Wonder what size cup he/she wears? Not talking about a bra.
 May 20, 2015 at 12:16pm
James Carville married an ultra-right conservative…. go figure………..
[-1] May 20, 2015 at 11:54am
Ask that question after paying a few thousand in tickets that were completely manufactured for revenue purposes and a few illegal searches thrown in…….. However, I don’t see any comments here celebrating criminal behavior….. Do you ?
 May 19, 2015 at 5:42pm
Could’ve been even MORE fun if the Capt. HADN’T called the Coast Guard…………….
Your interpretation of what the Pope says, and what he is actually teaching are two separate things. In order to understand him properly, it would do you well, to understand what the Catholic Church has always taught, and not just what you think the Catholic Church teaches.
The parking lots on Sunday at the three Catholic Churches I am at regularly indicate otherwise. Anecdotal, but just as relevant as a protester's word.
Bearway - what are the local priests and communities like? I live in a thriving Catholic community of 5 parishes, that all have very well attended services. (Including weekday masses.) Sure, there is room for more people to attend, but I'd say very few of the people attending are doing so because of what the Pope says or does.
 May 19, 2015 at 11:51am
Already done, it’s called “The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints”….. and YES, it is filling up… very fast……. new Temples going up almost monthly……… CHECK IT OUT….. You’ll find that 100% of the common stereotypes are false………. I converted over 10 years ago, and STILL have no regrets……..
Oh PLEASE!!! The LDS denies the concept of the Trinity, without that, there is no Christianity an no access to God. John Ankerberg ran a TV program where the then head of the LDS, a Catholic priest, and a protestant minister all sat together for a Q/A. Mr. Ankerberg asked each directly if they believed in the Trinity, Both the priest and minister affirmed their belief. The LDS leader denied the Trinity.
Another point. Don't believe that Satan is a man with a pitchfork, pointy tail and carries a pitchfork. He was created as an angel of light by God and is a liar.
Maybe you can answer me Junkman
Alma 32:30 read:
"But behold, as the seed swelleth, and sprouteth, and beginneth to grow, and then ye must needs say, That the seed is good; for behold it swelleth, and sprouteth, and beginneth to grow." (Alma 32:30, 1830 edition)
The 2006 edition reads:
"But behold, as the seed swelleth, and sprouteth, and beginneth to grow, then you must needs say that the seed is good; for behold it swelleth, and sprouteth, and beginneth to grow. And now, behold, will not this strengthen your faith? Yea, it will strengthen your faith: for ye will say I know that this is a good seed; for behold it sprouteth and beginneth to grow." (Alma 32:30, 2006 edition)
Thirty-five words were added.
I have read LDS written information that states Joseph Smith put a seer stone into a stove pipe hat . The words from the Gold plates would appear one by one which were dictated it would not go to the next word until it was pronounced correct .
Why were 35 words added ?
There are plenty more of these examples
you also believe lucifer is the brother of Jesus , correct ?
That God the Father has a wife
That God the Father used to be a man like you or me who became God
You deny God the father is YHWH
according to the Bible you are in a world of trouble
It only supports the notion that Joseph Smith was literally translating a foreign language if it would be helpful for him to go back and clarify what he was at the time attempting to express.
Do you speak any other languages? If so, have you ever translated that language into English for someone? If you have, you would know that if your initial translation ‘on the fly’ was written down, you could easily go back later to clarify with more thought what was initially said – even though the original statement was a correct translation.
This argument you make is really quite silly.
Out of the many grammatical and clarifying changes to the original book, there is NOT ONE single doctrinal change to the original Book of Mormon. Thus, the original, just as the subsequent editions are all perfect in the doctrine it teaches.
By the way – which Bible do you believe is most accurate? There are many more differences between the different Versions of the Bible than there between the different editions of the Book of Mormon. Do you really think the first linguistic translation of the Bible needed absolutely no grammatical and/or clarifying in later editions?
Please answer which Version of the Bible you believe is a perfect translation and why are there different Versions?
Not sure what you mean by the “trinity” – never read about that in the Bible. But I do know about the Godhead – consisting of three separate personages being God the Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost.
Here’s an example
“And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him: And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.”
God the Father speaking from heaven, Jesus Christ standing by the water, and the Holy Ghost descending like a dove. Pretty simple.
Indeed, the Prophet Stephen clearly stated that he even saw Jesus Christ standing at the right hand of God the Father.
“But he, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked up steadfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the right hand of God, And said, Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God.”
Yes, the Godhead is one in that they are perfectly harmonious in all things such purpose and thought. But that no more makes them morph into a singular personage than it would to every soldier that is “an army of one” (if you remember those commercials).
Christ explained it this way:
“Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be one, as we are.”
Jesus Christ is real. He’s not just another name for God.
BTW – asking George-Harrison to explain The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is like asking a Nazi to explain Judaism.
This guy must not have a job if you look at all the time he spends demeaning Mormons. Seriously, click on his name and take a look for yourself.
