User Profile: Red West

Member Since: March 21, 2011

CommentsDisplaying Red West's 10 most recent comments.

  • You’re all jumping to conclusions, aren’t you? Oh, don’t get me wrong… I don’t think she’s innocent by any stretch of the imagination. What I question is “who” she is protecting by claiming the 5th. Is it her, or is she trying to fall on the sword to stop the investigation at her level? Why everyone is rushing to assume she’s only doing this to protect herself I’m not sure. Seems just as plausible that she’s just another loyal Obama minion trying hard to protect the King.

  • The simple fact is that calling Sandra Fluke a slut is an insult to sluts. And no, I’m not kidding. Sure, a slut will screw her way through life, but no part of the conventional definition of “slut” that I’ve ever seen implies that she would ask someone else to pay for her promiscuity. You wanna bang your way through law school… knock yourself out. But why are you asking me to pay for your protection? The hell with sluts… WHORES don’t ask the taxpayers to pay for protection.

    No, the only thing Rush did wrong when he labeled her a slut is that the slandered sluts. But hey… if they want to turn a loser begging her neighbors to pay for her birth control into their poster girl, by all means… go for it. She ought to fit right into the rest of their base just perfectly.

  • That’s why you can’t waste time coddling these idiots… REGARDLESS of their sob story. IMO, the moment a person begins to leverage their personal tragedy to further a political agenda, then there is NO reason to treat them with kid gloves and bend over backward demonstrating your empathy.

    NOTHING in the bill she voted down would have had any impact on the Sandy Hook shooting. If it had passed 10 years earlier, her mother would still be dead, and so would 20 kids. So why let this woman get away with trying to distort the facts to attack based on a false premise. Call the b!tch on the carpet and ask her… “Why are you asking me to strip the rights of law abiding citizens to pass poorly drafted legislation that by EVERY account would have had NO impact in the Sandy Hook shooting? If we ALL know the two are completely unrelated, then I have to ask WHY would you exploit the death of your own mother to further an irrelevant political agenda that would have done NOTHING to save her? I’m really interested in your answer… please… give her the microphone and give her all the time she needs to try and connect two dots that cannot be connected as she tries in futility to make her point. But when she fails to do so, as she will, I’ll expect her to apologize to me, the audience, and most importantly to her dead mother for trying to exploit her death like any cheap political hack would do to get what he wants”.

  • Is this really that complicated? A woman approaches a Senator who voted based on logic and reasoning, upset that she wasn’t more swayed by irrational, emotional factors. The woman posted a question based on a false premise. That’s all that needed to be pointed out.

    Woman: “I am just wondering why the burden of my mother being gunned down in the halls of her elementary school isn’t more important than that.”

    Senator (should have said): “Can you point me to a single provision in the legislation I rejected that would have saved your mother or prevented ANY of the deaths at Sandy Hook?”

    Woman: “Uh”.

    Senator: “Right. So… your question again was?”

    The Senator never placed this woman’s mother’s life below a gun shop owners’ convenience in terms of priority. They were never part of the same equation, because they were completely unrelated. But hey, let’s not allow little things like facts and logic to get in the way of a good emotional plea and a little temper tantrum for the press, right?

    The critical reasoning skills of the average American idiot are truly a pitiful thing to witness. And their ignorance, under the collective mentality and majority rule pushed by the Progressives, is what will eventually drag the whole country into the sewer. Sad to watch.

  • The students and the teacher should have called the b!tch out right then and there. They designed the quilt to display an empty figure (void of color representing void of education / ignorance). Gold, not a skin color of any sort, was used to demonstrate the wealth imparted through education and the elimination of ignorance). Neither was used to represent any aspect of any person other than ignorance and knowledge.

    And this mental midget manages to see an empty figure designed to demonstrate ignorance and immediately self-identifies with that figure. What does that tell you about her? Tells me the kids nailed it without ever considering race when creating the quilt. What a sad and pathetic human being she is.

