User Profile: resme

resme

Member Since: September 27, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [6] December 16, 2014 at 2:45pm

    Can I have your definition of a neo-confederate? Without using google.

  • [29] December 16, 2014 at 2:42pm

    From one Article defending police to the next article bashing police? I’m confused. When it comes down to the wire the boys in blue won’t be on your side.

    “La Boétie,Anti-Dictator, pp. 43–44.
    Whenever a ruler makes himself dictator – all those who are corrupted by burning ambition or extraordinary avarice, these gather around him and support him in order to have a share in the booty and to constitute themselves petty chiefs under the big tyrant. “

  • [1] December 16, 2014 at 12:23pm

    To keep Fascism afloat? And ya Docs writing prescriptions with side effects out-weighing the benefits… Asking people if they own guns????? ( Had to add the ? – Because you can’t make that sh1111t up. )

    Doctors went from caring for a patients well-being and sitting down listening to the patients concerns of their ailments to rushing them out the door ASAP with anti-depressants with SUICIDE as a side-effect. It’s really screwed up man…. Doctors pushing big pharmas agenda.

  • [2] December 16, 2014 at 12:18pm

    Shh, DUDE it’s a secret!!!!! National security n stuff. You know how it is, Homie. Wars before well-being. Wars before economic freedom. But But WW2 ended the great depression!!!! I mean my great-grandparents didn’t have food but at-least they had a job!!!!

    Did I mention War? War is the health of the state.

    Ultima Ratio Regum

  • [6] December 14, 2014 at 12:43pm

    “Majid Khan was then subjected to involuntary rectal feeding and rectal hydration, which included two bottles of Ensure. Later that same day, Majid Khan’s “lunch tray,” consisting of hummus, pasta with sauce, nuts, and raisins, was “pureed” and rectally infused.”

    From using Taxes to rape people with pasta to jeb bush giving hillary an award. HAHAHA, I can’t wait to see people defending pasta rape and when they vote for Jeb Bush.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] December 14, 2014 at 8:22am

    Calling them out and getting down voted.

    Nice.

  • [39] December 11, 2014 at 10:12am

    As one of the blaze posters stated “Kill them young before they grow up evil”

    NUKE ‘EM YOUNG

    Responses (3) +
  • December 5, 2014 at 7:44pm

    He was convicted (in america) for selling information to Israel.

  • [2] December 5, 2014 at 7:40pm

    Selling untaxed cigarettes. I consider him a patriot for that alone.

  • [1] November 29, 2014 at 8:11pm

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puk5eeqaGIk

    Responses (1) +
  • [-3] November 14, 2014 at 7:14am

    Yup. I was like awe… How sweet they go back to murdering each other.

    Responses (2) +
  • [21] November 14, 2014 at 6:30am

    Government?

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] October 2, 2014 at 10:06am

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puk5eeqaGIk

    :)

  • [3] August 14, 2014 at 6:34pm

    Secession is the only answer I see. Read my post below. I’m sure you know about Lysander :).

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] August 14, 2014 at 6:27pm

    “6. That no government, so called, can reasonably be trusted for a moment, or reasonably be supposed to have honest purposes in view, any longer than it depends wholly upon voluntary support.

    These facts are all so vital and so self-evident, that it cannot reasonably be supposed that any one will voluntarily pay money to a “government,” for the purpose of securing its protection, unless he first make an explicit and purely voluntary contract with it for that purpose.

    It is perfectly evident, therefore, that neither such voting, nor such payment of taxes, as actually takes place, proves anybody’s consent, or obligation, to support the Constitution. Consequently we have no evidence at all that the Constitution is binding upon anybody, or that anybody is under any contract or obligation whatever to support it. And nobody is under any obligation to support it. ” ~ Lysander Spooner

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] August 14, 2014 at 6:27pm

    “6. That no government, so called, can reasonably be trusted for a moment, or reasonably be supposed to have honest purposes in view, any longer than it depends wholly upon voluntary support.

    These facts are all so vital and so self-evident, that it cannot reasonably be supposed that any one will voluntarily pay money to a “government,” for the purpose of securing its protection, unless he first make an explicit and purely voluntary contract with it for that purpose.

    It is perfectly evident, therefore, that neither such voting, nor such payment of taxes, as actually takes place, proves anybody’s consent, or obligation, to support the Constitution. Consequently we have no evidence at all that the Constitution is binding upon anybody, or that anybody is under any contract or obligation whatever to support it. And nobody is under any obligation to support it. ” ~ Lysander Spooner

  • [3] August 14, 2014 at 6:26pm

    For this reason, whoever desires liberty, should understand these vital facts, viz.: 1. That every man who puts money into the hands of a “government” (so called), puts into its hands a sword which will be used against him, to extort more money from him, and also to keep him in subjection to its arbitrary will. 2. That those who will take his money, without his consent, in the first place, will use it for his further robbery and enslavement, if he presumes to resist their demands in the future. 3. That it is a perfect absurdity to suppose that any body of men would ever take a man’s money without his consent, for any such object as they profess to take it for, viz., that of protecting him; for why should they wish to protect him, if he does not wish them to do so? To suppose that they would do so, is just as absurd as it would be to suppose that they would take his money without his consent, for the purpose of buying food or clothing for him, when he did not want it. 4. If a man wants “protection,” he is competent to make his own bargains for it; and nobody has any occasion to rob him, in order to “protect” him against his will. 5. That the only security men can have for their political liberty, consists in their keeping their money in their own pockets, until they have assurances, perfectly satisfactory to themselves, that it will be used as they wish it to be used, for their benefit, and not for their injury.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] August 14, 2014 at 6:26pm

    Lol? Adding amendments to a constitution that they do not follow isn’t going to fix the issue.

    “But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain – that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist.”

    All political power, so called, rests practically upon this matter of money. Any number of scoundrels, having money enough to start with, can establish themselves as a “government”; because, with money, they can hire soldiers, and with soldiers extort more money; and also compel general obedience to their will. It is with government, as Caesar said it was in war, that money and soldiers mutually supported each other; that with money he could hire soldiers, and with soldiers extort money. So these villains, who call themselves governments, well understand that their power rests primarily upon money. With money they can hire soldiers, and with soldiers extort money. And, when their authority is denied, the first use they always make of money, is to hire soldiers to kill or subdue all who refuse them more money.”

    Responses (2) +
  • August 13, 2014 at 9:40pm

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGdoqsuiN8

    Responses (3) +
  • [2] August 13, 2014 at 8:52pm

    Must resist Asian wife. Damn can’t resist.

123 To page: Go