User Profile: Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve


Member Since: September 22, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [45] December 15, 2014 at 4:52pm

    You ever notice how fast cops arrive on a scene when it is one of their own involved in a fracas? Of course if you call for help, they’ll finish their donut before they mosey on over.

  • [3] December 1, 2014 at 9:46pm

    The Hibel case only applies to states where they have stop and identify laws. In states that prohibit that practice, the SCOTUS ruling doesn’t apply. It wasn’t an endorsement of the practice on a national level. Rather, it was an upholding of state laws where it existed. Two very different scenarios. And yes, the SCOTUS is wrong.

    Responses (3) +
  • [43] December 1, 2014 at 9:40pm

    Amen Pastor Steve!

    The VAST majority of people are good folks.

  • [3] December 1, 2014 at 9:38pm

    That is a bogus argument about how bad the neighborhoods would be if there weren’t cops there. Total conjecture. First off, only a slight fraction of a time does a cop ever prevent a crime. They show up afterwards to do paperwork (and intimidate the sheep).

    Secondly, that suggests that humanity is somehow incapable of A) policing itself B) acting civil without government supervision. When in fact, the lions share of misbehavior that I see nowadays actually COMES from the government. Furthermore, on a tit for tat basis, our government delivers more violence in the name of freedom, justice, American Way, etc. than just about any nation on earth. In fact, in the “Land of the Free” we have the highest incarceration rate on earth.

    Spare me the cops keep the peace drivel.

    Responses (3) +
  • December 1, 2014 at 9:33pm

    Officer was NOT correct.

    She did NOT have to show ID. She was not LAWFULLY ARRESTED. Maybe you should brush up on Texas statutes.

  • [11] December 1, 2014 at 9:16pm

    Nice. The world needs more bootlickers. The law doesn’t require you to provide ID in that situation in Texas. Of course, it’s your line of thinking that ultimately got Jews loaded on trains. Good job sheep.

    Responses (1) +
  • December 1, 2014 at 9:15pm

    In TX you don’t have to provide ID unless you are LAWFULLY ARRESTED. Brown v. Texas 1979.

    If they had a charge, bring it and arrest her. Otherwise the jerks can go pound sand. They assaulted that woman unlawfully and you idiots cheer. And they wonder why the police state is flourishing in the US.

  • [126] December 1, 2014 at 9:12pm

    Because in Brown v. Texas (1979) it is established that you do not have to produce ID to a cop when you are not driving a vehicle until you are LAWFULLY ARRESTED.

    Not only did that cop act outside of that law he and his dillweed partner just committed assault. Of course, he’s a cop so it’s okay. You sheep just have to accept it and rely on the resident badge lickers to defend the actions.

    “If you have nothing to hide then why not comply” comments in 3, 2, 1.

    Responses (12) +
  • November 7, 2013 at 8:35am

    “While police officers involved in the incidents will face a (law enforcement board) — delete / insert [Firing Squad]”

    There fixed it.

  • November 1, 2013 at 5:33pm

    If my family member’s job was to frisk nuns and take naked pictures of irradiated children while wiping his tush with the 4th amendment while unionizing against the people he’s violating….well, what should I think?

    Responses (1) +
  • November 1, 2013 at 5:31pm

    Maybe if you a-hats didn’t strip us down to sheep from taking care of ourselves we wouldn’t have to lay there until you put down the donuts and empty magazines to get a couple rounds on target.

    Get off your high horse and go back to doing what you do best. Roughing up citizens to enforce the will of the state. What a joke.

  • November 1, 2013 at 12:01pm

    That is exactly right. The interest payments to the Chinese for the debt they hold almost equals (or used to) their defense budget.

    Responses (1) +
  • October 24, 2013 at 9:49am

    Of course they don’t list a single name of any of the “men” in tactical gear pointing guns at innocent people in their own home who are operating within the rights insured by the constitution. Nah, can’t list the cops names can we? They were just following orders right?

    Until cops stop obeying orders this will continue. Until cops start leaving scenes in body bags there will be no incentive to not obey orders. You have a right to defend your life and property from illegal activity be it from a citizen or someone with a badge. What those cops did should result in increased admittance to the morgue. The fact that they had a badge doesn’t (or at least shouldn’t) change anything. Start holding people accountable for their actions. You badge lickers take heed. You are one “order” away from finding yourself on the wrong end of a muzzle aimed by your “friend” Officer Joe.

    Wake up sheeple.

    Responses (22) +
  • October 11, 2013 at 9:00am

    This is my shocked face. :-O

  • October 7, 2013 at 9:18am

    They should not prosecute this crime as a hate crime? Why? Because that is a stupid law to begin with. Two wrongs don’t make a right. Just because that bull happens in one direction it doesn’t make it okay to go the other way. If the law is wrong then it is always wrong.

  • October 2, 2013 at 2:22pm

    No worries. If the market hiccups the Fed will be there with POMO. Free markets are for suckers.

    Responses (1) +
  • October 1, 2013 at 9:36am

    Hopefully Anonymous will hack it and take it down. Go for it fellas.

  • October 1, 2013 at 9:13am

    Yeah, that works Doc. Allow statism to win so that statists will win the next election and really stick it to the other statists.

  • October 1, 2013 at 9:12am

    What if I don’t want to try it? In the land of the free I guess the only “choice” I have is to suck a baby from a womb. If I want to choose not to participate the state will put a gun to my head. If it is so great, why does it have “teeth”?

  • September 28, 2013 at 11:29am


    Indeed sir. From my understanding, building an EFP isn’t that hard. Bring them into an urban environment and change the angle of deployment to come from the side rather than in the road…ex-MRAP.

    These vehicles are for intimidation. In a true guerrilla battlefield (particularly urban) these vehicles have some serious tactical disadvantages.

    If you ain’t light, you ain’t right.

123 To page: Go