 2014 at 2:51pm

    How does someone on Welfare manage to grow from Obese to Rotund in the span of a year. When Democrats can explain that to me, then we’ll talk about some compromises on food stamps. Until then… vegetarian express. She can have fruits and vegetables and only reasonable portions of each… nothing else is covered. Hell, why is it so difficult to propose welfare / food stamp recipients simply follow the same diet Michelle FatASS Obama is trying to force on everyone else? Why doesn’t she start with those she has the right to dictate diet to… the one’s we’re picking up the tab for.

123 To page: Go