User Profile: rx4nv


Member Since: January 03, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [8] April 29, 2016 at 1:29pm

    Choices have consequences, no matter when or where. I’m just surprised the NFL teams saw that as a negative and passed on him. Usually the NFL supports crime and stupidity.

  • [3] April 25, 2016 at 11:09am

    All these conservatives claiming they will not vote Trump in the general election have only one thing going for their threat…. we are not in the general election yet. If Trump is the nominee, I guarantee 99% of these threats will be retracted and they will vote for Trump over Clinton. The other 1% were just crazy from the beginning and may be committed to the State Hospital next week. These threats are similar to those that vowed they would move out of the country if Obama was elected. Guess what? They still live here.

  • [-4] April 21, 2016 at 6:52pm

    Sir Rich: If the modern day medicine has made it to where no woman has to decide between their life or the life of the infant, then why do you care about that language? It won’t change anything either way.

    By the way, I am pro-life, I support adoption. If we lived in a perfect bubble, I would be on your side. However, we live in the real world where there is good and evil. Is it good or evil to make a young woman carry a pregnancy that occurred under an evil situation? That is a moral question, not scientific based on when life begins. That is a question that the young woman should be able to make between herself and her God, not you or any politician. However, if a girl purposely and willfully engages in sex, then the pregnancy falls under a completely different set of moral standards.

  • [21] April 21, 2016 at 4:03pm

    So the outcry is that the Police and University did not care about how the criminal felt as he showed that he did not care about how someone else might feel about their property being destroyed?

    Well that doesn’t sound selfish and liberal to the core at all!!!

  • [3] April 21, 2016 at 3:27pm

    Just because the child was conceived through rape, does not mean the child has to be aborted according to what Trump is saying. He is just saying that women want a choice. If the woman chooses to have sex, she has lost her choice to end the life she helped create, unless her life is in danger. On the other hand, if the child was conceived against her will and she does not desire to keep it, in this instance she can opt to abort, since she was not the one that made the choice to create the baby. See how women still have a choice and how choices have consequences?

    I applaud those that carried a baby as a result of rape full term!!! I also understand and respect a woman that chose not to!!! I do not respect a women that purposely and willingly had sex, then aborted the living infant within!!!

    Responses (6) +
  • [1] April 21, 2016 at 3:17pm

    x-factor: And you believe any other politician any more than Donald?

    Responses (1) +
  • [-14] April 21, 2016 at 3:13pm

    Did you not read what this was all about. He is actually supporting the change of the wording to include the 3 exceptions of incest, rape and the life of the mother. Most every conservative agrees with these exceptions. How is this making the RNC more like the DNC?

    I have found that our politics are like the school playground. You have no interest in the slide, until I get on it, then it becomes a fight. And rather than agree civilly to establish a line that is formed on a first come first serve basis, you have to argue that the one coming last should be given priority because they have not had the chance to stand in line as long as everyone else and I argue that the first have waited longer. So now I am accused of discriminating against the latecomers. In the end, we spent all recess fighting over the slide that not a single person got to use it. GROW UP AMERICA!!!!!!!!

    Responses (9) +
  • [9] April 21, 2016 at 12:14pm

    DLV: Someone with common sense would agree with you, but Liberals are not about common sense, they are all about “feelings”. See, I can feel like I am a man or a woman and you cannot prove that I don’t. However, I can feel that I have a pe#is or vag#na, but you can prove that I do not. That is how Liberals are eroding our freedoms, is based on the “feelings” and not common sense. In this way, there is no discrimination, because you have either of those parts and therefore, everyone falls within a category.

  • [29] April 21, 2016 at 10:52am

    Here’s an idea: We get rid of men’s and women’s bathrooms and instead label them “pe#is” and “vag#na”. A bathroom should not be a place you go based on “how you feel”. A bathroom is a place you go to eliminate waste from certain parts of your body.

