User Profile: Red West

Red West

Member Since: March 21, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • August 28, 2014 at 8:10pm

    Damn. Well done.

  • [5] August 28, 2014 at 6:30pm

    :) Beat me to it. I mean hell… they came for copper, right?

  • [7] August 28, 2014 at 12:27pm

    Couldn’t agree with you more on the candidates. If we run another squish RINO, even if we actually win, nothing will change. And when the Romney’s and McCains of the world keep placating the Progressive scum and saying things like “they mean well… they’re just in a little over their heads”, they are effectively lying to the American people. Dark days are coming, and the scum in the Middle East will find a way to strike inside the US again. When that happens, the American people will be ready to pivot from complacency and will want to rise up. When they do, they’ll be looking for contrast. If our squish candidate is only 15 degrees away from theirs because we’re trying to go the moderate route… again… then what do they turn to?

    In the words of a very wise scumbag, never let a good crisis go to waste. This country needs to wake the F up. When it hits the fan, we need to be as far away from the people who supported Obama’s foreign policy, his border security, his everything. We need leaders that don’t soften criticisms because he’s black or because she’s a woman, but says “I don’t give a damn what you skin color is or what gender you are… if you’re an idiot with destructive ideas, then you’re an idiot with destructive ideas.” THAT candidate is one that will be able to actually turn a tragedy into an opportunity to turn this country around. In contrast… just imagine Hillary at the helm if another 9/11 hits. WTF would she do?

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] August 28, 2014 at 12:12pm

    Was there any value to that post at all? I mean seriously… what was the point. Tell me… when was the last time a Muslim was executed in the streets of America just for being Muslim? When was the last time a Muslim was executed in the streets of America for being a RADICAL Muslim preaching hatred and the overthrow of this country? Right. Never. No… we idiots stand by and give them their right to free speech, give them jobs as professors in our universities, allow them to build mosques from which to spew and recruit, allow them to hold office and act as advisors in some of the most powerful levels of government. In the middle east, they behead Christians for being Christians. They behead other Muslims who they consider too moderate (i.e. those tolerant of other religions).

    So tell me… you whine that Hannity (and I’m not even a fan) was unprofessional. He was challenging a radical scumbag who preaches the convert or die doctrine. He supports every damned thing that ISIS is doing, and he’s allowed to walk our streets. He denies facts and reality. Hannity called him ignorant, because he is. Hannity told him every radical like him willing to murder innocent people who don’t agree with them will be wiped off the face of the earth. And that’s exactly what has to happen.

    You point to a conversation between an American stating fact and common sense, and an evil radical pig and then cry that “we can’t communicate”? WTF does that mean?

  • [4] August 28, 2014 at 11:58am

    Excellent post. Sums up my views as well.

  • [3] August 27, 2014 at 7:06pm

    You’re missing the point. They just want… whatever they want. Period. If they happen to want to mingle with whites because it suits their purposes that day, great. Then they want desegregation and equal rights. But if they want to claim a restaurant as their own and kill any whitey who dares to walk in for a burger… then that’s what they’ll do. And if they want to rob a convenience store and attack a cop, then they should be able to do that without any consequences. It’s not about wanting equality. It’s about WANTING… period. Just wanting. And if you don’t give them what they want, then you get what you’ve seen the last couple of weeks. Rioting… shooting at police… looting stores of innocent people… kicking in skulls of innocent white Marines. It’s all excused, because they didn’t get what they WANT.

    C’mon man. Get with the Program! It’s called JUSTICE!

  • [2] August 27, 2014 at 7:01pm

    Nah… they should’ve just followed Rosa Parks to the library after she got off the bus and kicked her skull in, right?

  • August 27, 2014 at 7:00pm

    Just a few minor items:

    1) you clearly can’t read. Knighten was talking to the black man outside of the Waffle House, while Weems went in ahead. Clearly states Weems probably just thought the man was a panhandler… i.e. wasn’t part of the conversation

    2) according to your logic, any group of people may simply say “you’re not welcome here in this public establishment… we don’t like your kind”. And if the person ignores the racist threats, then that group of racist scum has carte blanche to kill that person? Uh huh. OK Mr. 12% of the population. You wanna live every day like the whole world is a Klan meeting? No problem. But you might wanna take a look at the numbers before answering.

