User Profile: republic2011

republic2011

Member Since: January 10, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [19] May 22, 2015 at 12:59am

    Thank you and well put.

  • [6] May 21, 2015 at 11:50pm

    He’s a class act.

  • May 21, 2015 at 11:54am

    Hmm… if they would let us drill on land and not force us to drill off the coast, this would not happen.

  • [1] May 20, 2015 at 1:35pm

    Yes. Typical professor of the modern age. Take the actions of the few and apply that to the many.. Statistics alone contradict this loser. Move to Mexico, Cuba, .. anywhere you like. They have the gun control you seek and you can live with the consequences. We’ll stay here with our 2nd Amendment and our “Civil” society.

  • [22] May 20, 2015 at 10:09am

    I don’t care if you are a liberal or a conservative. If you just regurgitate what your Universities and Media spoon feed you then you deserve to be disappointed. At the end, that last one on the panel says she has “good policies”.. Name one. In fact, if he took the time to investigate her, even just 30 min., he would be hard pressed to find any “good policies” that this woman has ever touted. Try her brazen attack on free speech, her alignment with Margaret Sanger, the multitude of scandals surrounding her and her husband, the many lies she has been caught in, etc.

  • [2] May 18, 2015 at 7:22pm

    Probably, the truth would end this sensation too soon. Better to create a totally useless track for the investigators. That keeps it in the news. Then, at some point, they may ask, “why was the train going 2X the speed it should have been?”. However, this might fizzle before anyone investigates what really happened. Seems to be the way they handle all news stories.

  • May 17, 2015 at 7:46pm

    The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. Crooks, the lot of them.

  • May 16, 2015 at 9:18pm

    oh, yes.. and those darn Christians in the crusades were fighting a political war, too.. right? Would love to hear her take on that…..

  • [2] May 16, 2015 at 9:13pm

    Should just have sentenced him to life, with no parole. While the death sentence is fitting, he will chew up more tax payer dollars in appeals, and we may never see him executed. Tired of seeing the system work against us, but that seems to be the reality today.

    Responses (2) +
  • [46] May 14, 2015 at 2:03pm

    This is exactly how we counteract those that are trying to divide us.

  • [7] May 8, 2015 at 5:19pm

    Right on!

  • May 6, 2015 at 10:08am

    What happened to “Insulting America is stupid.”? Why is it that we have to be the ones that appease. Why is it that we have to limit our expression and free speech so that people that don’t believe in America or the Constitution don’t get offended? If you don’t like it, go back home. We love our Constitution and our Bill of Rights and if you want to stay here, you either assimilate into society or leave. We don’t need Bill and Greta pushing for multiculturalism, here in the US. It worked so well in Europe. “Insulting the Entire Muslim World is stupid.”? Why? Why should we care?

  • [1] May 2, 2015 at 11:10am

    Racism in America? Really?

  • [2] April 30, 2015 at 6:38pm

    Release them all in Michael’s neighborhood and disarm his security staff (and Michael, of course). Then Michael can live in his dream world with all his friends.

  • [8] April 24, 2015 at 8:15pm

    Dismantle the frat, for good.

  • [2] April 24, 2015 at 8:13pm

    So, we live in a Country where everyone, including “illegal aliens” (yes, I said it) are able to give birth in a hospital and receive everything under the sun (including pre-natal care). All this is already funded by our beloved taxpayers. Of course, the taxpayers need to buy insurance and flit the bill, but let’s not quibble over details. Then Hillary concocts this pile of dung to make people feel like there is a problem? She should move to Venezuela or Cuba where they have the laws and health care system she desires and leave us the hell alone.

  • [1] April 24, 2015 at 11:46am

    Ever wonder if the Clintons are also being paid to lose? I mean, Hillary and Bill are already in with some of the most powerful people in the world (including Soros). They can influence and do more from their current position than they could ever do from the White House (with all those burdensome rules and the Constitution). They are much more comfortable operating above the law. These recent revelations about Hillary seem all too fortuitous for other candidates and the timing from the liberal left media is just way too good. Whenever the liberal media is honest and takes a shot at its own, I always have to question their motives.

  • [2] April 24, 2015 at 11:19am

    It was only a matter of time before the useful idiots woke up and realized they were part of the sham. This is the communist playbook, executed, once again, very effectively on the sheep that liberals are. Progressives are dangerous, because they are elitists, eugenicists, narcisitcs, etc. They don’t care about poor or middle class. They only care about a means to an end, where they have control and those not in their circles serve them. Be careful what type of power you want to give one President. If the next one is not cut from your same cloth, you may not like the results. That’s why the Constitution and Bill of Rights reigned in the Federal Government and put limits on what the President and Congress could do to you.

  • [10] April 15, 2015 at 1:07pm

    Eliminate all entitlement programs, un-constitutioinal agencies, and useless projects (like studying the mating habits of monkeys on taxpayer dime). Then institute a flat tax. Current tax code is 70,000 pages large. This is a problem that’s been created by both parties (none is guiltless) and the current tax system favors specific groups of society – and I wouldn’t even say that is the poor. The current tax code is an assault on the middle class (most of which are on W2′s – so they can’t hide income and have less write off’s) and is causing it to shrink. So, we’ll end up with really rich and really poor. Originally, I think it was only land owners that paid taxes on the land they owned. As our federal government has created entitlement programs and more ways to spend our money, they had to go after our income and other sources. Shrink the beast, simplify the tax code, and let everyone keep more of their hard earned money and spend it on what they want to spend it on (not what the government dictates we spend it on). National defense and infrastructure is all the Federal government should be concerning themselves with. Infrastructure falls on the States, too (which is why land owners originally paid the taxes – or part of the reason – to develop roads and bridges).

    Responses (1) +
  • [26] April 9, 2015 at 6:23pm

    I know someone that is working for Obamacare – yes, on tax payer dollars. She told me that they hired a bunch of temps and that they are starting lay them off and will only keep a small pool of people full time. So, with that, you tend to wonder how many other temp jobs our government has created to skew the numbers. BTW, she doesn’t get any benefits until she lands a full time position – assuming she is one of the lucky ones.

    Responses (2) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love