User Profile: RNM

Member Since: June 29, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • October 19, 2016 at 2:53pm

    Holy crap… I never thought I’d see the day. Although I don’t agree in a futurist end times full of catastrophic events as Glenn does, I’m super glad to see he’s owning his part and apologizing for being a perpetual doomsday alarmist. He must’ve spoken to or listened to Andy Stanley (Charles Stanley’s son) in recent days. He’s been telling the older folks in this country to stop scaring the children for some time now.

    Responses (1) +
  • October 13, 2016 at 10:48am

    You guys are really some useful idiots… video is clearly doctored, and who the hell wouldn’t have exposed that if it were true. Here’s a shot from actual photos taken at that moment.

  • [-6] October 7, 2016 at 3:26pm

    Ratioinactive, don’t bog these idiots down with facts… if it doesn’t fit their narrative, they’re not interested.

  • October 7, 2016 at 3:24pm

    Really… I realize you can’t admit that even the sky is blue with Obama in the White House, but, after nearly a record 80 months straight of private sector job growth, maybe it’s time to throw in the towel on the negative jobs number spin.

  • [19] October 6, 2016 at 9:52am

    I do declare… Hannity has let his likely monetarily-induced, sloppy-kissy-face bromance with The Donald get him all worked up into a regular ole’ southern belle tizzy in defense of his beloved. Time to come up for air, Sean.

  • [1] August 8, 2016 at 1:34pm

    ((Yawn))… Oh Jim, did you lose a lot of money betting on this collapse that has yet to come after “predicting” it will every year for the past 8 years? How many more years need to slip by before you are the boy who cried wolf?

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] July 28, 2016 at 3:16pm

    Wow, a guy that realizes that feelings aren’t facts… hat tip to you Mr. Agresti.

  • [1] July 28, 2016 at 3:14pm

    Ouch… you should know by now that you can make no claim of anything going right whatsoever while Obama’s in office. It’s un-Christian.

  • [1] July 22, 2016 at 1:55pm

    Bingo! I was thinking the exact same thing!

  • [15] July 12, 2016 at 4:38pm

    It’s rather entertaining but sad to watch the media do everything they can to vilify Castile. The guy had a clean record… nothing in his past, so naturally, they have to reach for the ridiculous insinuation that he somehow was justifiably shot because he looked like somebody who may have committed a crime. Why can’t we just at least entertain the idea that the officer made a mistake… a very poor call of judgment that cost someone their life? We question politicians and their motives and actions we see as mistakes all the time. Why are police officers untouchable? I have the utmost respect for the job our police officers do, but come on!

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] June 30, 2016 at 10:04am

    These are such old and tired conspiracy BS stories that have been hashed and re-hashed ad nauseum and properly debunked every time. But… you know… continue to build your bunker and order survivalist supplies from Glenn’s sponsors if it makes you feel better. It has certainly made Glenn’s wallet feel better.

  • [5] June 22, 2016 at 3:37pm

    I get it, we were primed to find somebody that is everything that our politicians have not been, however, once you weed through the “jackass is a jackass”, “illegal is an illegal” and “terrorist is a terrorist” rhetoric, there’s just no substance. Trump is an extremely thin-skinned whinebag, and lies so often, the media can’t even keep up to debunk the last thing he just said. Aside from all that, the guy is really just not that bright.

  • [9] June 22, 2016 at 10:50am

    Who cares about the Playboy in the pic? As a Christian myself, I’m more appalled at the prospect of Falwell getting kickbacks to endorse the most ridiculous, circus sideshow candidate we’ve seen in recent history… because he can’t be doing it willingly and with a clear conscience… can he?

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] June 3, 2016 at 10:31am

    Why is this all of a sudden a super scandalous thing. I am not an Obama guy nor was I a Bush supporter, but Bush skipped 6 out of 8 D-Days for which he was in office. He even had a big Black Music Month celebration on D-Day in 2005. So what!

  • [-5] June 2, 2016 at 2:42pm

    His poor attempt to make like Obama was the first to skip D-Day while linking to a commemoration speech by a POTUS who skipped 6 out of 8 of them is not very truthful.

  • [4] June 2, 2016 at 2:07pm

    Hey Schilling… it’s pretty funny that you link to Bush’s commemoration speech on Memorial Day 2007… because there is no mention of D-Day on D-Day in the same archive for the same year. Neither is there for 6 out of the 8 D-Days he was in office. Hell, he even had a Black Music History celebration on D-Day 2005. I’m no Obama guy, but the double standards or at least very poor memory are what’s mind-boggling, Curt.

    Responses (4) +
  • [10] June 2, 2016 at 12:01pm

    They should just call this kid Lil’ Donnie… he’s perfected the squint and pucker face.

    Responses (1) +
  • [19] June 2, 2016 at 10:54am

    That may be so, but it’s just as bad as a guy who says 1000 single-syllable words in a speech while saying really nothing at all… hello Trump.

  • June 2, 2016 at 10:50am

    His quote basically said, “if Congress can’t remove him from office, what patriot is going to step up and do it?” Please expound upon any and all non-violent options a single individual has to remove a POTUS from office in the scenario that Congress will not do so? The truth is your allegiance to all things Beck is clouding your judgment.

  • [22] May 31, 2016 at 2:00pm

    Beck, you have a history of twisting and contorting many folks’ words to the nth degree to extrapolate some of the most ridiculous conspiracy theory nonsense I’ve ever heard in my life, no matter if your conclusion is even remotely close to what the person actually says or not. And now you’re boy uses a phrase like “what patriot is going to step up and do that [remove him from office]“, and you cry foul when folks come to a rather logical conclusion considering the language used? What a hypocrite! At least this time, the conclusions are somewhat plausible.

    Responses (4) +
123 To page: Go