    3) and according to your logic, being “macho”… your words, not mine, as I have no idea what happened in the Waffle House as I wasn’t there… is now grounds for capital punishment, dished out in the streets without a trial. Uh huh. So the next time I see some black guy walking down the street like his sh## doesn’t stink, struttin’, flipping people off, using foul language in front of kids and just all around acting like he’s Mr. Badass who can’t be touched… I can just go ahead and kick his skull in? Doh! Whatcha gonna do when every rapper in the country suddenly goes gold-teeth up?

    You sure these are the positions you want to take? I mean fine with me, but seems to me you’re biting off a little more than you can chew.

  • [3] August 27, 2014 at 6:47pm

    Let the poor guy go… it wasn’t his fault. He was all upset about that poor black criminal in Ferguson who got shot after attacking a cop. See… perfectly reasonable. So just let him go… but make sure you announce exactly where he’ll be let go, what time he’ll be let go, and please make sure any and all officers in the area leave immediately after his release.

    Lets see… about 5 minutes alone with Weems Marine buddies and the rest of the names will be known. Then it’s just a few inexpensive rounds and society will be better off, racial violence will be down, the taxpayers will be better off, and the collective IQ of the community will increase a couple of ticks.

    Let him go.

  • [2] August 27, 2014 at 6:33pm

    Actually, the policeman and his department should both file libel suits against this scumbag. They have all of the proof they need to get a civil judgement and bury him. Damages? Oh I don’t know… what does it cost when a community loses its faith in the police? How many are eventually harmed? Are officers put at risk? Are crimes going to go unreported? A freakin’ PASTOR making public claims about police brutality? As sick as it is, his title comes with credibility, and he could do an incredible amount of damage and possibly put lives at risk by making claims like this.

    I would love to see them drag his fat trash a## into court and rip him to shreds. Get him thrown out of his church and back on the streets where trash belongs.

    Responses (2) +
  • [20] August 27, 2014 at 6:28pm

    Latter days? There have been liars preaching from the pulpits for millennia. THIS is the problem I have with organized religion… not faith… not spirituality or a belief in God. But institutional religion. People begin wrapping themselves around an individual, a man… not God. The day I trust any mortal man to be my conduit to God is the day hell freezes over. I have absolutely NO respect for any person that would continue to attend services with this “man” at the pulpit. I’ll be the first to admit there are some truly remarkable people serving as pastors, priests and ministers, but when one is proven to be an outright liar looking to score cheap political points by demonizing other people with libelous rants, then he is not one who should be trusted to spiritually guide you through life.

    What an absolute scumbag. It’s one thing when a politician is outed as a liar. That’s just a given, and an extreme rarity when you find an honest one. But a pastor? A man who claims to serve God and his congregation? That’s just disgusting. He needs to be thrown out on the streets, but then I suppose someone is going to come along and say “the Christian thing to do is to give him another chance”. Uh huh. And I circle back to my thoughts on institutional religion.


    Responses (3) +
  • August 27, 2014 at 2:52pm

    And far more likely to be killed by someone else’s gun if you don’t own one. I’ll take my chances… thanks.

  • August 27, 2014 at 2:51pm

    Good to see common sense and experience actually on display once in a while.

  • August 27, 2014 at 2:49pm

    Seriously? As compared to training them to use the weapon they’ll be hiding in the closet with? Sorry… that’s just brutally misguided. No, a child should not be at a range to recreationally shoot a fully automatic weapon that she’ll never be in a position to use outside the range with more recoil than she can handle. She should never have been anywhere near THAT gun, but that’s much different than no child should be taught to use an appropriate weapon. That’s how responsible shooters are raised.

