Dolly Kyle, one of Bill’s gal pals, described Hillary as frumpy, unbathed, smelly and having hairy toes. If that doesn’t qualify as “nasty” I don’t know what does.
 October 21, 2016 at 12:19pm
I don’t see how anyone can state that “any other Republican candidate would clean the floor” with Hillary, when the evidence points to the contrary. McCain backed down from attacking Bill Clinton, even though his corruption and seedy behavior was already surfacing. Romney certainly didn’t “clean the floor” with Barack Hussein Obama, despite his thin resume, lack of any real experience and nonsensical policies. Do you really believe Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio or (ew) Jeb Bush would have gone after Hillary the way Trump has? Not on your nellie. Trump SAYS what we KNOW. For the first time, the words “honest” and “politician” may go together. It’s a shock to everyone’s system. But like a dose of Epsom salts,it might help to flush the s**t out of Washington.
October 20, 2016 at 1:39pm
I think the point is that Gore got name recognition for once in his life by contesting the election. It hasn’t hurt him at all, so why should it hurt Trump. Especially when anyone paying attention knows that Hillary and the DNC machine are crooked?? He’s just stating that if results like those for Romney in some areas come in (e.g. Black Panthers “patrolling” polling places, zero percent of voters casting a ballot for Trump, ballots handed out that are pre-punched for HRC, etc.) he will question the results.
 October 20, 2016 at 1:33pm
I don’t see this as “political suicide,” given the mounting evidence of corruption and voter fraud perpetrated by the Democrats. Was it “political suicide” for Al Gore?? And when Hillary loses, do you really believe she’ll take it gracefully?
 October 20, 2016 at 1:31pm
Donna, just saying it doesn’t make it true. You want to prove that the e-mails were doctored? Produce the originals!!! Oh wait, Hillary destroyed them, didn’t she? Oh well, we’re left to believe what we see…….
[-1] October 19, 2016 at 10:41am
Actually, the millennials are the most selfish, self absorbed generation. With demands for “safe spaces” to avoid dealing with reality, the assumption that because one lives and breathes then one is entitled to things, taxpayer support and payment-free loans. I’d call that selfish as well as totally immature. The freeloader generation will have a rough row to hoe if socialism / communism is ever implemented. In every communist country on the planet, unemployment is a crime, punishable by “reeducation” in a labor camp. The state assigns you a task. Doesn’t matter if you don’t like it, you do it. Only in America and in a capitalist system are you allowed to mooch off everyone else.
October 19, 2016 at 10:37am
You people need a few lessons in basic math and biology. The youngest Baby Boomer is in her late 50s. The millennials are in their 20s. The Baby Boom generation did NOT raise these miscreants. We, unfortunately, are the grandparents of these fools. They have been raised primarily by television (you know, quality shows like “Keeping Up With The Kardashians” and “Jerry Springer”) and public educators from pre-K to post graduate. Mama was too busy “finding herself” and sperm donor dad was finding himself as well – in gal pal’s bed.
The baby boomers are the ones that gave us abortion on demand because they would rather kill their own children than be burdened with their care. Roe v Wade became the "law" of the land 1 month before my birth and at least 1/4 of my generation and the ones to follow have been slaughtered for the sake of "convenience".
I’m a Millennial (30 years old), and my dad is now 60. One of my best friends in Elementary was raised by his grandparents though – a situation that was all too likely while Millennials were growing up, again thanks to Baby Boomers.
Those public educators that you’re complaining about are probably also baby boomers in all likelihood.
Even if the parents in particular weren’t baby boomers, the Baby Boomers *were* the ones with political power. To a large degree they still are.
October 18, 2016 at 10:53am
I’m sure that if we asked Ms. Warren for a DNA sample in order to authenticate her Native American ancestry, that clucking might go on for a while. Especially if she were to be asked to pay a fine equivalent to her Ivy League tuition to fund the education of a legitimate NA.
No Democrat would ever want Trump’s tax returns publicized. That would add ammunition and provide proof of how messed up the tax code (that Democrat congresses wrote) is, and how we need a serious revolution to straighten that mess out.
 October 18, 2016 at 10:50am
Look for Billy Bush to snag a very cushy job with the DNC soon. He deserves a raise for his efforts, ya’ know.