You do know that Joseph Smith put a stone into a hat and dictated from the gold plates
Emma Smith, who acted as an earlier scribe for Joseph, gave this account in 1856:
“When my husband was translating the Book of Mormon, I wrote a part of it, as he dictated each sentence, word for word, and when he came to proper names he could not pronounce, or long words, he spelled them out, and while I was writing them, if I made any mistake in spelling, he would stop me and correct my spelling although it was impossible for him to see how I was writing them down at the time. Even the word Sarah he could not pronounce at first, but had to spell it, and I would pronounce it for him.
“Joseph Smith would put the seer stone into a hat, and put his face in the hat, drawing it closely around his face to exclude the light; and in the darkness the spiritual light would shine. A piece of something resembling parchment would appear, and on that appeared the writing. One character at a time would appear, and under it was the interpretation in English. Brother Joseph would read off the English to Oliver Cowdery, who was his principal scribe, and when it was written down and repeated to Brother Joseph to see if it was correct, then it would disappear, and another character with the interpretation would appear. Thus the Book of Mormon was translated by the gift and power of God, and not by any power of man.” (David Whitmer, An Address to All Believers in Christ, Richmond, Mo.: n.p., 1887, p. 12.) ..
Oh please George, if you really don't know that the majority of translation was done through a Urim and Thummim, then you're not worth your salt as an anti-mormon.
Your Queen Sandra Tanner would be ashamed of you! ;)
 May 19, 2015 at 2:43am
@KGditto….. To be honest, I DID think about it, almost exactly as you described……… However, I just couldn’t come up with a more precisely descriptive term…….. Of course I don’t believe there is ANY appropriate age to be raped….. But, I WASN’T talking about the victims…. It was a play on irony, lamenting the sad truth that blacks raping someone their own appoximate age doesn’t even make the news…… I’m sure blacks rape people of all ages, all the time………The Central Park Jogger case comes to mind….. But mostly, all we hear are the truly grotesque cases where teenage blacks are raping, sometimes gang-raping really old ladies and really little girls…… Seems like animalistic behavior to me…… Hunting in packs…… Preying on the weakest, most defensless victims…….. I was only commenting on the evidence I have before me…….. But, what do I know….. I’m just an “oblivious racist” !
 May 19, 2015 at 12:42am
I get it……… Can’t argue the message…. So, attack the messenger……….
THAT’s a classic Liberal tactic……… Are you sure you’re not a Dem. ???
 May 19, 2015 at 12:03am
Do blacks EVER commit age-appropriate rapes ??? It seems like the victim is always <12 or 80+……. WTF ?
Age-Appropriate rapes, huh? I don't even know what to make of your disgusting and racist comment. And no...I'm not a liberal or anything close to it
Well damn, I didn't realize that Blacks had the market cornered on Rape and l;likewise activity....
Seems like the 14 year olds love to rape the elderly White women.
One of the most eye opening books you will ever read is Soul on Ice by Eldridge Cleaver.
He “practiced” on black girls till he learned the ropes, then he moved on to the big time, raping White women.
Rape is a weapon of war to the tribes.
Its one thing to be an oblivious racist. You see a few stories of black men raping kids and conclude they all do. Not a thorough train of logic but many fall short when it comes to logic on the topic of race, but still…
When you were typing “age-appropriate rapes” nothing went through your head and made you think: “oh thats silly, theres no such thing as an appropriate age to be raped.”
You can go ahead and call everyone idiot dems for calling you out on this comment but please.
Try thinking before you type or better yet, don’t type anymore at all.
they don't discriminate, they will hit anything.....any age, any weight class
 May 18, 2015 at 10:25pm
It takes BALLS to be an effective president……… THAT’s why I like Rick Perry….. BIG BALLS….. Big……….. Walker is no slouch either, taking on the unions………….. I’d like to see a Perry/Walker ticket……
The main thing to remember is when the campaign to win the Primary really begins, don't give up on your candidate. The RINO in the GOP field knows how to play the game. They are paying for attack ads against their fellow Republican candidates. One by one they fall, because people decide their guy has no chance in winning in the general election against the Democrat. Then, only the RINO remains. Will it be Jeb or Christie this time? Or will the American people disregard all the attack ads for once and stand firm. That's what we have to do to win it. The RINO's paid for attack ads against the Republican candidates going against the incumbents in the Senate in 2012. Remember Chris McDaniel of Miss? Thad Cochran's PAC paid for pamphlets passed out to Blacks that said McDaniel was a secret racist. There is no low to which the RINO's will not stoop.
 May 18, 2015 at 10:10pm
Yeah, between that statement and his gun-control views, I think my opinion of Christie has definitely taken a turn…………….
 May 18, 2015 at 7:47pm
Oh no…. You went there…. You looked behind the elephant ears……….
 May 18, 2015 at 11:14am
Cuz’ yur’ a Communist ???
 May 18, 2015 at 10:54am
Seattleites are even stupider than NY’ers………………
May 18, 2015 at 2:33am
A crash is when everyone dies. Since only 1 died, and 21 lived, it’s a hard landing……….