User Profile: rickroland

rickroland

Member Since: September 09, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [3] July 4, 2015 at 11:48am

    Pull your kids out of school, petition local and state governments to relieve them of their portion of taxes that pay for schools. Enough people do this, local and state governments would have to and eventually would grant such things. There’s lots more that needs to be done here, like removing idiots from school boards by any and all legal means available.

  • [5] July 3, 2015 at 10:22pm

    Uh, Hillary, who picked out your outfit for today? THAT’S THE FREAKIN’ TONE OF THESE QUESTIONS, OMFG!

  • [3] July 2, 2015 at 8:42pm

    Reporters have their stories written beforehand, the greatest majority of the time (perhaps always), they then just go out and gather the information they want or need to fill in and “prove” the stories they wrote.

    Responses (1) +
  • [11] July 2, 2015 at 8:40pm

    Not a smidgeon — yeah, it was way beyond a mere smidgeon.

  • [8] July 2, 2015 at 12:45pm

    An absolutely worthless study — physical characteristics do not make one pre-disposed to nor do they cause any sort of thing. It’s merely a study of coincidences, there is absolutely no causative action of eye color, skin color or any other body characteristic to brings about the things this study hints at. What a waste of freakin’ money and time.

  • [1] July 1, 2015 at 8:36pm

    Then, the majority of people are completely ignorant of the First Amendment, and that needs to be corrected.

    Responses (2) +
  • [4] July 1, 2015 at 1:44pm

    I unfriended, blocked in a few cases, or shut off updates from any and all I was connected with that put this idiotic filter on their profile.

  • [13] June 30, 2015 at 11:39pm

    And it just keeps getting deeper and deeper, more and more corrupt, plus more and more despicable, etc.

  • [14] June 29, 2015 at 11:06pm

    Shakedowns — er — fund raising…. :)

  • [17] June 29, 2015 at 10:59pm

    Uh, yeah, who didn’t see this coming?

  • [4] June 29, 2015 at 9:38pm

    Well, no. It takes a complete lack of brains. :)

  • [2] June 29, 2015 at 8:13pm

    Most transparent Administration ever — oh, wait….

  • June 28, 2015 at 10:15pm

    No one cares. No. One.

  • [18] June 27, 2015 at 10:37am

    But where was she when a U.S. Ambassador was murdered? Yeah, wasn’t there, despite it being HER responsibility, she left her leadership in the trash heap.

  • [8] June 27, 2015 at 1:40am

    It isn’t settled law. There will be more challenges related to the 10th Amendment, states rights, as the Constitution has absolutely NO statement nor amendment regarding the subject of marriage. The Supremes wrote it into law by tortured logic via the 14th Amendment, which was absolutely insane, no other way to describe it.

    Responses (2) +
  • [33] June 27, 2015 at 12:42am

    Well, that’s not really hard, Boehner and McConnell HAVE NO BALLS!

  • [3] June 26, 2015 at 6:07pm

    Look, Obama, you evidently do not know a gosh darn thing about the history of nor the cause of slavery. The Confederacy *didn’t cause* slavery, you moron! Slavery existed for thousands of years before the Confederacy, or the Union, were even conceived. But, I’m sure you know that and, like your normal pandering narcissist self always does, you have to gin up some idiocy to make yourself look good and give yourself a self-induced ego stroke. You’re a despicable human being and an even worse President.

    Responses (2) +
  • [-1] June 26, 2015 at 1:10pm

    Nope — court cases will fly as this would be a direct violation of the U.S. Constitution, 1st Amendment, and any and all such cases will win out, which will reverse this absolute nonsense from the Supremes.

  • June 26, 2015 at 1:08pm

    Oh, there will be more court cases related to this, especially when it comes to the Federal government or states attempting to bully, mandate or otherwise charge various religious entities with performing such marriages or else — all in violation of the U.S. Constitution, 1st Amendment, of course.

    Responses (3) +
  • [-2] June 26, 2015 at 1:07pm

    Such unions do not, and never have, forward the progress of and survivability of the human race. Any form of sanctioning such idiocy is factually curbing and impeding the survivability of the human race. If people want to “join together” fine, but no government agency or state is obligated to sanction or otherwise approve of such joinings.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love