Why are his attacks “unfair”? Is he not entitled to believe Hillary Clinton is a warmonger deserving of exposure for her true beliefs and intentions? And how “unfair” is to to publish full emails, with no editing? These are Hillary’s words, along with those of her cohorts. So, they disparage Latinos, blacks, Catholics…..and show Hillary to be something lower than human (“she has to show that she connects with people….try to show some genuine emotion…..”)
 October 17, 2016 at 10:45am
And really, haven’t we seen all of this from the Democrats before? Remember Herman Cain? Amazingly, his accuser had ties to David Axelrod and was later found to have been paid a handsome sum for her accusations. Hillary is a bigger liar than Obama, merely because she’s had more years of experience. I’m sure ABC hand-picked its demographic (staffers, reporters who are in the tank for Hillary, the O J Simpson jurors, etc.) but anyone who buys the claptrap hook line and sinker is living under a rock and shouldn’t be voting in the first place.
Remember Ted Cruz...? Oh wait, his accuser had stopped calling himself a democrat by that point.
 October 17, 2016 at 10:42am
If leftists are so scientifically oriented, then why do they overwhelmingly support public policies that are unscientific? The fact that you support things like welfare and EBT show that you have no logic. If you truly respect Margaret Sanger’s work, you would be championing the elimination of every government funded entitlement that is intended to shore up the weak and ineffectual. You would encourage not just abortion, but you would fund long-term birth control for the lowest echelon of society. That’s right – no more publicly funded housing for gang bangers, crack whores, etc. Let them figure out how to deal with life on their own. In addition, a truly scientific approach to education would be to increase funding for the gifted and talented. Instead, federal funds overwhelmingly go to get academic underachievers up to speed, and fail miserably as more and more are spent. So why do leftists all claim that they believe in science when they do the opposite of what is scientifically sound? Why do you think you’re smart but you act so damned stupid?
 October 16, 2016 at 11:53am
Well Dana, how about not defending the Democrat media machine and doing a little investigative journalism. I would begin with the women’s relationship to any Democrat operatives, the Clinton Foundation and some research into their financials. I would bet every one of them is being paid off in one way or another, just as Herman Cain’s accuser was alleviated from debts after she came forward with her story.
BTW, there is now a new Twitter meme: #HillaryGropedMe. Many of the tweets are hilarious, including the one that used Glenn Beck’s crying photo.
 October 16, 2016 at 11:52am
I would love to see Wikileaks release ANY emails relating to Benghazi. Video my a**. Hillary knew the problems and the threat long before the attacks. Blood is on her hands – let’s get the evidence out there for the voters to see. Especially those Code Pink broads.
 October 16, 2016 at 11:46am
It’s easy to come up with a poll that produces the results you want. Even with leading questions and a hand picked sampling audience, the media still can’t produce more than a few points lead for Hillary. That should be encouraging to anyone who plans to vote against her this election.
October 14, 2016 at 12:23pm
Um, I think it’s an IRS audit, and Trump’s defense is perfectly legitimate. And what will the Becksters do if, after the audit, the IRS actually admits it was WRONG and pays Trump a sum for overpayment of taxes during the years under audit??? It happened to one of my employers…
 October 14, 2016 at 12:21pm
Remember Clarence Thomas????? Just sayin’…. all engineered in that instance by Ted Kennedy.
 October 14, 2016 at 12:19pm
I would look for a relationship with a Democrat operative in this woman’s background. This sounds like the same kind of story David Axelrod invented against Herman Cain. That was later debunked 100%, and the female accuser received a tidy little stipend for her on-camera efforts. If we actually had journalists in this country, they would be looking at these women’s financials to see if there have been any “gifts” recently, and from whom.
 October 14, 2016 at 12:14pm
It’s ironic that people want Trump to release his evidence right now, but no one batted an eye when Obama released his birth certificate under duress and demand from Trump. And the BC Obama released was analyzed by many people and suspected to have been Photoshopped, so there is still doubt as to its authenticity. And where are Obama’s college transcripts? Wouldn’t the smartest man on the planet want to prove to one and all that his reputation was well deserved? GW Bush and John Effin Kerry both released their college records (to the dismay of Dems, as it showed Bush had the better academic record.)