User Profile: right_is_right

Member Since: March 16, 2012

CommentsDisplaying right_is_right's 10 most recent comments.

  • Ragner,

    Most of us conservatives would hardly be considered monsters. Not that we have to prove ourselves to you, but here’s a recap.

    Conservatives are, on average, more “giving” of time and money than liberals
    It would appear no one knows if republicans or democrats are really richer

    Abraham Lincoln was the first republican president
    The civil rights bill of the 1960s was passed with a higher percentage of republican votes than democrat by a wide margin (which cited King, Desmond (1995). Separate and Unequal: Black Americans and the US Federal Government. p. 311.)
    Republicans favored intervention in World War II on tales of genocide, infanticide, and anti-semitism

    So I know all of this doesn’t matter to liberals, but we actually have a very rich history of NOT being monsters. After all, we have ascribed individuals like Martin Luther King Jr, Lincoln, Harriet Tubman, and George Washington Carver. You democrats have Strohm Thurman, Robert Bird, and the socialist leaders like Stalin and Mao. Good luck with the whole “conservatives are monsters!!!” thing.

  • Somebody ought to put together a video showing all the times Obama and his admin officials say “I dunno” like the Blaze had for Eric Holder.

    Title the clip (it’d be long enough to be a movie) “Most transparent administration in history”

    Follow with all the “Uh, I dunno’s”

    Finish with: “If this is the most transparent administration in history, it’s also the DUMBEST administration in history. No one knows what is going on!”

  • Don’t forget this administration’s key words: “Unprecidented fairness equal share fair share unfettered transparency.” That’s what it all boils down to: a word game.

  • Here’s my list of top five things Carney says:

    1) No one cares more about (fill in the blank) than the President.
    2) The President will demand answers from (fill in the blank).
    3) Fair and balanced
    4) The (President, AG, EPA, fill in the blank) gave UNPRECIDENTED access to (fill in the blank)

    Actually, I’ve heard number 4 so often I’ll give it a 4.5

    4.5) Unprecidented access to Benghazi, Unprecidented access to EPA, Unprecidented access to Fast and Furious, Unprecidented access to Libya rebel armament, Unprecidented access to EPA drone usage…

    5) Obama cares deeply about (fill in the blank)…

    Seriously, I wish my career was getting paid for the number of times good ol’ Jay threw those phrases out. Particularly the “unprecidented access” parts. If it weren’t so dark and depressing, particularly bathed in the light of recent scandals, it would be funny, huh?

  • @ Jaemd:

    Flat taxes can come in two fundamental ways: income and sales. You would argue that flat taxes hurt the low-income individuals the most and help the higher-income individuals. But here is where you are wrong. You operated under the assumption that the system is static, so low-income earners continue to purchase the same goods (thus the increase in taxes) and actually have to pay income taxes, instead of being part of the 40% that pay NO INCOME TAX. Conversely, the “rich” will pay less by having their taxes reduced.

    But what do “rich” people do with more money? Put it in the bank? Of course not. Interest rates now are so low, who would just sit on cash? Instead, companies could hire more workers, increase worker wages, increase benefits, purchase necessary goods they can’t afford now, expand, hire, and become more profitable and more charitable. Charity, otherwise denoted as a good “PR campaign”, is something virtually every large business is part of. Perhaps you forgot?

    So if you want to fail, like “developed countries”, do what “developed countries” do. Socialize the system and watch the citizens suffer with inadequate medical care (e.g. England), poverty (rural France), violence (Italy)… or you could try a novel approach and be FAIR to your citizens. If I don’t use a disproportionate amount of government resources, why should you fund a disproportionate amount of government spending? Haven’t figured that one out yet.

  • If you all want something to happen like I do, start tweeting vigorously #BenghaziScandal and let’s make the ignorant in the country find out the truth. Better yet, try #HillaryLied or something like that.

    Obama may or may not be bulletproof. But we could spend the next three years throwing anything at him to make it stick, or we could get smart and upend the liberal machine by targeting their future candidates. Come on, people! We’re the Tea Party, and the next-to-last great hope for this country (the last is Jesus Christ). It’s up to us. If we want Obama to get tagged, it’s time to be educating masses on Obama and foster inquisitive minds to pay attention to this and other disasters.

    Easily coming to mind are “Bengahzi scandal, Obamacare, “Acted stupidly”, [Russia's] Reset Button, 57 states, and [Palestinian and Israeli] Single-State Solution” as examples of complete botch jobs by this administration. Get the word out!

  • Hey, don’t forget – the tragedy of the dead is unspeakable, but nearly as unconscionable is the fact that they detained and imprisoned the “man behind the movie”. He was, and is (to my knowledge), still locked up! Don’t forget that Joe B. and Hil C. looked the families of the victims in the face and told them that they would “get that guy” who made the video!

    Don’t just impeach, imprison!

    #BenghaziScandal

  • @Sambo82: You are out of your mind. So let me get this straight: you’re not okay with Romney winning, but you were okay with Obama winning? And you’re proud?

    Don’t ever call yourself a conservative. That’s not true. You’re an idealist and believe in a retro-utopian society, one in which a libertarian will magically make things work out right. Romney wasn’t a great candidate, but action for action, he was a better man and better suited for the job than Obama! And you’re PROUD of the way you vote? Couldn’t you do a simple benefit-to-cost ratio to determine Obama is unacceptable, no matter how bad Romney was?

    You, sir, are complicit to the destruction of your country.

    And really – if we want to be serious about getting a good guy in, let’s have a pre-primary vote for our best conservative candidate, run that person against the establishment. Then, instead of wading through damaging, long primaries, let’s hold all of our primary voting on one day and pick the winner that way. No more party-wide self-destruction, and we can get our poop in a group and hammer these socialist morons!

    And DON’T EVER LET A SOCIALIST LIAR DEFEAT A PROGRESSIVE REPUBLICAN. We just need to defeat the progressive republicans with conservatives!

    Sometimes I think the country is lost when we can’t even make basic logical conclusions!

    #BenghaziScandal

  • @pudssweetie: You’re correct. It’s not about the attack, and @winedude you’re correct that former Pres. Bush was in power during many of the attacks on US soil. But there was no cover up for those attacks. They were reported and it was shown how dangerous the extreme muslim world had become. Now, the administration blames the US – a coptic Christian who is in JAIL now! – for practically identical attacks. This is beyond scandalous. They threw a guy in prison and brought a fatwa to his head because they couldn’t accept responsibility for their “incompetence”. Whitewater was a hiccup compared to this.

    #BenghaziScandal

  • Ladies and gents, I suppose it’s time to do the media’s job. If any of you are on twitter, please tweet #BenghaziScandal; if you’re on facebook or other social media, tell all your conservative friends the same. Let’s get this hash tag number one tweeted item and let the world, in vain curiousity, accidentally discover some truth.

    Then we’ll see what these liberal networks cover.

    #BenghaziScandal