    Responses (6) +
  • April 15, 2016 at 11:08am

    Hey! That looks like the mannequin missing from my clothing store.

    Who would have thought, I bought a ghost to model my clothing line.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 14, 2016 at 6:47pm

    Check out this awesome video about smart phones and distracted driving:

  • [1] April 14, 2016 at 2:59pm

    Smart Phones cause a lot of distracted driving.

    See this great video made to fight distracted driving

  • [7] April 14, 2016 at 11:22am

    Nentin, you better look at the footage again. You can obviously see Fields touch Donald Trump on his right arm, to which he pulls it away and looks at her. Immediately after that, Cory and the Secret Service swoop in.

  • [7] April 14, 2016 at 11:19am

    Who defamed who?

  • April 11, 2016 at 2:31pm

    How petty is this accusation. Any profit to a Trump company is Trumps money. He is the one that decides how it will be spent. Why write himself a check to then write it to someone else? How come if money comes from a super PAC, it is the candidate spending that money, but if it comes from Trump’s business, it is not from the candidate?

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] April 7, 2016 at 9:37pm

    qdllc: That sounds very wise of you, however, if everyone waited to see, there would be no one getting the vaccines to test their efficacy. So make sure you thank all those who are willing to sacrifice their lives for science so that you can sit on the fence and criticize while they try and make the world a better place.

  • [5] April 7, 2016 at 8:21pm

    Silversmith: Don’t be so quick to dismiss AvalonIsRisen’s comment of “way more than 9″ as not being valid since the drug is so new. Your claim of nine comes after the same number of studies. You can’t have it both ways, but common sense would tell you that Avalon is probably more accurate.

    Also, it is a choice. Even though many states mandate that kids be vaccinated to attend school, there are exception forms to over-ride the mandate. So it truly is more of choice than mandate in this country.

    Finally, it is such a faulty question to ask “who hurts your children – nature or you”? You would rather let the world face mumps, measles, polio, pertussis, influenza and many other deadly diseases in epic proportions, because that is natural? The sad part is you sit there without these diseases because of all the intelligent people that came up with these vaccines and have immunized all those around you, so you can benefit from this herd immunity. I bet you would have a different opinion if you lived 100 years ago and you children were dying right and left. Humans are bad! They’ve created antibiotics, pain relievers, surgical procedures, clothing, shelter, crop farms, transportation vehicles. All of which have in some way killed people, yet, I would bet you have used and benefited from everyone of these. How dare you support these things that have killed others!

  • [1] April 7, 2016 at 11:36am

    As long as we are trying to link Trump to OJ in hopes of making him look bad, don’t we also need to link him to the Buffalo Bills, the NFL, Hollywood, Hertz, any TV or cable channel that has played an OJ Simpson movie, TV show or commercial. The fact that they employed him prior to his conviction of a double murder is unbelievable!!! What about his parents that gave birth to him prior to this grizzly accusation?

    Please Blaze, this is pathetic.

  • [19] April 5, 2016 at 12:02pm

    Why would the motorcycle driver turn this video over to the police? Regardless of this car driver having road rage, that does not make it legal to speed, make unsafe lane changes, run a stop light, drive on the wrong side of the road… The smart driver would have pulled over and let the car go on his way. How many lives did these 2 idiots put at risk during that 5 minutes of stupidity. Neither of them are in the right.

    I want to see the few minutes of video footage that lead up to this incident… Did the motorcycle driver do something stupid that ticked off the car driver? The motorcyclist may be the instigator!!! You have to question that after seeing how he is willing to drive so recklessly.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] April 1, 2016 at 11:26am

    Funny thing…. there is no nominee yet. Trump cannot be held in violation of this agreement until there is a nominee and he does not give his support. Otherwise, it is like throwing someone in prison because they said they might have to kill someone if they do not get this job, yet never did actually do anything. Until someone is killed, there is no murder. Until there is a nominee, you cannot be un-supportive of the nominee.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love