User Profile: Ronald Wilson

Ronald Wilson

Member Since: July 03, 2011


  • January 14, 2014 at 10:13am

    Some nuggets of truth and some intentional falsehoods in what appears to be a ridiculous story.

  • September 16, 2013 at 3:53pm

    Got that right ! Did you read some of the others on there ? Why the #$%^ can’t they print the entire text of those amendments ? It’s not like they are more than a few sentences. Can’t let anyone other than the all-powerful educated elite interpret anything, I guess. Sounds like keeping the Bible only printed in Latin to me…

  • September 14, 2013 at 4:11am

    It is Austin, probably the most lib part. Take note that that there still is enough freedom to actually make the videos of the police. Seems like some cops in the US are more afraid of cameras than firearms.

  • September 11, 2013 at 10:53am

    What exactly does “defend Islam” mean ?

    Responses (1) +
  • August 27, 2013 at 3:06pm

    Based on how angry he makes people with these kinds of comments, it seems like another civil war is exactly what he is trying to accomplish.

  • July 27, 2013 at 8:52am

    Classic left : Accuse the opposition of your own flaws.

  • July 14, 2013 at 3:19pm

    Good job changing the subject. Whatever happens, it’s got to be related to your agenda.

  • July 14, 2013 at 3:08pm

    A robot, devoid of a soul, programmed to create sound bites that support and uphold his own, and their own power. Critical thinking is not an option, and truth only when it suits the agenda.

  • July 14, 2013 at 12:37pm

    It was never established that Zimmerman was a racist and we will never be able to get into his mind. However, events surrounding this trial are definitively racist, and shows the worst of people’s character. The assumption of guilt and profiling, the lynch mob mentality and revenge aspect, the excuses, the arrogance, the perverted definition of justice where past wrongs are placed on one man.
    We live in a more racist country than I have seen since I was young, but the majority of the fault does not lie with the majority group(s) any longer.
    The more of these actions we see from people like the NAACP, the more people will start to shun them as they did with the KKK.

  • July 5, 2013 at 10:32am

    “Your party” ? Which party is that ? Last I heard, there were only two corrupt parties with any power. Don’t assume that I or anyone else here belongs to either one.

  • July 5, 2013 at 9:28am

    Fear-mongering is for those without evidence. We have rule of law ? A functioning banking system is what’s important to you ? If you don’t want to see the evidence, fine. Only a progressive would disparage another man’s right to free speech, assembly and capitalism.

  • June 17, 2013 at 7:17pm

    Ok Seth, calm down before we publish your personal info from the NSA database.

  • May 4, 2013 at 5:09pm

    At some point, this won’t be a theoretical discussion, but I suspect ‘ol Billy will be proved wrong.

    Responses (38) +
  • January 26, 2013 at 2:54pm

    Yep. That is the most dangerous department in the government.
    Why doesn’t the Posse Comitatus Act apply to them as well ?

  • January 26, 2013 at 2:51pm

    It would have been cheaper to purchase the source code from some commercial off the shelf software.

  • January 22, 2013 at 6:45am

    I respect your rights under the first amendment, but I will still follow the “Patriotic Customs”, United States Code – Title 36 Chapter 10 . But I will put a flag below it with multiple curses on that man’s name.

  • January 19, 2013 at 7:30pm

    I suppose, to both coast liberals, the entire middle of the country is “fringe”. Besides, progressives that ignore the inconvenient parts of the constitution aren’t “extreme” ?

  • January 18, 2013 at 6:52pm

    You may have missed my point, deterrents was what I was trying to establish, both foreign and domestic ( as was stated above ), not exactly successful armed resistance. That would require an armed populace in addition to state militias; national guard and/or commandeering of federal resources at a state or local level. It’s not impossible that resistance would go that far, look at the recent declarations by state governments and local authorities, in addition to defections from the federal forces due to the violation of their oath to uphold the constitution.

  • January 18, 2013 at 5:48pm

    It’s not a matter of the government showing up at your door, at least not yet, but an armed citizenry is a deterrent to government overreach. It’s much less likely for them to show up at your door for any trivial reason if they know you have the right to ( and possibility of ) armed resistance. Once they disarm the populace, then all bets are off.

    Responses (19) +
  • January 12, 2013 at 4:32pm

    I probably should not have used the word “subsidizing” to describe the difference, “official” numbers using dollars as the measure do not bear this out. It’s much more complicated than that. The creation of wealth is much more important than it’s (re)distribution.