    So if it’s your opinion that my teenage son sitting in the duck blind next to me with a shotgun he’s been professionally trained to use is the equivalent of a jihadi, then I guess we’ll just have to agree to disagree.

  • [1] August 27, 2014 at 2:46pm

    IMO… that’s a weapon virtually no civilian should be using, let alone a child. Don’t get me wrong… I have no problem with full autos in recreational circumstances in licensed ranges permitted to offer them. But IMO, the profile of an UZI is WAY too short and light to be able to be controlled by far too many shooters. I think idiots look at the small profile and say “hey… I think I could handle that”, with absolutely NO understanding of the impact of being light weight and short barreled has on recoil and control. It’s a weapon, IMO, best stabilized with a sling while firing, and even then only by a strong shooter.

    Responses (2) +
  • August 27, 2014 at 2:35pm

    You don’t have to be against guns to know this was just stupidity all around. Stupid instructor, and stupid parents. With that said, the concept of never letting a kid under 18 handle weapons is equally as stupid. We have junior olympians that have reached pro-status with very powerful weapons long before that. It’s about knowing the kid, his/her limits, the right gun for the right situation and going beyond any standard safety practice when dealing with minors.

    Handing an auto to a 9 year old girl was just beyond stupid, and 99.999999% of all of us “proud ‘mericans” who are pro 2A would say the same.

  • [1] August 27, 2014 at 2:32pm

    Seriously… WTF is wrong with you? Do you just spend so much time touching yourself while watching the Disney channel that this was the first thought that came to mind? Damn this country’s getting sicker by the day.

  • [1] August 27, 2014 at 2:30pm

    Spot on. My kid started with a pellet gun to learn the basics. He then went to a .22. Then back to the range for single shots with a .223. When he was ready and had the strength to handle it, we moved on to a shotgun. I’m a damned good shot at the skeet range, but I’m at least smart enough to know that that doesn’t mean I’m a damned good teacher. I took him in and had him work with a pro on safety first, and then on technique. And before he was ever allowed to chamber a round, we went through several guns to find one that fit him and that we knew he could control well enough to fire safely.

  • [1] August 27, 2014 at 2:25pm

    They’re legal on specific gun ranges who are licensed to have them for recreational purposes. Individuals cannot own them, and they cannot be used outside of the range. Think about tracks that allow every day people to come in and take a Nascar car around the oval a few times for a rush. Those cars aren’t legal on the street, but they are on that track under specific guidelines.

    I don’t have a problem with the concept of full auto weapons being used in this context. But absolutely NOT by a child and NOT by anyone without demonstrated proficiency in other weapons proving they have the skills and the sense to know how to handle them. This scenario just throws every common sense rule of gun safety out the freakin’ window. The parents should be beaten for even allowing it. The instructor has already paid too high a price for his stupidity. The saddest thing is that the only really innocent person in this situation is the little 9 year old girl who now has to live with the death of this man for the rest of her life.

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] August 27, 2014 at 2:20pm

    WTF is a nine year old doing with a full auto uzi in her hands? WTF is an instructor doing allowing a kid who’s fired all of one shot through a weapon shifting to full auto with NO IDEA how she’ll handle the recoil? WTF is the instructor doing standing ANYWHERE but directly behind her and ready to take control of the weapon if she appears to be losing control of it? WTF are the parents thinking to let a 9 yr old handle a weapon that 1) she’ll NEVER own or use in this country and 2) is BEYOND inappropriate given her age and obvious inexperience (inexperience obvious given the way she’s holding the gun, her stance, her bent elbows, etc.)?

    Just WTF? Seriously. How many levels of stupid does it take to kill a man? Here you go. Truly sad for a man to have to die when there are any NUMBER of things that could have been done to prevent it. I’ve taken my kid through hunters safety courses and lessons at the range to get him started. And the FIRST thing we did (instructor and me) was run through multiple options to find the right gun to fit his size, strength, experience, etc. If this is an indication of how youth are taught at that range, I would never allow my kid within 10 miles of it. Again… just truly sad.

    Responses (1) +
123 To page: Go