  • Great to see he was taxpayer funded with a City Scholarship. Way to GO!!!! How’s that Muslim outreach thingy workin’ for ya? Seems he made the most of the education we paid for… they say those bombs were “complex”.

    So tell me… how does a human being intentionally set a bomb down next to an 8 year old boy?

    War’s coming folks. It’s coming. The world can’t keep taking the body blows and constantly turning the other cheek. Eventually it’ll come down to a war where all religions are pitted against Islam, and Secularists are going to have to pick a side. And the “peaceful Muslims” who keep claiming they don’t condone this stuff are going to have to do the same. They’ll either turn on the radicals and purge them, or they’re going to been seen as standing with them. It’s long overdue. This kind of war can’t be fought between countries and between armies. This one is more like the body fighting off a cancer within itself. It’ll come down to every little blood cell doing its job.

  • @Keatonc333: Seriously… where did you learn to frame an argument. I find it amazing that we haven’t been able to rid ourselves of this embarrassment of a President with supporters as stupid as you appear to be.

    On your “blanketing” argument. No… we don’t need to paint anyone with a broad brush here. This man went on the record voting to allow babies who were NO LONGER IN THE WOMB to be murdered after a failed abortion. This was a known fact, and how many tens of millions of you voted for him anyway. YOU knowingly put into office a man with views that extreme, and that indefensible. We don’t need to paint you, Sparky… your covered in dark red already.

    On a related note… let’s take your “he would be legalizing abortion” argument – equally as stupid. First, once it’s left the woman’s body and is breathing on it’s own on a table, please stop calling it a fetus. It’s beyond reprehensible. At that point, no one, not even a blind Obama apologist like you can continue to argue about whether it’s a baby or not. Once the BABY is no longer in the womb, the question of ABORTION is no longer relevant. And the woman who was trying to have the baby killed in the first place can no longer claim “her body… her rights”. At that point, the BABY is an independent person with its own rights… and she has relinquished ALL rights to determine its welfare/fate. So NO, the issues aren’t even CLOSE. But hey, whatever fits the narrative, right???

  • He spews is vile crap even as the Fire Chief in Boston is telling the world (those without an agenda to further) that he JFK fire has nothing to do with the bombings. Yes Chris. An 8 year old and two others are dead. Dozens are dismembered. Hundreds are injured. And your first thought is that the Democratic party is under siege.

    People can be as politically correct as they want, but the simple truth is, he’s a classic example of a disease in this country. He’s a cancer that America needs to excise… plain and simple. It’s hard to imagine something lower and more pathetic than Bawney Fwank’s response, but then there’s Matthews coming in right behind Bawney to drive it home. God the left must be so incredibly proud.

  • Yeah Pole Smoker… time to increase taxes to fund the future ban on ball bearings and nails, right? That’ll stop ‘em.

  • On the Conservative vs. Progressive community… wouldn’t that be an amazing experiment? Let’s just let folks self select into which community they want to live in… Free-Market or Socialist. They can support their own, and we’ll support ours. What you’d find immediately is that while we would thrive beyond imagination without the anchor of the welfare state around our necks, they’d collapse immediately. They are the parasite, we are the host.

    Our needy would be cared for by our families and our churches… both of which are condemned by the left. Our economy would be based on a massive self-reliant middle class, driven by opportunity and a direct correlation between effort and reward. Theirs would be based upon massive taxation of the hyper-liberal wealthy to support the permanent dependent underclass. Ours would reward innovation and growth. Theirs would be stifled by over-regulation, high taxation and a one-size-fits-all, top-down policy. Our education system would be privatized, localized, and merit based both amongst the teachers and the students. Success would be held up as a beacon to motivate and guide others to follow. Theirs will continue to be driven by special interests and union thugs more interested in their gold-lined retirement plans than the welfare of the kids.

    It goes on and on. It’s a fun exercise… just imagine if we split into two societies and let each have complete reign over the policies they live under. :)